| Literature DB >> 32500012 |
Maxim Alexeevich Filatov1, Denis Alexandrovich Nikishin1,2, Yulia Vladimirovna Khramova1, Maria L'vovna Semenova1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of ovarian follicle in vitro culture is to obtain mature oocytes. To evaluate the efficiency of in vitro culture system, the status of the cultured oocyte can be analyzed.Entities:
Keywords: Alginate; In vitro culture; Mice; Oocyte; Ovarian follicle; Real-time PCR; Time-lapse microscopy
Year: 2020 PMID: 32500012 PMCID: PMC7253941
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Reprod Infertil ISSN: 2228-5482
Figure 1.Scheme representing principle steps of work
Target and reference genes selected for qRT-PCR analysis of oocytes
| NM_172301.3 | Exon 1F: 5′-TCTCGAATCGGGGAACCTC-3′ | 106 | 61.7 | |
| Exon 2R: 5′-GCGCCTGCCATACTGACC-3′ | 61.6 | |||
| NM_023243.5 | Exon 7F: 5′-AAGCTGGAGCGGTGTCATTCT-3′ | 174 | 63.2 | |
| Exon 9R: 5′-AAGTACTGCTGCGGTCATTTATT-3′ | 59.9 | |||
| NM_007659.3 | Exon 5F: 5′-CCCGGCGAGTTCTTCACA-3′ | 173 | 62.1 | |
| Exon 6R: 5′-CGAGCCCAGCAACACTTCT-3′ | 60.6 | |||
| NM_001114079.2 | Exon 13F: 5′-CCTGCGCCCCACTGACT-3′ | 123 | 61.9 | |
| Exon 14R: 5′-GTACTGCCACCGCCTCTTCTAT-3′ | 62.1 | |||
| NM_001289726.1 | Exon 5F: 5′-GACGTGCCGCCTGGAGA-3′ | 144 | 63.0 | |
| Exon 6R: 5′-GAAGAGTGGGAGTTGCTGTTGAA-3′ | 62.9 | |||
| NM_016750.3 | Exon 4–5F: 5′-ATTGCTGGTGGTGGTGTCATC-3′ | 212 | 62.3 | |
| Exon 5R: 5′-GCCTCCAACTTGCTCAAATAGAAT-3′ | 62.9 | |||
| NM_020021.2 | Exon 1F: 5′-TGTTAACGGCCTGCTTTTTC-3′ | 171 | 60.2 | |
| Exon 1R: 5′-GTGCCCCCTATGTGGTGAG-3′ | 60.3 | |||
| NM_024212.4 | Exon 1–2F: 5′-TCCCCGTCATGGCTTGTG-3′ | 169 | 62.7 | |
| Exon 2R: 5′-ACGGCATAGGGCTGTCTGTT-3′ | 61.6 | |||
| NM_201370.2 | Exon 10F: 5′-GAGCTCTCGGATGACTTTTATGGT-3′ | 186 | 62.7 | |
| Exon 11–12R: 5′-TTTCAGTTCCCTTTTCAGTGTGG-3′ | 62.8 |
Figure 2.Scheme illustrating oocyte diameter measurement
Figure 3.The box-and-whisker plot illustrating diameter of oocytes from three different groups: A–oocytes obtained from mature mice (3 months, oocyte n=71, Median=75.37 μm, IQR: 73.25–80.21), B–oocytes obtained from immature mice (3 weeks, n=85, Median=68.23 μm; Interquartile range: 64.04–70.05), C–oocytes isolated from ovarian follicles cultured for 8 days in alginate hydrogel (n=51, Median=67.07 μm, IQR: 64.42–68.47). Group B and group C oocytes are smaller than group A oocytes (p<0.01 in both cases, multiple comparisons of mean ranks), there is no difference between the diameters of group B and group C oocytes (p>0.9, multiple comparisons of mean ranks)
Figure 4.Photo of typical oocytes from three different groups: A–oocytes obtained from mature mice (3 months), B– oocytes obtained from immature mice (3 weeks), C–oocytes isolated from ovarian follicles cultured for 8 days in alginate hydrogel. The scale bar is 100 μm
Morphological stages of oocytes from three different groups after 40 hr of culture
| 0.31 (0%) | 2.31 (7%) | 29.31 (93%) | |
| 7.45 (16%) | 24.45 (53%) | 14.45 (31%) | |
| 4.21 (19%) | 8.21 (38%) | 9.21 (43%) |
A–oocytes obtained from mature mice (3 months), B–oocytes obtained from immature mice (3 weeks), C–oocytes isolated from ovarian follicles cultured for 8 days in alginate hydrogel. Group B and group C oocytes show significantly lower rates of progression to GVBD compared to group A oocytes (p=0.02 and p=0.01, correspondingly, chi-square test). Progression to MII stage was also lower in oocytes from groups B and C compared to group A oocytes (p<0.01 and p<0.01, correspondingly). There was no significant differences in progression to MII or GVBD stages between B and C groups (p=0.26 and p=0.72, correspondingly)
