| Literature DB >> 35865304 |
Przemysław Zakowicz1,2, Maria Skibińska1, Joanna Pawlak1.
Abstract
A recent view on schizophrenia phenomenology underlines the impaired relations between the mind and the body. An aberrant feeling of ipseity may be the real source of suffering of the patients from psychosis and impacts general symptomatology. The disturbed connection between thinking processes and environmental stimuli may lead to language disembodiment. In the study, we aimed to experimentally test the presence of disembodied language and investigate its association with symptoms of psychosis in adolescents diagnosed with early-onset schizophrenia spectrum disorders. Assessment of language embodiment was conducted using the Zabór Verbal Task (ZVT) with concurrent linguistic and clinical assessment using the Thought, Language, and Communication Scale (TLCS) and Positive and Negative Symptoms Scale (PANSS). The study group of patients (n = 31) aged 11-18 years, with the diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum according to Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) and the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) criteria, was compared with a sex- and age-matched healthy control sample (n = 31). Patients with psychosis made more errors in ZVT than healthy controls (p = 0.01) and this parameter did not improve after 6-8 weeks of standard treatment (p = 0.55). A higher number of errors in ZVT were associated with the presence of auditory hallucinations (odds ratio [OR] 1.14; 95% CI 1.02-1.26). ZVT errors coincided with perception disorders, alternatively to the TLCS scores where we observed association with abnormal beliefs. The results of these preliminary studies indicate the value of the phenomenological approach in the diagnosis of schizophrenia spectrum and suggest a potential involvement of language disembodiment in symptomatology.Entities:
Keywords: disembodiment; language; phenomenology; psychosis; schizophrenia
Year: 2022 PMID: 35865304 PMCID: PMC9294146 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2022.888844
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychiatry ISSN: 1664-0640 Impact factor: 5.435
Demographic and clinical data (SCID items).
|
| ||
|---|---|---|
| Age (min.-max; mean | 11–18; 14 (±1.94) | 12-18; 15 (±1.67) |
| Sex | Male ( | Male ( |
| Family history of schizophrenia | 4 | |
| Family history psychiatric disease in I and II degree | 14 | |
| Disease type ( | SCH ( | |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Reference | 19 (61.29) | |
| Persecutory | 14 (45.16) | |
| Grandiose | 1 (3.23) | |
| Somatic | 2 (6.45) | |
| Religious | 5 (16.13) | |
| Being controlled | 22 (70.97) | |
| Bizarre | 19 (61.29) | |
|
| ||
| Auditory | 19 (61.29) | |
| Visual | 14 (45.16) | |
| Tactile | 7 (22.58) | |
| Other | 4 (12.90) | |
|
| ||
| Avolition | 27 (87.10) | |
| Alogia | 26 (83.87) | |
| Affective blunting | 30 (96.77) | |
SCH, schizophrenia; SF, schizophreniform disorder; NOS, psychotic disorder none otherwise specified; ex, exclusion criterion.
p = 0.13,
p= 0.38.
Figure 1Differences in Zabór Verbal Task (ZVT) results between early-onset psychosis patients at baseline vs. after treatment vs. healthy controls (logistic regression).
Mann-Whitney U analysis of Zabór Verbal Task (ZVT) and Thought, Language, and Communication Scale (TLCS) scores in relation to psychotic symptoms (Operational Criteria for Psychotic Symptoms [OPCRIT] items).
|
|
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
| ||||||||
| Thought echo | 1.29 | 0.19 | 1.27 | 0.2 | 0.88 | 0.38 | 0.95 | 0.34 |
| Third person auditory hallucinations | 2.04 |
| 2.23 |
| 0.02 | 0.99 | 0.07 | 0.94 |
| Running commentary voices | 1.8 | 0.07 | 1.5 | 0.13 | 0.75 | 0.45 | 0.07 | 0.94 |
| Abusive/accusatory/persecutory voices | 3.0 |
| 2.05 |
| −1.99 |
| 0.33 | 0.74 |
| Other (non–affective) auditory hallucinations | 1.03 | 0.3 | 0.05 | 0.96 | 1.62 | 0.11 | −1.37 | 0.17 |
| Non–affective hallucination in any modality | 0.63 | 0.53 | 0.1 | 0.92 | 1.77 | 0.08 | −0.51 | 0.61 |
|
| ||||||||
| Persecutory delusions | −0.28 | 0.78 | −0.78 | 0.44 | −1.07 | 0.28 | −0.68 | 0.50 |
| Delusions of influence | 0.12 | 0.91 | −0.17 | 0.86 | 0.67 | 0.50 | −1.22 | 0.21 |
| Bizarre delusions | −0.35 | 0.74 | 0.58 | 0.56 | 2.13 |
| −0.71 | 0.48 |
| Delusions of passivity | 0.61 | 0.22 | 0.68 | 0.50 | 0.45 | 0.65 | −1.21 | 0.22 |
| Primary delusional perception | 0.18 | 0.86 | −0.74 | 0.46 | −2.46 |
| 1.39 | 0.17 |
| Other primary delusions | −0.26 | 0.79 | 0.59 | 0.55 | −3.38 |
| 0.21 | 0.83 |
| Thought insertion delusions | −0.39 | 0.70 | −0.85 | 0.39 | 1.97 |
| −0.77 | 0.44 |
| Thought withdrawal delusions | 0.04 | 0.97 | −0.40 | 0.70 | 2.14 |
| −0.17 | 0.86 |
| Thought broadcasting delusions | 0.02 | 0.98 | −0.56 | 0.57 | 2.17 |
| 0.02 | 0.99 |
Bolded: statistically significant.
Figure 2An impaired embodiment of language may lead to compensatory delusional belief about external influence on patient's inner processes. In a healthy state (left), the connection of language with bodily sensations provides self-integrity. Patients with schizophrenia (right), due to disrupted language-body connection, may perceive their own thoughts as unfamiliar.