Zhenlv Lin1, Fan Yang2, Dong Lu3, Wenjie Sun4, Guangwei Zhu4, Bin Lan4. 1. Department of Emergency Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. 2. Department of Pediatric Surgery, First Hospital of Quanzhou, Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China. 3. Department of Gastrointestinal Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China. 4. Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine the role of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 in cell proliferation and invasion ability of gastric cancer cells and to explore its possible mechanisms. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining was used to determine NCOA2 gene expression in gastric cancer. Western blotting was used to detect Wnt signal pathways-related protein expression. Colony formation assays, Cell Counting Kit-8 assays, and transwell assays were used to determine cell proliferation, metastasis, and invasion ability of gastric cancer cells. A flow cytometric apoptosis tests determine gastric cancer cell apoptosis ability after inhibition of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2. Subcutaneous mouse models were used to determine the gastric cancer growth and peritoneal metastasis differences after inhibition the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2. RESULTS: The expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 in gastric cancer cells is high (P < .01), including lymph node metastasis, TNM staging, and gender differences in nuclear receptor coactivator 2 expression were statistically significant (P < .01). Short interfering nuclear receptor coactivator 2 could inhibit the proliferation and invasion ability of gastric cancer cells. Short interfering nuclear receptor coactivator 2 promotes the apoptosis of gastric cancer cells. Animal experiments showed that short interfering nuclear receptor coactivator 2 could inhibit the growth and invasion of gastric cancer-transplantable tumors. Knockdown of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 inhibited the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in the gastric cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS: Knockdown of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 can inhibit the proliferation and invasion of human gastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. The underlying mechanism of NOCA2 affects the Wnt signaling pathway.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to determine the role of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 in cell proliferation and invasion ability of gastric cancer cells and to explore its possible mechanisms. METHODS: Immunohistochemical staining was used to determine NCOA2 gene expression in gastric cancer. Western blotting was used to detect Wnt signal pathways-related protein expression. Colony formation assays, Cell Counting Kit-8 assays, and transwell assays were used to determine cell proliferation, metastasis, and invasion ability of gastric cancer cells. A flow cytometric apoptosis tests determine gastric cancer cell apoptosis ability after inhibition of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2. Subcutaneous mouse models were used to determine the gastric cancer growth and peritoneal metastasis differences after inhibition the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2. RESULTS: The expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 in gastric cancer cells is high (P < .01), including lymph node metastasis, TNM staging, and gender differences in nuclear receptor coactivator 2 expression were statistically significant (P < .01). Short interfering nuclear receptor coactivator 2 could inhibit the proliferation and invasion ability of gastric cancer cells. Short interfering nuclear receptor coactivator 2 promotes the apoptosis of gastric cancer cells. Animal experiments showed that short interfering nuclear receptor coactivator 2 could inhibit the growth and invasion of gastric cancer-transplantable tumors. Knockdown of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 inhibited the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway in the gastric cancer cells. CONCLUSIONS: Knockdown of the expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 can inhibit the proliferation and invasion of humangastric cancer in vitro and in vivo. The underlying mechanism of NOCA2 affects the Wnt signaling pathway.
Gastric cancer is very common worldwide, especially in East Asia.[1] Early gastric cancer often has no obvious symptoms or is associated with some
nonspecific symptoms, such as indigestion and loss of appetite. Gastric cancer often
reached late stage when symptoms appear. The 5-year survival rate after surgery is
only 20% to 40%.[2] Therefore, it is important to discover new biomarkers and broader mechanisms
involved in the development and metastasis of gastric cancer.Nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (NCOA2, aka SRC-2) is a transcriptional regulator of
nuclear receptors that plays a key role in regulation of energy balance.[3-6] The transcription factor NCOA2 is a member of the p160 family, which does not
bind to DNA directly but regulates transcription by interacting with an enhancer or
promoter region that regulates target genes.[5-8] Nuclear receptor coactivator 2 also affects different physiological
processes, including cell growth, energy metabolism, circadian rhythm, and feeding behavior.[4-8] The expression of the NCOA2 gene plays a crucial role in the
development, progression, and metastasis of many malignant tumors, such as prostate
cancer. Amplification or overexpression of NCOA2 occurred in 8% of the patients with
prostate cancer and up to 37% in patients with metastatic cancer.[9] More importantly, patients with high expression of NCOA2 are more likely to
relapse after androgen-deprivation therapy.[10] Amplification or overexpression of the NCOA2 gene may play
an important role in metastasis. In the present study, we investigated the role of
NCOA2 in gastric cancer. Previous study had revealed that NCOA2, also known as
SRC-2, is essential for the epithelial–mesenchymal transformation (EMT) in breast
cancer cells.[11] Yu et al
[12] also reported that NCOA2 can inhibit Wnt/β-catenin signaling in colorectal
cancer. The Wnt signaling pathway played an important role in the development of
numerous humantumors, such as in gastric cancer,[13-16] breast cancer,[17] and melanoma.[18-20] The Wnt pathway may also play a role in leukemia.[21,22] Mutation of the Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway induces EMT in normal cells
and promotes proliferation, invasion, and metastasis of gastric cancer cells.[23-27]In the present study, we investigate NOCA2 expression in the gastric cancer samples
and relationship between expression of NOCA2 and clinicopathological factors of
gastric cancer. We investigate that NOCA2 affects the biologic behaviors of gastric
cancer cells and the underlying mechanisms.
