| Literature DB >> 32518649 |
Denise K Gessner1, Corinna Brock1, Lena M Hof1, Erika Most1, Christian Koch2, Klaus Eder1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: We hypothesised that supplementation of green tea extract (GTE) in dairy cows during the transition period can attenuate proinflammatory conditions and prevent endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress in the liver of these cows. Thirty Holstein cows with an average parity of 3.06 (± 1.31, SD) were divided into a control group and a group that received a daily amount of 10 g of GTE from d 7 before the calving day and a daily amount of 20 g of GTE from the day of calving until d 7 of lactation.Entities:
Keywords: Animal nutrition; Cow; Green tea extract; Liver; Metabolism; Milk performance
Year: 2020 PMID: 32518649 PMCID: PMC7273663 DOI: 10.1186/s40104-020-00465-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Anim Sci Biotechnol ISSN: 1674-9782
Composition of the basal total mixed rations used as experimental diets during dry period and lactation
| Dry period (week 3 a.p. – calving) | Lactation (calving – week 7 p.p.) | |
|---|---|---|
| Component, % of DM | ||
| Corn silage | 37.8 | 18.3 |
| Grass silage | 37.7 | 24.4 |
| Concentrate1 | 14.1 | 34.6 |
| Hay | 6.9 | 4.1 |
| Straw | 2.3 | 2.8 |
| Pressed sugar beet pulp | – | 14.5 |
| Urea | 0.5 | – |
| Vitamin and mineral premix2 | 0.8 | – |
| Fat | – | 0.9 |
| Sodium hydrogen carbonate | – | 0.4 |
| Energy and nutrient contents | ||
| Net energy for lactation, MJ/kg DM | 6.4 | 7.0 |
| Crude fibre, % of DM | 20.6 | 17.5 |
| NDF, % of DM | 38.2 | 33.3 |
| ADF, % of DM | 22.3 | 21.0 |
| Crude protein, % of DM | 13.2 | 17.1 |
| Available crude protein, % of DM3 | 13.8 | 15.7 |
| Ruminal N balance, g/kg3,4 | −1.0 | 2.3 |
1 Concentrate (Raiffeisen Waren-Zentrale Rhein-Main, Köln, Germany) consisted of (% of dry matter): rapeseed meal, 25.0; soybean meal, 22.5; corn, 17.7; barley, 15.8; soybean hulls, 12.2; melasses, 1.7; mineral mix, 1.9; urea, 1.1; sodium chloride, 1.0; fat, 0.8; calcium carbonate, 0.3. The mineral mix provided (per kg concentrate): Sodium, 1.52 g; magnesium, 0.95 g; calcium, 3.42 g; phosphorus, 0.67 g; iron, 0.57 mg; manganese, 95 mg; zinc, 152 mg; copper, 38 mg; iodine 1.9 mg; cobalt, 1.52 mg; selenium, 0.95 mg; vitamin A, 22,800 IU; vitamin D, 2850 IU; vitamin E, 114 mg
2 The vitamin and mineral premix (Rindamin K11 ATG; Schaumann, Pinneberg, Germany) provides per kg TMR: Calcium, 0,36 g; phosphorus, 0,36 g; sodium, 0.36 g; magnesium, 0.4 g; zinc, 28 mg; manganese, 17 mg; copper, 6.0 mg; cobalt, 0.24 mg; iodine, 0.8 mg; selenium, 0.21 mg; vitamin A, 4,000 IU; vitamin D, 600 IU; vitamin E, 20 mg
3Calculated according to GfE [18]
4Ruminal N balance = (crude protein – available protein)/6.25
