Haigang Song1,2, Ju Ratè Fahrig-Kamarauskaitè3, Emmanuel Matabaro3, Hannelore Kaspar3, Sally L Shirran4, Christina Zach3, Amy Pace3, Bozhidar-Adrian Stefanov3, James H Naismith1,5,2, Markus Künzler3. 1. Division of Structural Biology, Wellcome Trust Centre of Human Genomics, Roosevelt Drive, Oxford OX3 7BN, United Kingdom. 2. Research Complex at Harwell, Rutherford Laboratory, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0FA, United Kingdom. 3. Institute of Microbiology, Department of Biology, Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland. 4. Biomedical Sciences Research Complex, North Haugh, University of St. Andrews, Fife KY16 9ST, United Kingdom. 5. Rosalind Franklin Institute, Rutherford Laboratory, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0FA, United Kingdom.
Abstract
The methylation of amide nitrogen atoms can improve the stability, oral availability, and cell permeability of peptide therapeutics. Chemical N-methylation of peptides is challenging. Omphalotin A is a ribosomally synthesized, macrocylic dodecapeptide with nine backbone N-methylations. The fungal natural product is derived from the precursor protein, OphMA, harboring both the core peptide and a SAM-dependent peptide α-N-methyltransferase domain. OphMA forms a homodimer and its α-N-methyltransferase domain installs the methyl groups in trans on the hydrophobic core dodecapeptide and some additional C-terminal residues of the protomers. These post-translational backbone N-methylations occur in a processive manner from the N- to the C-terminus of the peptide substrate. We demonstrate that OphMA can methylate polar, aromatic, and charged residues when these are introduced into the core peptide. Some of these amino acids alter the efficiency and pattern of methylation. Proline, depending on its sequence context, can act as a tunable stop signal. Crystal structures of OphMA variants have allowed rationalization of these observations. Our results hint at the potential to control this fungal α-N-methyltransferase for biotechnological applications.
The methylation of amidenitrogen atoms can improve the stability, oral availability, and cell permeability of peptide therapeutics. Chemical N-methylation of peptides is challenging. Omphalotin A is a ribosomally synthesized, macrocylic dodecapeptide with nine backbone N-methylations. The fungal natural product is derived from the precursor protein, OphMA, harboring both the core peptide and a SAM-dependent peptide α-N-methyltransferase domain. OphMA forms a homodimer and its α-N-methyltransferase domain installs the methyl groups in trans on the hydrophobic core dodecapeptide and some additional C-terminal residues of the protomers. These post-translational backbone N-methylations occur in a processive manner from the N- to the C-terminus of the peptide substrate. We demonstrate that OphMA can methylate polar, aromatic, and charged residues when these are introduced into the core peptide. Some of these amino acids alter the efficiency and pattern of methylation. Proline, depending on its sequence context, can act as a tunable stop signal. Crystal structures of OphMA variants have allowed rationalization of these observations. Our results hint at the potential to control this fungal α-N-methyltransferase for biotechnological applications.
Peptide macrocyclization
offers a way to increase peptide stability,
membrane permeability, and rigidity.[1] Chemical
modifications do likewise[2] and include
exocyclic amide bonds,[3]d-amino
acids,[4−7] tailoring of side chains,[4,8,9] and backbone (α-)N-methylation.[10−14] Backbone N-methylation is particularly potent,
because it alters the energetic landscape of backbone dihedral angles
(profoundly impacting the peptide secondary structure),[15] shifts the amide bond cis/trans equilibrium, disrupts hydrogen bonding,[12] reduces hydrophilicity of the amide backbone, and, in the macrocyclic
peptidecyclosporine A, allows “shape shifting”.[12,16] Methylation is highly desirable for peptide therapeutics, since
these properties influence metabolic stability, cell permeability,
oral availability, and target selectivity.[11]Conditions for chemical N-methylation of
backbone
amides often result in epimerization of amino acids, removal of protecting
groups, and other unwanted side reactions.[12,17−19] Thus, a biotechnological method of N-methylation would be very valuable. Omphalotin A (Figure A), a nematotoxic macrocyclic
dodecapeptide natural product from the fungus Omphalotus olearius, contains nine backbone N-methylations.[20,21] For many years, omphalotin A was believed to be produced via nonribosomal
peptide synthesis (NRPS). However, the peptide and its derivatives[22,23] are derived from a ribosomally synthesized precursor protein that
is processed by an enzymatic cascade comprising an S-adenosylmethionine (SAM)-dependent peptide α-N-methyltransferase domain of the precursor protein (OphMA), a prolyl
oligopeptidase (OphP), member of the structurally characterized POP
family of macrocycle forming enzymes, an acetyl transferase (OphD),
and at least two cytochrome P450 monooxygenases (OphB1 and OphB2)
(Figure B).[24,25] OphMA consists of the N-terminal peptide α-N-methyltransferase domain (NMT, residues 1–251), a clasp domain
(residues 252–378), and the C-terminal substrate peptide (residues
379–417).[26,27] The precise boundary between
the clasp and C-terminal substrate peptide is somewhat arbitrary.
The C-terminal substrate peptide is subdivided into a leader sequence
(residues 379–399), the core peptide which becomes omphalotin
(residues 400–411), and a C-terminal recognition sequence (residues
412–417) (see Figures B and 1C). The enzyme is an interlocked
homodimer with a pseudo-catenane structure.[26] The peptide α-N-methyltransferase domains
of the two subunits form a “back to back” interface
while the clasp domain of one protomer wraps around the “front”
of the methyltransferase domain of the other protomer. The substrate
peptide from one protomer is modified at the active site of the other
protomer (Figure C).[26] The low reactivity of the amide bond is overcome
through a combination of proton shuttling, conformation control, and
steric clash between SAM and an amideproton in the active site.[26,27] The core peptide is methylated in a distinct pattern, where, for
example, Ile402 is not methylated (skipped) whileIle407 and Ile412
are methylated (see Figures A and 1B). A similar skipping occurs
at Val409, whileVal401, 403, 404, and 406 are methylated. The basis
of this methylation pattern, which is conserved in two OphMA homologues
(dbOphMA from Dendrothele bispora and LedMA from Lentinula edodes),[24,25,27,28] has not been addressed.
