Literature DB >> 32518199

Roles of Organohalide-Respiring Dehalococcoidia in Carbon Cycling.

Yi Yang1, Robert Sanford2, Jun Yan3, Gao Chen4,5, Natalie L Cápiro6, Xiuying Li3, Frank E Löffler7,5,8,9,10,11.   

Abstract

The class Dehalococcoidia within the Chloroflexi phylum comprises the obligate organohalide-respiring genera Dehalococcoides, Dehalogenimonas, and "Candidatus Dehalobium." Knowledge of the unique ecophysiology and biochemistry of Dehalococcoidia has been largely derived from studies with enrichment cultures and isolates from sites impacted with chlorinated pollutants; however, culture-independent surveys found Dehalococcoidia sequences in marine, freshwater, and terrestrial biomes considered to be pristine (i.e., not impacted with organohalogens of anthropogenic origin). The broad environmental distribution of Dehalococcoidia, as well as other organohalide-respiring bacteria, supports the concept of active halogen cycling and the natural formation of organohalogens in various ecosystems. Dechlorination reduces recalcitrance and renders organics susceptible to metabolic oxidation by diverse microbial taxa. During reductive dechlorination, hydrogenotrophic organohalide-respiring bacteria, in particular Dehalococcoidia, can consume hydrogen to low consumption threshold concentrations (<0.3 nM) and enable syntrophic oxidation processes. These functional attributes and the broad distribution imply that Dehalococcoidia play relevant roles in carbon cycling in anoxic ecosystems.
Copyright © 2020 Yang et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dehalococcoidiazzm321990; carbon cycling; hydrogen thresholds; organohalide respiration; syntrophy; thermodynamics

Year:  2020        PMID: 32518199      PMCID: PMC7289593          DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00757-19

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  mSystems        ISSN: 2379-5077            Impact factor:   6.496


INTRODUCTION

The phylum Chloroflexi is a deeply branching, highly heterogeneous bacterial lineage that currently comprises eight classes (Dehalococcoidia, Anaerolineae, Caldilineae, Ktedonobacteria, Thermomicrobia, Ardenticatenia, Thermoflexia, and Chloroflexia) with a diversity of phenotypes and lifestyles (1–3). This heterogeneity is also apparent in phylogenetic and comparative genome analyses, and the suggestion was made that the phylum Chloroflexi sensu stricto should only consist of the classes Chloroflexia and Thermomicrobia, while other members should be reclassified (4). In an effort to standardize bacterial taxonomy based on genome phylogeny, the reclassification of the Chloroflexi phylum (“Chloroflexota”) into eight classes (i.e., Anaerolineae, Chloroflexia, Dehalococcoidia, Ktedonobacteria, UBA2235, UBA4733, UBA5177, and UBA6077) was proposed (5). Based on the SILVA database (release 138) (6) and the Ribosomal Database Project (RDP; release 11, update 5) (7), 8.5 and 3.1% of Chloroflexi 16S rRNA gene sequences, respectively, affiliate with the Dehalococcoidia class (Table 1). Currently, the Dehalococcoidia include two formally published genera, Dehalococcoides and Dehalogenimonas, and the candidate genus “Dehalobium,” all of which comprise obligate organohalide-respiring species (Fig. 1). All Dehalococcoidia in cultivation, including the Dehalococcoides and Dehalogenimonas isolates, can only derive energy from cleaving carbon-chlorine bonds (8, 9) although some may also use organobromine compounds as electron acceptors (10). While Dehalococcoides are strictly hydrogenotrophic (i.e., require hydrogen [H2] as an electron donor), at least some Dehalogenimonas species also utilize formate as an electron donor (9). Efforts in characterizing Dehalococcoides and Dehalogenimonas were largely driven by the interest in exploiting the dechlorination capabilities of these specialized bacteria for remediation of sites impacted with anthropogenic, chloroorganic pollutants such as chlorinated solvents (e.g., chlorinated ethenes). Examples of the utility of Dehalococcoides and Dehalogenimonas for environmental cleanup can be found in the recent comprehensive research update on organohalide-respiring bacteria and their applications (11).
TABLE 1

Numbers of 16S rRNA gene sequences representing Chloroflexi, including class Dehalococcoidia and unclassified Chloroflexi, and total bacteria in the Silva and RDP databases

16S rRNA gene sequence databaseNo. (%) of Chloroflexi sequences
No. of total bacterial sequences
DehalococcoidiaNon-DehalococcoidiaUnclassified
RDP v11.51,411 (3.1)30,328 (67.2)13,419 (29.7)3,196,041
RDP v11.5 isolates48 (17.2)213 (76.3)18 (6.5)515,987
RDP v11.5 uncultured1,363 (3.0)30,115 (67.1)13,401 (29.9)2,680,054
Silva SSU v13816,297 (8.5)176,547 (91.5)30 (0.0)8,394,436
Silva Ref SSU v1382,654 (9.3)25,837 (90.7)5 (0.0)1,916,743
Silva Ref NR SSU v1381,601 (17.7)7,444 (82.3)4 (0.0)381,662

Included are sequences representing the existing taxonomy of the Chloroflexi phylum (i.e., Dehalococcoidia and non-Dehalococcoidia Chloroflexi sequences) and sequences that cannot be classified into the lower-rank taxonomy of the Chloroflexi phylum (i.e., unclassified Chloroflexi). Within the classified Chloroflexi, sequences belong to the Dehalococcoidia or any of the other seven non-Dehalococcoidia classes (i.e., Anaerolineae, Caldilineae, Ktedonobacteria, Thermomicrobia, Ardenticatenia, Thermoflexia, and Chloroflexia).

FIG 1

Phylogenetic tree of representative isolated and not-yet-cultured bacteria affiliated with the Chloroflexi phylum based on complete 16S rRNA gene sequences. Sequences were retrieved from the RDP database and imported into the Geneious software (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand) for alignment with MAFFT. The tree was constructed with Tree Builder using the default settings in Geneious. The scale bar indicates 0.01 nucleotide substitution per site.