Feed intake, milk production, and milk composition of cows fed the control diet or the control diet supplemented with green tea extract (GTE) in average over weeks 2 to 7 of lactation1
| Week 2 to week 7 | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Variable | Control | GTE | SEM | GTE | Week | GTE × week | Parity |
| DMI, kg/d | 20.2 | 19.8 | 0.65 | 0.67 | < 0.001 | 0.06 | 0.45 |
| Net energy intake, MJ/d | 141 | 138 | 4.5 | 0.67 | < 0.001 | 0.06 | 0.45 |
| Energy balance, MJ NEL/d | - 45.1 | - 35.0 | 7.0 | 0.06 | < 0.001 | 0.72 | 0.44 |
| Milk yield, kg/d | 46.1 | 43.9 | 1.50 | 0.17 | < 0.001 | 0.21 | 0.70 |
| ECM2, kg/d | 46.6a | 40.7b | 1.68 | 0.002 | 0.08 | 0.91 | 0.53 |
| Feed efficiency, kg ECM/kg DMI | 2.36a | 2.11b | 0.12 | 0.010 | < 0.001 | 0.09 | 0.47 |
| Fat, % | 4.29a | 3.68b | 0.18 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.003 | 0.89 |
| Protein, % | 3.05 | 3.08 | 0.07 | 0.92 | < 0.001 | 0.02 | 0.54 |
| Lactose, % | 4.83a | 4.75b | 0.03 | 0.026 | 0.015 | 0.34 | 0.44 |
| Fat, kg/d | 1.96a | 1.58b | 0.10 | < 0.001 | 0.07 | 0.13 | 0.74 |
| Protein, kg/d | 1.40 | 1.34 | 0.05 | 0.16 | 0.36 | 0.031 | 0.33 |
1Values are least square means, n = 15 for each group
2ECM, energy corrected milk, adjusted to 4% fat and 3.4% protein
a,b Means with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
DMI, dry matter intake; SEM, standard error of means
Concentrations of fat and protein in the milk and daily amount of milk protein of cows fed the control diet or the diet supplemented with green tea extract (GTE) in weeks 2 to 7 of lactation1
| Week | Fat, % | Protein, % | Protein, kg/d | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | GTE | SEM | Control | GTE | SEM | Control | GTE | SEM | |
| 2 | 4.97a | 3.57b | 0.25 | 3.34 | 3.53 | 0.09 | 1.37 | 1.39 | 0.06 |
| 3 | 4.69a | 4.06b | 0.26 | 3.16 | 3.14 | 0.09 | 1.38 | 1.33 | 0.06 |
| 4 | 4.34 | 3.90 | 0.26 | 3.01 | 2.97 | 0.09 | 1.39 | 1.28 | 0.06 |
| 5 | 4.14a | 3.54b | 0.26 | 2.93 | 2.80 | 0.09 | 1.41a | 1.26b | 0.06 |
| 6 | 3.85a | 3.29b | 0.25 | 2.86 | 2.91 | 0.09 | 1.39 | 1.31 | 0.06 |
| 7 | 3.71 | 3.47 | 0.26 | 2.91 | 2.85 | 0.09 | 1.41a | 1.28b | 0.06 |
1Values are least square means, n = 15 for each group
a,b Means within one week with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
SEM standard error of means
Metabolic and antioxidant parameters in plasma and concentrations of lipids in the liver of cows fed the control diet (Con) or the diet supplemented with green tea extract (GTE) in weeks 1, 4 and 7 of lactation1
| Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 7 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | GTE | SEM | Con | GTE | SEM | Con | GTE | SEM | GTE | Week | GTE × week | Parity | |
| Plasma | |||||||||||||
| NEFA, mmol/L | 0.52 | 0.43 | 0.06 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.07 | 0.30 | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.17 | < 0.001 | 0.48 | 0.66 |