Figure 1
Overview of omphalotin biosynthesis. (A) Structure
of omphalotin
A, with methyl groups highlighted in green. (B) The putative biosynthetic
gene cluster for omphalotin A. For OphMA, the methyltransferase domain
is shown as a green sphere and the α-helices of the clasp domain
are shown in blue, respectively. The residues of the core peptide
are colored in red. Methylated residues in the core peptide and the
C-terminal recognition sequence are marked with green circles. (C)
Monomer of OphMAΔC6–Y98A (PDB ID: 5N0S) lacks the C-terminal
recognition sequence; the methyltransferase domain is green, the clasp
domain is blue, the leader sequence is yellow, and the core peptide
is red. (D) Dimer of OphMAΔC6–Y98A where the second subunit
is represented in transparent surface (cyan). SAM is represented by
sticks.
Overview of omphalotin biosynthesis. (A) Structure
of omphalotin
A, with methyl groups highlighted in green. (B) The putative biosynthetic
gene cluster for omphalotin A. For OphMA, the methyltransferase domain
is shown as a green sphere and the α-helices of the clasp domain
are shown in blue, respectively. The residues of the core peptide
are colored in red. Methylated residues in the core peptide and the
C-terminal recognition sequence are marked with green circles. (C)
Monomer of OphMAΔC6–Y98A (PDB ID: 5N0S) lacks the C-terminal
recognition sequence; the methyltransferase domain is green, the clasp
domain is blue, the leader sequence is yellow, and the core peptide
is red. (D) Dimer of OphMAΔC6–Y98A where the second subunit
is represented in transparent surface (cyan). SAM is represented by
sticks.One limitation on exploitation
of OphMA in the biotechnological
production of N-methylated macrocycles is the rather
narrow known substrate profile (small hydrophobic residues, e.g.,
Ala and Val). We show that the enzyme has a broader profile and is
able to methylate also large hydrophobic, small polar, and even charged
amino acids. We also demonstrate that some mutations of the core peptideprofoundly alter the pattern of methylation, including residues that
act as a stop and alternative start signals. Using structural analysis
of the respective OphMA variants, we have been able to rationalize
some of the rules governing the regioselectivity of the enzyme.
Results
Core Peptide
Substitutions Affect the Degree of Methylation
Small hydrophobic
residues (Val, Ile) at positions 403, 404, 406,
and 407 (Figure b)
of the precursor protein were mutated to Thr, Glu, Arg, Phe, or Pro
to probe effects of charge, size, and conformational rigidity. The
mutations were introduced in the context of the full-length (including
the C-terminal recognition sequence), N-terminally His-tagged protein
(see Figure ).Mutant protein expression was induced in E. coli BL21(DE3) for 72 h, and the degree of methylation was determined
as described previously.[24] The mutant and
wild-type proteins eluted with the same retention time on a size exclusion
column consistent with a folded dimeric state. The most abundant species
of the wild-type protein showed complete methylation of the core peptide
(9-fold) with an additional methylation at Val413 (Figure A).[24] LC-ESI-MS extracted ion chromatograms (EIC) of proteolytic digests
of the OphMA variants were analyzed to identify the most abundant
methylated species for each variant (Figure ). The number of methylations of the most
abundant species (judged by integrated peak intensity) in each mutant
was compared to the native to judge methylation efficiency.
Figure 2
Methylation
analysis of full-length OphMA core peptide variants
under in vivo conditions. LC-ESI-MS analysis of methylation
of (A) OphMA wild type; (B) OphMA V403T, V404T, V406T, and I407T;
(C) OphMA V403F, V404F, V406F, and I407F; (D) OphMA V403E, V404E,
V406E, and I407E; (E) OphMA V403R, V404R, V406R, and I407R; and (F)
OphMA V403P, V406P, and I407P. Red dashed lines mark the number of
methylations states. Co-eluting contaminants are marked with a blue
asterisk. The integrated peak intensity was used to estimate the relative
abundance of the peptide species.
Methylation
analysis of full-length OphMA core peptide variants
under in vivo conditions. LC-ESI-MS analysis of methylation
of (A) OphMA wild type; (B) OphMA V403T, V404T, V406T, and I407T;
(C) OphMA V403F, V404F, V406F, and I407F; (D) OphMA V403E, V404E,
V406E, and I407E; (E) OphMA V403R, V404R, V406R, and I407R; and (F)
OphMA V403P, V406P, and I407P. Red dashed lines mark the number of
methylations states. Co-eluting contaminants are marked with a blue
asterisk. The integrated peak intensity was used to estimate the relative
abundance of the peptide species.The introduction of Thr at positions 403 and 404 resulted in similar
methylation to wild-type (10-fold methylated species most abundant)
(Figure A and 2B). In I407T, methylation was slightly reduced (9-fold).
However, the introduction of Thr at position 406 reduced methylation,
with a 3-fold methylated species being the most abundant (Figure B). The introduction
of the large hydrophobic Phe generally decreased methylation but the
effect was dependent on the position (Figure C). Substitution at position 403 yielded
comparably abundant monomethylated, dimethylated, trimethylated, and
tetramethylated species, while V404F yielded mainly monomethylated
peptides. A tetramethylated species and, to a lesser extent, a trimethylated
species, resulted from a V406F substitution, while the I407F mutant
yielded mainly a tetramethylated species with some pentamethylated
species (Figure C).
