Literature DB >> 32504696

A computer-assisted algorithm for narrow-band imaging-based tissue characterization in Barrett's esophagus.

Maarten R Struyvenberg1, Albert J de Groof1, Joost van der Putten2, Fons van der Sommen2, Francisco Baldaque-Silva3, Masami Omae3, Roos Pouw1, Raf Bisschops4, Michael Vieth5, Erik J Schoon6, Wouter L Curvers6, Peter H de With2, Jacques J Bergman1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The endoscopic evaluation of narrow-band imaging (NBI) zoom imagery in Barrett's esophagus (BE) is associated with suboptimal diagnostic accuracy and poor interobserver agreement. Computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) systems may assist endoscopists in the characterization of Barrett's mucosa. Our aim was to demonstrate the feasibility of a deep-learning CAD system for tissue characterization of NBI zoom imagery in BE.
METHODS: The CAD system was first trained using 494,364 endoscopic images of general endoscopic imagery. Next, 690 neoplastic BE and 557 nondysplastic BE (NDBE) white-light endoscopy overview images were used for refinement training. Subsequently, a third dataset of 112 neoplastic and 71 NDBE NBI zoom images with histologic correlation was used for training and internal validation. Finally, the CAD system was further trained and validated with a fourth, histologically confirmed dataset of 59 neoplastic and 98 NDBE NBI zoom videos. Performance was evaluated using fourfold cross-validation. The primary outcome was the diagnostic performance of the CAD system for classification of neoplasia in NBI zoom videos.
RESULTS: The CAD system demonstrated accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity for detection of BE neoplasia using NBI zoom images of 84%, 88%, and 78%, respectively. In total, 30,021 individual video frames were analyzed by the CAD system. Accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of the video-based CAD system were 83% (95% confidence interval [CI], 78%-89%), 85% (95% CI, 76%-94%), and 83% (95% CI, 76%-90%), respectively. The mean assessment speed was 38 frames per second.
CONCLUSION: We have demonstrated promising diagnostic accuracy of predicting the presence/absence of Barrett's neoplasia on histologically confirmed unaltered NBI zoom videos with fast corresponding assessment time.
Copyright © 2021 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32504696     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.05.050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  5 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopic Management of Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Jennifer M Kolb; Sachin Wani
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2022-02-28       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Today's Mistakes and Tomorrow's Wisdom… In Barrett's Surveillance.

Authors:  Pauline A Zellenrath; Carlijn A M Roumans; Manon C W Spaander
Journal:  Visc Med       Date:  2022-03-01

3.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Artificial Intelligence (AI) to Detect Early Neoplasia in Barrett's Esophagus: A Non-comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Jin Lin Tan; Mohamed Asif Chinnaratha; Richard Woodman; Rory Martin; Hsiang-Ting Chen; Gustavo Carneiro; Rajvinder Singh
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-06-22

4.  Systematic review with meta-analysis: artificial intelligence in the diagnosis of oesophageal diseases.

Authors:  Pierfrancesco Visaggi; Brigida Barberio; Dario Gregori; Danila Azzolina; Matteo Martinato; Cesare Hassan; Prateek Sharma; Edoardo Savarino; Nicola de Bortoli
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2022-01-30       Impact factor: 9.524

Review 5.  Deep learning for diagnosis of precancerous lesions in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: A review.

Authors:  Tao Yan; Pak Kin Wong; Ye-Ying Qin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.742

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.