Median time required for the transition to different morphological stages in oocytes from three different groups
| 85 | 570 | |
| 90 | 1020 | |
| 110 | 1195 |
(A–oocytes obtained from mature mice (3 months), B–oocytes obtained from immature mice (3 weeks), C–oocytes isolated from ovarian follicles cultured for 8 days in alginate hydrogel) during in vitro culture. No differences in GVBD time occurrence have been observed across all three groups (p=0.38, Kruskal-Wallis test). Significant differences in the time required for GVBD-MII transition have been observed between group A and B (p< 0.01, multiple comparisons of mean ranks), group A and C (p<0.01, multiple comparisons of mean ranks); no significant difference in the GVBD-MII transition time was detected across groups B and C (p>0.9, multiple comparisons of mean ranks)
Figure 5.The box-and-whisker plot illustrating gene expression levels (Cdk1, Ccnb, Wee2, Ccnh, Mos and Epab– Figures 5.1–5.6, correspondingly) in oocytes from three different groups: A–oocytes obtained from mature mice (3 months, samples n=8), B–oocytes obtained from immature mice (3 weeks, n=8), C–oocytes isolated from ovarian follicles cultured for 8 days in alginate hydrogel (n=6). Figure 5.1-Cdk1: group A (Median= 0.96, IQR 0.83–1.06), group B (Median=0.90, IQR 0.51–1.25), group C (Median=0.88, IQR 0.55–1.01), no differences were found in the expression levels across three groups (p=0.69, Kruskal-Wallis test); Figure 5.2-Ccnb: group A (Median= 0,50, IQR 0.31–0.86), group B (Median=0,42, IQR 0.18–1.07), group C (Median= 0,42, IQR 0.31–0.56), no differences were found in the expression levels across three groups (p=0.91); Figure 5.3-Wee2: group A (Median=1.88, IQR 1.11–2.94), group B (Median= 0.94, IQR 0.46–2.58), group C (Median=2.12, IQR 0.95–3.17), no differences were found in the expression levels across three groups (p=0.29); Figure 5.4-Ccnh: group A (Median=1.17, IQR 0.93–1.30), group B (Median=1.26, IQR 0.64–1.65), group C (Median=0.38, IQR 0.32–0.41), statistically significant differences were found between groups A and C, B and C (p=0.01 and p=0.03, correspondingly, multiple comparisons of mean ranks), no differences were found in the expression levels between groups A and B (p>0.9, multiple comparisons of mean ranks); Figure 5.5-Mos: group A (Median=11.52, IQR 7.29–15.10), group B (Median=4.29, IQR 1.38–6.55), group C (Median= 6.24, IQR 4.69–11.57), statistically significant differences were found between groups A and B (p<0.01, multiple comparisons of mean ranks), no differences were found in the expression levels between groups A and C (p=0.89, multiple comparisons of mean ranks), B and C (p=0.51, multiple comparisons of mean ranks); Figure 5.6-Epab: group A (Median= 0.92, IQR 0.58–1.35), group B (Median=0.75, IQR 0.54–1.10), group C (Median=0.27, IQR 0.17–0.41), statistically significant differences were found between groups A and C, B and C (p=0.02 in both cases, multiple comparisons of mean ranks), no differences were found in the expression levels between groups A and B (p>0.9, multiple comparisons of mean ranks)
Figure 6.The box-and-whisker plot illustrating diameter (μm) of ovarian follicles cultured in 5% FCS medium (Cultured follicles n=51) vs. 10% FCS (Cultured follicles n=28) medium on day 8. No statistically significant differences between these two groups were observed (p=0.23, Mann-Whitney U-test). 5% FCS: Median=125.27, IQR 96.20–209.31; 10% FCS: Median=110.11, IQR 82.54–180.23