Introduction of Glu also decreased the degree of methylation in a
position-dependent manner. Substitutions at positions 403, 404, and
407 yielded peptides with 1, 2, and 5 methylations, respectively (Figure D). Substitution
at position 406 produced a mixture of similarly abundant peptides
containing 4, 5, or 6 methylations (Figure D). Introduction of the large and positively
charged Arg residue strongly decreased the degree of methylation,
irrespective of its position (Figure E). At position 407, the dominant species carried three
methylations (Figure E). At positions 403, 404, and 406, the dominant species was unmethylated,
with the next most abundant having two methylations (Figure E). Proline was introduced
at positions 403, 406, and 407 (Figure F). In both V403P and V406P, the dominant species was
unmethylated, but V403P showed evidence for two methylations, while
V406P showed evidence for two and four methylations (see Figures F and Figure F, as well as Figure S1f4 in the Supporting Information). The I407P variant
had a variety of species (two to four methylations) (Figure F), with evidence of up to
six methylations (see Figure F, as well as Figure S1f6 in the
Supporting Information).
Figure 3
Methylation pattern analysis of full-length
OphMA core peptide
variants under in vivo conditions. Peptides detected
by LC-ESI-MS were further analyzed by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. The most abundant
(left) and most methylated (right) species are shown. For some species,
more than one isoform was detected. In these cases, all detected isoforms
are listed. Wild-type OphMA is shown in panel (A); Thr substitutions
are shown in panel (B); Phe substitutions are shown in panel (C);
Glu substitutions are shown in panel (D); Arg substitutions are shown
in panel (E); and Pro substitutions are shown in panel (F). Substitutions
are shown in red. Solid green circles indicate methylated residues
confirmed by MS/MS, while solid yellow circles are assumed to be based
on the number and pattern of methylation but they are not experimentally
confirmed by MS/MS.
Methylation pattern analysis of full-length
OphMA core peptide
variants under in vivo conditions. Peptides detected
by LC-ESI-MS were further analyzed by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS. The most abundant
(left) and most methylated (right) species are shown. For some species,
more than one isoform was detected. In these cases, all detected isoforms
are listed. Wild-type OphMA is shown in panel (A); Thr substitutions
are shown in panel (B); Phe substitutions are shown in panel (C);
Glu substitutions are shown in panel (D); Arg substitutions are shown
in panel (E); and Pro substitutions are shown in panel (F). Substitutions
are shown in red. Solid green circles indicate methylated residues
confirmed by MS/MS, while solid yellow circles are assumed to be based
on the number and pattern of methylation but they are not experimentally
confirmed by MS/MS.
Core Peptide Substitutions
Alter the Pattern of Methylation
The patterns of methylation
of both the most abundant and highly
methylated species were analyzed by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS (see Figure S1 in the Supporting Information), and
the results are summarized schematically in Figure .Thr substitutions at 403, 404, and
407 showed a wild-type methylation pattern from Val401 to Val413 (skipping
Ile402, Val409, and Ser412) (see Figure B, as well as Figure S1). In V406T, methylation terminated at position 404 but was
wild-type to this point (see Figure B, as well as Figures S1b5 and S1b6 in the Supporting Information).In contrast, the
introduction of Phe resulted in a significantly
altered methylation pattern. V403F, V406F, and I407F mutants showed
a pattern where Ile402 was, in contrast to the wild-type situation,
methylated (see Figure C, as well as Figures S1c2, S1c4, and S1c6 in the Supporting Information). The introduction of Phe terminated
methylation in most mutants either one or two residue N-terminals
to the Phe (see Figures C and 3C, as well as Figures S1c1, S1c3, S1c5, and S1c7 in the Supporting Information).Examination of the most abundant peptides in the Glu mutants revealed
that, generally, methylation ended immediately prior to the Glu residue
(with a wild-type methylation pattern; see Figure D, as well as Figures S1d1–S1d8 in the Supporting Information). Analysis of
the most highly methylated species revealed that methylation of Phe
and Glu residues by OphMA was possible (see Figures C and 2D, and Figures C and 3D).The presence of Arg terminated methylation prior
to the Arg (see Figure E, as well as Figures S1e3, S1e4, S1e7, and S1e8 in the Supporting
Information). Arg itself was not methylated by OphMA. Analysis of
the doubly methylated peptides isolated from V403R, V404R, and V406R
showed methylation C-terminal to Arg with a profoundly disrupted methylation
pattern (see Figure E, as well as Figures S1e1, 2S1e, S1e5, and S1e6 in the Supporting Information). Pro, which cannot be methylated,
appeared able to function as an alternate start (V403P) or as a stop
(V406P, I407P) signal for methylation, depending on its location (see Figures F and 3F, as well as Figures S1f1–S1f6 in the Supporting Information).
In vitro Methylation Analysis for OphMA Variants
Previous work showed
that partially methylated OphMA active site
mutants can be purified from E. coli and further
methylated in vitro upon incubation with SAM.[26] We applied this procedure to the mutants where
methylation appeared to be halted (stalling mutants), V404E, V406E,
V403P, V406P, I407P, ΔC6-V403F, ΔC6-V404F, and ΔC6-V406F,
as well as the double mutant ΔC6-G405A/V406F. The prefix abbreviation
ΔC6 denotes the deletion of residues 412–417, yielding
a protein that is easier to crystallize and characterize than the
full-length protein but is a valid model for the full-length protein.[26] The most abundant C-terminal peptide of OphMAΔC6
is 7-fold methylated, with a pattern identical to the wild-type protein
(see Figures and 5).
Figure 4
Methylation analysis of selected ΔC6 and full-length
OphMA
core peptide variants after in vitro SAM incubation.
LC-ESI-MS was used to measure the extent and estimate the relative
abundance of methylated species: (A) selected OphMAΔC6 Phe-substitutions,
(B) selected full-length OphMA Glu-substitutions, and (C) selected
full-length OphMA Pro-substitutions. Contaminants are marked with
a blue asterisk.
