| Literature DB >> 32489394 |
Yuxiang Dai1, Qianqian Tian1,2,3, Jing Si4, Zhonghan Sun2, Shalaimaiti Shali1, Lili Xu1, Daoyuan Ren1, Shufu Chang1, Xin Dong1,5, Hongxia Zhao1,5, Zhendong Mei2, Yan Zheng1,2,4, Junbo Ge1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence shows that circulating levels of trimethylamine N-oxide, which is generated from the metabolism of dietary choline, may predict cardiovascular disease among Caucasians. Acute coronary syndrome (ACS), one common presentation of cardiovascular disease, is a spectrum of signs and symptoms due to acute decreased blood flow in the coronary arteries. The relationship between the metabolites from choline pathway and ACS remains unclear. We aimed to assess the associations of circulating metabolites from the choline pathway with ACS among a Chinese population, who consume a different dietary pattern than their Western counterparts.Entities:
Keywords: Cardiovascular risk; Choline; Intestinal flora; Metabolite score; Trimethylamine N-oxide
Year: 2020 PMID: 32489394 PMCID: PMC7245747 DOI: 10.1186/s12986-020-00460-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutr Metab (Lond) ISSN: 1743-7075 Impact factor: 4.169
Characteristics of participants in cases of acute coronary syndrome and controls
| Characteristics | Total ( | Cases ( | Controls ( | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, mean (SD), year | 62.92 ± 10.84 | 63.07 ± 11.02 | 62.77 ± 10.69 | 0.54 |
| Sex male, No. (%) | 430(85.8%) | 217(85.4%) | 213(86.2%) | 0.90 |
| Current smokers, No. (%) | 163(32.5%) | 110(43.3%) | 53(21.5%) | < 0.001 |
| Hypertension, No. (%) | 296(59.1%) | 149(58.7%) | 147(59.5%) | 0.92 |
| Diabetes mellitus, No. (%) | 104(20.8%) | 71(28.0%) | 33(13.4%) | < 0.001 |
| Hyperlipidaemia, No. (%) | 13(2.6%) | 5(2.0%) | 8(3.2%) | 0.54 |
| BMI, mean (SD), kg/m2 | 25.06 ± 3.33 | 24.73 ± 3.53 | 25.41 ± 3.08 | 0.02 |
| Smoking Index, mean (SD), pack-years | 15.13 ± 25.21 | 17.96 ± 26.37 | 12.22 ± 23.73 | < 0.001 |
| eGFR, mean (SD), ml/min/1.73m2 | 82.36 ± 19.90 | 80.76 ± 20.79 | 84.01 ± 18.88 | 0.07 |
| Gensini Score, mean (SD) | 39.88 ± 52.01 | 76.73 ± 50.83 | 1.99 ± 2.90 | < 0.001 |
| Betaine, mean (SD), μmol/L | 40.07 ± 15.94 | 41.74 ± 17.87 | 38.36 ± 13.55 | 0.02 |
| Choline, mean (SD), μmol/L | 47.93 ± 33.26 | 57.04 ± 34.70 | 38.55 ± 28.99 | < 0.001 |
| TMA, mean (SD), μmol/L | 4.10 ± 2.99 | 4.27 ± 3.30 | 3.93 ± 2.63 | 0.20 |
| TMAO, mean (SD), μmol/L | 1.92 ± 2.08 | 1.84 ± 2.21 | 1.99 ± 1.95 | 0.42 |
| Choline metabolite score, mean (SD) | 34.58 ± 21.33 | 40.21 ± 22.39 | 28.78 ± 18.56 | < 0.001 |
| Ratio of betaine/choline, mean (SD), μmol/L | 1.03 ± 0.44 | 0.89 ± 0.43 | 1.18 ± 0.40 | < 0.05 |
BMI body mass index, eGFR estimated glomerular filtration rate, TMA trimethylamine, TMAO trimethylamine N-oxide
Choline metabolite score was applied by a weighted sum of concentrations of four metabolites in the choline pathway (betaine, choline, TMA and TMAO)
Fig. 1Spearman correlations of the choline pathway metabolites in all participants. Red represents a positive correlation, blue represents a negative correlation, and the number in the matrix is the coefficients of spearman correlation
The inverse normal transformation was applied to the raw values of metabolites. To build the score, we applied a weighted sum of concentrations of 4 metabolites in the choline pathway (betaine, choline, TMA and TMAO). The ratio of betaine/choline was calculated by dividing the raw values and then applying the inverse normal transformations.