Numbers of 16S rRNA gene sequences representing Chloroflexi, including class Dehalococcoidia and unclassified Chloroflexi, and total bacteria in the Silva and RDP databases Included are sequences representing the existing taxonomy of the Chloroflexi phylum (i.e., Dehalococcoidia and non-Dehalococcoidia Chloroflexi sequences) and sequences that cannot be classified into the lower-rank taxonomy of the Chloroflexi phylum (i.e., unclassified Chloroflexi). Within the classified Chloroflexi, sequences belong to the Dehalococcoidia or any of the other seven non-Dehalococcoidia classes (i.e., Anaerolineae, Caldilineae, Ktedonobacteria, Thermomicrobia, Ardenticatenia, Thermoflexia, and Chloroflexia). Phylogenetic tree of representative isolated and not-yet-cultured bacteria affiliated with the Chloroflexi phylum based on complete 16S rRNA gene sequences. Sequences were retrieved from the RDP database and imported into the Geneious software (Biomatters, Auckland, New Zealand) for alignment with MAFFT. The tree was constructed with Tree Builder using the default settings in Geneious. The scale bar indicates 0.01 nucleotide substitution per site.

DISTRIBUTION OF DEHALOCOCCOIDIA IN NATURE

Enrichment and isolation of Dehalococcoidia are challenging tasks. Information about the distribution of Dehalococcoidia in the environment relies on PCR-based surveys using specific primer sets and 16S rRNA gene amplicon, shotgun metagenome, and single-cell genome sequencing (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). An investigation of 116 uncontaminated terrestrial soil samples using a targeted PCR approach demonstrated that Dehalococcoides-like bacteria were present in the majority (>88%) of samples analyzed (12). A similar approach was used to study lake sediment samples from distinct locations (n = 20) across a geographic sulfur gradient, where 16S rRNA gene sequences of putative organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia were found in 67 out of 68 samples examined (13). Shotgun metagenome and 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing identified a diversity of Dehalococcoidia in samples collected from various environments, including marine subsurface sediments (14–21). For example, bacterial 16S rRNA gene sequences affiliated with the Chloroflexi phylum dominated in shallow sediment 9.5 to 364 meters below the seafloor (mbsf) and became rare in deeper sediment (1,372 mbsf) (17). Closer scrutiny of the shallow marine sediment sequences retrieved from the DNA Data Bank of Japan (DDBJ accession number DRA001030) using the SILVAngs pipeline (6) revealed that more than 95% of all Chloroflexi sequences classify within the Dehalococcoidia class. Members of the Dehalococcoidia formed a dominant group in sediment samples from the eastern Juan de Fuca Ridge flank, a well-studied hydrothermal environment (22). Another metagenomic study reported abundant Dehalococcoidia sequences (up to 14.2% of all reads) in a methane (CH4) hydrate-bearing sediment sample from the Ulleung Basin in the East Sea of Korea (23). Dehalogenimonas sequences were present in 60 m depth in a perennially stratified Arctic lake with saline (2.9 to 3.2%), anoxic bottom waters (24). Phylogenetically diverse Dehalococcoidia sequences were found at different depths in anoxic waters of the remote meromictic Lake Pavin, with 11 out of 65 nearly complete 16S rRNA gene sequences showing 80 to 98% nucleotide identity with Dehalococcoides or Dehalogenimonas (25). Dehalogenimonas 16S rRNA gene sequences were also detected in the photic layer (0 to 25 m) and the near-bottom zone (1,465 to 1,515 m) of Lake Baikal, the world’s deepest and most voluminous lake (20). No deep-sea sediment Dehalococcoidia have yet been cultured and isolated; however, single cell sequencing generated several incomplete Dehalococcoidia genomes (26–30). Reductive dehalogenase (RDase) genes, which encode the key enzymes for organohalide respiration, have been detected in various marine subsurface sediments (e.g., Juan de Fuca Ridge Flank, Nankai Trough Forearc Basin) (31, 32) but have not (yet) been found on published single-cell Dehalococcoidia genomes, suggesting that deep-sea sediment Dehalococcoidia may have the potential to utilize energy metabolisms other than organohalide respiration (26–30). List of Dehalococcoidia identified in various contaminated and pristine ecosystems. Included in the table are isolates and uncultured Dehalococcoidia identified in mixed cultures and environmental samples. The light-blue background indicates Dehalococcoidia isolates analyzed by whole-genome sequencing. Single-cell genome sequencing (light-gray background), 16S rRNA gene amplicon sequencing (light-yellow background), and metagenome sequencing (light-green background) were applied to retrieve Dehalococcoidia sequence information from mixed cultures and environmental samples from various geographic locations. Download Table S1, XLSX file, 0.03 MB.