Figure 5
Methylation pattern for
core peptide mutants of OphMA or ΔC6
after in vitro SAM incubation. The methylation pattern
of the most abundant (left side) and most methylated (right side)
species: (A) OphMAΔC6-variants V403F, V404F, V406F, and G405A/V406F;
(B) OphMA-variants V404E and V406E; (C) OphMA-variants V403P, V406P,
and I407P. Color coding is as described in Figure .
Methylation analysis of selected ΔC6 and full-length
OphMA
core peptide variants after in vitro SAM incubation.
LC-ESI-MS was used to measure the extent and estimate the relative
abundance of methylated species: (A) selected OphMAΔC6 Phe-substitutions,
(B) selected full-length OphMA Glu-substitutions, and (C) selected
full-length OphMA Pro-substitutions. Contaminants are marked with
a blue asterisk.Methylation pattern for
core peptide mutants of OphMA or ΔC6
after in vitro SAM incubation. The methylation pattern
of the most abundant (left side) and most methylated (right side)
species: (A) OphMAΔC6-variants V403F, V404F, V406F, and G405A/V406F;
(B) OphMA-variants V404E and V406E; (C) OphMA-variants V403P, V406P,
and I407P. Color coding is as described in Figure .After 20 h of induction in E. coli, most (with
71% relative abundance) of OphMAΔC6 was already completely (7-fold)
methylated (see Figure A and Table ).[26] Full-length OphMA was not completely methylated
under these conditions, but the relative abundance of the 10-fold
methylated species was already significant (see Figure B and Table ). OphMAΔC6-V403F was mostly 4-fold methylated,
similar to the in vivo results for the full-length
OphMA V403F variant. Incubation of this protein with SAM for three
days resulted in a shift to more methylated species with evidence
of methylation of Phe403 (see Figures A and 5A, as well as Figures S2a and S2b in the Supporting Information).
In contrast, the ΔC6-V404F variant was purified as monomethylated,
dimethylated, and trimethylated species whose distribution changed
little upon incubation with SAM. Compared to the full-length V404F
variant, the truncated protein revealed a higher degree of methylation
(Figure A), with clear
evidence that Phe404 was methylated (Figure S2d in the Supporting Information). OphMAΔC6-V406F purified with
the unmethylated species being dominant but upon incubation with SAM
became completely (7-fold) methylated (Figure A). The methylation pattern of this species
was the same as that for wild-type OphMAΔC6 and Phe406 was methylated
(see Figure A, as
well as Figure S2e in the Supporting Information).
The double mutant ΔC6-G405A/V406F yielded a range of methylated
species (see Figure A, as well as Figure S2g in the Supporting
Information), with the 2-fold methylated species being most abundant
(Figure A). Only a
limited increase in methylation occurred upon incubation with SAM
(Figure A).
Table 1
Percentage of the Three Most Abundant
Methylated Species of Selected OphMA Variants Used in the In Vitro Assaysa
OphMA variant
most abundant species
(a. sp.)
second a. sp.
third a. sp.
ΔC6
7 Me, 71%
5 Me, 10%
6 Me, 7%
ΔC6-V403F
4 Me, 30%
3 Me, 19%
1 Me, 16%
ΔC6-V403F + SAM
4 Me, 44%
3 Me, 20%
5 Me, 14%
ΔC6-V404F
2 Me, 45%
3 Me, 24%
1 Me, 23%
ΔC6-V404F + SAM
2 Me, 41%
3 Me, 26%
1 Me, 22%
ΔC6-V406F
0 Me, 54%
6 Me, 10%
3 Me, 10%
ΔC6-V406F + SAM
7 Me, 41%
6 Me, 23%
5 Me, 15%
ΔC6-G405A/V406F
2 Me, 31%
3 Me,
30%
4 Me, 17%
ΔC6-G405A/V406F
+ SAM
3 Me, 30%
4 Me, 20%
6 Me, 19%
OphMA
3 Me, 23%
10 Me, 20%
5 Me, 20%
V404E
2 Me, 57%
1 Me, 25%
0 Me, 10%
V404E + SAM
2 Me,
74%
3 Me, 12%
1 Me, 7%
V406E
4 Me, 44%
5 Me, 22%
3 Me, 10%
V406E + SAM
6 Me, 44%,
5 Me, 20%
7 Me, 16%
V403P
0 Me, 47%
1 Me,
31%
2 Me, 12%
V403P + SAM
3 Me, 19%
2 Me, 17%
1 Me, 17%
V406P
2 Me, 69%
0 Me,
13%
1 Me, 10%
V406P + SAM
2 Me, 78%
3 Me, 5%
1 Me, 5%
I407P
2 Me, 32%
1 Me,
21%
3 Me, 19%
I407P + SAM
4 Me, 36%
3 Me, 17%
2 Me, 16%
The relative abundance is determined
by integrating the EIC peaks and calculating the ratio between the
integration of a specific species and the sum of the integrations
of all species.
The relative abundance is determined
by integrating the EIC peaks and calculating the ratio between the
integration of a specific species and the sum of the integrations
of all species.The full-length
OphMA-V404E variant was purified as a mixture of
monomethylated and dimethylated species (with methylation at Val401
and Val403) from E. coli (see Figure B, as well as Figure S2h in the Supporting Information), consistent with the in vivo data. Incubation with SAM resulted in accumulation
of a dimethylated species and proteins with additional methylations
at Glu404, Gly411, and Val413 (see Figure B, as well as Figure S2i in the Supporting Information). OphMA-V406E purified as
a mixture of species (Figure B), such as the in vivo analysis. Incubation
with SAM yielded a 6-fold methylated species but residues 406 to 410
were skipped (Figure B). An 8-fold methylated species was detected, suggesting the methylation
of Ile402 and Val409 (see Figure B, as well as Figure S2k in the Supporting Information).OphMA-V403P was purified mostly
as unmethylated protein with some
monomethylated and dimethylated species (Figure C). Upon incubation with SAM, further methylation
up to a maximum of 7-fold was observed (Figure C). MS/MS-analysis suggested that methylation
occurred at a variety of positions but only after the introduced Pro
residue (see Figure C, as well as Figure S2m in the Supporting
Information). OphMA-V406P was purified as dimethylated species (Val401
and Val403), with evidence for a very small amount of Val404 methylation
upon incubation with SAM (see Figures C and 5C, as well as Figures S2n and S2o in the Supporting Information).
