Literature DB >> 32511589

Clinical and Genetic Characteristics of Covid-19 Patients from UK Biobank.

David A Kolin1,2, Scott Kulm1,2, Olivier Elemento1,2.   

Abstract

We conducted an analysis of 669 Covid-19 positive patients within the UK Biobank cohort, a prospective cohort including over 500,000 participants. Our analyses led to several findings. We found that black participants in the cohort were over four times more likely to be diagnosed with Covid-19 than white participants. In order to assess for confounding, we produced - to our knowledge - the first multivariable adjusted estimate of the association of racial characteristics with Covid-19. Our adjusted estimates indicated that black participants remained at over threefold increased risk of Covid-19 relative to white participants. Exploratory analyses identified that 22.9% of Covid-19 positive black patients were using either angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers, relative to just 6.7% of all black participants. Our genetic analyses confirmed the finding of a previous report noting an association of blood type A with Covid-19, and we discovered a novel genetic association with HLA DQA1_509 that remained significant even after Bonferroni correction.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32511589      PMCID: PMC7276016          DOI: 10.1101/2020.05.05.20075507

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  medRxiv


Introduction

The coronavirus disease 2019 (Covid-19) pandemic has afflicted hundreds of thousands of people worldwide. Evidence suggests that minorities are at increased risk of Covid-19. In the United States, the Center for Disease Prevention and Control found that 33% of people hospitalized with Covid-19 are African American, even though African Americans make up only 13% of the U.S. population.[1] The risk of death from Covid-19 for black Americans is 92.3 per 100,000 individuals, while for white Americans the risk of death is 45.2 per 100,000 individuals. Similarly, in the United Kingdom evidence suggests that Covid-19 is devastating minority communities. Approximately one-third of Covid-19 patients admitted to 201 critical care units in the United Kingdom were ethnic minorities.[2] However, limitations in data collection make tracking mortality amongst different minorities difficult. Many countries – including the United Kingdom – do not require incorporating demographic data like ethnicity when reporting mortality. There has also been considerable interest in better understanding the effects of medication use on Covid-19 susceptibility. Because coronaviruses use angiotensin converting enzyme 2 to gain entry into cells, concerns arose regarding the use of medications targeting the angiotensin system in Covid-19 patients. However, some recent evidence suggests that angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin II receptor blockers do not increase the risk of Covid-19.[3,4] In order to better understand risk factors, including demographics and medication use, we analyzed data from 669 Covid-19 positive patients from UK Biobank.

Methods

This prospective cohort study includes a population of 502,536 participants between the ages of 40 and 69 recruited from the United Kingdom from 2006 to 2010. Recently, Public Health England began providing UK Biobank with information on participantsCovid-19 test results from March 16, 2020 onwards. Samples obtained from patients were kept on a medium salt solution during transfer to a testing facility, where samples were tested for Covid-19 using polymerase chain reaction. Approximately four days elapsed between the time of sample retrieval and the time of data transfer into the Public Health England system. We used frequencies, percentages, and relative risk [RR] estimates to characterize associations. For continuous variables, relative risk was calculated using quasi-Poisson models. Adjusted relative risk [ARR] estimates accounted for age, sex, body-mass index, systolic blood pressure, race, and Townsend deprivation index.

Results

Among 502,536 participants, 1,474 (0.3%) patients were tested for Covid-19, of which 1,116 (75.7%) were inpatients. The cohort underwent 2,724 tests, with a total of 1,160 (42.6%) positive tests. One participant was tested 20 times. Although, Public Health England notes that duplicate tests may be present in this study due to the arrival of results via several different routes. The majority of tests were upper respiratory tract swabs (33.0%), nasal swabs (17.6%), or throat swabs (13.2%). Of the patients tested, 669 (45.4%) tested positive at least one time (Table 1). The mean age of Covid-19 positive participants was 57.5 years, 56.5% were male, and mean body-mass index was 29.2.
Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics of UK Biobank Participants

