Adam Antoszewski1, Chi-Jui Feng1, Bodhi P Vani1, Erik H Thiede2,3, Lu Hong4, Jonathan Weare5, Andrei Tokmakoff1,6,7, Aaron R Dinner1,6,7. 1. Department of Chemistry, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States. 2. Department of Computer Science, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States. 3. Department of Statistics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States. 4. Graduate Program in Biophysical Sciences, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States. 5. Courant Institute of Mathematical Sciences, New York University, New York, New York 10012, United States. 6. James Franck Institute, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States. 7. Institute for Biophysical Dynamics, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637, United States.
Abstract
The protein hormone insulin exists in various oligomeric forms, and a key step in binding its cellular receptor is dissociation of the dimer. This dissociation process and its corresponding association process have come to serve as paradigms of coupled (un)folding and (un)binding more generally. Despite its fundamental and practical importance, the mechanism of insulin dimer dissociation remains poorly understood. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations, leveraging recent developments in umbrella sampling, to characterize the energetic and structural features of dissociation in unprecedented detail. We find that the dissociation is inherently multipathway with limiting behaviors corresponding to conformational selection and induced fit, the two prototypical mechanisms of coupled folding and binding. Along one limiting path, the dissociation leads to detachment of the C-terminal segment of the insulin B chain from the protein core, a feature believed to be essential for receptor binding. We simulate IR spectroscopy experiments to aid in interpreting current experiments and identify sites where isotopic labeling can be most effective for distinguishing the contributions of the limiting mechanisms.
The protein hormone insulin exists in various oligomeric forms, and a key step in binding its cellular receptor is dissociation of the dimer. This dissociation process and its corresponding association process have come to serve as paradigms of coupled (un)folding and (un)binding more generally. Despite its fundamental and practical importance, the mechanism of n class="Gene">insulin dimer dissociation remains poorly understood. Here, we use molecular dynamics simulations, leveraging recent developments in umbrella sampling, to characterize the energetic and structural features of dissociation in unprecedented detail. We find that the dissociation is inherently multipathway with limiting behaviors corresponding to conformational selection and induced fit, the two prototypical mechanisms of coupled folding and binding. Along one limiting path, the dissociation leads to detachment of the C-terminal segment of the insulin B chain from the protein core, a feature believed to be essential for receptor binding. We simulate IR spectroscopy experiments to aid in interpreting current experiments and identify sites where isotopic labeling can be most effective for distinguishing the contributions of the limiting mechanisms.
Authors: James C Phillips; Rosemary Braun; Wei Wang; James Gumbart; Emad Tajkhorshid; Elizabeth Villa; Christophe Chipot; Robert D Skeel; Laxmikant Kalé; Klaus Schulten Journal: J Comput Chem Date: 2005-12 Impact factor: 3.376
Authors: Carlos R Baiz; Yu-Shan Lin; Chunte Sam Peng; Kyle A Beauchamp; Vincent A Voelz; Vijay S Pande; Andrei Tokmakoff Journal: Biophys J Date: 2014-03-18 Impact factor: 4.033
Authors: A D MacKerell; D Bashford; M Bellott; R L Dunbrack; J D Evanseck; M J Field; S Fischer; J Gao; H Guo; S Ha; D Joseph-McCarthy; L Kuchnir; K Kuczera; F T Lau; C Mattos; S Michnick; T Ngo; D T Nguyen; B Prodhom; W E Reiher; B Roux; M Schlenkrich; J C Smith; R Stote; J Straub; M Watanabe; J Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera; D Yin; M Karplus Journal: J Phys Chem B Date: 1998-04-30 Impact factor: 2.991
Authors: John Strahan; Adam Antoszewski; Chatipat Lorpaiboon; Bodhi P Vani; Jonathan Weare; Aaron R Dinner Journal: J Chem Theory Comput Date: 2021-04-28 Impact factor: 6.006