| Literature DB >> 32491100 |
Lia Puppim Buzanovsky1, Manuel José Sanchez-Vazquez1, Ana Nilce Silveira Maia-Elkhoury2, Guilherme Loureiro Werneck3.
Abstract
Cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) is a zoonotic disease with complex transmission cycle. Some environmental and socioeconomic factors are known to be the major determinants of the transmission process, which are involved in configuring the spatiotemporal patterns and thus can be delimiting. However, the relevance of these socioeconomic and environmental determinants is still not well understood. In this study, we aimed to identify the major environmental and socioeconomic determinants of CL in Brazil by articulating a systematic literature review of studies that are based on this subject. The methodology included a search for studies according to a structured protocol using the scientific platforms, such as Scielo and PubMed. The references of each identified article were who referred to CL determinants were further screened, and so on. We extracted information from 41 articles and the determinants were grouped accordingly. Two measures were evaluated as follows: a) the frequency of citations of the determinants; and b) the proportion of determinants identified as having "significant association in analytical studies" with respect to the total number of determinants analyzed in other analytical studies using the same concept. The analyzed articles covered most of the regions of Brazil and 7 other countries bordering Brazil. We found 43 concepts of determinants. However, the final selection resulted in the identification of 14 major determinants. These results therefore contribute in the identification of major CL determinants and this information can be used to establish strategies for identifying risk prone areas for disease surveillance.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32491100 PMCID: PMC7269534 DOI: 10.1590/0037-8682-0291-2019
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Rev Soc Bras Med Trop ISSN: 0037-8682 Impact factor: 1.581
FIGURE 1:Sample flowchart of the systematic literature review. The numbers indicate the nested level structure implemented within the search. The 1st order articles are the ones that were used in the preparation of this review and are included in the references , , , , , , , , , , , , , , .
FIGURE 2:Types of publications identified through the literature review.
FIGURE 3:Number of studies corresponding to different regions of Brazil.
Frequency of studies based on the environmental and socioeconomic determinants that were identified.
| Groups of environmental and socioeconomic determinants | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | With SA in AS | Total in AS | Total in DS | Total of JM |
| Sanitation | 1 | 2 | 9 | 6 |
| Agricultural and livestock | 1 | 6 | 8 | 12 |
| Agricultural Development Projects | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6 |
| Agroindustry | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Air humidity | 1 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| Altitude | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Animal production | 2 | 6 | 1 | 2 |
| Armed conflicts | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Bioclimatic zones | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Climate phenomena | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
| Construction of large infrastructures | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
| Cultural habits that cause exposure | 5 | 6 | 0 | 10 |
| Deforestation | 1 | 2 | 1 | 21 |
| Degree of urbanization | 1 | 1 | 1 | 5 |
| Forestry explorations | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| House near nature | 0 | 2 | 5 | 9 |
| Human development | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Income | 2 | 4 | 2 | 4 |
| Land use | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 |
| Leisure and tourism activities | 0 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Life expectancy | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Migration processes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Mining activities | 1 | 1 | 0 | 3 |
| Natural ecological changes | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Non-rural activities | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Population concentration | 1 | 3 | 1 | 4 |
| Presence of domestic animals | 2 | 5 | 9 | 3 |
| Presence of forests | 1 | 6 | 3 | 23 |
| Presence of reservoirs | 0 | 0 | 3 | 4 |
| Presence of vectors | 2 | 5 | 3 | 8 |
| Presence of water | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Professional occupation | 3 | 3 | 9 | 22 |
| Protected areas | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Rainfall | 2 | 9 | 2 | 3 |
| Relief | 0 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Rural area | 1 | 3 | 3 | 18 |
| Scholarity | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Solar radiation | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Temperature | 1 | 17 | 1 | 4 |
| Type of soil | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
| Types of vegetation | 0 | 3 | 1 | 15 |
| Urban and periurban area | 1 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
| Rural population | 2 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
Determinants selected by using “proportion with statistical significance” and “frequency of citations”.
| Determinants selected by “proportion with statistical significance” | Determinants selected by “frequency of citations” | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Groups | Proportion SA/AS | Groups | Frequency |
| Degree of urbanization | 1 | Professional occupation | 34 |
| Mining activities | 1 | Presence of forests | 32 |
| Professional occupation | 1 | Agricultural and livestock activities | 26 |
| Cultural habits that cause exposure | 0.83 | Rural areas | 24 |
| Deforestation | 0.5 | Deforestation | 24 |
| Human development | 0.5 | Temperature | 22 |
| Income | 0.5 | Types of vegetation | 19 |
| Rural population | 0.5 | ||
| Access to basic public services and sanitation | 0.5 | ||