ROLES OF DEHALOCOCCOIDIA IN CONTAMINATED AND PRISTINE ENVIRONMENTS

The need for cost-effective remediation of sites impacted with chlorinated contaminants was a driver leading to the discovery of Dehalococcoidia capable of utilizing chlorinated organic compounds as respiratory electron acceptors (33, 34). The organohalide respiration process revolutionized bioremediation at sites impacted with chlorinated pollutants (35, 36), and detailed characterization work transformed our understanding of the physiology, biochemistry, and evolution of organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia (11). What is generally not acknowledged is that most organochlorines are not only xenobiotics (i.e., anthropogenic chemicals) but also have natural origins. Natural organohalogens commonly occur in many undisturbed (i.e., pristine) environments. More than 5,000 naturally occurring organohalogens have been reported to date, the majority of which are organochlorines (11, 37–39) that Dehalococcoidia potentially can utilize as electron acceptors (40). Chlorinated organics are produced in biotic and abiotic processes in various aquatic and terrestrial environments. The diversity of naturally occurring organochlorines may explain the astounding diversity of genes with predicted RDase function in Dehalococcoidia genomes. As of March 2020, the NCBI Identical Protein Groups database lists 842 distinct Dehalococcoides and 219 distinct Dehalogenimonas putative RDase proteins, but the substrate specificity (i.e., the range of chlorinated electron acceptors used) has only been assigned to a small subset. Of note, Dehalococcoidia possess RDase genes and also dehalogenate truly anthropogenic chemicals with no evidence of natural formation, such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) (41). A possible explanation is that RDases with broad substrate range dechlorinate anthropogenic PCBs. Intriguing is the possibility of evolutionary processes that allow RDase genes of Dehalococcoidia to adapt to chlorinated xenobiotics in fairly short time periods (i.e., the production of PCBs commenced in the 1930s). In support of this hypothesis, the dynamic rearrangement and mobilization of RDase genes in Dehalococcoides and Dehalogenimonas genomes have been observed (42–45). In pristine environments, Dehalococcoidia may perform reductive dehalogenation by utilizing natural organochlorines as electron acceptors. The removal of chlorine atoms transforms recalcitrant organochlorines into compounds that can then be metabolized and mineralized by other microorganisms. Although nature produces a plethora of organochlorines, these compounds do not accumulate and evade detection, presumably because microorganisms, such as Dehalococcoidia, reduce recalcitrance by breaking carbonchlorine bonds. The absence of widespread elevated concentrations of natural organochlorines supports the notion that nature evolved a balanced system of organochlorine production and consumption. Because the mass of organochlorines in pristine environments is generally low, the natural formation of organochlorines often goes unnoticed; however, the flux of carbon through halogenation-dehalogenation cycles can be substantial. Extensive carbon turnover through halogenation-dehalogenation cycles has been demonstrated in a few natural (46–48) and engineered ecosystems (49), but accurate and comprehensive flux measurements that could help estimate the total amounts of chlorinated electron acceptors turned over in various environmental systems are largely lacking. Of note, the cultivated Dehalococcoidia can only grow via organohalide respiration without any other demonstrated growth-supporting energy metabolism. Therefore, the distribution of Dehalococcoidia in various environmental systems supports the hypothesis that natural halogen cycling (i.e., the natural formation and consumption of halogenated electron acceptors) occurs broadly. The following examples illustrate relevant ecological roles organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia can fulfill in pristine environments.

DEHALOCOCCOIDIA ENABLE SYNTROPHIC PROCESSES INCLUDING THE ANAEROBIC OXIDATION OF METHANE

Reductive dechlorination is an electron-consuming process, and H2 fulfills the electron donor demand of many organohalide-respiring bacteria, including the Dehalococcoidia. Under standard conditions (i.e., solutes at 1 M concentration and gases at 1 atmosphere partial pressure) at pH 7, reductive dechlorination is associated with Gibb’s free energy changes (ΔG°′) in the range of −127 to −193 kJ/mol of H2 (50, 51). These ΔG°′ values indicate more energy is gained in the organohalide respiration process than in sulfate reduction (−38 kJ/mol of H2), ferric iron reduction (−44.6 kJ/mol of H2 with amorphous hydrous ferric oxide), CO2 reduction to CH4 (i.e., methanogenesis, −33.9 kJ/mol of H2), or CO2 reduction to acetate (i.e., reductive acetogenesis, −26.1 kJ/mol of H2) and is in the range of nitrate reduction to nitrite (−158.1 kJ/mol of H2) (Table 2).
TABLE 2

Gibbs free energy changes under standard conditions (i.e., 298.15 K [25°C], pH 7.0), concentrations of solutes at 1 M and partial pressures of gases at 1 atmosphere) for AOM and different H2-consuming redox reactions

No.Redox reactionGibbs free energy change (ΔG°′) in kJ/mol of:
Redox potential E°′ (V)b Theoretical H2 consumption threshold concn (nM)c Experimentally determined H2 threshold concn (nM)d
H2Electron acceptorElectrons
1CH4(g) + 3H2O → HCO3 + 4H2(g) + H+33.9135.416.9–0.18NANA
22HCO3 + 4H2(g) + H+→ acetate + 4H2O–26.1–52.1−13.00.13863.0>100
3HCO3 + 4H2(g) + H+ → CH4(g) + 3H2O–33.9−135.4–16.90.18162.312.4–13.6
4SO42– + 4H2(g) + 2H+ → H2S(aq) + 4H2O–38.0–151.9–19.00.2015.41–15
52Fe(OH)3(s) + 4H+ + H2(g) → 2Fe2+(aq) + 6H2O–44.6–22.3–22.30.236.06 × 10–100.1–0.8
6NO3 + H2(g) → NO2 + H2O–158.1–158.1–79.00.825.39 × 10–220.026–0.036
7PCE(aq) + H2(g)→ TCE(aq) + H+ + Cl–173.3–173.3–86.70.907.19 × 10–25<0.3

Also indicated are H2 consumption threshold concentrations associated with H2-consuming redox reactions. The ΔG°′ values for all reactions except reductive dechlorination of tetrachloroethene (PCE) to trichloroethene (TCE) were calculated using Geochemists WorkBench (GWB14). The ΔG°′ value for reductive dechlorination was calculated according to values obtained from Dolfing and Janssen (51). NA, not applicable; (g), gas phase; (aq), aqueous phase; (s), solid.

Redox potentials and Gibbs free energy changes were calculated according to ΔG°′ = –nFΔE°′ is the number of moles of electrons transferred in the reaction, and F is the Faraday’s constant (96.5 kJ/V). Redox reactions are numbered in the first column of the table as follows: 1, AOM; 2, H2/CO2 reductive acetogenesis; 3, methanogenesis; 4, sulfate reduction; 5, ferric iron reduction; 6, nitrate reduction; and 7, organohalide respiration.

The theoretical H2 consumption threshold concentrations were calculated based on equation 6 using a ΔG′ = −10 kJ/mol H2 and assumed standard conditions for all other reactants (1 M for solutes and 1 atm for gases).