TMA, trimethylamine; TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide
Odds of acute coronary syndrome by circulating concentration of choline pathway metabolites
| Variable | Odds Ratio (95% CI) for Quartiles of Metabolites Concentration | Odds Ratio (95% CI) per 1-SD increment | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| No. of controls | 62 | 62 | 61 | 62 | … | … |
| No. of cases | 59 | 45 | 53 | 97 | … | … |
| Model 1 a | Ref. | 0.69 (0.40–1.18) | 0.84 (0.50–1.43) | 1.43 (0.87–2.34) | 0.07 | 1.11(0.93–1.33) |
| Model 2 b | Ref. | 0.62 (0.35–1.07) | 0.76 (0.44–1.31) | 1.43 (0.87–2.36) | 0.07 | 1.12(0.93–1.35) |
| Model 3 c | Ref. | 0.63 (0.36–1.09) | 0.78 (0.45–1.34) | 1.41 (0.85–2.34) | 0.08 | 1.12(0.93–1.34) |
| No. of controls | 62 | 62 | 61 | 62 | … | … |
| No. of cases | 35 | 28 | 27 | 164 | … | … |
| Model 1 a | Ref. | 0.82 (0.44–1.53) | 0.70 (0.37–1.31) | 4.36 (2.61–7.38) | < 0.001 | 1.85(1.52–2.28) |
| Model 2 b | Ref. | 0.79 (0.42–1.47) | 0.58 (0.30–1.11) | 3.91 (2.33–6.65) | < 0.001 | 1.79(1.47–2.21) |
| Model 3 c | Ref. | 0.73 (0.39–1.39) | 0.55 (0.29–1.06) | 3.72 (2.21–6.34) | < 0.001 | 1.77(1.44–2.18) |
| No. of controls | 62 | 62 | 61 | 62 | … | … |
| No. of cases | 70 | 49 | 59 | 76 | … | … |
| Model 1 a | Ref. | 1.41 (0.85–2.34) | 0.94 (0.56–1.58) | 0.67 (0.39–1.15) | 0.02 | 1.11(0.92–1.34) |
| Model 2 b | Ref. | 1.53 (0.92–2.57) | 1.09 (0.64–1.85) | 0.76 (0.44–1.32) | 0.07 | 1.05(0.87–1.27) |
| Model 3 c | Ref. | 1.71 (1.01–2.91) | 1.26 (0.73–2.17) | 0.80 (0.46–1.40) | 0.09 | 1.10(0.90–1.33) |
| No. of controls | 62 | 62 | 61 | 62 | … | … |
| No. of cases | 85 | 62 | 42 | 65 | … | … |
| Model 1 a | Ref. | 0.79 (0.47–1.35) | 0.95 (0.57–1.60) | 1.25 (0.75–2.08) | 0.37 | 0.87(0.72–1.05) |
| Model 2 b | Ref. | 0.70 (0.40–1.20) | 0.91 (0.54–1.53) | 1.01 (0.60–1.70) | 0.76 | 0.84(0.69–1.02) |
| Model 3 c | Ref. | 0.71 (0.41–1.23) | 0.94 (0.56–1.59) | 1.09 (0.64–1.85) | 0.56 | 0.80(0.65–0.97) |
| No. of controls | 62 | 62 | 61 | 62 | … | … |
| No. of cases | 41 | 26 | 59 | 128 | … | … |
| Model 1 a | Ref. | 1.10(0.60–2.03) | 1.65(0.93–2.97) | 3.65(2.14–6.32) | < 0.001 | 1.96(1.49–2.59) |
| Model 2 b | Ref. | 1.00(0.54–1.86) | 1.39(0.77–2.52) | 3.26(1.90–5.67) | < 0.001 | 1.85(1.40–2.45) |
| Model 3 c | Ref. | 1.00(0.54–1.86) | 1.35(0.75–2.46) | 3.18(1.85–5.54) | < 0.001 | 1.80(1.37–2.40) |
| No. of controls | 62 | 62 | 61 | 62 | … | … |
| No. of cases | 160 | 39 | 24 | 31 | … | … |
| Model 1 a | Ref. | 0.23(0.14–0.39) | 0.16(0.09–0.29) | 0.19(0.11–0.31) | < 0.001 | 0.46(0.37–0.57) |
| Model 2 b | Ref. | 0.24(0.14–0.39) | 0.17(0.09–0.30) | 0.20(0.12–0.35) | < 0.001 | 0.48(0.39–0.59) |
| Model 3 c | Ref. | 0.24(0.14–0.41) | 0.17(0.09–0.30) | 0.21(0.12–0.36) | < 0.001 | 0.49(0.39–0.60) |
The inverse normal transformation was applied to the raw values of metabolites. To build the score, we applied a weighted sum of concentrations of 4 metabolites in the choline pathway (betaine, choline, TMA, and TMAO). The ratio of betaine/choline was calculated by dividing the raw values and then applying the inverse normal transformations
TMA trimethylamine, TMAO trimethylamine N-oxide. Ref., i.e., reference group, and we used participants assigned to the first quartile of the concentrations of each metabolite, the metabolite score and betaine to choline ratio, as the reference group in each model
