Literature DB >> 32502143

Detecting differential alternative splicing events in scRNA-seq with or without Unique Molecular Identifiers.

Yu Hu1, Kai Wang2,3, Mingyao Li1.   

Abstract

The emergence of single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) technology has made it possible to measure gene expression variations at cellular level. This breakthrough enables the investigation of a wider range of problems including analysis of splicing heterogeneity among individual cells. However, compared to bulk RNA-seq, scRNA-seq data are much noisier due to high technical variability and low sequencing depth. Here we propose SCATS (Single-Cell Analysis of Transcript Splicing) for differential splicing analysis in scRNA-seq, which achieves high sensitivity at low coverage by accounting for technical noise. SCATS models scRNA-seq data either with or without Unique Molecular Identifiers (UMIs). For non-UMI data, SCATS explicitly models technical noise by accounting for capture efficiency and amplification bias through the use of external spike-ins; for UMI data, SCATS models capture efficiency and further accounts for transcriptional burstiness. A key aspect of SCATS lies in its ability to group "exons" that originate from the same isoform(s). Grouping exons is essential in splicing analysis of scRNA-seq data as it naturally aggregates spliced reads across different exons, making it possible to detect splicing events even when sequencing depth is low. To evaluate the performance of SCATS, we analyzed both simulated and real scRNA-seq datasets and compared with existing methods including Census and DEXSeq. We show that SCATS has well controlled type I error rate, and is more powerful than existing methods, especially when splicing difference is small. In contrast, Census suffers from severe type I error inflation, whereas DEXSeq is more conservative. When applied to mouse brain scRNA-seq datasets, SCATS identified more differential splicing events with subtle difference across cell types compared to Census and DEXSeq. With the increasing adoption of scRNA-seq, we believe SCATS will be well-suited for various splicing studies. The implementation of SCATS can be downloaded from https://github.com/huyustats/SCATS.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32502143     DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol        ISSN: 1553-734X            Impact factor:   4.475


  5 in total

1.  SRSF1 governs progenitor-specific alternative splicing to maintain adult epithelial tissue homeostasis and renewal.

Authors:  Tingsheng Yu; Oscar Cazares; Alison D Tang; Hyun-Yi Kim; Tomas Wald; Adya Verma; Qi Liu; Mary Helen Barcellos-Hoff; Stephen N Floor; Han-Sung Jung; Angela N Brooks; Ophir D Klein
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2022-02-23       Impact factor: 12.270

2.  Isoform-level Quantification for Single-Cell RNA Sequencing.

Authors:  Lu Pan; Huy Q Dinh; Yudi Pawitan; Trung Nghia Vu
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2021-12-02       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Applications of single-cell genomics and computational strategies to study common disease and population-level variation.

Authors:  Benjamin J Auerbach; Jian Hu; Muredach P Reilly; Mingyao Li
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 9.043

4.  Robust and annotation-free analysis of alternative splicing across diverse cell types in mice.

Authors:  Gonzalo Benegas; Jonathan Fischer; Yun S Song
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-03-01       Impact factor: 8.713

5.  acorde unravels functionally interpretable networks of isoform co-usage from single cell data.

Authors:  Sonia Tarazona; Ana Conesa; Angeles Arzalluz-Luque; Pedro Salguero
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-04-05       Impact factor: 17.694

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.