Similar to the in vivo analysis, OphMA-I407P was
a mixture of monomethylated, dimethylated, trimethylated, and tetramethylated
species (Val401, Val403, Gly404, and Val405) (see Figures C and 5C, as well as Figure S2p). Incubation
with SAM resulted in a decrease of the dimethylated and a concomitant
increase in the tetramethylated species (Figure C). MS/MS analysis revealed 5- and 6-fold
methylated species (at Gly411 and Val413; see Figure C, as well as Figure S2q in the Supporting Information). Our results differ from dbOphMA, where I407P abolished methylation and V403P yielded
a single methylation.[27]
Structural
Analysis of Some OphMA Core Peptide Variants
The crystal
structures of OphMA-V404E, OphMAΔC6-V404F, OphMA-V406P,
and OphMA-I407P in complex with SAH were determined at resolutions
of 1.9, 1.8, 1.6, and 2.2 Å, respectively (Table S1). The overall structures of the four mutants are
unchanged from OphMAΔC6-SAH (PDB ID: 5N0Q).[26]The structure of V404F showed the clear electron density for SAH,
methylation at Val401, and methylated Val403 at the active site (denoted
as position i, following the previous nomenclature[26]) (see Figure A, as well as Figure S3 in
the Supporting Information). The backbone of C-terminal substrate
peptide and the active site residues overlap well with active site
mutant OphMA-Y63F, with a root-mean-square deviation (rmsd) of 0.76
Å (PDB ID: 5N0N(26)) (Figure E). Phe404 sits at i+1 and
interacts with many of the active site residues but does not significantly
perturb their arrangement. In the V404E structure, the electron density
of chain B was clear and modeled as a trimethylated species with methylated
Glu404 at position i and SAH bound at the active
site (see Figure B,
as well as Figure S3). The conformation
of the introduced Glu404 requires Tyr98 to adopt a conformation that
was not observed previously and would seem “inactive”
(see Figure B, as
well as Figure S4 in the Supporting Information).
In chain A, the electron density of the substrate peptide was heterogeneous,[26] and our best model has methylated Val401 (monomethylated
species) at position i with SAH bound to the protein.
Heterogeneity in the electron density has been suggested[26] to arise from heterogeneity of methylation in
the protein and may be unavoidable for some samples, such as V404E
(see Figures B and 5B).
Figure 6
Active site view of several “stalling” mutants:
(A)
OphMAΔC6-V404F has Phe404 at i+1 position;
(B) OphMA-V404E has Glu404 at position i and a different
conformation of Tyr98; (C) OphMA-V406P has a cis-peptide
conformation; (D) OphMA-I407P has a trans-peptide
conformation; and (E) superimposition of OphMA-V406P (purple), OphMA-V404E
(orange), OphAMAΔC6–V404F (silver), OphMA-I407P (green),
and, for comparison, OphMA-Y63F (cyan, PDB ID: 5N0N,[26] methylated V403 at position i).
Active site view of several “stalling” mutants:
(A)
OphMAΔC6-V404F has Phe404 at i+1 position;
(B) OphMA-V404E has Glu404 at position i and a different
conformation of Tyr98; (C) OphMA-V406P has a cis-peptide
conformation; (D) OphMA-I407P has a trans-peptide
conformation; and (E) superimposition of OphMA-V406P (purple), OphMA-V404E
(orange), OphAMAΔC6–V404F (silver), OphMA-I407P (green),
and, for comparison, OphMA-Y63F (cyan, PDB ID: 5N0N,[26] methylated V403 at position i).The structure of V406P shows the clear electron
density for Asn396
to Gly408 with Val401 and Val403 methylated (Figure S3b), consistent with in vitro analysis (Figure D). The substrate
peptide adopts the same conformation as that seen in the native structure[26] until it reaches Val404. The introduction of
the Pro residue has resulted in a cis-peptide bond
between Gly405 and V406P (positions i+2 and i+3) (Figures C and 6E), which prevents further substrate
translocation. The structure of I407P shows a well-resolved C-terminal
peptide from Gly397 to Gly408 with clear density for methylated Val401
and Val403 (position (i). I407P at position i+4 has a normal trans-peptide conformation
(see Figure D).
Discussion
Methylation of peptideamide N atoms is desirable
but chemically
challenging. The enzyme OphMA is unusual in that the α-N-methyltransferase domain and its substrate (core peptide)
are part of the same polypeptide. The catalytic domain of the enzyme
binds the core peptide and a SAM molecule in a hydrophobic tunnel
that is formed by the dimeric arrangement of two OphMA molecules.
