Literature DB >> 32489252

The most important attribute: stakeholder perspectives on what matters most in a physician.

P Wheatley-Price1,2, K Laurie1, T Zhang2, D Bossé1,2, D Chowdhury1.   

Abstract

Background: Most people can think of important attributes that they believe physicians should have. The canmeds framework defines domains of attributes in medical training (Leader, Medical Expert, Scholar, Communicator, Advocate, Collaborator, and Professional). Whether some are more valued by various stakeholders is unknown. Previous research has shown that patients can receive suboptimal care if physician and patient expectations of a health care encounter differ. In the present study, we sought to identify what various stakeholders identified as the single most important attribute for a physician to possess.
Methods: A simple survey asked the question "What is the single most important attribute a physician should have?" at a single academic teaching hospital and affiliated medical school. The survey was administered to medical students, doctors, nurses, patients, and caregivers. Age and sex were also collected. Responses were assigned to domains and analyzed to identify trends. The primary outcome is a descriptive analysis of the findings.
Results: From 362 individuals who responded, 109 different responses were obtained. The single most common answer was "compassion" (n = 86). Responses were categorized into these 5 domains: Caring, n = 209; Professional or Collaborator, n = 58; Medical Expert, n = 54; Communicator, n = 32; and Other, n = 9. Compared with men, women chose attributes in the Caring domain more frequently (64% vs. 49%), although that domain was the most popular for both sexes. Medical students were less likely to highly value Communicator attributes. Conclusions: All stakeholder group identified attributes in the Caring domain as being most important. Although all canmeds roles are important, our research highlights the priorities of stakeholders. 2020 Multimed Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Stakeholders in health care system; medical education; physician attributes; quality of care

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32489252      PMCID: PMC7253743          DOI: 10.3747/co.27.5489

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Oncol        ISSN: 1198-0052            Impact factor:   3.677


  6 in total

1.  Advancing our craft: focus group methods and practice.

Authors:  David L Morgan; Joan L Bottorff
Journal:  Qual Health Res       Date:  2010-05

2.  Primary care: core values. Patients' priorities.

Authors:  J Neuberger
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-07-25

Review 3.  How patients want their doctor to communicate. A literature review on primary care patients' perspective.

Authors:  Giuseppe Deledda; Francesca Moretti; Michela Rimondini; Christa Zimmermann
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-06-17

Review 4.  A systematic review of the literature on patient priorities for general practice care. Part 1: Description of the research domain.

Authors:  M Wensing; H P Jung; J Mainz; F Olesen; R Grol
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.634

5.  Sex differences in the neural correlates of affective experience.

Authors:  Yoshiya Moriguchi; Alexandra Touroutoglou; Bradford C Dickerson; Lisa Feldman Barrett
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 3.436

6.  Significance of gender in the attitude towards doctor-patient communication in medical students and physicians.

Authors:  Henriette Löffler-Stastka; Tamara Seitz; Sabrina Billeth; Barbara Pastner; Ingrid Preusche; Charles Seidman
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2016-08-11       Impact factor: 1.704

  6 in total
  1 in total

1.  A Scoping Review on the Concept of Physician Caring.

Authors:  David S Burstein; Faith Svigos; Akash Patel; Neha K Reddy; Kelly N Michelson; Linda C O'Dwyer; Mark Linzer; Jeffrey A Linder; David Victorson
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 6.473

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.