CharacteristicAll Participants (N = 502536)All Tests Negative (N = 805)At Least One Positive Test (N = 669)
Baseline and demographic
Mean age, s.d. (years)56.5 (8.1)57.9 (8.7)57.5 (8.7)
Male, no. (%)229134 (45.6)409 (50.8)378 (56.5)
Mean body-mass index, s.d.*27.4 (4.8)28.3 (5.7)29.2 (5.5)
Mean systolic blood pressure, s.d. (mmHg)139.7 (19.7)140.1 (20.6)141.3 (20.4)
Race, no. (%)
 White472725 (94.1)741 (92.0)565 (84.5)
 Asian12287 (2.4)22 (2.7)33 (4.9)
 Black9079 (1.8)23 (2.9)48 (7.2)
Mean Townsend deprivation index, s.d.−1.3 (3.1)−0.3 (3.5)0.0 (3.6)
Social habit
Smoking, no. (%)
 Never273537 (54.4)354 (44.0)303 (45.3)
 Previous173070 (34.4)307 (38.1)285 (42.6)
 Current52979 (10.5)141 (17.5)72 (10.8)
Alcohol use, no. (%)
 Never40648 (8.1)85 (10.6)84 (12.6)
 Once or twice a week129297 (25.7)191 (23.7)157 (23.5)
 Three or four times a week115445 (23.0)159 (19.8)128 (19.1)
 Daily or almost daily101774 (20.3)168 (20.9)113 (16.9)
Comorbidity
Cancer, no. (%)41700 (8.3)84 (10.4)58 (8.7)
Diabetes, no. (%)26402 (5.3)71 (8.8)66 (9.9)
Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, no. (%)[1]11823 (2.4)43 (5.3)28 (4.2)
Asthma, no. (%)58278 (11.6)111 (13.8)102 (15.2)
Ischemic heart disease, no. (%)[2]22727 (4.5)79 (9.8)58 (8.7)
Hypothyroidism, no. (%)24240 (4.8)33 (4.1)30 (4.5)
Hypercholesterolemia, no. (%)61635 (12.3)142 (17.6)111 (16.6)
Allergic rhinitis, no. (%)28148 (5.6)40 (5.0)42 (6.3)
Depression, no. (%)28208 (5.6)75 (9.3)56 (8.4)
Serology
Mean white blood cell count, s.d.6.9 (2.1)7.2 (2.2)7.4 (5.2)
Mean red blood cell count, s.d.4.5 (0.42)4.5 (0.45)4.6 (0.5)
Mean hemoglobin concentration, s.d.14.2 (1.2)14.1 (1.3)14.3 (1.5)
Mean corpuscular volume, s.d.91.1 (4.6)91.3 (5.1)90.8 (5.1)
Mean corpuscular hemoglobin concentration, s.d.34.5 (1.1)34.4 (1.0)34.4 (1.0)
Mean platelet count, s.d.253.0 (60.0)250.1 (61.1)249.5 (64.7)
Mean lymphocyte count, s.d.2.0 (1.2)2.0 (1.2)2.3 (4.8)
Mean monocyte count, s.d.0.5 (0.3)0.5 (0.2)0.5 (0.4)
Mean neutrophil count, s.d.4.2 (1.4)4.5 (1.5)4.4 (1.5)

Body-mass index is the weight in kilograms divided by the square of the height in meters.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease was defined as a diagnosis of emphysema and/or bronchitis.

Ischemic heart disease was categorized as history of myocardial infarction or angina.