For omphalotin biosynthesis, the core peptide is cleaved out and macrocyclized
by the prolyloligopeptidase OphP; the remainder of the enzyme is assumed
to be discarded.[24] The covalent attachment
of the substrate to the enzyme renders the otherwise very hydrophobic
(and insoluble) substrate soluble and increases its local concentration
and, hence, the rate of the reaction. The side chains of the core
peptide are not recognized by the enzyme[26] and, thus, the covalent linkage may also compensate for the lack
of recognition. Despite this apparent lack of recognition, there is
a distinct methylation pattern (skipping of some residues), but what
underpins this is unknown.Sequence alignments of fungal OphMA
homologues show that the core
peptide sequences are biased toward hydrophobic (Gly, Ile, Val, Leu)
and small hydrophilic (Thr) amino acids.[28] Since evolution would be expected to select for the properties of
the compound, the enzymes may be naturally promiscuous, allowing mutations
of the core sequence without requiring compensating mutations in the
catalytic machinery. Substrate plasticity has previously been investigated
by replacing the entire core peptide with unrelated sequences of other
backbone N-methylated peptide natural products. This
showed that OphMA was able to methylate residues in these other sequences
but with patterns different from either omphalotin or the desired
natural product.[24] Here, we report a systematic
analysis of single substitutions at different positions of the core
peptide by small hydrophilic (Thr), large charged (Arg or Glu), large
hydrophobic (Phe), and conformationally rigid (Pro) residues. Threonine
was well-tolerated at all positions, although the degree of methylation
was slightly lower than wild-type. We attribute this slight decrease
in the methylation efficiency to the mismatch between the hydrophobic
tunnel and the hydrophilic side-chain hydroxyl of threonine. Consistent
with our results, the homologue dbOphMA natively
methylates a threonine residue.[24,25,27] The introduction of Arg effectively abolishes methylation, except
in one variant, I407R, where three residues N-terminal to Arg were
efficiently methylated before halting at Val404. The large positively
charged residue is likely to be incompatible with the hydrophobic
substrate tunnel.Glu does not have such a pronounced effect
as Arg, and methylation
proceeds up to the position of the introduced Glu, where it stalls.
The stalling is not absolute and the enzyme can methylate Glu albeit
slowly and we detect peptides with methylation C-terminal to the introduced
Glu (see Figures D, 3D, 4B, and 5B), suggesting Glu can translocate through the active site.
The crystal structure of SAH-bound OphMA-V404E, which has a methylated
Glu at the active site, reveals that catalytically essential residue
Tyr98[26] adopts an “inactive”
conformation to accommodate Glu. We hypothesize that this distortion
of the active site is responsible for the very slow methylation rate
(stalling).The presence of phenylalanine altered both the pattern
and degree
of methylation (N-terminal and C-terminal to site of mutation) but
its effect was highly dependent on its position. Simple modeling shows
that the larger phenylalanine side chain requires a rearrangement
of the core peptide and/or the enzyme to avoid severe van der Waals
clashes when Phe occupies either the i–1, i, or i+2 positions. Since methylation
was observed, these changes must be possible, but we suggest they
cause multiple stalling events. The clashes at the i+2 site explain the observed stalling of methylation two residues
before the Phe in three such variants (see Figures C and 4A). In the
V403F mutant, Phe would occupy the i+2 position as
this is the starting configuration for the protein; its subsequent
translocation to i+1 would reduce clashes but further
translocation to position i would be disfavored (second
stalling event). We propose, with Phe stalling further translocation,
that Ile402 is held at position i and methylated
(rather than skipped). Finally, modeling suggests that there is potential
for π-stacking between a Phe at the i–2
position and Tyr63, giving rise to third stalling event, but arising
from preserving favorable interactions rather than avoiding clashes.
This event would explain the pattern observed for OphMA variants V403F
and V404F where methylation apparently stalled two residues after
the introduced Phe.Proline cannot be a substrate for the enzyme
and would cause extensive
steric clashes at the active site. The introduction of proline at
position 403 of OphMA completely eliminates methylation. Prolonged
incubation with SAM yields some methylation but starting after Pro403
and with heterogeneous patterns suggestive of multiple start sites.
We suggest that this arises as a result of the Pro inducing conformations
in the substrate that mimic (imperfectly) the natural start site after
Pro399 and consequent “misfolding” of some protein.
Proline introduced at either residue 406 or 407 gives rise to wild-type
methylation which stops at Val403 or Gly405, respectively. Structural
analysis of the V406P mutant reveals that the proline adopts a cis-peptide conformation with Gly405 which acts as a stop
signal at n–2 to the proline. I407P shows
that the proline adopts a trans conformation, which
acts as a stop signal, but at n–1 relative
to the proline. The small amount of methylation at Val404 in V406P
could arise from a small amount of trans-configured
peptide.[29,30]Unexpectedly, the enzyme is able to
process large residues such
as Phe and the negatively charged Glu. In many cases, the heterogeneous
methylation in vivo can be driven to completion by
incubation in vitro with SAM. This inherent promiscuity
of the enzyme indicates synthetic potential. However, the tolerance
of the active site is not limitless (Arg cannot be processed and appears
unable to enter the active site tunnel). Peptide flexibility appears
to be important, because the V406F mutant (Phe follows Gly405) was
methylated to a much higher degree than other Phe variants. The double
variant G405A/V406F, which reduced the flexibility, showed a reduced
degree of methylation, compared to V406F (Figure A), which is consistent with this suggestion.There are three Ile residues in the wild-type core peptide, two
of which are methylated and one is skipped; thus, the methylation
pattern is not a function of the nature of the residue. Our data provide
evidence that the pattern arises from the translocation of the six
residues of the substrate peptide that are in contact with the enzyme
substrate tunnel during catalysis (positions i–3
to i+2). We suggest the analogy of a clutch as means
to think of the methylation pattern. When the clutch is disengaged,
the gears mesh and this is equivalent to peptide translocation and
methylation. When the clutch is engaged, the gears rotate freely and
this equivalent to skipping, where the peptide moves through the active
site faster than it can be positioned for catalysis. In the V403F,
Ile is stuck at the active site (the gears mesh) long enough for it
to be methylated. In the Glu variants, the active site Try98 is displaced
(gears rotate freely) and this results in extensive skipping before
methylation can resume. In the same way, we suggest that distortion
of the active site during Pro passage results in multiple skipping
explaining the pattern of methylation C-terminal to Pro in I407P (see Figures F and 5C).By introducing point mutations in the core peptide
sequence of
OphMA, we show that the substrate promiscuity of this peptide α-N-methyltransferase is larger than anticipated from the
naturally occurring core peptide sequences of fungal OphMA homologues.[28] An additional challenge for biotechnological
applications of OphMA, besides substrate promiscuity, is how to control
the enzyme to produce a homogeneously methylated product. In this
regard, we have been able to identify some of the factors and mechanisms
controlling the efficiency and the pattern of OphMA-mediated peptide
methylation. These insights will be useful for applications like the
production of de novo libraries of multiply backbone N-methylated peptides for the development of peptide therapeutics.[32]
Materials and Methods
Materials
and General Procedures
Plasmid DNA purification
from E. coli cultures was performed using the Nucleospin
spin columns (Macherey-Nagel). DNA from PCR, restriction digests,
and ligations was purified either first by agarose gel electrophoresis
or spin columns. DNA concentration was determined spectrophotometrically
using NanoDrop (Thermo Fisher Scientific). DNA manipulations were
performed according to manufacturer recommendations or using standard
procedures.[33] DNA sequencing, synthesis,
and purification by desalting of oligonucleotides was performed by
Microsynth AG. Primers for full-length V406P, V404E, and OphMAΔC6–V404F
were purchased from IDT. Fast-digest restriction endonucleases, Phusion
DNA-polymerase, and T4 DNA ligase were purchased from Thermo Scientific
or New England Biolabs. Crystallization screens were purchased from
Hampton Research and Molecular Dimensions. EDTA-free Protease Inhibitor
Cocktail (cOmplete) were bought from Roche. Other chemicals were purchased
from Sigma–Aldrich/Fluka.
