| Literature DB >> 32517057 |
Isabella Capodanno1, Mirta Rocchi2, Rossella Prandi3, Cristina Pedroni4, Enrica Tamagnini5, Pierluigi Alfieri1, Francesco Merli1, Luca Ghirotto6.
Abstract
The role of caregivers in homecare settings is relevant to the patient's wellbeing and quality of life. This phenomenon is well described in the literature for the oncological setting but not specifically for that of hematological malignancies. The aim of this study was to explore the experience of primary caregivers of patients with hematological malignancies within home care. We conducted a phenomenological study based on interviews with 17 primary caregivers of hematological patients. Analysis of the contents led to the identification of five main themes. Perhaps, the innovative aspects of this study can be summarized in three points: This service was demonstrated to fulfil the ethical aspects of providing the patient with a dignified accompaniment to the end of life. Secondly, the efficiency of the service and the benefit are directly dependent on the caregivers' wellbeing, so knowledge of the dynamics and emotions involved can lead to the development and implementation of programs for hematological malignancies. Lastly, a collaborative caregivers-professionals relationship can improve a sense of accomplishment for all parties involved, lessening the family's frustration related to not having done their best. Home care brings significant benefits for both the patient and the caregivers and fulfils the ethical obligation of providing the patient dignified end-of-life care.Entities:
Keywords: caregivers; hematologic neoplasms; home care services; palliative care; qualitative research
Year: 2020 PMID: 32517057 PMCID: PMC7312962 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17114036
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health ISSN: 1660-4601 Impact factor: 3.390
Reggio Emilia health district hematological home care service program.
|
|
|
|
| The hospital hematologists recommend the HHC service to patients based on the following criteria:
Patient living in the urban area covered by the HHC service; Physical limitations and/or compromised clinical and personal status (with at least two of the following conditions: ECOG performance status ≥ or Karnofsky Performance Status ≤ 50%; unable to walk and/or without a person to accompany him/her to the hospital; high risk of infection); Adequate venous access; as to the home environment: suitable and safe for HHC service, adult caregiver, capable, collaborating and helpful caregiver at home (family member, friend or home-aid assistant). Other criteria regard the caregiving situation: caregivers’ cohabitation with the patient (the presence of a helpful person during the time needed for assistance is required); availability/possibility to be absent from work for assistance; health status of the caregiver; architectural barriers and impossibility to modify the home of the patient according to new needs; uncleanliness and unhealthy or poorly ventilated location; the presence of pets. |
|
|
| The staff should provide all the required information, both during the first visit at home and during the assistance. In particular, the nurse provides training moments about hygiene practices, assessment of vital parameters, caring of venous catheters and urinary catheters, wound dressing, management and prevention of constipation. |
Interview guide.
| Foci | Exemplifying Question(s) |
|---|---|
|
| “Thank you for participating. I would like to ask you if the reason we are here is clear? Are there any questions you wish to ask me? Are there any doubts that you want me to clarify?” |
|
| “Could you please tell me what you thought when healthcare professionals offered home care to your loved-one?” |
|
| “Could you please tell me how you experienced the care of your loved one? |
|
| “Could you please tell me how was your daily life? Could you please tell me how your organization was?” |
|
| “Could you please tell me what happened at home in the last few days?” |
|
| “Could you please tell me how you did feel about managing your loved one’s last moments at home?” |
|
| “Is there any other though you would like to share? Anything to add?” |
Participants’ characteristics.
| Code | Age Range | Occupation | Education | The CG is the Patient’s | The CG was |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1PF | 61–70 | Retired | Secondary | Wife | Alone |
| 2PF | 61–70 | Teacher | Tertiary | Daughter | Alone |
| 3PF | 41–50 | Employee | Secondary | Daughter | Alone |
| 4PPFF | 61–70 | Unemployed | Primary | Wife | Helped by the daughter |
| 4PPFF | 31–40 | Employee | Secondary | Daughter | Helped by the mother |
| 5PM | 41–50 | Sport trainer | Tertiary | Son | Helped by the brother |
| 6PF | 61–70 | Retired | Tertiary | Wife | Helped by children |
| 7PF | 51–60 | Un-employed | Secondary | Daughter | Helped by siblings |
| 8PF | 50 | Un-employed | Secondary | Wife | Alone |
| 9PF | 51–60 | Employee | Secondary | Daughter | Helped by in-home assistant |
| 10PM | 61–70 | Retired | Secondary | Husband | Helped by the daughter |
| 11PF | 41–50 | Employee | Secondary | Daughter | Helped by the mother |
| 12PM | 41–50 | Employee | Secondary | Son | Helped by the father |
| 13PPMM | 31–40 | Researcher | Tertiary | Son | Helped by the father |
| 13PPMM | 61–70 | Retired | Secondary | Husband | Helped by the son |
| 14PPFM | <71 | Retired | Primary | Wife | Helped by the son |
| 14PPFM | 51–60 | Employee | Secondary | Son | Helped by the mother |
Results’summary.
| Main Themes | Sub-Themes |
|---|---|
|
| Feeling the strength of the loved-one |
| Accepting the patient’s wishes | |
| Participating the care | |
|
| Feeling the burden |
| Neglecting themselves | |
| Needing relief | |
|
| Preserving normal life |
| Strengthening family bonds | |
| Making a gift to the loved-one | |
|
| Perceiving home care as necessary |
| Feeling the professionalism and prompt availability | |
| Comfort and sense of familiarity | |
|
| Spirit of initiative |
| Building determination |