Literature DB >> 32498999

Early detection of sepsis utilizing deep learning on electronic health record event sequences.

Simon Meyer Lauritsen1, Mads Ellersgaard Kalør2, Emil Lund Kongsgaard2, Katrine Meyer Lauritsen3, Marianne Johansson Jørgensen4, Jeppe Lange5, Bo Thiesson6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The timeliness of detection of a sepsis incidence in progress is a crucial factor in the outcome for the patient. Machine learning models built from data in electronic health records can be used as an effective tool for improving this timeliness, but so far, the potential for clinical implementations has been largely limited to studies in intensive care units. This study will employ a richer data set that will expand the applicability of these models beyond intensive care units. Furthermore, we will circumvent several important limitations that have been found in the literature: (1) Model evaluations neglect the clinical consequences of a decision to start, or not start, an intervention for sepsis. (2) Models are evaluated shortly before sepsis onset without considering interventions already initiated. (3) Machine learning models are built on a restricted set of clinical parameters, which are not necessarily measured in all departments. (4) Model performance is limited by current knowledge of sepsis, as feature interactions and time dependencies are hard-coded into the model.
METHODS: In this study, we present a model to overcome these shortcomings using a deep learning approach on a diverse multicenter data set. We used retrospective data from multiple Danish hospitals over a seven-year period. Our sepsis detection system is constructed as a combination of a convolutional neural network and a long short-term memory network. We assess model quality by standard concepts of accuracy as well as clinical usefulness, and we suggest a retrospective assessment of interventions by looking at intravenous antibiotics and blood cultures preceding the prediction time.
RESULTS: Results show performance ranging from AUROC 0.856 (3 h before sepsis onset) to AUROC 0.756 (24 h before sepsis onset). Evaluating the clinical utility of the model, we find that a large proportion of septic patients did not receive antibiotic treatment or blood culture at the time of the sepsis prediction, and the model could, therefore, facilitate such interventions at an earlier point in time.
CONCLUSION: We present a deep learning system for early detection of sepsis that can learn characteristics of the key factors and interactions from the raw event sequence data itself, without relying on a labor-intensive feature extraction work. Our system outperforms baseline models, such as gradient boosting, which rely on specific data elements and therefore suffer from many missing values in our dataset.
Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Clinical decision support systems; Early diagnosis; Electronic health records; Machine learning; Medical informatics; Sepsis

Year:  2020        PMID: 32498999     DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2020.101820

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  13 in total

1.  Identifying infected patients using semi-supervised and transfer learning.

Authors:  Fereshteh S Bashiri; John R Caskey; Anoop Mayampurath; Nicole Dussault; Jay Dumanian; Sivasubramanium V Bhavani; Kyle A Carey; Emily R Gilbert; Christopher J Winslow; Nirav S Shah; Dana P Edelson; Majid Afshar; Matthew M Churpek
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2022-09-12       Impact factor: 7.942

2.  Error and Timeliness Analysis for Using Machine Learning to Predict Asthma Hospital Visits: Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Xiaoyi Zhang; Gang Luo
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2022-06-08

3.  Performance effectiveness of vital parameter combinations for early warning of sepsis-an exhaustive study using machine learning.

Authors:  Ekanath Srihari Rangan; Rahul Krishnan Pathinarupothi; Kanwaljeet J S Anand; Michael P Snyder
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2022-10-14

4.  Leveraging the potential of machine learning for assessing vascular ageing: state-of-the-art and future research.

Authors:  Vasiliki Bikia; Terence Fong; Rachel E Climie; Rosa-Maria Bruno; Bernhard Hametner; Christopher Mayer; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Peter H Charlton
Journal:  Eur Heart J Digit Health       Date:  2021-10-18

5.  Precision medicine in anesthesiology.

Authors:  Laleh Jalilian; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  Int Anesthesiol Clin       Date:  2020

6.  MGP-AttTCN: An interpretable machine learning model for the prediction of sepsis.

Authors:  Margherita Rosnati; Vincent Fortuin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-05-07       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Artificial Intelligence for Clinical Decision Support in Sepsis.

Authors:  Miao Wu; Xianjin Du; Raymond Gu; Jie Wei
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-05-13

8.  Early Detection of Sepsis With Machine Learning Techniques: A Brief Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Alessio Signori; Filippo Del Puente; Sara Mora; Luca Carmisciano; Federica Briano; Antonio Vena; Lorenzo Ball; Chiara Robba; Paolo Pelosi; Mauro Giacomini; Matteo Bassetti
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-12

9.  Validation of a machine learning algorithm for early severe sepsis prediction: a retrospective study predicting severe sepsis up to 48 h in advance using a diverse dataset from 461 US hospitals.

Authors:  Hoyt Burdick; Eduardo Pino; Denise Gabel-Comeau; Carol Gu; Jonathan Roberts; Sidney Le; Joseph Slote; Nicholas Saber; Emily Pellegrini; Abigail Green-Saxena; Jana Hoffman; Ritankar Das
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2020-10-27       Impact factor: 2.796

10.  Cohort profile: CROSS-TRACKS: a population-based open cohort across healthcare sectors in Denmark.

Authors:  Anders Hammerich Riis; Pia Kjær Kristensen; Matilde Grøndahl Petersen; Ninna Hinchely Ebdrup; Simon Meyer Lauritsen; Marianne Johansson Jørgensen
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-10-29       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.