Shown are experimentally determined H2 threshold concentrations reported in the literature (51, 52, 55, 58, 59, 66, 81, 82). The measured data are substantially higher than the theoretical values because the available analytical instrumentation cannot measure H2 reliably below 50 ppb (∼0.04 nM).

Gibbs free energy changes under standard conditions (i.e., 298.15 K [25°C], pH 7.0), concentrations of solutes at 1 M and partial pressures of gases at 1 atmosphere) for AOM and different H2-consuming redox reactions Also indicated are H2 consumption threshold concentrations associated with H2-consuming redox reactions. The ΔG°′ values for all reactions except reductive dechlorination of tetrachloroethene (PCE) to trichloroethene (TCE) were calculated using Geochemists WorkBench (GWB14). The ΔG°′ value for reductive dechlorination was calculated according to values obtained from Dolfing and Janssen (51). NA, not applicable; (g), gas phase; (aq), aqueous phase; (s), solid. Redox potentials and Gibbs free energy changes were calculated according to ΔG°′ = –nFΔE°′ is the number of moles of electrons transferred in the reaction, and F is the Faraday’s constant (96.5 kJ/V). Redox reactions are numbered in the first column of the table as follows: 1, AOM; 2, H2/CO2 reductive acetogenesis; 3, methanogenesis; 4, sulfate reduction; 5, ferric iron reduction; 6, nitrate reduction; and 7, organohalide respiration. The theoretical H2 consumption threshold concentrations were calculated based on equation 6 using a ΔG′ = −10 kJ/mol H2 and assumed standard conditions for all other reactants (1 M for solutes and 1 atm for gases). Shown are experimentally determined H2 threshold concentrations reported in the literature (51, 52, 55, 58, 59, 66, 81, 82). The measured data are substantially higher than the theoretical values because the available analytical instrumentation cannot measure H2 reliably below 50 ppb (∼0.04 nM). In contrast to these electron-accepting, formally H2-consuming processes, the anaerobic oxidation of methane (AOM) is an electron-donating, formally H2-forming process with unfavorable energetics under standard conditions (equation 1). The energetics of AOM become favorable (i.e., negative ΔG values) when the H2 (i.e., reducing equivalents) generated during CH4 oxidation is consumed in an associated electron-accepting, H2-consuming process. To calculate H2 consumption threshold concentrations and Gibbs free energy changes associated with different redox reactions, equations 2 to 6 were used, where R is the ideal gas constant (8.314 J × K−1 × mol−1), T is the temperature (298 K), ΔG°′ is the free-energy change at pH 7 under standard conditions, ΔG′ is the free-energy change at pH 7 under nonstandard concentration conditions, “a” refers to the activity (i.e., the effective concentration) of the different chemicals in the reaction, and EA refers to the electron acceptor. The letters a, b, c and d are stoichiometric coefficients for reactants EA, H2, C and D, respectively. To allow energy conservation in anaerobic microorganisms, it has been argued that the Gibbs free energy change (i.e., ΔG) of the reaction must be more negative than −10 ± 1 kJ/mol (53, 54). Based on this assumption, any H2 concentration exceeding 29.7 μM (3,888 Pa) would render AOM unfavorable (i.e., ΔG′ > −10 ± 1 kJ/mol) and would not allow microorganisms capable of AOM to harvest energy from the process. The breaking point H2 concentration of 29.7 μM is based on presumed environmentally relevant concentrations of reactants and products (i.e., [CH4] = 2.14 atm, [HCO3–] = 20.2 mM) and a ΔG′ of −10 kJ/mol, and was calculated according to equations 2 and 3 (52). These calculations assumed that a values approximate the concentration of HCO3– and partial pressure of CH4. Partial pressures were entered directly into the calculations as indicated in Table 2, and the equilibrium aqueous phase concentrations of CH4 and H2 were calculated using the respective Henry’s constant. In anoxic environments, the H2 partial pressure is the primary thermodynamic control determining the extents and rates of syntrophic oxidation processes and carbon turnover (52). AOM has been observed in anoxic marine sediments and is mediated by a syntrophic partnership between anaerobic methanotrophic archaea (ANME) and sulfate-reducing bacteria (55, 56). The candidates for syntrophic partners of ANME have been extended to ferric iron-reducing microorganisms (57, 58), and various mechanisms, including interspecies H2 transfer and direct interspecies electron transfer, may enable these syntrophic partnerships (59–61). An interesting observation was the partner population-independent AOM in nitrate-reducing cultures comprising “Candidatus Methanoperedens nitroreducens” and in nitrite-reducing cultures comprising the NC10 bacterium “Candidatus Methylomirabilis oxyfera” (62). Since both organisms are not available in pure culture, possible syntrophic partnerships with nitrate/nitrite-reducing populations cannot be ruled out, and it remains to be seen if single organisms can carry out AOM (63, 64). In interspecies H2 transfer, hydrogenotrophic partner populations (e.g., sulfate-, ferric iron-, and nitrate-reducing microorganisms) consume the H2 produced from the oxidation of CH4 to low H2 partial pressures and create conditions with favorable thermodynamics for AOM to proceed (59, 65) (Table 3). On grounds of thermodynamics, reductive dehalogenation in partnership with AOM yields greater free energy changes compared to sulfate reduction (Table 3) (51, 55, 66). The theoretical H2 consumption threshold concentration for sulfate reduction under relevant in situ concentrations of reactants and products (i.e., ΔG′ values) is about 15.4 nM (∼2 Pa) (see Fig. 2 for details). By comparison, reductive dechlorination, nitrate reduction, and ferric iron reduction under environmentally relevant concentrations can theoretically maintain much lower H2 consumption threshold concentrations of 7.19 × 10−25, 5.39 × 10−22, and 6.06 × 10−10 nM, respectively, indicating these processes would be far better partners for enabling syntrophic processes (Table 2). Organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia could serve as a relevant H2 sink and maintain H2 concentrations far below the 29.7 μM value needed to enable AOM (67) (Fig. 2). The syntrophic partnership between organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia and ANME could be a relevant function of Dehalococcoidia in various anoxic environmental systems with CH4 and a sustained formation of organohalogens. In support of this hypothesis, a recent study demonstrated the coexistence of Dehalococcoides and ANME in a permanently ice-covered Antarctic lake (21), suggesting a possible linkage between organohalide respiration and AOM in situ. To summarize, organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia would be ideal syntrophic partners for energetically challenging, syntrophic processes, such as AOM (Table 3), and are likely relevant drivers of carbon turnover and nutrient cycling in environments where other electron acceptors are absent and active production of organochlorines occurs.
TABLE 3