| BHBA, mmol/L | 0.97 | 1.03 | 0.15 | 0.98 | 0.88 | 0.15 | 0.68 | 0.68 | 0.15 | 0.87 | 0.004 | 0.68 | 0.71 |
| TAG, μmol/L | 98.8a | 79.6b | 6.6 | 108 | 95.1 | 6.8 | 128a | 99.6b | 6.67 | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.20 | 0.52 |
| Cholesterol, mmol/L | 2.05 | 1.77 | 0.24 | 3.48a | 2.97b | 0.24 | 4.97a | 4.05b | 0.24 | 0.003 | < 0.001 | 0.007 | 0.017 |
| α-Tocopherol, μmol/g lipids2 | 6.55 | 6.35 | 0.50 | 7.10a | 6.08b | 0.50 | 7.02 | 6.59 | 0.51 | 0.21 | < 0.43 | 0.32 | 0.60 |
| β-Carotene, μmol/g lipids2 | 13.5a | 10.8b | 1.18 | 10.9 | 9.51 | 1.20 | 13.7a | 9.78b | 1.18 | 0.007 | 0.036 | 0.29 | 0.05 |
| TEAC, mmol/L | 3.50 | 3.67 | 0.14 | 3.70 | 3.79 | 0.14 | 3.96 | 3.96 | 0.14 | 0.25 | < 0.001 | 0.55 | 0.24 |
| Liver | |||||||||||||
| TAG, μmol/g | 37.1 | 25.5 | 6.3 | 37.2a | 22.3b | 6.3 | 15.0 | 9.4 | 6.4 | 0.07 | < 0.001 | 0.24 | 0.57 |
| Cholesterol, μmol/g | 7.52 | 7.01 | 0.59 | 7.78 | 7.27 | 0.59 | 5.66 | 5.92 | 0.62 | 0.62 | < 0.001 | 0.43 | 0.74 |
1Values are least square means, n = 15 for each group
2Concentrations of α-tocopherol and β-carotene are related to lipids (TAG + cholesterol)
a,b Means within one week with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
BHBA, β-hydroxybutyrate; NEFA, non esterified fatty acids; SEM, standard error of means; TAG, triacylglycerols; TEAC, trolox equivalent antioxidative capacity
Concentrations of acute phase and negative acute phase proteins in plasma and relative mRNA abundances of proinflammatory genes and genes of the acute phase reaction in the liver of cows fed the control diet (Con) or the diet supplemented with green tea extract (GTE) in weeks 1, 4 and 7 of lactation1
| Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 7 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | GTE | SEM | Con | GTE | SEM | Con | GTE | SEM | GTE | Week | GTE × week | Parity | |
| Plasma | |||||||||||||
| SAA, μg/mL | 0.33a | 0.26b | 0.02 | 0.33a | 0.27b | 0.02 | 0.29 | 0.25 | 0.02 | 0.007 | 0.029 | 0.52 | 0.41 |
| HP, mg/mL | 0.93 | 0.83 | 0.34 | 0.37 | 0.26 | 0.33 | 0.96 | 0.50 | 0.34 | 0.59 | 0.22 | 0.67 | 0.003 |
| Albumin, g/dL | 2.83 | 2.70 | 0.14 | 2.98 | 2.87 | 0.14 | 3.08 | 3.00 | 0.14 | 0.23 | 0.003 | 0.94 | 0.30 |
| RBP4, μg/mL | 1.59 | 1.66 | 0.15 | 1.57 | 1.64 | 0.15 | 1.76 | 1.76 | 0.15 | 0.22 | 0.08 | 0.87 | < 0.001 |
| Liver, relative mRNA abundances2 | |||||||||||||
| 1.00 | 1.02 | 0.31 | 1.21 | 1.13 | 0.31 | 1.53 | 1.56 | 0.31 | 0.90 | 0.034 | 0.96 | 0.68 | |
| 1.00 | 1.20 | 0.18 | 0.86 | 1.05 | 0.18 | 0.94 | 1.00 | 0.18 | 0.65 | 0.33 | 0.78 | 0.018 | |
| 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.36 | 1.36 | 1.93 | 0.36 | 1.74 | 1.66 | 0.36 | 0.48 | 0.001 | 0.20 | 0.61 | |
| 1.00 | 1.10 | 0.22 | 1.18 | 1.28 | 0.22 | 1.01 | 1.22 | 0.22 | 0.27 | 0.38 | 0.90 | 0.44 | |