Black participants were disproportionately Covid-19 positive (supplementary eTable 1). Compared to white participants, black participants were at over four times increased risk of testing positive for Covid-19 (RR 4.35, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.24 to 5.83). Amongst the 48 black participants who tested positive for Covid-19, 8 (16.7%) had diabetes. In exploratory analyses adjusting for age, sex, body-mass index, Townsend deprivation score, and history of diabetes, angina, or myocardial infarction, black participants remained at increased risk of Covid-19 (ARR 3.14, 95% CI 2.28 to 4.31). Asian participants were also at increased risk of testing positive for Covid-19 compared to white participants (ARR 2.03, 95% CI 1.40 to 2.95). Analyses of several serological markers identified that baseline white blood cell count, lymphocyte count, and monocyte count were associated with Covid-19. Next, we investigated the association of common classes of medications with Covid-19 (Table 2). Participants who used angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors were at increased risk of Covid-19 (RR 1.76, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.41) (supplementary eTable 2). However, adjustment reduced the strength of the association (ARR 1.32, 95% CI 0.95 to 1.84). Participants using angiotensin receptor blockers had a similar adjusted risk ratio (ARR 1.37, 95% CI 0.94 to 1.98). Of the 48 black Covid-19 patients, 11 (22.9%) were using either an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or an angiotensin II receptor blocker. Of all black participants, 611 (6.7%) were using either of the two medications. Adjusted risk ratios for use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen were 1.02 (95% CI 0.86 to 1.22) and 1.25 (95% CI 1.03 to 1.51), respectively. Analyses of Covid-19 positive inpatients and outpatients found that the groups were similar across baseline characteristics and medication use (supplementary eTable 3 to 6).
Table 2.

Frequency of Medication Use and Detection of Covid-19

Medication ClassAll Participants (N = 502536)All Tests Negative (N = 805)At Least One Positive Test (N = 669)
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, no. (%)[1]133030 (26.5)261 (32.4)196 (29.3)
Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor, no. (%)[2]18623 (3.7)45 (5.6)41 (6.1)
Angiotensin II receptor blocker, no. (%)[3]5497 (1.1)16 (2.0)14 (2.1)
Dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker, no. (%)[4]26832 (5.3)80 (9.9)65 (9.7)
Beta blocker, no. (%)[5]31725 (6.3)79 (9.8)65 (9.7)
Thiazolidinedione, no. (%)[6]1838 (0.4)5 (0.6)4 (0.6)
Sulfonylurea, no. (%)[7]4923 (1.0)21 (2.6)17 (2.5)
Other Common Therapies
Acetaminophen, no. (%)93668 (18.6)202 (25.1)154 (23.0)
Levothyroxine, no. (%)20344 (4.0)32 (4.0)27 (4.0)
Metformin, no. (%)14179 (2.8)42 (5.2)43 (6.4)
Glucosamine, no. (%)32135 (6.4)37 (4.6)32 (4.8)
Cod liver oil capsule, no. (%)27963 (5.6)37 (4.6)30 (4.5)

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs included aspirin, ibuprofen, diclofenac, naproxen, indomethacin, celecoxib, and meloxicam.

Angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors included captopril, enalapril, lisinopril, fosinopril, ramipril, and quinapril.

Angiotensin II receptor blockers included losartan, candesartan, eprosartan, irbesartan, olmesartan, telmisartan, and valsartan.

Dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers included amlodipine, felodipine, isradipine, nicardipine, and nifedipine.

Beta blockers included acebutolol, atenolol, bisoprolol, carvedilol, labetalol, metoprolol, nadolol, nebivolol, pindolol, and propranolol.

Thiazolidinediones included rosiglitazone, troglitazone, and pioglitazone.

Sulfonylureas included glipizide, glibenclamide, glibornuride, gliclazide, gliquidone, acetohexamide, tolbutamide, chlorpropamide, and tolazamide.

Lastly, we investigated the genetics of participants with Covid-19. ABO blood types of participants were inferred through their genetic profiles.[5] Participants with blood type A had increased odds of at least one positive Covid-19 test relative to blood type O participants (P = 0.003), consistent with the previously-noted association (supplementary eTable 7).[6] However, no significant associations were identified when comparing Covid-19 positive inpatients to positive outpatients. We then analyzed whether any polymorphisms in ACE2, TMPRSS2, or the HLA region were enriched in either Covid-19 positive individuals or in Covid-19 positive inpatients. We found that a single HLA variant (DQA1_509, P = 1.0 × 10−5) was enriched in Covid-19 positive cases, even after Bonferroni correction (eFigs 1 and 2). Systematic genome wide association studies were then conducted with adjustments for age, sex, and the first ten genetic principal components. No significant variants (P < 5×10−8) were identified when comparing participants with any positive Covid-19 test relative to those with no positive test (669 cases and 481,583 controls) or when comparing Covid-19 positive inpatients to positive outpatients (574 cases and 95 controls) (eFigs 3 and 4). Finally, polygenic risk scores for Covid-19 were unable to significantly stratify either Covid-19 positive individuals or the full cohort (eFigs 5 and 6).

