| Literature DB >> 32494667 |
Yangwu Chen1,2,3,4, Weiliang Shen1,2,3,4, Chenqi Tang1,2,3,4, Jiayun Huang1,2,3,4, Chunmei Fan1,2,3,4, Zi Yin1,2,3,4, Yejun Hu1,2,3,4, Weishan Chen1,2,3,4, Hongwei Ouyang1,2,3,4, Yiting Zhou1,5, Zhengwei Mao6, Xiao Chen1,2,3,4.
Abstract
Heterotopic ossification (HO) in connective tissues like tendons and ligaments severely damages tissue structure. The pathogenesis of HO remains unclear but may involve mTOR. The results presented here indicate that tendon stem/progenitor cells do not undergo osteochondrogenic differentiation when mTOR signaling is inactivated by gene knockout or rapamycin (RAPA) treatment. Meanwhile, it is necessary to deliver RAPA to the injured sites and avoid disturbing the normal tendon. A RAPA delivery system, developed using collagen hybrid peptide (CHP) to modify the surface of poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) (PLGA) nanoparticles, targeted RAPA specifically to pathological tendon collagen. The CHP-PLGA-RAPA nanoparticles showed excellent pathological collagen affinity, sustained-release ability, and bioactivity. In a mouse model of tendon HO, CHP-PLGA-RAPA nanoparticles specifically bound to pathological tendon and strongly suppressed HO progression. The mTOR signaling pathway appears to be a viable therapeutic target for tendon HO, and CHP-PLGA nanoparticles may be valuable for the treatment of tendon-related diseases.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32494667 PMCID: PMC7239699 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.aay9526
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Adv ISSN: 2375-2548 Impact factor: 14.136
Fig. 1The mTOR signaling pathway is required in tendon HO.
(A and B) Micro-CT imaging and quantitative analysis of the Achilles tendon from WT and mTOR knockout (mTOR-TKO) mice. n = 10. Scale bar, 2 mm. (C to F) HE, Masson, and SO staining and histological score evaluation of WT and mTOR-TKO mice. n = 10. Scale bar, 50 μm. (G and H) ALP staining and positive rate of cells cultured in an osteogenic medium for 7 days. n = 3. Scale bars, 100 μm. (I and J) ARS staining and optical density (OD) value of cells cultured in the osteogenic medium for 14 days. n = 3. Scale bar, 200 μm. (K) Light microscopy of cells cultured in the chondrogenic medium for 3 days. BV, bone volume.
Fig. 2RNA-seq analysis of tendon between WT and mTOR-knockout (mTOR-TKO) mice.
(A) Volcano plot of gene expression (mTOR-TKO versus WT; fold change, ≥2; q value < 0.05). (B) Heat map of differentiated expression genes. (C) GO analysis of differentially expressed genes. (D and E) GSEA of the genes associated with mTOR signaling and BMP signaling. NES, normalized enrichment score; FDR, false discovery rate; KO, knockout.
Fig. 3RAPA inhibited osteogenesis and chondrogenesis of TSPCs induced by IL-1β.
(A) Cell proliferation of TSPCs when cultured with different concentrations of RAPA. (B) The protein expression of mTOR signaling pathway, including p-mTOR, mTOR, p-S6, S6, and the reference protein α-tubulin. (C and D) Alcian blue and SO staining of TSPCs cultured in the chondrogenic medium for 14 days. Scale bars, 50 μm. (E and F) ALP and ARS staining of TSPCs cultured in the osteogenic medium for 7 and 14 days, respectively. Scale bars, 50 and 200 μm, respectively. (G) Optical density (blue) of Alcian blue staining. n = 3. ns, not significant. (H) Optical density (red) of SO staining. n = 3. (I) Positive rate of ALP staining. n = 3. (J) Optical density value of ARS staining. n = 3.
Fig. 4Characterization of CHP-PLGA nanoparticles.
(A and B) TEM and SEM images of PLGA and CHP-PGLA nanoparticles. Scale bars, 1 μm. (C) Zeta potential of PLGA and CHP-PLGA nanoparticles. n = 4. (D) Size distribution of PLGA and CHP-PLGA nanoparticles. (E and F) CHP density at various feeding concentrations and different times. n = 4. (G) Drug release from PLGA and CHP-PLGA nanoparticles over the course of 10 days. n = 4. (H) TEM of CHP-PLGA binding to intact and injured collagen. (I) SEM of CHP-PLGA binding to intact and injured tendon.
Fig. 5In vivo assessment of pathological tendon-affinity ability of CHP-PLGA nanoparticles in a mouse model of tendon HO.
(A) In vivo fluorescence images of injured Achilles tendon after subcutaneous injection of nanoparticles. Scale bars, 1 cm. (B and C) Total radiant efficiency and percentage of signal preservation of nanoparticles at different time points. n = 5.
Fig. 6In vivo assessment of pathological tendon protection ability of CHP-PLGA-RAPA nanoparticles in a mouse model of tendon HO.
(A) Animal experiment design. (B and C) micro-CT images of the Achilles tendon at 6 weeks after HO modeling and quantitative analysis. n = 10. Scale bar, 2 mm. (D to G) HE, Masson, and SO staining and histological score evaluation of the Achilles tendon at 6 weeks. n = 10. Scale bars, 50 μm.
| Mouse | Forward | CCTTCTGCCTCAGCAACCAG |
| Mouse | Forward | CCCCGGACATCGGATCTACTA |
| Mouse | Forward | GGGTGGTCCCGCAAGTGAAGGTG |
| Mouse | Forward | AGACTCACAGCCGAGTAGGA |
| Mouse | Forward | CAATGTCTACACCGTCCCTGA |
| Mouse | Forward | AACCCGAGGTATGCTTGATCT |
| Mouse | Forward | GCCTCCCAGAACATTACATAC |
| Mouse | Forward | CGTGCTCTGCTTATGGCGTTG |
| Mouse | Forward | CAGCGCCTTCAATCCTCAAG |
| Mouse | Forward | GCCACACCTACAACCAGTATACA |
| Mouse | Forward | ATACGGCTACAGCAACAGGG |