a in model 1, odds ratio was adjusted for age, sex, smoking index and body mass index;
b in model 2, odds ratio was adjusted for all factors in model 1, plus history of the disease (i.e., hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia);
c in model 3, odds ratio was adjusted for all factors in model 2, plus kidney function measured by eGFR
Relations between Gensini score and circulating metabolites in acute coronary syndrome patients
| Variable | Adjusted means (standard errors) of Gesini score across quartiles of metabolites levesl | Regression coefficient (95% CI) per 1-SD increment d | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| Model 1 a | 75.7 (7.68) | 75.0 (8.33) | 73.7 (7.75) | 71.1 (6.37) | 0.57 | -0.18 (-6.12~5.75) |
| Model 2 b | 71.8 (13.7) | 72.0 (13.5) | 68.9 (14.0) | 68.4(12.9) | 0.65 | 0.11 (-5.82~6.04) |
| Model 3 c | 71.8 (13.7) | 72.0 (13.6) | 68.9 (14.0) | 68.4 (12.9) | 0.65 | 0.11 (-5.84~6.06) |
| Model 1 a | 71.6 (9.44) | 73.1 (10.34) | 62.4 (10.42) | 75.7 (5.29) | 0.50 | 4.32 (-2.03~10.66) |
| Model 2 b | 69.8 (14.6) | 72.0 (14.4) | 54.8 (15.7) | 71.5 (12.5) | 0.68 | 3.77 (-2.63~10.16) |
| Model 3 c | 69.8 (14.7) | 72.0 (14.4) | 54.8 (15.7) | 71.5 (12.6) | 0.68 | 3.77 (-2.64~10.19) |
| Model 1 a | 77.0 (7.44) | 77.8 (8.20) | 72.7 (7.57) | 69.3 (6.63) | 0.30 | -3.78 (-10.08~2.52) |
| Model 2 b | 78.2 (13.7) | 74.8 (13.8) | 72.9 (13.6) | 63.6 (12.8) | 0.11 | -5.40 (-11.85~1.06) |
| Model 3 c | 78.3 (13.7) | 74.7 (13.8) | 72.8 (13.7) | 63.5 (12.9) | 0.11 | -5.56 (-12.13~1.00) |
| Model 1 a | 73.0 (6.47) | 79.0 (7.59) | 66.8 (8.68) | 73.4 (7.36) | 0.80 | -1.28 (-7.84~5.27) |
| Model 2 b | 67.3 (13.4) | 76.0 (13.3) | 62.5 (14.5) | 68.9 (14.5) | 0.92 | -1.17 (-7.84~5.51) |
| Model 3 c | 67.5 (13.5) | 76.2 (13.4) | 62.6 (14.6) | 68.8 (13.0) | 0.92 | -1.29 (-8.33~5.75) |
| Model 1 a | 76.7 (9.82) | 63.0 (9.01) | 73.4 (7.46) | 76.2 (5.87) | 0.55 | 3.14 (-7.23~13.51) |
| Model 2 b | 75.4 (14.8) | 61.5 (14.2) | 68.4 (13.4) | 73.5 (12.7) | 0.64 | 2.46 (-7.93~12.85) |
| Model 3 c | 75.3 (14.8) | 61.3 (14.3) | 68.4 (13.5) | 73.5 (12.7) | 0.64 | 2.49 (-7.99~12.96) |
| Model 1 a | 76.2 (5.33) | 71.1 (8.55) | 79.7 (11.19) | 58.4 (9.83) | 0.15 | -4.9 (-11.21~1.41) |
| Model 2 b | 73.7 (13.0) | 68.7 (13.3) | 78.9 (15.6) | 58.4 (15.0) | 0.26 | -4.15 (-10.55~2.25) |
| Model 3 c | 73.7 (13.0) | 68.5 (13.4) | 78.8 (15.7) | 58.4 (15.0) | 0.26 | -4.15 (-10.56~2.26) |
Inverse normal transformation was applied to raw values of metabolites. To build the score, we applied a weighted sum of concentrations of 4 metabolites in the choline pathway (betaine, choline, TMA and TMAO). The ratio of betaine/choline was calculated by dividing the raw values and then applying inverse normal transformations
TMA, trimethylamine; TMAO, trimethylamine N-oxide
a Model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, smoking index and body mass index
b Model 2 was adjusted for all factors in model 1, plus history of disease (i.e., hypertension, diabetes mellitus and hyperlipidemia)
c Model 3 was adjusted for all factors in model 2, plus kidney function measured by eGFR
d The regression coefficient represented the average difference in the Gensini score per 1-SD increase in the transformed levels of metabolites