| Literature DB >> 32492866 |
Hwan-Hee Jang1, Ji Hyun Bae1, Mi-Ju Kim1, Mi Young Park1, Haeng Ran Kim1, Young-Min Lee2.
Abstract
Estrogen deficiency is associated with obesity, dyslipidemia, and increased insulin resistance in postmenopausal women. An efficient therapeutic agent prevents or improves postmenopausal conditions induced by estrogen deficiency. Here, we investigated the effects of aqueous Agrimonia pilosa Ledeb. extract on glucose and lipid metabolism in ovariectomized rats fed a high-fat diet (HFD). Female Sprague-Dawley rats were sham-operated or ovariectomized, and 3 weeks later were assigned to the following groups: sham-operated + HFD (S); ovariectomized + HFD (OVX); and ovariectomized + HFD with 0.5% A. pilosa aqueous extract (OVX + 0.5A) groups. Ovariectomy significantly increased body weight and dietary intake relative to the S group. However, A. pilosa treatment did not significantly affect weight gain or dietary intake. Blood triacylglycerol, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels tended to decrease in the A. pilosa-supplemented group. Blood glucose levels were significantly lower in the OVX + 0.5A group than those in the OVX group. Blood adiponectin and insulin concentrations increased significantly after A. pilosa treatment in the ovariectomized group. A. pilosa supplementation tended to decrease liver weights and prevented lipid accumulation. These effects correlated with reduced hepatic expression of lipogenesis-related genes (fatty acid synthase, acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase alpha, and 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase). Therefore, A. pilosa may improve metabolic disorders in ovariectomized rats.Entities:
Keywords: Agrimonia pilosa; hepatic steatosis; high-fat diet; hyperglycemia; ovariectomy.
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32492866 PMCID: PMC7352636 DOI: 10.3390/nu12061631
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Effects of A. pilosa on body weight, weight gain, food intake, and FER of rats.
| S 1 | OVX | OVX + 0.5A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial body weight (BW), g | 276.2 ± 2.8 2,NS,3 | 276.2 ± 2.8 | 276.2 ± 2.8 |
| OVX (at 0 week) BW, g | 288.5 ± 6.6 b | 334.3 ± 6.4 a | 338.0 ± 8.4 a |
| Final BW (after 4 weeks), g | 336.6 ± 11.8 b | 393.8 ± 9.1 a | 389.4 ± 6.1 a |
| Weight gain (after 4 weeks), g | 48.1 ± 8.3 NS | 59.5 ± 5.7 | 58.5 ± 4.6 |
| Intake (for 4 weeks), g/d | 18.3 ± 0.7 b | 21.0 ± 0.6 a | 20.9 ± 0.7 a |
| FER 4 (for 4 weeks) | 0.09 ± 0.01 NS | 0.10 ± 0.01 | 0.11 ± 0.01 |
1Abbreviations: S, sham-operated + high-fat diet (HFD); OVX, ovariectomized + HFD; OVX + 0.5A, ovariectomized + HFD with 0.5% aqueous Agrimonia pilosa extract; NS, not significant; FER, food-efficiency ratio. 2Data shown expressed as mean ± standard error (SE) of 9–10 rats per group. 3Values with different superscripted letters within same row were significantly different at p < 0.05, as determined by Duncan’s multiple-range test. NS: p ≥ 0.05. 4FER = weight gain (g/day)/food intake (g/day).
Effect of A. pilosa on serum lipid levels.
| S 1 | OVX | OVX + 0.5A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| TG, mg/dL | 71.80 ± 2.14 2,NS,3 | 69.69 ± 12.18 | 60.00 ± 2.06 |
| Total cholesterol, mg/dL | 115.23 ± 6.22 NS | 163.85 ± 36.95 | 121.17 ± 12.49 |
| HDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 18.08 ± 1.11 b | 32.24 ± 3.53 a | 37.03 ± 3.28 a |
| LDL cholesterol, mg/dL | 81.25 ± 7.78 NS | 120.84 ± 35.09 | 69.21 ± 12.74 |
| Free fatty acid, μM | 205.26 ± 10.82 a | 192.09 ± 35.53 a,b | 128.97 ± 18.63 b |
| AI 4 | 5.55 ± 1.14 a | 5.97 ± 1.45 a | 1.89 ± 0.35 b |
1Abbreviations: S, sham-operated + HFD; OVX, ovariectomized + HFD; OVX+0.5A, ovariectomized + HFD with 0.5% aqueous A. pilosa extract; TG, triacylglycerol; HDL, high-density lipoprotein; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; NS, not significant; AI, atherogenic index. 2Data shown expressed as mean ± SE of 9–10 rats per group. 3Values with different superscripted letters within same row were significantly different at p < 0.05, as determined by Duncan’s multiple-range test. NS: p ≥ 0.05. 4 AI = [(Total cholesterol)–(HDL cholesterol)]/(HDL cholesterol).
Effect of A. pilosa on serum metabolic parameters.
| S 1 | OVX | OVX + 0.5A | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Insulin, pM | 322.05 ± 35.51 2,b,3 | 462.88 ± 58.43 b | 765.33 ± 104.24 a |
| Glucose, mg/dL | 163.12 ± 12.58 a,b | 193.86 ± 18.00 a | 143.70 ± 8.53 b |
| Leptin, pM | 548.9 ± 59.9 2,NS,3 | 728.3 ± 158.3 | 736.7 ± 54.9 |
| Adiponectin, µg/mL | 13.34 ± 1.44 b | 11.99 ± 1.57 b | 20.75 ± 2.73 a |
1Abbreviations: S, sham-operated + HFD; OVX, ovariectomized + HFD; OVX + 0.5A, ovariectomized + HFD with 0.5% aqueous A. pilosa extract; NS, not significant. 2Data shown expressed as mean ± SE of 9–10 rats per group. 3Values with different superscripted letters within same row were significantly different at p < 0.05, as determined by Duncan’s multiple-range test. NS: p ≥ 0.05.
Figure 1Effect of A. pilosa supplementation on hepatic steatosis in OVX rats fed an HFD. (a) Photomicrographs of hematoxylin and eosin-stained liver from representative rats in (left) S, (middle) OVX, and (right) OVX + 0.5A groups (×400). (b) Percentages of rats with each hepatic-steatosis grade (0–3 scale) for each group. Hepatic steatosis graded as 0 (fatty hepatocytes occupying <5% of hepatic lipids), 1 (fatty hepatocytes occupying 5–33%), 2 (fatty hepatocytes occupying 34–66%), or 3 (fatty hepatocytes occupying >66%). Abbreviations: S, sham-operated + HFD; OVX, ovariectomized + HFD; OVX+0.5A, ovariectomized + HFD with 0.5% aqueous A. pilosa extract.
Figure 2Effects of A. pilosa on differential expression of lipogenesis-related genes (a–d) in fatty liver PCR array. Fas, fatty acid synthase; Hmgcr, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A reductase; Pparg, peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ; Acaca, acetyl-coenzyme A carboxylase alpha; S, sham-operated + HFD; OVX, ovariectomized + HFD; OVX+0.5A, ovariectomized + HFD with 0.5% aqueous A. pilosa extract. Data shown were normalized to Ct value of lactate dehydrogenase A (LDH), and are expressed as mean ± SE of 4 rats per group. Values with different superscripted letters (a,b) within same graph were significantly different at p < 0.05, as determined by Duncan’s multiple-range test.