Bacterial Strains and Plasmids
Escherichia
coli strains DH5α and BL21 (DE3) were used for cloning
and protein production, respectively. Plasmids PMA997 (pET24-OphMA),
PMA1004 (pET24-His8-OphMA), and PMA1304 (pET24-His8-OphMA-TEVcs-ΔC6)
were described previously.[24] Plasmids constructed
in this study are listed in Table S2 in
the Supporting Information.
Construction of Core Peptide Mutants
Primers used for
plasmid constructions are listed in Table S3 in the Supporting Information. A PCR fragment was generated using
primers 24 and 25 and plasmid PMA997 as a template. The fragment was
digested with BamHI and EcoRI and
ligated into accordingly digested plasmid PMA1304 to obtain plasmid
PMA1471 encoding His8-tagged wild-type OphMA.The plasmids encoding
the OphMA core peptide mutants were generated using overlap extension
PCR and plasmid PMA1471 as a template. A first PCR product for overlap
extension was generated using primer 27, together with 28, 30, 32,
34, 36, 38, 40, 42, 44, 46, 48, 50, 52, 54, 56, or 58. A second PCR
product was obtained using primer 26, in combination with 29, 31,
33, 35, 37, 39, 41, 43, 45, 47, 49, 51, 53, 55, 57, or 59. The resulting
PCR products were assembled using the external primers 27 and 26.
After digestion with HindIII and BamHI, the resulting fragments were ligated with the accordingly digested
plasmid PMA1304.The plasmids encoding the OphMA Pro mutants
were created by the
Phusion Site-Directed Mutagenesis Kit (Thermo Fisher Scientific),
using plasmid PMA1004 as template and respective primer pairs according
to the manufacturer’s protocol.A TEV cleavage site was
introduced after the His8-tag into constructs
coding for the wild-type versions of both full-length OphMA and OphMAΔC6
using PMA1004 as a template.[24,34] The resulting plasmids
were used as template to generate OphMA core peptide mutants for in vitro assays and crystallization by a reported protocol.[26,34] Plasmids were sequenced using T7 primers.
Protein Production
Protein production was performed
as described in refs (24 and 26), with small modifications. A preculture was grown in LB medium containing
50 μg/mL kanamycin at 37 °C. The main cultures were inoculated
to OD600 of 0.01 in 1 L of TB medium (2.4% (w/v) yeast
extract (Oxoid AG), 1.2% (w/v) Tryptone (Oxoid AG), additionally containing
0.4% (w/v) glycerol, 0.17 M KH2PO4 and 0.72
M K2HPO4) supplied with 50 μg/mL kanamycin.
For full methylation, cultures were grown at 37 °C to OD600 = 1.5–2 and chilled on ice before induction with
0.2 mM isopropyl-β-d-thiogalactopyranoside (IPTG),
which was followed by incubation for 72 h at 16 °C. OphMA mutants
used for in vitro assay and crystallization were
expressed for 20 h at 16 °C.[26]In vitro methylation was performed as previously described.[26]
Protein Purification
Protein purification
was performed
as described previously,[24,26] with small modifications.
After induction for the required amount of time, the bacterial cells
were spun down at 8000g for 5 min at 4 °C. The
cell pellets were resuspended in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0) additionally
containing 100 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, and 20 mM imidazole. After
a freeze–thaw cycle, 0.2 mg/mL lysozyme and EDTA-free cocktail
protease inhibitor (Roche) was added and incubated for 1 h on ice.
Cells were disrupted using a French press, and the debris was removed
by centrifugation at 13 000g for 30 min. After
that, the cell supernatant was equilibrated with rotation with Ni-NTA
beads (Thermo Scientific) at 4 °C for 1 h. The collected beads
were washed, and the protein was eluted in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0)
containing an additional 100 mM NaCl, 10% (v/v) glycerol, and 400
mM imidazole.The sample was concentrated using an Amicon Ultra-4
centrifugal filter device with a molecular-weight cutoff of 30 kDa
(Millipore). One milliliter (1 mL) of protein sample was loaded into
a Superdex-200 Increase column (GE Healthcare), which was pre-equilibrated
with 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10% (v/v) glycerol, and 100 mM NaCl.
Protein concentration was determined using the Pierce BCA protein
assay (Thermo Scientific) and bovine serum albumin as a standard.All proteins were further purified by gel filtration as described
previously[26] and used fresh or stored at
−80 °C.
