Literature DB >> 32505778

Persistent detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in patients and healthcare workers with COVID-19.

Saurabh Gombar1, Marcello Chang2, Catherine A Hogan3, James Zehnder4, Scott Boyd3, Benjamin A Pinsky3, Nigam H Shah2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines for returning health care workers (HCW) to service after a positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR test and ceasing of transmission precautions for patients is based on two general strategies. A test-based strategy that requires negative respiratory RT-PCR tests obtained after the resolution of symptoms. Alternatively, due to the limited availability of testing, many sites employ a symptom-based strategy that recommends excluding HCW from the workforce and keeping patients on contact precautions until a fixed period of time has elapsed from symptom recovery. The underlying assumption of the symptom-based strategy is that waiting for a fixed period of time is a surrogate for negative RT-PCR testing, which itself is a surrogate for the absence of shedding infectious virus.
OBJECTIVES: To better understand the appropriate length of symptom based return to work and contact precaution strategies. STUDY
DESIGN: We performed an observational analysis of 150 patients and HCW that transitioned from RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positive to negative over the course of 2 months at a US academic medical center.
RESULTS: We found that the average time to transition from RT-PCR positive to negative was 24 days after symptom onset and 10 % remained positive even 33 days after symptom onset. No difference was seen in HCW and patients.
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest until definitive evidence of the length of infective viral shedding is obtained that the fixed length of time before returning to work or ceasing contract precautions be revised to over one-month.
Copyright © 2020 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COVID-19; Healthcare workers; RT-PCR; SARS−COV-2

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32505778      PMCID: PMC7260561          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104477

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Virol        ISSN: 1386-6532            Impact factor:   3.168


Background

Health care workers (HCW) who test positive for SARS-CoV-2 via reverse transcriptase PCR (RT-PCR) of nasopharyngeal swab (NP) specimens are asked to self-quarantine and only return to work after symptoms resolve and/or a fixed duration of time has passed. Similarly, hospitalized patients with COVID-19 are subject to transmission-based precautions to limit nosocomial spread. The CDC provides guidance for HCW to return to work, and for discontinuation of transmission-based precautions in hospitalized patients, for confirmed or suspected COVID-19 infection [1]. Both of these guidelines, last updated on April 30th, offer two strategies to proceed with routine processes. A test-based strategy requires two consecutive negative respiratory RT-PCR tests obtained after the resolution of symptoms. Alternatively, due to the limited availability of testing, a symptom-based strategy recommends excluding HCW from the workforce and keeping patients on contact precautions until at least 3 days after symptomatic recovery, and at least 7 days since initial symptom onset. The underlying assumption of the symptom-based strategy is that waiting for a certain period of time is a surrogate for negative RT-PCR testing, which itself is a surrogate for the absence of shedding infectious virus. There have been several case reports and small series exploring RT-PCR positivity in COVID-19 patients suggesting that individuals can remain SARS-CoV-2 RNA positive significantly after symptom resolution [[2], [3], [4]]. Quantitative data are lacking on the extent to which such “duration of time” based exclusion is adequate to reduce transmission risk. Therefore, It remains uncertain whether current guidelines for the duration of exclusion from work and duration of contact precautions are adequate to reduce transmission.

Objectives

To better understand if the guidance to return HCW to routine activities in the absence of negative RT-PCR testing is appropriately timed by analyzing how long HCW remain positive for SARS-CoV-2.

Study design

We performed an observational analysis of 150 patients and HCW that transitioned from RT-PCR SARS-CoV-2 positive to negative over the course of 2 months at a large US academic medical center.

Results

We analyzed 33,038 RT-PCR tests performed at Stanford Healthcare (SHC) between 3/4/2020 and 4/30/2020. Tests were initially available to patients who experienced COVID related symptoms (cough, fever, runny nose, etc), travel to or through a region with known endemic COVID spread, close contact with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection, or HCW with suspected COVID exposure. After 3/17 testing was opened up to all individuals seeking care given physician discretion to order the lab test. Testing was performed using one of three emergency use authorized RT-PCR tests deployed at SHC [5,6]. Over this period 1809 (5.4 %) positive tests were obtained. Of this group, 87 patients and 63 healthcare workers had an initial positive test, follow up testing, and eventual negative test. Individuals were not included in the study if the time to their first follow-up test was greater than 1 standard deviation from the average time of a follow-up test in our dataset (cutoff of 20 days). The 150 individuals included had 380 NP RT-PCRs (2.5 tests on average per person) (Table 1).
Table 1

Selected demographics of patients and healthcare workers.

CategoryPatientsHCW
Count8763
Age (SD)57.2 (21.7)35.5 (11.1)
<655860
>=65293
Female (%)48.767.2
Mean Onset of Symptoms prior to the first test7.9 (5.3)4.6 (4.8)
Average time to first follow up17.118.5
Median time to first negative test2523
Selected demographics of patients and healthcare workers. For the patients, the average age was 57.2 years (standard deviation 21.7), with 48.7 % female. The average time from the first positive test to follow up testing was 17.1 days, and the median time for a patient to transition to negative was 25 days. For the HCW the average age was 35.5 years (standard deviation 11.1), with 67.2 % female. The average time from the first positive test to follow up testing was 18.5 and the median time for a patient to transition to negative was 23 days. The median time to transition from a positive test to a negative test was 17.5 days and 90 % of individuals had a negative RT-PCR test within 28 days of their first positive (Fig. 1a). Day of symptom onset was available for 80.1 % (121/150) of individuals, and the mean onset of symptoms was 6.1 days prior to the first positive test. From onset of symptoms, the median time to a negative RT-PCR was 24 days and the 90th percentile was 33 days. We found no demonstrable difference in the duration for which RT-PCR remained positive for HCW and patients (Fig. 1b).
Fig. 1

Duration of time for a positive RT-PCR test to turn negative.