| 1.00 | 1.48 | 0.38 | 1.38 | 1.84 | 0.38 | 1.17 | 1.39 | 0.38 | 0.36 | 0.16 | 0.78 | 0.14 | |
| 1.00 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.72 | 0.77 | 0.16 | 0.84 | 0.75 | 0.16 | 0.66 | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.49 | |
| 1.00 | 0.65 | 0.16 | 1.21 | 1.04 | 0.16 | 1.16 | 0.93 | 0.16 | 0.035 | 0.030 | 0.72 | 0.87 | |
| 1.00 | 0.86 | 0.43 | 0.13 | 0.95 | 0.43 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.43 | 0.28 | 0.06 | 0.14 | 0.98 | |
| 1.00 | 1.29 | 0.36 | 0.54 | 0.79 | 0.36 | 0.58 | 0.63 | 0.36 | 0.46 | 0.025 | 0.83 | 0.93 | |
1Values are least square means, n = 15 for each group
2Relative mRNA abundances of Con in week 1 are set as a reference (=1.00)
a,b Means within one week with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
HP, haptoglobin; RBP4, retinol binding protein 4; SAA, serum amyloid A; SEM, standard error of means
Relative mRNA abundances of genes of the unfolded protein response (UPR) and genes of the Nrf2 pathway in the liver of cows fed the control diet (Con) or the diet supplemented with green tea extract (GTE) in weeks 1, 4 and 7 of lactation1
| Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 7 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | GTE | SEM | Con | GTE | SEM | Con | GTE | SEM | GTE | Week | GTE × week | Parity | |
| Genes of Nrf2 pathway2 | |||||||||||||
| 1.00 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 1.11 | 0.92 | 0.18 | 1.41 | 1.23 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.003 | 0.49 | 0.036 | |
| 1.00 | 1.10 | 0.19 | 0.79a | 1.29b | 0.19 | 1.02 | 1.21 | 0.19 | 0.25 | 0.67 | 0.12 | 0.053 | |
| 1.00 | 0.71 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.35 | 0.16 | 0.10 | 0.15 | 0.32 | 0.85 | < 0.001 | 0.37 | 0.81 | |
| 1.00 | 0.90 | 0.17 | 0.97 | 0.84 | 0.17 | 1.09 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.19 | 0.38 | 0.98 | 0.34 | |
| 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.10 | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 0.92 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.48 | 0.96 | 0.16 | |
| 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.88 | 0.67 | 0.17 | 1.04 | 0.92 | 0.17 | 0.17 | 0.07 | 0.64 | 0.34 | |
| Genes of UPR2 | |||||||||||||
| 1.00 | 0.87 | 0.08 | 0.96 | 0.98 | 0.08 | 1.04 | 0.99 | 0.08 | 0.36 | 0.41 | 0.49 | 0.98 | |
| 1.00 | 1.32 | 0.32 | 0.76 | 1.27 | 0.32 | 0.90 | 1.06 | 0.32 | 0.19 | 0.61 | 0.71 | 0.11 | |
| 1.00 | 0.94 | 0.19 | 1.49 | 1.43 | 0.19 | 1.12 | 1.25 | 0.19 | 0.71 | 0.001 | 0.71 | 0.12 | |
| 1.00a | 0.77b | 0.10 | 0.90 | 0.79 | 0.10 | 0.81 | 0.71 | 0.10 | 0.06 | 0.06 | 0.42 | 0.46 | |
| 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.14 | 1.07 | 1.13 | 0.14 | 0.97 | 1.01 | 0.14 | 0.82 | 0.017 | 0.10 | 0.28 | |
| 1.00 | 0.73 | 0.14 | 0.97 | 1.15 | 0.14 | 0.96 | 0.91 | 0.14 | 0.96 | 0.051 | 0.028 | 0.08 | |
