BACKGROUND: The Government of Ghana launched the Rural LPG (RLP) promotion program in 2013 as part of its efforts to reduce fuelwood consumption. The aim of the RLP is to contribute to Ghana's overarching goal to provide LPG access to 50% of Ghana's population by 2020. The RLP has not announced long-term program objectives. However, in the interim the RLP targeted a cumulative total of 170,000 LPG cookstoves to rural households by the end of 2017. As of November 2017, 149,500 rural households had received the LPG cook stoves. Our case study documents Ghana's experiences to date with LPG scale up. METHODS: We carried out a desktop review/document analysis of literature on the RLP. Each document was reviewed for information related to the elements of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework as it pertained to LPG promotion and adoption. In-depth interviews were held among key stakeholders in Ghana. Previously collected data from a field evaluation of the RLP was also assessed. FINDINGS: Generally, our evaluation suggests that the current form of the RLP is not achieving its stated goal. Our evaluation of the RLP in five rural communities showed that about 58% of households had never refilled their LPG cylinders nine months after the initial delivery of a filled cylinder. Only 8% still used their LPG at 18 months post distribution. Cost and distance to LPG filling stations were the main reasons for low LPG use. Beneficiaries did not exclusively use their LPG even at the initial stages when all of them had LPG in their cylinders. Ghana is currently undergoing transitions in the LPG sector including a change from the current private cylinder ownership model to a cylinder recirculation model for the distribution of LPG. There was no evidence of a well-documented implementation framework for the RLP. CONCLUSION: Fuel cost, poor LPG access, and an inadequate implementation framework hinder the RLP implementation.
BACKGROUND: The Government of Ghana launched the Rural LPG (RLP) promotion program in 2013 as part of its efforts to reduce fuelwood consumption. The aim of the RLP is to contribute to Ghana's overarching goal to provide LPG access to 50% of Ghana's population by 2020. The RLP has not announced long-term program objectives. However, in the interim the RLP targeted a cumulative total of 170,000 LPG cookstoves to rural households by the end of 2017. As of November 2017, 149,500 rural households had received the LPG cook stoves. Our case study documents Ghana's experiences to date with LPG scale up. METHODS: We carried out a desktop review/document analysis of literature on the RLP. Each document was reviewed for information related to the elements of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework as it pertained to LPG promotion and adoption. In-depth interviews were held among key stakeholders in Ghana. Previously collected data from a field evaluation of the RLP was also assessed. FINDINGS: Generally, our evaluation suggests that the current form of the RLP is not achieving its stated goal. Our evaluation of the RLP in five rural communities showed that about 58% of households had never refilled their LPG cylinders nine months after the initial delivery of a filled cylinder. Only 8% still used their LPG at 18 months post distribution. Cost and distance to LPG filling stations were the main reasons for low LPG use. Beneficiaries did not exclusively use their LPG even at the initial stages when all of them had LPG in their cylinders. Ghana is currently undergoing transitions in the LPG sector including a change from the current private cylinder ownership model to a cylinder recirculation model for the distribution of LPG. There was no evidence of a well-documented implementation framework for the RLP. CONCLUSION: Fuel cost, poor LPG access, and an inadequate implementation framework hinder the RLP implementation.
Authors: Kendra N Williams; Josiah L Kephart; Magdalena Fandiño-Del-Rio; Carolyn J O'Brien; Lawrence H Moulton; Kirsten Koehler; Steven A Harvey; William Checkley Journal: Energy Sustain Dev Date: 2020-09-07 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Kendra N Williams; Josiah L Kephart; Magdalena Fandiño-Del-Rio; Suzanne M Simkovich; Kirsten Koehler; Steven A Harvey; William Checkley Journal: Environ Int Date: 2020-10-05 Impact factor: 9.621
Authors: Rebecca Kyerewaa Dwommoh Prah; Daniel Carrion; Felix Boakye Oppong; Theresa Tawiah; Mohammed Nuhu Mujtaba; Stephaney Gyaase; Adolphine Kwarteng; Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise; Oscar Agyei; Mieks Twumasi; Francis Agbokey; Kwaku Poku Asante; Darby W Jack Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2020-12-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Ashlinn K Quinn; Kendra N Williams; Lisa M Thompson; Steven A Harvey; Ricardo Piedrahita; Jiantong Wang; Casey Quinn; Ajay Pillarisetti; John P McCracken; Joshua P Rosenthal; Miles A Kirby; Anaité Diaz Artiga; Gurusamy Thangavel; Ghislaine Rosa; J Jaime Miranda; William Checkley; Jennifer L Peel; Thomas F Clasen Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2021-11-29 Impact factor: 3.390
Authors: Carlos F Gould; Samuel B Schlesinger; Emilio Molina; Miryan L Bejarano; Alfredo Valarezo; Darby W Jack Journal: Energy Policy Date: 2019-11-04 Impact factor: 6.142
Authors: Kendra N Williams; Lisa M Thompson; Zoe Sakas; Mayari Hengstermann; Ashlinn Quinn; Anaité Díaz-Artiga; Gurusamy Thangavel; Elisa Puzzolo; Ghislaine Rosa; Kalpana Balakrishnan; Jennifer Peel; William Checkley; Thomas F Clasen; J Jaime Miranda; Joshua P Rosenthal; Steven A Harvey Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2020-09-29 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Steven N Chillrud; Kenneth Ayuurebobi Ae-Ngibise; Carlos F Gould; Seth Owusu-Agyei; Mohammed Mujtaba; Grace Manu; Katrin Burkart; Patrick L Kinney; Ashlinn Quinn; Darby W Jack; Kwaku Poku Asante Journal: J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol Date: 2021-03-03 Impact factor: 5.563