Literature DB >> 36267121

Performance effectiveness of vital parameter combinations for early warning of sepsis-an exhaustive study using machine learning.

Ekanath Srihari Rangan1, Rahul Krishnan Pathinarupothi2, Kanwaljeet J S Anand3, Michael P Snyder1.   

Abstract

Objective: To carry out exhaustive data-driven computations for the performance of noninvasive vital signs heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), and temperature (Temp), considered both independently and in all possible combinations, for early detection of sepsis. Materials and methods: By extracting features interpretable by clinicians, we applied Gradient Boosted Decision Tree machine learning on a dataset of 2630 patients to build 240 models. Validation was performed on a geographically distinct dataset. Relative to onset, predictions were clocked as per 16 pairs of monitoring intervals and prediction times, and the outcomes were ranked.
Results: The combination of HR and Temp was found to be a minimal feature set yielding maximal predictability with area under receiver operating curve 0.94, sensitivity of 0.85, and specificity of 0.90. Whereas HR and RR each directly enhance prediction, the effects of SpO2 and Temp are significant only when combined with HR or RR. In benchmarking relative to standard methods Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), National Early Warning Score (NEWS), and quick-Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA), Vital-SEP outperformed all 3 of them.
Conclusion: It can be concluded that using intensive care unit data even 2 vital signs are adequate to predict sepsis upto 6 h in advance with promising accuracy comparable to standard scoring methods and other sepsis predictive tools reported in literature. Vital-SEP can be used for fast-track prediction especially in limited resource hospital settings where laboratory based hematologic or biochemical assays may be unavailable, inaccurate, or entail clinically inordinate delays. A prospective study is essential to determine the clinical impact of the proposed sepsis prediction model and evaluate other outcomes such as mortality and duration of hospital stay.
© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Medical Informatics Association.

Entities:  

Keywords:  XGBoost; machine learning; sepsis prediction; vitals parameters

Year:  2022        PMID: 36267121      PMCID: PMC9566305          DOI: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooac080

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMIA Open        ISSN: 2574-2531


  31 in total

1.  A permutation test to compare receiver operating characteristic curves.

Authors:  E S Venkatraman
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  PhysioBank, PhysioToolkit, and PhysioNet: components of a new research resource for complex physiologic signals.

Authors:  A L Goldberger; L A Amaral; L Glass; J M Hausdorff; P C Ivanov; R G Mark; J E Mietus; G B Moody; C K Peng; H E Stanley
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2000-06-13       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).

Authors:  Mervyn Singer; Clifford S Deutschman; Christopher Warren Seymour; Manu Shankar-Hari; Djillali Annane; Michael Bauer; Rinaldo Bellomo; Gordon R Bernard; Jean-Daniel Chiche; Craig M Coopersmith; Richard S Hotchkiss; Mitchell M Levy; John C Marshall; Greg S Martin; Steven M Opal; Gordon D Rubenfeld; Tom van der Poll; Jean-Louis Vincent; Derek C Angus
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Time to Treatment and Mortality during Mandated Emergency Care for Sepsis.

Authors:  Christopher W Seymour; Foster Gesten; Hallie C Prescott; Marcus E Friedrich; Theodore J Iwashyna; Gary S Phillips; Stanley Lemeshow; Tiffany Osborn; Kathleen M Terry; Mitchell M Levy
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2017-05-21       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score for predicting outcome in patients with severe sepsis and evidence of hypoperfusion at the time of emergency department presentation.

Authors:  Alan E Jones; Stephen Trzeciak; Jeffrey A Kline
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 7.598

6.  Development and Evaluation of a Machine Learning Model for the Early Identification of Patients at Risk for Sepsis.

Authors:  Ryan J Delahanty; JoAnn Alvarez; Lisa M Flynn; Robert L Sherwin; Spencer S Jones
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2019-01-17       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  When and how should multiple imputation be used for handling missing data in randomised clinical trials - a practical guide with flowcharts.

Authors:  Janus Christian Jakobsen; Christian Gluud; Jørn Wetterslev; Per Winkel
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2017-12-06       Impact factor: 4.615

8.  LiSep LSTM: A Machine Learning Algorithm for Early Detection of Septic Shock.

Authors:  Josef Fagerström; Magnus Bång; Daniel Wilhelms; Michelle S Chew
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-10-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Early Detection of Sepsis With Machine Learning Techniques: A Brief Clinical Perspective.

Authors:  Daniele Roberto Giacobbe; Alessio Signori; Filippo Del Puente; Sara Mora; Luca Carmisciano; Federica Briano; Antonio Vena; Lorenzo Ball; Chiara Robba; Paolo Pelosi; Mauro Giacomini; Matteo Bassetti
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-02-12

10.  Machine learning for early detection of sepsis: an internal and temporal validation study.

Authors:  Armando D Bedoya; Joseph Futoma; Meredith E Clement; Kristin Corey; Nathan Brajer; Anthony Lin; Morgan G Simons; Michael Gao; Marshall Nichols; Suresh Balu; Katherine Heller; Mark Sendak; Cara O'Brien
Journal:  JAMIA Open       Date:  2020-04-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.