Literature DB >> 32490080

Dataset of voxelwise correlated signal values of ADC, rCBV and FAP-specific PET of 13 Glioblastoma patients.

Manuel Röhrich1,2, Lisa Loi3, Ralf Floca4,5, Uwe Haberkorn1,2,6, Daniel Paech3.   

Abstract

This dataset is based on multimodal MRI and FAP-specific PET/CT Imaging applied to 13 patients with histologically proven glioblastomas. Imaging Data was processed using Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit (MITK) software. MRI images (contrast enhanced T1w, T2w/FLAIR, ADC, rCBV) were co-registrated with FAP-specific PET images. T2w/FLAIR hyperintensities and contrast enhancing lesions were segmented manually. Necrotic areas were segmented manually and subtracted from T2w/FLAIR hyperintensities and contrast enhancing lesions. Voxelwise ADC/rCBV and PET signal intensities in projection on T2w/FLAIR hyperintensities and contrast enhancing lesions were extracted using the pixel dumper function of the MITK software and stored as excel-files. The data presented in this article has been analysed and described in the article FAP-specific "PET signaling shows a moderately positive correlation with relative CBV and no correlation with ADC in 13 IDH wildtype Glioblastomas" published in the European Journal of Radiology.
© 2020 Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ADC; CBV; FAP; Fibroblast Activation Protein; Glioblastoma; PET

Year:  2020        PMID: 32490080      PMCID: PMC7256298          DOI: 10.1016/j.dib.2020.105712

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Data Brief        ISSN: 2352-3409


Specifications table

Value of the data

The data provided is useful for future correlation analyses of FAP-specific PET/CT imaging and MRI (ADC, rCBV) data. The data is of interest for research projects related to hybrid (MRI/PET) imaging that include publicly available data. The dataset could be included into similar hybrid imaging datasets with a higher number of individuals examined and used for correlation analyses of MRI parameters and FAP-specific PET signalling.

Data Description

The dataset consists of 13 folders each containing 2 excel-files. One excel file consists of voxelwise correlated signal values of ADC, rCBV and FAP-specific PET-signal in projection on the T2w/FLAIR hyperintensities (after subtraction of necrotic voxels). The other excel file consists of voxelwise correlated signal values of ADC, rCBV and FAP-specific PET-signal in projection on the contrast enhancing lesion (after subtraction of necrotic voxels).

Experimental Design, Materials, and Methods

Clinical PET/CT Imaging

Diagnostic imaging was performed under the conditions of the updated declaration of Helsinki, § 37 (unproven interventions in clinical practice) and in accordance to the German Pharmaceuticals Law §13 (2b) for medical reasons using 68Ga-FAPI-02 (2 Patients) and -04 (11 Patients), which was applied intravenously (200+/-50 MBq), 10 min, 1 and 3 hours post tracer administration in 2 patients examined with FAPI-2 and 30 minutes after tracer administration in the other 11 patients examined with FAPI-4. For the two patients that have undergone PET imaging at three different time points, images after 1 hour were chosen for further analysis. The PET/CT scans were performed with a Biograph mCT Flow™ PET/CT-Scanner (Siemens Medical Solutions, Berlin and Munich, Germany) using the following parameters: slice thickness of 5 mm, collimation of 5 mm, increment of 3-4 mm, soft-tissue reconstruction kernel, care dose. Immediately after CT scanning, a whole-body PET was acquired in 3D (matrix 200x200) in FlowMotion™ with 0.7 cm/min. The emission data were corrected for random, scatter and decay. Reconstruction was conducted with an OSEM algorithm with 2 iterations/21 subsets and Gauss-filtered to a transaxial resolution of 5 mm at full-width half-maximum. Attenuation correction was performed using the low-dose non-enhanced CT data. The quantitative assessment of standardized uptake values (SUV) was done using a ROI technique. SUV values were corrected for healthy appearing contralateral brain parenchyma as background (SUV/BG). The imaging protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (Study number S-016/2018) and conducted according to the guidelines of the Institutional Review Board and to good clinical practice.

