| Literature DB >> 32513239 |
Haisen Guo1, Weidai Zhang1, Chumin Ni1, Zhixiong Cai1, Songming Chen2, Xiansheng Huang3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Most electrocardiogram (ECG) studies still take advantage of traditional statistical functions, and the results are mostly presented in tables, histograms, and curves. Few papers display ECG data by visual means. The aim of this study was to analyze and show data for electrocardiographic left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) with ST-segment elevation (STE) by a heat map in order to explore the feasibility and clinical value of heat mapping for ECG data visualization.Entities:
Keywords: Data analysis; Electrocardiogram; Heat map; Visualization
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32513239 PMCID: PMC7281952 DOI: 10.1186/s12872-020-01560-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cardiovasc Disord ISSN: 1471-2261 Impact factor: 2.298
Characteristics of electrocardiographic LVH with STE
| Leads | Number of STEs(n, %) | Amplitude of STEs (mV) | STE characteristic | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform elevation | Bow-back elevation | Upwardly inclined elevation | Concave face up elevation | |||
| V1 | 39 (65) | 0.15 (0.1–0.2) | 31 (51.7%) | 2 (3.3%) | 6 (10%) | 0 |
| V2 | 55 (91.7) | 0.2 (0.1–0.3) | 29 (48.3) | 5 (8.3) | 20 (33.3) | 1 (1.7) |
| V3 | 38 (63.3) | 0.175 (0.15–0.3) | 20 (33.3) | 5 (8.3) | 11 (18.3) | 2 (3.3) |
| V4 | 12 (20) | 0.15 (0.1–0.275) | 4 (6.7) | 1 (1.7) | 4 (6.7) | 3 (5) |
| V5 | 7 (11.7) | 0.15 (0.1–0.3) | 2 (3.3) | 1 (1.7) | 1 (1.7) | 3 (5) |
| V6 | 3 (5) | 0.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 (5) |
| I | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| aVL | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| II | 3 (5) | 0.1 | 3 (5) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| III | 4 (6.7) | 0.1 (0.1–0.2125) | 4 (6.7) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| aVF | 3 (5) | 0.125 (0.1–0.15) | 3 (5) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| aVR | 5 (8.3) | 0.1 (0.1–0.2) | 5 (8.3) | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Values are median (interquartile range) or n (%)
left ventricular hypertrophy, STE ST-segment elevation
Fig. 1Heat map corresponding to ST-segment elevation conditions for each case. The transverse axis of the heat map represents the leads of the electrocardiograms, and the longitudinal axis represents the cases. Each lattice color represents an ST condition, with blue representing a normal or depressed ST-segment, red representing an elevated ST-segment, and blue-to-red lattice color changes representing the increase in ST amplitude. STE = ST-segment elevation
Fig. 2Heat map corresponding to an ST-segment elevation amplitude that reached the threshold specified in the STEMI guidelines. The transverse axis of the heat map represents the leads of the electrocardiograms, and the longitudinal axis represents the cases. Each lattice color represents an STE condition. Red indicates an STE magnitude that meets the thresholds specified in the STEMI guidelines, whereas blue color indicates an ST that did not meet STEMI guidelines for STE. STEMI=ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; STE = ST-segment elevation