Gibbs free energy changes (ΔG) associated with anaerobic CH4 oxidation coupled to the reduction of different electron acceptors under standard conditions (ΔG°′ values) and environmentally relevant concentrations of reactants and products (ΔG′ values)

Redox reactionΔG°′, kJ/mol of:
ΔG′, kJ/mol of:
CH4EAElectronsCH4EAElectrons
CH4(g) + SO42– + H+ → HCO3 + H2S(aq) + H2O–16.5–16.5–2.06–5.0–5.0−0.63
CH4(g) + 8Fe(OH)3(s) + 15H+ → HCO3 + 8Fe2+ + 21H2O46.25.785.78–144.1–18.0–18.0
CH4(g) + 4 2-CP(aq) + 3H2O → HCO3 + 4 phenol(aq) + 5H+ + 4Cl–476.3–119.1−59.5–486.2–121.6–60.8
CH4(g) + 4 MCB(aq) + 3H2O → HCO3 + 4 benzene(aq) + 5H+ + 4Cl–477.9–119.5–59.7–499.3–124.8–62.4
CH4(g) + 4NO3 → HCO3 + 4NO2 + H2O + H+–510.7–127.7–63.8–501.4–125.4–62.7
CH4(g) + 4 PCE(aq) + 3H2O → HCO3 + 4TCE(aq) + 5H+ + 4Cl–557.9–139.5–69.7–574.0–143.5–71.8
CH4(g) + 4 TCE(aq)+ 3H2O → HCO3 + 4 cDCE(aq) + 5H+ + 4Cl–539.9–135.0–67.5–568.8–142.2–71.1
CH4(g) + 4 1,2-DCA(aq) + 2H2O → HCO3 + 4 ethene(aq) + 9H+ + 8Cl−853.5–213.4−106.7–839.5−209.9−104.9

The ΔG°′ values for all reactions except reductive dechlorination of tetrachloroethene (PCE) to trichloroethene (TCE) were calculated using Geochemists WorkBench (GWB14). The ΔG°′ for reductive dechlorination was calculated according to Dolfing and Janssen (51). The ΔG′ values were calculated according to equation 5 (see the text) with CH4 substituting for H2 and using the concentration values listed below. Abbreviations: PCE, tetrachloroethene; TCE, trichloroethene; cDCE, cis-1,2-dichloroethene; 1,2-DCA, 1,2-dichloroethane; MCB, monochlorobenzene; 2-CP, 2-chlorophenol; EA, electron acceptor; (g), gas phase; (aq), aqueous phase; (s), solid. The following concentrations were used for calculating ΔG′ values: HCO3–, 2.020 × 10−2 M; CH4, 3.000 × 10−5 M; SO42–, 5.200 × 10−3 M; H2S, 8.000 × 10−4 M; Fe2+, 3.000 × 10−5 M; NO3–, 1.850 × 10−4 M; NO2–, 1.160 × 10−5 M; PCE, 3.190 × 10−7 M; TCE, 7.290 × 10−7 M; Cl–, 1.690 × 10−2 M; acetate, 1.000 × 10−4 M; cDCE, 4.570 × 10−7 M; DCA, 4.730 × 10−7 M; ethene, 1.340 × 10−3 M; 2-CP, 5.072 × 10−7 M; phenol, 2.178 × 10−6 M; MCB, 5.313 × 10−7 M; benzene, 7.105 × 10−7 M.

FIG 2

Visualization of ΔG′ values calculated per mol of electron acceptor consumed for different redox reactions versus the H2 concentration. Depicted are the redox reactions 3 to 7 listed in Table 2. The ΔG′ values were calculated according to equation 6 except for AOM, which was calculated according to equation 3 (see the text). The minimum Gibbs free energy yield allowing an anaerobic microbe to conserve energy falls in the range of −10 ± 1 kJ/mol for each reaction (horizontal, dashed black line). At Gibbs free energy changes greater (i.e., more positive) than −10 ± 1 kJ/mol, microorganisms cannot conserve energy and cease metabolic activity (53). The concentrations of chemical species representative of environments favoring sulfate reduction, ferric iron reduction, nitrate reduction, and organohalide respiration were retrieved from published data (53, 79) and the Substance Priority List database (www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/resources/index.html). The following concentrations were used for calculating ΔG′ at different H2 concentrations: HCO3–, 2.020 × 10−2 M; CH4, 3.000 × 10−5 M; SO42–, 5.200 × 10−3 M; H2S, 8.000 × 10−4 M; Fe2+, 3.000 × 10−5 M; NO3–, 1.850 × 10−4 M; NO2–, 1.160 × 10−5 M; PCE, 3.190 × 10−7 M; TCE, 7.290 × 10−7 M; Cl–, 1.690 × 10−2 M; acetate, 1.000 × 10−4 M; cDCE, 4.570 × 10−7 M. The headspace partial pressures of CH4 and H2 were converted to aqueous concentration units (M) using Henry’s law constants of 1.4 × 10−5 for CH4 and of 7.8 × 10−6 for H2 (80, 82). The dashed vertical lines indicate the theoretical H2 consumption threshold concentrations for each reaction. The abbreviations CH4, SO42–, Fe3+, NO3–, and R-Cl indicate different redox processes utilizing H2 as the electron donor, including methanogenesis (reaction 3 in Table 2), sulfate reduction (reaction 4), iron reduction (reaction 5), nitrate reduction to nitrite (reaction 6), and reductive dechlorination (reaction 7), respectively.