MRI Acquisition

The acquisition of MRI exams was performed at 3T, employing the following protocol parameters: T1-weighted GdCE MRI (GdCE-T1) (echo time[TE] = 4.04 ms; repetition time [TR] = 1710 ms; field of view [FoV] in mm2: 256 × 256; matrix: 512 × 512; slice thickness: 1 mm), T2 fluid attenuated inversion recovery (TE = 135 ms; TR = 8500 ms; FoV: 230 × 172 mm2; matrix: 256 × 192; slice thickness: 5 mm), and T2-weighted MRI turbo spin echo (TSE) (TE = 86 ms; TR = 5550 ms; FoV: 229 × 172 mm2; matrix: 384 × 230; slice thickness: 5 mm). Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps were generated from diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). DWI was performed using a single-shot spin-echo (SE) echo-planar (EPI) sequence with the following parameters: echo time (TE) = 86–109 ms, repetition time (TR) = 4700–5300 ms, flip angle (FA) = 90°, slice thickness (ST) = 5 mm, field of view (FOV) = 229 × 229 mm, echo train length (ETL) = 1, number of slices (NS) = 25–26, spacing between slices (SS) = 5-6 mm, acquisition matrix (matrix) = 130/0/0/130 mm, number of averages (NA) = 3–4, parallel-acquisition-technique factor (PAT) = 2. Diffusion sensitizing gradients were applied sequentially in the x, y, and z directions with b values of 0 and 1200 s/mm2. Relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) maps were generated from dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced perfusion weighted Imaging (DSC-PWI).Prior to acquisition of the DSC-PWI sequence either dynamic-contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) or acquisition of a T2-w sequence was performed. In both cases a 0.1 mmol/kg prebolus dose of intravenous gadoterate meglumine (Gd-DOTA, DOTAREM, Guerbet, France) was administered 4 min prior to acquisition of the DSC-PWI sequence (injection was performed after a 20-s delay from the start of the DSC-MRI or prior to acquisition of the T2-w sequence) to diminish T1 effects that might result from agent extravasation. Timing of the prebolus with regard to the start of DSC-PWI was comparable in both cases, and allowed for contrast agent saturation within the extravascular space. DSC-PWI was obtained with a T2*-weighted gradient-echo EPI sequence and was started simultaneously with bolus injection of a standard dose (0.1 mmol/kg) of intravenous gadoterate meglumine. Bolus and prebolus injection was performed through a pneumatically driven injection pump at an injection rate of 5 ml/s. Twenty-six to 28 slices with a thickness of 5 mm were acquired with fat suppression (TE = 36 ms, TR = 2220 ms, FA = 90°, FOV = 240*240 mm, matrix = 128/0/0/128 mm). In total, 50–75 dynamic measurements were performed (including at least 8–10 prebolus measurements prior to bolus arrival). Subsequently, post-contrast MPRAGE data was acquired with inversion time (TI) = 1100 ms, TE = 4 ms, TR = 1710 ms, FA = 15°, ST = 1 mm, FOV = 250 × 250 mm and matrix = 256/0/0/256 mm. Both DWI and DSC-PWI have previously been described in detail [1,2]

Co-Registration of FAP-specific PET Scans and MRI Scans

For all patients, a corresponding MRI scan for the FAP-specific PET/CT scan (up to 4 weeks before PET/CT, no change of treatment between the examinations) was available. T2w/FLAIR sequences were available for all 13 patients, contrast enhanced T1 sequences were available for 12 patients. ADC maps were available for all 13 patients and rCBV maps were available for 11 patients. A post-process co-registration using a multi modal rigid registration algorithm was done [3]. Thereby, contrast enhanced T1 weighted, T2w/FLAIR, ADC and rCBV images were co-registered on the corresponding FAP-specific PET images using the software Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit (MITK) Workbench [4].