A) 150 individuals had an initial positive RT-PCR NP test followed by an eventual negative RT-PCR NP test. The median and 90th percentile for the duration of time between the positive to negative transition was 17.5 and 28 days respectively. From the time of symptom onset, the median and 90th percentiles were 24 days and 33 days respectively. Dashed lines represent the 95 % confidence interval. B) No difference was noted between 87 patients and 63 HCW in terms of duration of time for which the RT-PCR test remained positive after symptom onset.

Duration of time for a positive RT-PCR test to turn negative. A) 150 individuals had an initial positive RT-PCR NP test followed by an eventual negative RT-PCR NP test. The median and 90th percentile for the duration of time between the positive to negative transition was 17.5 and 28 days respectively. From the time of symptom onset, the median and 90th percentiles were 24 days and 33 days respectively. Dashed lines represent the 95 % confidence interval. B) No difference was noted between 87 patients and 63 HCW in terms of duration of time for which the RT-PCR test remained positive after symptom onset.

Discussion

To date guidance for exclusion from work and length of contract precautions for patients with SARS-CoV-2 have been based on extrapolation of data from other infectious diseases. In recent weeks several publications from patient cohorts in China have demonstrated a similar length of RT-PCR positivity in both prospective and observational studies [7,8]. Our analysis is the first large cohort analysis of length of RT-PCR positivity in patients and HCW within the United States. Our findings suggest that a high proportion of individuals are persistently positive for SARS-CoV-2 RNA in NP specimens. Taking into account the mean duration of self-reported symptoms, 20 % of individuals remain RT-PCR positive for more than one month from symptom onset, and 10 % of the patients did not have a negative test until after 33 days had passed. Our study, and similarly all studies based on RT-PCR analysis do not directly measure infectivity. Our analysis could be overestimating the length of infectious spreading by detecting non-infectious viral shedding. Large trials that rely on methods that detect the infective virus (ie viral culture) have not yet been reported in the literature. Until such studies are completed we suggest that return to work and contact precaution guidelines should require negative PCR tests or assume viral shedding for 33 days following symptom onset.

Declaration of competing interest

None.
  19 in total

1.  The management of surgical patients in the emergency setting during COVID-19 pandemic: the WSES position paper.

Authors:  Belinda De Simone; Elie Chouillard; Massimo Sartelli; Walter L Biffl; Salomone Di Saverio; Ernest E Moore; Yoram Kluger; Fikri M Abu-Zidan; Luca Ansaloni; Federico Coccolini; Ari Leppänemi; Andrew B Peitzmann; Leonardo Pagani; Gustavo P Fraga; Ciro Paolillo; Edoardo Picetti; Massimo Valentino; Emmanouil Pikoulis; Gian Luca Baiocchi; Fausto Catena
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2021-03-22       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 2.  Tools and Techniques for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2)/COVID-19 Detection.

Authors:  Seyed Hamid Safiabadi Tali; Jason J LeBlanc; Zubi Sadiq; Oyejide Damilola Oyewunmi; Carolina Camargo; Bahareh Nikpour; Narges Armanfard; Selena M Sagan; Sana Jahanshahi-Anbuhi
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 26.132

3.  Prolonged persistence of SARS-CoV-2 in the upper respiratory tract of asymptomatic infected individuals.

Authors:  S Saurabh; R Kumar; M K Gupta; P Bhardwaj; V L Nag; M K Garg; S Misra
Journal:  QJM       Date:  2020-08-01

4.  Passive inhaled mRNA vaccination for SARS-Cov-2.

Authors:  Wee Song Yeo; Qin Xiang Ng
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2020-11-24       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Risk of SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Among Coworkers in a Surgical Environment.

Authors:  Mark A Parkulo; Todd M Brinker; Wendelyn Bosch; Arta Palaj; Marie L DeRuyter
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2020-10-22       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Persistence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal, blood, urine, and stool samples of patients with COVID-19: a hospital-based longitudinal study.

Authors:  Farahnaz Joukar; Tofigh Yaghubi Kalurazi; Mahmoud Khoshsorour; Sonbol Taramian; Lida Mahfoozi; Heydar Ali Balou; Alireza Jafarinezhad; Aydin Pourkazemi; Ezat Hesni; Mehrnaz Asgharnezhad; Mohammad Shenagari; Issa Jahanzad; Mohammadreza Naghipour; Saman Maroufizadeh; Fariborz Mansour-Ghanaei
Journal:  Virol J       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 4.099

7.  Duration of SARS-CoV-2 shedding: A population-based, Canadian study.

Authors:  Susan P Phillips; Xuejiao Wei; Jeffrey C Kwong; Jonathan Gubbay; Kevin L Schwartz; Anna Majury; Patti A Groome
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-06-17       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Prolonged fecal shedding of SARS-CoV-2 in a young immunocompetent COVID-19 patient: A case report and literature overview.

Authors:  Fang Xiao; Peiqi Wan; Qiuling Wei; Guiyang Wei; Yanhong Yu
Journal:  J Med Virol       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 20.693

9.  Recurrence or Relapse of COVID-19 in Older Patients: A Description of Three Cases.

Authors:  Ludovic Lafaie; Thomas Célarier; Luc Goethals; Bruno Pozzetto; Sylvain Grange; Etienne Ojardias; Cédric Annweiler; Elisabeth Botelho-Nevers
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2020-08-13       Impact factor: 7.538

Review 10.  Immunopathology of galectin-3: an increasingly promising target in COVID-19.

Authors:  John L Caniglia; Swapna Asuthkar; Andrew J Tsung; Maheedhara R Guda; Kiran K Velpula
Journal:  F1000Res       Date:  2020-09-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.