Gibbs free energy changes (ΔG) associated with anaerobic CH4 oxidation coupled to the reduction of different electron acceptors under standard conditions (ΔG°′ values) and environmentally relevant concentrations of reactants and products (ΔG′ values) The ΔG°′ values for all reactions except reductive dechlorination of tetrachloroethene (PCE) to trichloroethene (TCE) were calculated using Geochemists WorkBench (GWB14). The ΔG°′ for reductive dechlorination was calculated according to Dolfing and Janssen (51). The ΔG′ values were calculated according to equation 5 (see the text) with CH4 substituting for H2 and using the concentration values listed below. Abbreviations: PCE, tetrachloroethene; TCE, trichloroethene; cDCE, cis-1,2-dichloroethene; 1,2-DCA, 1,2-dichloroethane; MCB, monochlorobenzene; 2-CP, 2-chlorophenol; EA, electron acceptor; (g), gas phase; (aq), aqueous phase; (s), solid. The following concentrations were used for calculating ΔG′ values: HCO3–, 2.020 × 10−2 M; CH4, 3.000 × 10−5 M; SO42–, 5.200 × 10−3 M; H2S, 8.000 × 10−4 M; Fe2+, 3.000 × 10−5 M; NO3–, 1.850 × 10−4 M; NO2–, 1.160 × 10−5 M; PCE, 3.190 × 10−7 M; TCE, 7.290 × 10−7 M; Cl–, 1.690 × 10−2 M; acetate, 1.000 × 10−4 M; cDCE, 4.570 × 10−7 M; DCA, 4.730 × 10−7 M; ethene, 1.340 × 10−3 M; 2-CP, 5.072 × 10−7 M; phenol, 2.178 × 10−6 M; MCB, 5.313 × 10−7 M; benzene, 7.105 × 10−7 M. Visualization of ΔG′ values calculated per mol of electron acceptor consumed for different redox reactions versus the H2 concentration. Depicted are the redox reactions 3 to 7 listed in Table 2. The ΔG′ values were calculated according to equation 6 except for AOM, which was calculated according to equation 3 (see the text). The minimum Gibbs free energy yield allowing an anaerobic microbe to conserve energy falls in the range of −10 ± 1 kJ/mol for each reaction (horizontal, dashed black line). At Gibbs free energy changes greater (i.e., more positive) than −10 ± 1 kJ/mol, microorganisms cannot conserve energy and cease metabolic activity (53). The concentrations of chemical species representative of environments favoring sulfate reduction, ferric iron reduction, nitrate reduction, and organohalide respiration were retrieved from published data (53, 79) and the Substance Priority List database (www.atsdr.cdc.gov/spl/resources/index.html). The following concentrations were used for calculating ΔG′ at different H2 concentrations: HCO3–, 2.020 × 10−2 M; CH4, 3.000 × 10−5 M; SO42–, 5.200 × 10−3 M; H2S, 8.000 × 10−4 M; Fe2+, 3.000 × 10−5 M; NO3–, 1.850 × 10−4 M; NO2–, 1.160 × 10−5 M; PCE, 3.190 × 10−7 M; TCE, 7.290 × 10−7 M; Cl–, 1.690 × 10−2 M; acetate, 1.000 × 10−4 M; cDCE, 4.570 × 10−7 M. The headspace partial pressures of CH4 and H2 were converted to aqueous concentration units (M) using Henry’s law constants of 1.4 × 10−5 for CH4 and of 7.8 × 10−6 for H2 (80, 82). The dashed vertical lines indicate the theoretical H2 consumption threshold concentrations for each reaction. The abbreviations CH4, SO42–, Fe3+, NO3–, and R-Cl indicate different redox processes utilizing H2 as the electron donor, including methanogenesis (reaction 3 in Table 2), sulfate reduction (reaction 4), iron reduction (reaction 5), nitrate reduction to nitrite (reaction 6), and reductive dechlorination (reaction 7), respectively.

DEHALOCOCCOIDIA BIOMASS FUELS MICROBIOMES IN HIGHLY OLIGOTROPHIC ENVIRONMENTS

Organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia use H2 at very low concentrations and are active in anoxic environments where organochlorines form naturally. Dehalococcoidia generate approximately four times more biomass per mole of H2 oxidized than methanogens (50). When hydrolysis and fermentation reactions sustain elevated H2 concentrations, hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis and organohalide respiration can cooccur, as long as chlorinated electron acceptors are available. In highly oligotrophic environments (e.g., the energy-deprived deep subsurface) the formation of H2 is thermodynamically controlled, and hydrogenotrophic organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia can outcompete other H2-consuming microorganisms (e.g., methanogens and sulfate reducers) for electron donor. In environments where energy sources limit microbial metabolism and growth (e.g., the deep subsurface), Dehalococcoidia necromass could be a relevant source of nutrients and energy, suggesting that Dehalococcoidia play relevant functions in carbon and energy cycling and support microbiomes in energy-depleted, oligotrophic ecosystems. This process likely extends to environments without measurable pools of chlorinated organics because balanced chlorination and dechlorination reactions maintain low steady-state organochlorine concentrations but provide sufficient flux to sustain Dehalococcoidia populations.

