| Literature DB >> 32509520 |
Hyesook Lee1, Hyun Hwang-Bo1, Seon Yeong Ji1, Min Yeong Kim1, So Young Kim1, Minji Woo2, Young-Sam Keum3, Jeong Sook Noh4, Joung-Hyun Park5, Bae-Jin Lee5, Gi-Young Kim6, Eui Kyun Park7, Young-Chae Chang8, You-Jin Jeon6, Yung Hyun Choi1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Oysters (Crassostrea gigas) are a popular marine product worldwide and have the advantage of nutritional benefits. This study aimed to investigate the effect of fermented oyster extract (FO) on growth promotion, including analysis of body size, bone microarchitecture, hematology and biochemistry in vivo.Entities:
Keywords: Fermented oyster (FO); Gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA); Insulin like growth factor-1; Recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH); Tibial growth plate
Year: 2020 PMID: 32509520 PMCID: PMC7264051 DOI: 10.1016/j.imr.2020.100412
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Integr Med Res ISSN: 2213-4220
Fig. 1Effects of FO on body weight and body length in SD rats. (A) The body weight gain of each group after 2 weeks of treatment. (B and C) The length from the nose to tail and the nose to anus of each group after 2 weeks of treatment. Scatter plot graphs show the means ± standard deviation (SD, n = 19). Statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of ANOVA-Tukey's post hoc test between groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01 and ***p < 0.001.
Changes in the Weight of Organs After 2 Weeks of Treatment
| Group | Weight of organs (g) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thymus | Heart | Lung | Liver | Kidney | Spleen | Uterus Ovary | |
| Control | 0.46 ± 0.09 | 0.60 ± 0.05 | 0.88 ± 0.09 | 6.09 ± 0.50 | 1.40 ± 0.10 | 0.45 ± 0.08 | 0.39 ± 0.07 |
| rhGH | 0.47 ± 0.07 | 0.62 ± 0.06 | 0.93 ± 0.10 | 7.88 ± 1.61 | 1.63 ± 0.29 | 0.51 ± 0.06 | 0.41 ± 0.11 |
| FO 50 | 0.48 ± 0.06 | 0.61 ± 0.03 | 0.88 ± 0.08 | 6.60 ± 0.95 | 1.42 ± 0.11 | 0.44 ± 0.02 | 0.48 ± 0.14 |
| FO 100 | 0.38 ± 0.05 | 0.57 ± 0.05 | 0.85 ± 0.08 | 6.55 ± 1.02 | 1.46 ± 0.12 | 0.43 ± 0.08 | 0.38 ± 0.06 |
Mice were sacrificed at day 14 after treatment. Thymus, heart, lung, liver, kidney, spleen, uterus, and ovary were immediately surgically excised, and the weights were then measured. The data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD, n = 19). The statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of ANOVA-Tukey's post hoc test between groups.
p < 0.05 compared to control.
Changes in the Hematological and Biochemical Profiles After 2 Weeks of Treatment
| Parameter (units) | Group | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Normal | rhGH | FO 50 | FO 100 | |
| RBC (106/μL) | 6.67 ± 0.39 | 6.60 ± 0.19 | 6.79 ± 0.15 | 6.92 ± 0.30 |
| WBC (103/μL) | 3.18 ± 0.45 | 2.85 ± 0.42 | 2.66 ± 0.96 | 3.75 ± 0.96 |
| Hematocrit (%) | 48.81 ± 2.86 | 48.69 ± 1.26 | 49.46 ± 1.41 | 50.08 ± 2.29 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 14.24 ± 0.66 | 14.04 ± 0.28 | 14.31 ± 0.49 | 14.21 ± 0.59 |
| MCV (fL) | 73.16 ± 1.52 | 73.70 ± 1.93 | 72.90 ± 1.40 | 72.56 ± 1.40 |
| MCH (pg) | 21.34 ± 0.48 | 21.36 ± 0.59 | 21.06 ± 0.63 | 20.94 ± 0.34 |
| MCHC (g/dL) | 29.16 ± 0.40 | 28.88 ± 0.44 | 28.89 ± 0.57 | 28.99 ± 0.31 |
| Platelet (103/μL) | 1101.38 ± 257.49 | 1219.63 ± 130.72 | 1222.88 ± 218.25 | 1360.38 ± 181.24 |
| ALT (U/L) | 40.70 ± 7.09 | 39.50 ± 6.87 | 35.20 ± 6.89 | 37.90 ± 6.81 |
| AST (U/L) | 100.20 ± 11.42 | 92.40 ± 14.18 | 105.10 ± 11.42 | 101.70 ± 10.14 |
| BUN (mg/dL) | 14.36 ± 2.93 | 12.52 ± 1.38 | 13.51 ± 1.62 | 12.76 ± 1.26 |
| Creatinine (mg/dL) | 0.29 ± 0.05 | 0.28 ± 0.02 | 0.29 ± 0.03 | 0.29 ± 0.03 |
| Calcium (mg/dL) | 11.45 ± 0.59 | 11.44 ± 0.31 | 11.14 ± 0.25 | 11.22 ± 0.27 |
At day 14 after treatment, whole blood and serum were analyzed for hematological and biochemical evaluation. The data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD, n = 19). The statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of ANOVA-Tukey's post hoc test between groups. All data showed that there is no statistically significant difference between groups. ALT, alanine aminotransferase; AST, aspartate aminotransferase; BUN, blood urea nitrogen, MCV, mean corpuscular volume; MCH, mean corpuscular hemoglobin; MCHC, MCH concentration; RBC, red blood cells; WBC, white blood cells.
Fig. 2Effects of FO on tibial trabecular bone microarchitecture in SD rats. Bone morphometric parameters were analyzed using high-resolution micro-computed tomography (μCT, Skyscan 1272; Kontich, Belgium). (A) Micro-CT images of tibial trabecular bone. (B) Analysis of bone morphometric parameters, such as bone volume per total volume (BV/TV), bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular thickness (Tb. Th), and trabecular number (Tb. N). The data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD, n = 19).
Fig. 3Effects of FO on the proximal tibial growth plate in SD rats. (A) Tibial length. (B, left) Representative photographs of H&E-stained chondrocytes of the proximal tibial growth plate in SD rats. (B, right) Length of the proximal tibial growth plate. The data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD, n = 19).
Fig. 4Effects of FO on growth parameters in SD rats. (A–C) Serum GH, IGFBP-3 and IGF-1 levels. The serum growth parameters were measured using ELISA kits. The data are expressed as the means ± standard deviation (SD, n = 19). The statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of ANOVA-Tukey's post hoc test. *p < 0.05 compared to control. (D) The protein expression of hepatic IGF-1. β-actin served as the loading control. (E) Bar graphs indicate the relative band density of the IGF-1 in western blot analysis. The statistical analyses were conducted using analysis of ANOVA-Tukey's post hoc test. **p < 0.01 compared to control.