Literature DB >> 32512125

The study of noninvasive brain stimulation using molecular brain imaging: A systematic review.

Sara Tremblay1, Lauri Tuominen2, Vanessa Zayed3, Alvaro Pascual-Leone4, Juho Joutsa5.   

Abstract

Electromagnetic noninvasive brain stimulation (NIBS) techniques, such as transcranial magnetic stimulation and transcranial electrical stimulation, are widely used in research and represent emerging clinical treatment options for many brain disorders. The brain-wide neurobiological effects of electromagnetic NIBS, however, are not yet fully characterized. The combination of NIBS with molecular brain imaging is a powerful tool for the investigation of these effects. Here, we conducted a systematic review of all published studies investigating the effects of all forms of electromagnetic NIBS using molecular imaging (positron emission tomography, single photon emission computed tomography). A meta-analysis was also conducted when sufficient studies employed similar methodologies. A total of 239 articles were identified, of which 71 were included in the review. Information was extracted about the study design, NIBS parameters, imaging parameters, and observed local and remote effects caused by the stimulation. Regional cerebral blood flow and glucose metabolism were the most common outcome measures, followed by dopamine neurotransmission. While the vast majority of studies obtained remote effects of stimulation in interconnected regions, approximately half of the studies showed local effects at the stimulation site. Our meta-analysis on motor cortex stimulation also showed consistent remote effects. The literature review demonstrates that although the local effects of NIBS as captured by molecular imaging are sometimes modest, there are robust remote changes in brain activity and neurotransmitter function. Finally, we discuss the potential pitfalls and methodological issues and identify gaps in the current knowledge that could be addressed using these techniques.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Positron emission tomography; Single photon emission computed tomography; Theta burst stimulation; Transcranial electrical stimulation; Transcranial magnetic stimulation

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32512125     DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  4 in total

Review 1.  Evidence of Neuroplastic Changes after Transcranial Magnetic, Electric, and Deep Brain Stimulation.

Authors:  Julius Kricheldorff; Katharina Göke; Maximilian Kiebs; Florian H Kasten; Christoph S Herrmann; Karsten Witt; Rene Hurlemann
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 2.  Application of positron emission tomography in psychiatry-methodological developments and future directions.

Authors:  Simon Cervenka; Andreas Frick; Robert Bodén; Mark Lubberink
Journal:  Transl Psychiatry       Date:  2022-06-14       Impact factor: 7.989

Review 3.  Neuroimaging evaluation of deep brain stimulation in the treatment of representative neurodegenerative and neuropsychiatric disorders.

Authors:  Shichun Peng; Vijay Dhawan; David Eidelberg; Yilong Ma
Journal:  Bioelectron Med       Date:  2021-03-30

4.  Non-invasive brain stimulation combined with psychosocial intervention for depression: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiali He; Yiling Tang; Jingxia Lin; Guy Faulkner; Hector W H Tsang; Sunny H W Chan
Journal:  BMC Psychiatry       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 4.144

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.