DEHALOCOCCOIDIA MEDIATE RECALCITRANCE OF ORGANIC COMPOUNDS AND AN ENVIRONMENTAL SYSTEM’S CHLORINE STORAGE CAPACITY

Natural chlorination is a widespread phenomenon in many environmental systems (40) and enhances the recalcitrance of organic compounds. Chlorination also influences the environmental phase partitioning and transport of organic compounds and increases the chlorine retention time, which impacts ecosystem processes, as documented in forest soils and marine sediments (46, 47, 68). The cleavage of carbon-chlorine bonds by abiotic and biotic processes releases inorganic chloride and transforms recalcitrant carbon into bioavailable and biodegradable organic carbon that various microbial taxa can metabolize (47). Thus, organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia play key roles by removing recalcitrance and rendering the remaining nonhalogenated organics (or with a lower degree of chlorination) more susceptible to microbial metabolism. Inorganic chloride is water-soluble and prone to leaching, especially in well-drained soils experiencing elevated rainfall. Chloride is an essential plant micronutrient and extensive chloride loss can affect plant productivity. Thus, the fine-tuned interplay between chlorination and dechlorination reactions impacts soil microbiomes, as well as macroflora, with potentially far-reaching consequences for plant productivity and carbon and nutrient cycling. Such cross-kingdom interactions involving halogen cycling are poorly understood and organohalide-respiring bacteria may play a crucial role in balancing this system.

DEHALOCOCCOIDIA ATTENUATE SIGNALING MOLECULES AND CHEMICAL DETERRENTS

Antibiotics selectively kill or inhibit competing (micro)organisms or have signaling function, and this weapon versus signal debate has received considerable attention (69–73). Antibiotics at low, subinhibitory concentrations may serve signaling purposes and can impact bacterial virulence, biofilm formation, quorum sensing, gene expression, and gene transfer (73). Many natural (e.g., vancomycin) and anthropogenic (e.g., triclosan) antibiotics are chlorinated organic compounds (74). An increasing number of halogenated natural products have been identified and characterized as chemical repellents, feeding deterrents and signaling molecules, including chlorinated steroid glycosides from the German cockroach (Blattella germanica), brominated organic compounds (e.g., bromoindoles, bromophenols, and bromopyrroles) from various marine sponges (e.g., Aplysina aerophoba, Agelas wiedenmayeri, and Agelas conifera), and brominated diterpenes from the marine red alga Laurencia saitoi (37, 39, 75–77). Dehalococcoidia may interact with organohalogen-producing organisms and play a role in recycling halogenated antibiotics and signaling molecules. For instance, the bacterial community associated with Aplysina aerophoba, a marine sponge that produces organobromine compounds, has been demonstrated to dehalogenate halogenated phenolic compounds, and a 16S rRNA gene sequence closely related to Dehalococcoidia was recovered from the sponge-associated microbiota (76, 77). Thus, Dehalococcoidia may play crucial ecological roles in disarming chemical defense systems and have functions as signal-attenuating agents by dehalogenating halogenated signaling molecules and antibiotics.

KNOWLEDGE GAPS

Innovative strategies for cultivating not-yet-cultured Dehalococcoidia.

Diverse uncultured Dehalococcoidia have been identified in various sequencing studies (i.e., shotgun metagenomic sequencing, amplicon sequencing, single-cell sequencing) (see Table S1 in the supplemental material). Single-cell sequencing has expanded the Dehalococcoidia pangenome, but the approach is plagued by cell selection biases and incomplete genome information (28). Cultivation from single cells has not been successful, preventing detailed physiological and biochemical studies of Dehalococcoidia captured by single-cell sorting approaches (26, 27, 78). The hope is that the increasing information obtained from metagenome and single-cell genome sequencing will guide innovative cultivation and enrichment strategies to obtain cultures for detailed physiological and biochemical studies.

Quantifying the roles of Dehalococcoidia in syntrophy and carbon cycling.

Hydrogenotrophic organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia consume H2 to low consumption threshold concentrations and are ideal partners in syntrophic processes, such as AOM, that are thermodynamically controlled by the prevailing H2 partial pressure. The concentrations (i.e., pools) of organochlorines in pristine environments are typically low; however, very little is known about the in situ rates of halogenation and dehalogenation reactions. Thus, the fluxes between nonhalogenated and halogenated pools of organic material may be large and the impact of hydrogenotrophic organohalide-respiring bacteria for carbon cycling may be far greater than is currently acknowledged. Therefore, concerted efforts are needed to measure fluxes of organohalogens in pristine environments, so that the role of organohalide-respiring bacteria for syntrophic processes can be more clearly understood and delineated. To advance the understanding of the dynamics of Dehalococcoidia populations in different microbiomes, time-resolved absolute quantitative information should be obtained. Should further research corroborate that Dehalococcoidia are crucial partner populations for syntrophic processes such as AOM, or key specialist degraders of halogenated signaling molecules, the resilience of Dehalococcoidia to changing environmental conditions (e.g., pH, warming temperatures, decreased or increased soil moisture content, and land-use change) must be explored, so that ecosystem-level responses can be predicted.

Biotechnological applications.

If the anticipated progress in cultivation can be realized and a broader suite of cultures and isolates from diverse environments becomes available, the roles of Dehalococcoidia in carbon and nutrient cycling in natural, pristine and organohalogen degradation in contaminated environments can be elucidated. Such efforts will likely lead to the discovery of dechlorinators with novel RDase genes, which can advance monitoring regimes and treatment of sites impacted with anthropogenic chlorinated contaminants. Organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia harbor a sizeable genetic diversity of RDase genes, but comparably few substrates have been identified, suggesting that Dehalococcoidia can utilize a much broader range of organohalogens as electron acceptors than is currently appreciated. Largely lacking is kinetic information about RDases (i.e., the affinity to chlorinated electron acceptors [K values] and the turnover rates), which would be necessary to gauge the contributions of Dehalococcoidia for transforming halogenated micropollutants (e.g., pesticides, pharmaceuticals like chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine). Bioaugmentation with Dehalococcoides-containing consortia has promoted in situ contaminant removal at a large number of sites (11); however, bioremediation is still an empirical practice and comprehensive knowledge of the diversity and ecophysiology of organohalide-respiring Dehalococcoidia can advance the approach to a science with predictable outcomes.
  59 in total

1.  Environmental distribution of the trichloroethene reductive dehalogenase gene (tceA) suggests lateral gene transfer among Dehalococcoides.