The C-terminal tryptic peptides of OphMA variants were
analyzed by
HPLC-ESI MS/MS as described previously.[24] The purified proteins were concentrated to 4 mg mL–1 in 25 mM Tris-HCl (pH 8.0), 10% (v/v) glycerol and 100 mM NaCl and
supplied with protease. All mutants except for Arg mutants were supplied
with trypsin in a molar ratio of 1:80 and incubated in a glass vial
for 16 h at 37 °C in a final volume of 20 μL. Arg mutants
were treated with endoproteinase Lys-C in a molar ratio of 1:20 and
incubated at 37 °C for 16–24 h in a final volume of 27.5
μL.After proteolytic digestion, 3 or 5 μL of sample
was used for MS/MS analysis. The resulting peptides were separated
in increasing acetonitrile gradient on the Phenomenex Kinetex 2.6
μm C18 column (150 mm × 2.1 mm) on Dionex Ultimate 3000
UHPLC system and subsequently analyzed with targeted MS/MS using Thermo
Scientific Q Exactive mass spectrometer.[24]In vitro methylated proteins were digested
at
37 °C overnight using sequencing-grade trypsin (Promega). Data
were recorded on a Sciex 5600+ mass spectrometer equipped with the
Eksigent 2D Ultra NanoLC system using a Thermo Scientific PepMap C18
column (75 μm × 15 cm) and trap (2 cm). MS/MS data were
extracted using the SCIEX PeakView software and analyzed using the
Mascot 2.6 search engine (Matrix Science) against sequences of OphMA
mutants. MS/MS interpretation was verified manually.
Crystallization,
Data Collection, and Structure Determination
Freshly prepared
V404F, V404E, V406P, and I407P were crystallized
by mixing 1 μL of protein (30–50 mg/mL) preincubated
with 3 mM SAM with 1 μL of reservoir solution (0.3–0.4
M KSCN, 1.8–2.4 M sodium malonate, and 0.1 M bicine buffer
pH 8.5–9.3)). Crystals were obtained at 16 °C within 1
week using the hanging drop diffusion method. These crystals were
flash frozen in the cryo protectant containing 0.1 M bicine (pH 9.0),
0.3 M KSCN, and 2.5–3.0 M sodium malonate.X-ray diffraction
data were recorded at Diamond Light Source beamline I03 (V404E and
V406P), I24 (ΔC6-V404F), or I04 (I407P). Data were reduced,
integrated, and scaled using xia2.[35] The
structures were solved by molecular replacement with OphMAΔC18
(PDB ID: 5N0O) as the initial search model using Phaser.[36] Structures were further refined and improved using Coot,[37] refmac,[38] and PDB_REDO.[39] The final models were verified with MolProbity.[40] The statistics of the data collection and refinement
are summarized in Table S1 in the Supporting
Information. All crystallographic figures were generated using Pymol
(Schrödinger).
Authors: Andreas F B Räder; Michael Weinmüller; Florian Reichart; Adi Schumacher-Klinger; Shira Merzbach; Chaim Gilon; Amnon Hoffman; Horst Kessler Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2018-10-03 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Arthur C Rand; Siegfried S F Leung; Heather Eng; Charles J Rotter; Raman Sharma; Amit S Kalgutkar; Yizhong Zhang; Manthena V Varma; Kathleen A Farley; Bhagyashree Khunte; Chris Limberakis; David A Price; Spiros Liras; Alan M Mathiowetz; Matthew P Jacobson; R Scott Lokey Journal: Medchemcomm Date: 2012-10 Impact factor: 3.597
Authors: Marissa R Quijano; Christina Zach; Fredarla S Miller; Aileen R Lee; Aman S Imani; Markus Künzler; Michael F Freeman Journal: J Am Chem Soc Date: 2019-06-05 Impact factor: 15.419
Authors: Jennifer L Hickey; Serge Zaretsky; Megan A St Denis; Sai Kumar Chakka; M Monzur Morshed; Conor C G Scully; Andrew L Roughton; Andrei K Yudin Journal: J Med Chem Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 7.446
Authors: Airlie J McCoy; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Paul D Adams; Martyn D Winn; Laurent C Storoni; Randy J Read Journal: J Appl Crystallogr Date: 2007-07-13 Impact factor: 3.304
Authors: Aman S Imani; Aileen R Lee; Nisha Vishwanathan; Floris de Waal; Michael F Freeman Journal: ACS Chem Biol Date: 2022-03-17 Impact factor: 4.634
Authors: Haigang Song; Antony J Burton; Sally L Shirran; Jūratė Fahrig-Kamarauskaitė; Hannelore Kaspar; Tom W Muir; Markus Künzler; James H Naismith Journal: Angew Chem Int Ed Engl Date: 2021-05-17 Impact factor: 15.336
Authors: Manuel Montalbán-López; Thomas A Scott; Sangeetha Ramesh; Imran R Rahman; Auke J van Heel; Jakob H Viel; Vahe Bandarian; Elke Dittmann; Olga Genilloud; Yuki Goto; María José Grande Burgos; Colin Hill; Seokhee Kim; Jesko Koehnke; John A Latham; A James Link; Beatriz Martínez; Satish K Nair; Yvain Nicolet; Sylvie Rebuffat; Hans-Georg Sahl; Dipti Sareen; Eric W Schmidt; Lutz Schmitt; Konstantin Severinov; Roderich D Süssmuth; Andrew W Truman; Huan Wang; Jing-Ke Weng; Gilles P van Wezel; Qi Zhang; Jin Zhong; Jörn Piel; Douglas A Mitchell; Oscar P Kuipers; Wilfred A van der Donk Journal: Nat Prod Rep Date: 2020-09-16 Impact factor: 15.111
Authors: Emmanuel Matabaro; Hannelore Kaspar; Paul Dahlin; Daniel L V Bader; Claudia E Murar; Florian Staubli; Christopher M Field; Jeffrey W Bode; Markus Künzler Journal: Sci Rep Date: 2021-02-11 Impact factor: 4.996