Literature DB >> 31413944

Stimulatory Effects of KPR-A148 on Osteoblast Differentiation and Bone Regeneration.

Soomin Lim1, Ju Ang Kim1, Taeho Lee2, Jiwon Lim1, Doohyun Lee2, Sang-Hyeon Nam1, Eui Kyun Park1.   

Abstract

Background: Xanthine derivatives have been used to treat a variety of medical conditions including respiratory disease and neural degeneration. However, few studies have reported their effects on bone regeneration. Therefore, we investigated the effects of KPR-A148, a synthetic xanthine derivative on osteoblast differentiation in vitro and bone regeneration in vivo.
Methods: The cytotoxicity of KPR-A148 was evaluated using MC3T3-E1 cells by the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltertrazolium bromide assay. The effects of KPR-A148 on osteoblast differentiation were examined by alkaline phosphatase staining, Alizarin red S staining, and real-time PCR of osteoblast differentiation marker genes. To investigate the effects of KPR-A148 on in vivo bone regeneration, a KPR-A148-containing collagen sponge was implanted into a mouse calvarial defect and KPR-A148 was injected twice, weekly. Bone regeneration was evaluated quantitatively by micro-CT and qualitatively by hematoxylin and eosin, as well as Masson's Trichrome staining.
Results: KPR-A148 did not show toxicity in the MC3T3-E1 cells and promoted osteoblast differentiation in a concentration-dependent manner. 10 μM of KPR-A148 showed the most significant effect on alkaline phospatase staining and matrix mineralization. KPR-A148 increased the expression of osteoblast marker genes in both the early and late stages of differentiation. In addition, KPR-A148 significantly induced new bone formation in the calvarial defect model.
Conclusion: These results demonstrate that KPR-A148 strongly induces osteoblast differentiation and new bone formation. Therefore, it could be used as a potential therapeutic agent for regenerating bone following its destruction by disease or trauma.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone regeneration; Collagen sponge; Osteoblast; Xanthine derivative

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2019        PMID: 31413944      PMCID: PMC6675851          DOI: 10.1007/s13770-019-00200-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med        ISSN: 1738-2696            Impact factor:   4.169


  29 in total

Review 1.  Xanthines as adenosine receptor antagonists.

Authors:  Christa E Müller; Kenneth A Jacobson
Journal:  Handb Exp Pharmacol       Date:  2011

Review 2.  The chemodiversity of purine as a constituent of natural products.

Authors:  Helmut Rosemeyer
Journal:  Chem Biodivers       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 2.408

3.  Phosphate is a specific signal for induction of osteopontin gene expression.

Authors:  G R Beck; B Zerler; E Moran
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-07-18       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Theobromine Upregulates Osteogenesis by Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells In Vitro and Accelerates Bone Development in Rats.

Authors:  Bret H Clough; Joni Ylostalo; Elizabeth Browder; Eoin P McNeill; Thomas J Bartosh; H Ralph Rawls; Tetsuo Nakamoto; Carl A Gregory
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 5.  Propentofylline in the treatment of Alzheimer's disease and vascular dementia: a review of phase III trials.

Authors:  M Rother; T Erkinjuntti; M Roessner; B Kittner; J Marcusson; I Karlsson
Journal:  Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 2.959

Review 6.  Growth factors in bone repair.

Authors:  Valentina Devescovi; Elisa Leonardi; Gabriela Ciapetti; Elisabetta Cenni
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2008-11-29

Review 7.  Theophylline.

Authors:  Peter J Barnes
Journal:  Am J Respir Crit Care Med       Date:  2013-10-15       Impact factor: 21.405

8.  Accelerated craniofacial bone regeneration through dense collagen gel scaffolds seeded with dental pulp stem cells.

Authors:  Frédéric Chamieh; Anne-Margaux Collignon; Benjamin R Coyac; Julie Lesieur; Sandy Ribes; Jérémy Sadoine; Annie Llorens; Antonino Nicoletti; Didier Letourneur; Marie-Laure Colombier; Showan N Nazhat; Philippe Bouchard; Catherine Chaussain; Gael Y Rochefort
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Bone regeneration strategies: Engineered scaffolds, bioactive molecules and stem cells current stage and future perspectives.

Authors:  Antalya Ho-Shui-Ling; Johanna Bolander; Laurence E Rustom; Amy Wagoner Johnson; Frank P Luyten; Catherine Picart
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2018-07-11       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 10.  Bone defect animal models for testing efficacy of bone substitute biomaterials.

Authors:  Ye Li; Shu-Kui Chen; Long Li; Ling Qin; Xin-Luan Wang; Yu-Xiao Lai
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Magnesium-based materials in orthopaedics: material properties and animal models.

Authors:  Xirui Jing; Qiuyue Ding; Qinxue Wu; Weijie Su; Keda Yu; Yanlin Su; Bing Ye; Qing Gao; Tingfang Sun; Xiaodong Guo
Journal:  Biomater Transl       Date:  2021-09-28

2.  Secretoneurin, a Neuropeptide, Enhances Bone Regeneration in a Mouse Calvarial Bone Defect Model.

Authors:  Freshet Assefa; Jiwon Lim; Ju-Ang Kim; Hye Jung Ihn; Soomin Lim; Sang-Hyeon Nam; Yong Chul Bae; Eui Kyun Park
Journal:  Tissue Eng Regen Med       Date:  2020-11-03       Impact factor: 4.169

3.  Effect of fermented oyster extract on growth promotion in Sprague-Dawley rats.

Authors:  Hyesook Lee; Hyun Hwang-Bo; Seon Yeong Ji; Min Yeong Kim; So Young Kim; Minji Woo; Young-Sam Keum; Jeong Sook Noh; Joung-Hyun Park; Bae-Jin Lee; Gi-Young Kim; Eui Kyun Park; Young-Chae Chang; You-Jin Jeon; Yung Hyun Choi
Journal:  Integr Med Res       Date:  2020-04-07

4.  Resveratrol promotes osteoblastic differentiation in a rat model of postmenopausal osteoporosis by regulating autophagy.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Li-Mei Zhang; Chang Guo; Jian-Feng Han
Journal:  Nutr Metab (Lond)       Date:  2020-04-16       Impact factor: 4.169

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.