| Literature DB >> 32499162 |
Cheryl M Corcoran1, Vijay A Mittal2, Carrie E Bearden3, Raquel E Gur4, Kasia Hitczenko5, Zarina Bilgrami1, Aleksandar Savic6, Guillermo A Cecchi7, Phillip Wolff8.
Abstract
Human ratings of conceptual disorganization, poverty of content, referential cohesion and illogical thinking have been shown to predict psychosis onset in prospective clinical high risk (CHR) cohort studies. The potential value of linguistic biomarkers has been significantly magnified, however, by recent advances in natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning (ML). Such methodologies allow for the rapid and objective measurement of language features, many of which are not easily recognized by human raters. Here we review the key findings on language production disturbance in psychosis. We also describe recent advances in the computational methods used to analyze language data, including methods for the automatic measurement of discourse coherence, syntactic complexity, poverty of content, referential coherence, and metaphorical language. Linguistic biomarkers of psychosis risk are now undergoing cross-validation, with attention to harmonization of methods. Future directions in extended CHR networks include studies of sources of variance, and combination with other promising biomarkers of psychosis risk, such as cognitive and sensory processing impairments likely to be related to language. Implications for the broader study of social communication, including reciprocal prosody, face expression and gesture, are discussed.Entities:
Keywords: Automated language analysis; Clinical high risk; Digital phenotyping; Discourse coherence; Latent semantic analysis; Machine learning; Natural language processing; Psychosis; Psychosis risk; Referential coherence; Schizophrenia; Semantic coherence; Semantic density; Ultra high risk
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32499162 PMCID: PMC7704556 DOI: 10.1016/j.schres.2020.04.032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Schizophr Res ISSN: 0920-9964 Impact factor: 4.939