| 1.00a | 0.57b | 0.16 | 0.86 | 1.01 | 0.16 | 0.81 | 0.81 | 0.16 | 0.34 | 0.21 | 0.006 | 0.79 | |
| 1.00 | 0.62 | 0.20 | 1.09 | 1.36 | 0.16 | 1.20 | 1.50 | 0.16 | 0.50 | 0.001 | 0.012 | 0.48 | |
| 1.00 | 0.89 | 0.16 | 0.69 | 0.77 | 0.16 | 0.76 | 0.76 | 0.16 | 0.79 | 0.10 | 0.66 | 0.48 | |
| 1.00a | 0.57b | 0.20 | 0.62 | 0.67 | 0.20 | 0.60 | 0.59 | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.32 | 0.11 | 0.47 | |
| 1.00 | 0.64 | 0.19 | 0.75 | 0.93 | 0.19 | 0.93 | 0.82 | 0.19 | 0.31 | 0.91 | 0.10 | 0.49 | |
| 1.00 | 0.61 | 0.21 | 0.33 | 0.68 | 0.21 | 0.42 | 0.49 | 0.21 | 0.87 | 0.046 | 0.055 | 0.19 | |
1Values are least square means, n = 15 for each group
2Relative mRNA abundances of Con in week 1 are set as a reference (=1.00)
a,b Means within one week with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
Nrf2 Nuclear factor-erythroid 2-related factor 2, SEM standard error of means, UPR unfolded protein response
Relative mRNA abundances of genes of the lipid metabolism (β-oxidation, lipogenesis, VLDL assembly) and ketogenesis in the liver of cows fed the control diet or the control diet supplemented with green tea extract (GTE) in weeks 1, 4 and 7 of lactation1
| Week 1 | Week 4 | Week 7 | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Con | GTE | SEM | Con | GTE | SEM | Con | GTE | SEM | GTE | Week | GTE × week | Parity | |
| Genes of β-oxidation2 | |||||||||||||
| 1.00 | 0.69 | 0.19 | 1.05 | 0.95 | 0.19 | 1.06 | 0.96 | 0.19 | 0.21 | 0.27 | 0.57 | 0.51 | |
| 1.00 | 0.74 | 1.57 | 1.19a | 0.84b | 1.53 | 1.11 | 0.93 | 1.57 | 0.005 | 0.23 | 0.70 | 0.06 | |
| 1.00a | 0.64b | 0.17 | 1.14 | 1.03 | 0.14 | 0.92 | 0.68 | 0.14 | 0.06 | 0.002 | 0.33 | 0.84 | |
| Genes of lipogenesis2 | |||||||||||||
| 1.00 | 0.85 | 0.44 | 1.49 | 1.37 | 0.44 | 2.22 | 1.33 | 0.44 | 0.13 | 0.018 | 0.34 | 0.56 | |
| 1.00 | 0.66 | 0.54 | 1.91 | 1.61 | 0.54 | 2.97 | 2.15 | 0.54 | 0.22 | < 0.001 | 0.69 | 0.55 | |
| 1.00 | 0.77 | 0.59 | 1.31 | 1.88 | 0.59 | 1.48 | 2.36 | 0.59 | 0.48 | 0.03 | 0.34 | 0.12 | |
| Genes of VLDL assembly2 | |||||||||||||
| 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.18 | 1.32 | 1.11 | 0.18 | 1.41 | 1.11 | 0.18 | 0.09 | < 0.001 | 0.91 | 0.75 | |
| 1.00 | 0.78 | 0.16 | 1.03 | 0.93 | 0.16 | 0.96 | 0.79 | 0.16 | 0.20 | 0.50 | 0.85 | 0.46 | |
| Genes of ketogenesis2 | |||||||||||||
| 1.00 | 0.98 | 0.20 | 0.94 | 0.75 | 0.20 | 1.36a | 0.84b | 0.20 | 0.07 | 0.19 | 0.19 | 0.41 | |
| 1.00 | 0.74 | 0.27 | 1.09 | 1.29 | 0.27 | 1.21 | 1.45 | 0.27 | 0.96 | 0.031 | 0.28 | 0.30 | |
| 1.00 | 1.08 | 0.22 | 0.79 | 0.80 | 0.22 | 1.01 | 1.02 | 0.22 | 0.89 | 0.11 | 0.94 | 0.09 | |
1Values are least square means, n = 15 for each group
2Relative mRNA abundances of Con in week 1 are set as a reference (=1.00)
a,b Means within one week with different superscripts differ significantly (P < 0.05)
SEM standard error of means, VLDL very low-density lipoproteins