| Literature DB >> 32498221 |
Jia-Feng Chang1,2,3,4,5,6, Chih-Yu Hsieh2,7,8, Kuo-Cheng Lu9,10, Yue-Wen Chen11, Shih-Shin Liang12,13, Chih-Cheng Lin14, Chi-Feng Hung15, Jian-Chiun Liou7, Mai-Szu Wu1,16.
Abstract
The nephrotoxicity of aristolochic acids (AAs), p-cresyl sulfate (PCS) and indoxyl sulfate (IS) were well-documented, culminating in tubulointerstitial fibrosis (TIF), advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD) and fatal urothelial cancer. Nonetheless, information regarding the attenuation of AAs-induced nephropathy (AAN) and uremic toxin retention is scarce. Propolis is a versatile natural product, exerting anti-oxidant, anti-cancer and anti-fibrotic properties. We aimed to evaluate nephroprotective effects of propolis extract (PE) in a murine model. AAN was developed to retain circulating PCS and IS using C57BL/6 mice, mimicking human CKD. The kidney sizes/masses, renal function indicators, plasma concentrations of PCS/IS, tissue expressions of TIF, α-SMA, collagen IaI, collagen IV and signaling pathways in transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family were analyzed among the control, PE, AAN, and AAN-PE groups. PE ameliorated AAN-induced renal atrophy, renal function deterioration, TIF, plasma retention of PCS and IS. PE also suppressed α-SMA expression and deposition of collagen IaI and IV in the fibrotic epithelial-mesenchymal transition. Notably, PE treatment in AAN model inhibited not only SMAD 2/3-dependent pathways but also SMAD-independent JNK/ERK activation in the signaling cascades of TGF-β family. Through disrupting fibrotic epithelial-mesenchymal transition and TGF-β signaling transduction pathways, PE improves TIF and thereby facilitates renal excretion of PCS and IS in AAN. In light of multi-faced toxicity of AAs, PE may be capable of developing a new potential drug to treat CKD patients exposed to AAs.Entities:
Keywords: aristolochic acid; chronic kidney disease; propolis extract; transforming growth factor-β; tubulointerstitial fibrosis; uremic toxins
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32498221 PMCID: PMC7354564 DOI: 10.3390/toxins12060364
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1Working model of AAN mouse and identifying renal function decline and uremic cachexia. (A) Mice were randomized into four groups: Group I (control; IP injection of vehicle (DMSO) once every 3 days for 6 weeks and orally administered with vehicle (distilled water, 200 μL) everyday, 12 weeks; n = 6). Group II (PE alone; IP injection of vehicle and orally administered with PE (0.2 mg/kg in 200 μL vehicle), 12 weeks; n = 6). Group III (AAN; IP injection of AAI and orally administered with vehicle (200 μL) everyday, 12 weeks; n = 6), Group IV (PE + AAI treatment; IP injection of AAI and orally administered with PE, 12 weeks; n = 6). (B) Plasma concentration of Cr correlates with BUN, PCS, IS and impaired urinary excretion of waste products (Group I-III, n = 18). (C) BW negatively correlates with BUN, Cr and uremic toxins, indicative of uremic cachexia. Data are expressed as * p < 0.05 and ** p < 0.01 to compare the differences between the two indicated variables. AAI = aristolochic acid I; AAN = aristolochic acid nephropathy; BUN = blood urea nitrogen; BW = body weight; Cr = creatinine; IS = indoxyl sulfate; PCS = p-cresyl sulfate; UCr = urine creatinine; UUN = urine urea nitrogen.
Figure 2Comparisons of BW, kidney size and weight, and the histopathological evaluation of H&E stain among the control, PE, AAN and AAN-PE treatment groups. (A) BW of C57BL/6 mice with AAN treatment were lower than those without AAN. (B,C) AAN group without PE treatment exhibited the smallest kidney size and mass, and PE treatment ameliorated such renal atrophy. (D) H&E stain showed renal tubular cells in AAN group exhibited the most prominent cytoplasmic vacuolation, loss of cell-cell adhesion, apical-basal polarity and necrosis- irreversible cellular change with eventual sloughing and cell loss. n = 6 in each group; ** p < 0.01, to compare the differences between the two indicated groups. AAN = aristolochic acid nephropathy; BW = body weight; PE = propolis extract.
Figure 3Comparisons of renal function indicators and plasma concentrations of uremic toxins (IS and pCS) among the control, PE, AAN and AAN-PE treatment groups. (A,B) The urine excretion capacity of UUN and creatinine in C57BL/6 mice with AAN were lowest, and PE treatment improved above renal function indicators. (C,D) AAN group without PE treatment exhibited the highest plasma concentration of BUN and creatinine, and PE treatment improved above renal function indicators. (E,F) AAN group without PE treatment exhibited the highest accumulation of IS and pCS in plasma, and PE treatment improved such retention of uremic solutes. AAN = aristolochic acid nephropathy; BUN = blood urea nitrogen; IS = indoxyl sulfate; pCS = p-cresyl sulfate; PE = propolis extract; UUN = urine urea nitrogen. n = 6 in each group; *** p < 0.001, ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 to compare the differences between the two indicated groups.
Figure 4Tissue expressions of TIF, fibrotic EMT and TGF-β signaling transduction pathways among the control, PE, AAN and AAN-PE treatment groups. (A) C57BL/6 mice with AAN exhibited the most prominent TIF in Masson’s trichrome stain, and PE treatment ameliorated such renal injury. (B) PE treatment suppressed α-SMA expression and deposition of Col IaI and IV in the fibrotic EMT. (C–I) PE treatment attenuated not only SMAD 2/3-dependent pathways but also SMAD-independent JNK/ERK activation in the signaling cascades of TGF-β family. AAI = aristolochic acid I; AAN = aristolochic acid nephropathy; Col = collagen; TGF-β = transforming growth factor-β; PE = propolis extract; TIF = tubulointerstitial fibrosis. n = 6 in each group; ** p < 0.01 and * p < 0.05 to compare the differences between the two indicated groups.
Figure 5Illustrating potential therapeutic mechanisms of PE for AA-I induced CKD progression and uremic toxin retention.