Literature DB >> 3250085

Rod-cone dependence of saccadic eye-movement latency in a foveating task.

H Doma1, P E Hallett.   

Abstract

This study examines the relations between some well known oculomotor functions (saccades) and well known retinal physiology (dark adaptation): it deals with the overall latency versus target luminance functions, with the underlying rod and cone latency-luminance functions, and with the synergistic interaction between these latency functions for mesopic targets. Saccadic latency was measured to small lit targets presented at 10 deg retinal eccentricity in complete darkness. Target luminance and wavelength were varied. Additional measurements were made during dark adaptation or on backgrounds, or at different retinal eccentricities. Luminance matched stimuli and Palmer's (1968) equivalent luminance transformation were also used. Latency is determined by an achromatic luminance mechanism that receives substantial rod inputs above the cone threshold. Latencies for pure rod or pure cone inputs increase rapidly as target luminance decreases. For the rods this latency increase appears to represent the waiting time for the 140 or so photons (lambda = 507 nm) that are required for a saccade. Errors in direction occur at scotopic luminances, or at low photopic luminances when only cones are functioning.

Mesh:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3250085     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(88)90099-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  5 in total

1.  Effects of direction on saccadic performance in relation to lateral preferences.

Authors:  T S Constantinidis; N Smyrnis; I Evdokimidis; N C Stefanis; D Avramopoulos; I Giouzelis; C N Stefanis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-25       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  A noisy transform predicts saccadic and manual reaction times to changes in contrast.

Authors:  M J Taylor; R H S Carpenter; A J Anderson
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2006-04-13       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Perimetric evaluation of saccadic latency, saccadic accuracy, and visual threshold for peripheral visual stimuli in young compared with older adults.

Authors:  David E Warren; Matthew J Thurtell; Joy N Carroll; Michael Wall
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-08-27       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  An informational approach to reaction times.

Authors:  K H Norwich; C N Seburn; E Axelrad
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  When pros become cons for anti- versus prosaccades: factors with opposite or common effects on different saccade types.

Authors:  Arni Kristjánsson; Myriam W G Vandenbroucke; Jon Driver
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.