Image Analysis

T2w/FLAIR hyperintensities and contrast enhancing lesions and necrotic areas were delineated manually within co-registrated MRI slides on T1-w contrast enhanced images and T2-Flair images. Segmentations have been performed in consensus by D.P. and M.R. with eight years and five years of experience in brain tumor imaging. To generate volumes of interest (VOIs) necrotic areas were subtracted from T2w/FLAIR and contrast enhancing areas. Pixelwise signal intensity values of FAP-specific PET signaling, ADC and rCBV within T2w/FLAIR based and contrast enhancement based VOIs were extracted using the software Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit (MITK) Workbench.
SubjectRadiology and Imaging
Specific subject areaWe provide voxelwise signal intensities of FAP-specific PET-imaging and ADC/rCBV in projection on the T2w/FLAIR hyperintensities and contrast enhancing lesions of 13 glioblastomas.
Type of dataTable
How data were acquiredMRI and PET data were acquired during clinical routine. Data analysis was performed using Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit (MITK) Workbench.
Data formatRaw
Parameters for data collectionOnly imaging data of patients with histologically proven glioblastomas and sufficient MRI and PET data were included into the dataset.
Description of data collectionImaging data was processed using Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit (MITK) software. MRI image series (contrast enhanced T1w, T2w/FLAIR, ADC, rCBV) were co-registrated with FAP-specific PET images. T2w/FLAIR hyperintensities and contrast enhancing lesions were segmented manually. Necrotic areas were segmented manually and subtracted from T2w/FLAIR hyperintensities and contrast enhancing lesions. Voxelwise ADC/rCBV and PET signal intensities in projection on T2w/FLAIR hyperintensities and contrast enhancing lesions were extracted using the pixel dumper function of the MITK software.
Data source locationInstitution: University Hospital Heidelberg City/Town/Region: HeidelbergCountry: Germany
Data accessibilityWith the article
Related research articleManuel Röhrich et al.: FAP-specific PET signaling shows a moderately positive correlation with relative CBV and no correlation with ADC in 13 IDH wildtype Glioblastomas
  3 in total

1.  The Medical Imaging Interaction Toolkit: challenges and advances : 10 years of open-source development.

Authors:  Marco Nolden; Sascha Zelzer; Alexander Seitel; Diana Wald; Michael Müller; Alfred M Franz; Daniel Maleike; Markus Fangerau; Matthias Baumhauer; Lena Maier-Hein; Klaus H Maier-Hein; Hans-Peter Meinzer; Ivo Wolf
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2013-04-16       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Prognostic value of combined visualization of MR diffusion and perfusion maps in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Katerina Deike; Benedikt Wiestler; Markus Graf; Caroline Reimer; Ralf O Floca; Philipp Bäumer; Philipp Kickingereder; Sabine Heiland; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Wolfgang Wick; Martin Bendszus; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 4.130

3.  Assessing the predictability of IDH mutation and MGMT methylation status in glioma patients using relaxation-compensated multipool CEST MRI at 7.0 T.

Authors:  Daniel Paech; Johannes Windschuh; Johanna Oberhollenzer; Constantin Dreher; Felix Sahm; Jan-Eric Meissner; Steffen Goerke; Patrick Schuenke; Moritz Zaiss; Sebastian Regnery; Sebastian Bickelhaupt; Philipp Bäumer; Martin Bendszus; Wolfgang Wick; Andreas Unterberg; Peter Bachert; Mark Edward Ladd; Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Alexander Radbruch
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 13.029

  3 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Clinical Results of Fibroblast Activation Protein (FAP) Specific PET and Implications for Radiotherapy Planning: Systematic Review.

Authors:  Paul Windisch; Daniel R Zwahlen; Stefan A Koerber; Frederik L Giesel; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn; Sebastian Adeberg
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 2.  Clinical results of fibroblast activation protein (FAP) specific PET for non-malignant indications: systematic review.

Authors:  Paul Windisch; Daniel R Zwahlen; Frederik L Giesel; Eberhard Scholz; Patrick Lugenbiel; Jürgen Debus; Uwe Haberkorn; Sebastian Adeberg
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2021-02-19       Impact factor: 3.138

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.