Authors:  Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown; Youlboong Sung; Kirsti M Ritalahti; F Michael Saunders; Frank E Löffler
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Ecol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 4.194

2.  Genomic characterization of three unique Dehalococcoides that respire on persistent polychlorinated biphenyls.

Authors:  Shanquan Wang; Kern Rei Chng; Andreas Wilm; Siyan Zhao; Kun-Lin Yang; Niranjan Nagarajan; Jianzhong He
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Candidatus Desulfofervidus auxilii, a hydrogenotrophic sulfate-reducing bacterium involved in the thermophilic anaerobic oxidation of methane.

Authors:  Viola Krukenberg; Katie Harding; Michael Richter; Frank Oliver Glöckner; Harald R Gruber-Vodicka; Birgit Adam; Jasmine S Berg; Katrin Knittel; Halina E Tegetmeyer; Antje Boetius; Gunter Wegener
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-04-06       Impact factor: 5.491

4.  Metagenomic analysis reveals the contribution of anaerobic methanotroph-1b in the oxidation of methane at the Ulleung Basin, East Sea of Korea.

Authors:  Jin-Woo Lee; Kae Kyoung Kwon; Jang-Jun Bahk; Dong-Hun Lee; Hyun Sook Lee; Sung Gyun Kang; Jung-Hyun Lee
Journal:  J Microbiol       Date:  2016-11-26       Impact factor: 3.422

5.  Chloride and organic chlorine in forest soils: storage, residence times, and influence of ecological conditions.

Authors:  Paul-Olivier Redon; Abdesselam Abdelouas; David Bastviken; Sébastien Cecchini; Manuel Nicolas; Yves Thiry
Journal:  Environ Sci Technol       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 9.028

6.  Fraction of electrons consumed in electron acceptor reduction and hydrogen thresholds as indicators of halorespiratory physiology.

Authors:  F E Löffler; J M Tiedje; R A Sanford
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 4.792

7.  Dehalococcoides mccartyi gen. nov., sp. nov., obligately organohalide-respiring anaerobic bacteria relevant to halogen cycling and bioremediation, belong to a novel bacterial class, Dehalococcoidia classis nov., order Dehalococcoidales ord. nov. and family Dehalococcoidaceae fam. nov., within the phylum Chloroflexi.

Authors:  Frank E Löffler; Jun Yan; Kirsti M Ritalahti; Lorenz Adrian; Elizabeth A Edwards; Konstantinos T Konstantinidis; Jochen A Müller; Heather Fullerton; Stephen H Zinder; Alfred M Spormann
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-27       Impact factor: 2.747

8.  Archaea catalyze iron-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane.

Authors:  Katharina F Ettwig; Baoli Zhu; Daan Speth; Jan T Keltjens; Mike S M Jetten; Boran Kartal
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Vertical distribution of microbial communities in a perennially stratified Arctic lake with saline, anoxic bottom waters.

Authors:  André M Comeau; Tommy Harding; Pierre E Galand; Warwick F Vincent; Connie Lovejoy
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2012-08-28       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Comparative Single-Cell Genomics of Chloroflexi from the Okinawa Trough Deep-Subsurface Biosphere.

Authors:  Heather Fullerton; Craig L Moyer
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 4.792

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Microbial Journey: Mount Everest to Mars.

Authors:  Utkarsh Sood; Gauri Garg Dhingra; Shailly Anand; Princy Hira; Roshan Kumar; Jasvinder Kaur; Mansi Verma; Nirjara Singhvi; Sukanya Lal; Charu Dogra Rawat; Vineet Kumar Singh; Jaspreet Kaur; Helianthous Verma; Charu Tripathi; Priya Singh; Ankita Dua; Anjali Saxena; Rajendra Phartyal; Perumal Jayaraj; Seema Makhija; Renu Gupta; Sumit Sahni; Namita Nayyar; Jeeva Susan Abraham; Sripoorna Somasundaram; Pushp Lata; Renu Solanki; Nitish Kumar Mahato; Om Prakash; Kiran Bala; Rashmi Kumari; Ravi Toteja; Vipin Chandra Kalia; Rup Lal
Journal:  Indian J Microbiol       Date:  2022-07-02

2.  Ultrastructure of Organohalide-Respiring Dehalococcoidia Revealed by Cryo-Electron Tomography.

Authors:  Danielle L Sexton; Gao Chen; Fadime Kara Murdoch; Ameena Hashimi; Frank E Löffler; Elitza I Tocheva
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-11-17       Impact factor: 5.005

3.  Novel Chloroflexi genomes from the deepest ocean reveal metabolic strategies for the adaptation to deep-sea habitats.

Authors:  Rulong Liu; Xing Wei; Weizhi Song; Li Wang; Junwei Cao; Jiaxin Wu; Torsten Thomas; Tao Jin; Zixuan Wang; Wenxia Wei; Yuli Wei; Haofeng Zhai; Cheng Yao; Ziyi Shen; Jiangtao Du; Jiasong Fang
Journal:  Microbiome       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 16.837

4.  Assembly of 97 Novel Bacterial Genomes in the Microbial Community Affiliated with Polyvinyl Alcohol in Soil of Northern China.

Authors:  Jiaxing Liu; Xun Gu; Hui Li
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  The effects of high-fat foods on gut microbiota and small molecule intestinal gases: release kinetics and distribution in vitro colon model.

Authors:  Zhi-Tao Li; Jia-Wei Wang; Xing-Hai Hu; Li Zhu; Yun Jiang; Min-Jie Gao; Xiao-Bei Zhan
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2022-10-03

6.  Soil Microbial Indicators within Rotations and Tillage Systems.

Authors:  Gevan D Behnke; Nakian Kim; Maria C Zabaloy; Chance W Riggins; Sandra Rodriguez-Zas; Maria B Villamil
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2021-06-08

7.  Bacterial and Archaeal Diversity and Abundance in Shallow Subsurface Clay Sediments at Jianghan Plain, China.

Authors:  Dandan Song; Zhou Jiang; Teng Ma; Yiran Dong; Liang Shi
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 5.640

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.