Discussion

Multiple reports both in the United States and the United Kingdom have shown that Covid-19 is disproportionately affecting black populations.[7] In this cohort of study participants from the United Kingdom, we found that risk of Covid-19 was over fourfold higher for black participants than for white participants. Prior to this study, data fully adjusting for comorbidities in black populations had not been reported.[8] Our adjusted effect estimates, accounting for a range of comorbidities, did not nullify the risk of Covid-19 in black participants. One possible explanation for the sustained increased risk, which we were unable to control for, was the number and duration of social interactions sustained by individuals, an important consideration given the highly contagious nature of Covid-19. This study lends some support to the reported hypothesis that upregulation of angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a risk factor for Covid-19; however, adjustment for several risk factors reduced the strength of the association.[9,10] Differential effects of medications targeting the angiotensin system in black individuals may partially explain the increased prevalence of Covid-19 in black populations.[11] However, additional data is required to support this conjecture. Finally, the analysis presented herein is one of the first genetic explorations of Covid-19 positive individuals. We identified a novel association in the HLA region, and we confirmed the association of Covid-19 with blood type A. Our findings suggest that genetic drivers of Covid-19 may emerge as additional data is released.
  10 in total

1.  COVID-19 and African Americans.

Authors:  Clyde W Yancy
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Is ethnicity linked to incidence or outcomes of covid-19?

Authors:  Kamlesh Khunti; Awadhesh Kumar Singh; Manish Pareek; Wasim Hanif
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-04-20

3.  Lesser response to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor therapy in black as compared with white patients with left ventricular dysfunction.

Authors:  D V Exner; D L Dries; M J Domanski; J N Cohn
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2001-05-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Are patients with hypertension and diabetes mellitus at increased risk for COVID-19 infection?

Authors:  Lei Fang; George Karakiulakis; Michael Roth
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-11       Impact factor: 30.700

5.  Genetically Determined ABO Blood Group and its Associations With Health and Disease.

Authors:  Hilde E Groot; Laura E Villegas Sierra; M Abdullah Said; Erik Lipsic; Jacco C Karper; Pim van der Harst
Journal:  Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 8.311

6.  Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Blockers and the Risk of Covid-19.

Authors:  Giuseppe Mancia; Federico Rea; Monica Ludergnani; Giovanni Apolone; Giovanni Corrao
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Cardiovascular Disease, Drug Therapy, and Mortality in Covid-19.

Authors:  Mandeep R Mehra; Sapan S Desai; SreyRam Kuy; Timothy D Henry; Amit N Patel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2020-05-01       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Relationship between the ABO Blood Group and the COVID-19 Susceptibility.

Authors:  Jiao Zhao; Yan Yang; Hanping Huang; Dong Li; Dongfeng Gu; Xiangfeng Lu; Zheng Zhang; Lei Liu; Ting Liu; Yukun Liu; Yunjiao He; Bin Sun; Meilan Wei; Guangyu Yang; Xinghuan Wang; Li Zhang; Xiaoyang Zhou; Mingzhao Xing; Peng George Wang
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2020-08-04       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Ethnicity and COVID-19: an urgent public health research priority.

Authors:  Manish Pareek; Mansoor N Bangash; Nilesh Pareek; Daniel Pan; Shirley Sze; Jatinder S Minhas; Wasim Hanif; Kamlesh Khunti
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2020-04-21       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Antihypertensive drugs and risk of COVID-19?

Authors:  Christopher J Tignanelli; Nicholas E Ingraham; Matthew A Sparks; Ronald Reilkoff; Tamara Bezdicek; Bradley Benson; Timothy Schacker; Jeffrey G Chipman; Michael A Puskarich
Journal:  Lancet Respir Med       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 30.700

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.