Materials and Methods
Immunohistochemistry and Patient Samples Collection
Immunohistochemistry of tissues chips was carried out as previously described.[26] Briefly, the tissue chips were deparaffinized in xylene and rehydrated
through a graded series of ethanol. Then, the chips were incubated with 3%
hydrogen peroxide for 10 minutes to block endogenous peroxidase activity,
followed by bovine serum albumin (BSA) for 10 minutes to block nonspecific
binding. Next, the sections were incubated with rabbit anti-humanNCOA2 antibody
(Abcam) and diluted 200-fold in Tris-buffered saline (TBS; pH 7.6) with 1% BSA,
at 4 °C overnight. An LSAB kit was used for staining and visualization by DAB
affects counterstaining with hematoxylin.The humangastric cancer tissue chips study was performed at the Shanghai
Jiaotong University. One hundred gastric cancer tissues and normal gastric
tissues were located away from the cancer and used as controls. The expression
of NCOA2 in tissues is determined by the immunohistochemistry as follows: ≤5%,
5% to 25%, 26% to 50%, 51% to 75%, and ≥75% as positive cells value 0, 1, 2, 3,
and 4, respectively, and multiplied with the staining intensity of 0, 1, 2, or 3
to represent no staining, light yellow, yellow brown, or brown. The score <3
points indicates NCOA2-positive expression, and >3 points indicates
NCOA2-negative expression. All patients with gastric cancer included in the
present study had not been given any preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy or
other therapy such as radiotherapy.
Cell Culture
The Hs-746T, SGC-7901, MKN-45, CRL-5822, AGS, CRL-5971, GES-1, MKN-28, and
BGC-823gastric cancer cell lines were purchased from the Chinese Academy of
Science (Shanghai, China). The gastric cancer cells were adherent cells; the
Hs-746T, SGC-7901, MKN-45, CRL-5822, CRL-5971, MKN-28, and BGC-823 were cultured
in RPMI 1640 complete medium containing 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) and 100
U/mL penicillin and streptomycin and placed at 37 °C, 5% CO2, in an
incubator with saturated humidity.
Lentivirus-Mediated Knockdown of Gastric Cancer Cell Lines
The negative control (NC) and short hairpin RNA knockdown of NCOA2 lentivirus
were provided by Genechem Co Ltd. The 300-µL lentivirus particles (titer:
>108 TU/mL), which were constructed by Genechem Co and
carrying green fluorescence protein, infectedMKN-28 and BGC-823 cells that were
preplanted in 6-well plates with 40% cell confluence, with polybrene at a ratio
of 1:1000. After 48 hours, the fluorescence was observed under a microscope.
Then, puromycin was added to the culture solution at a ratio of 1:1000, and
after continuing to culture for a period of time, all the cells that were
successfully transfected with lentivirus particles were selected, the
fluorescence was verified under the microscope, and then the cells were stably
cultured and passaged to obtain a stable cell line.
Western Blot Analysis
Western blotting was carried as previously described.[28-30] Briefly, an equal amount of protein was separated by sodium dodecyl
sulfate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis on a 10% gel electrophoresis and
transferred onto a 0.45-µm polyvinylidene fluoride membranes (PALL). The
membranes were blocked in 0.5% BSA at room temperature for 2 hours. The
following monoclonal primary antibodies were used in the Western blot analysis:
anti-NOCA2 (Abcam), anti-glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate dehydrogenase (CST),
anti-Slug (Abcam), anti-N-cad (Abcam), anti-E-cad (Abcam), anti-Vimentin
(Abcam), anti-β-catenin (Abcam), and anti-TCF-8 (Abcam), overnight at 4 °C. The
membranes were washed 3 times with TBST (0.1% Tween-20) for 10 minutes, each at
room temperature. The signal was visualized by chemiluminescence kit.
Colony Formation Assay
Humangastric cancer cells MKN-28NC, MKN-28SH, GBC-823NC, and BGC-823SH in
logarithmic growth phase were harvested. The cells were seeded onto 6-well
plates at a density of 1 × 103 cells/well. These cells were cultured
in RPMI 1640 complete medium containing 10% FBS in the incubator at 37 °C, 5%
CO2, for 7 to 10 days. Then, methanol was used to fix cells for
10 minutes and crystal violet was used to stain the cells. Clones were read
directly by the naked eye, and the number of clones larger than 10 cells were
identified under a microscope (low magnification). Clone formation was
calculated as: efficiency = (number of clones/number of cells inoculated) ×
100%. The results represent the mean values from 3 independent experiments.
Cell Proliferation Assay
MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells cancer cells were planted in 96-well plates at a density
of 1500 per well, 3 replicate per group. These cells were cultured in a 10% FBS
medium in a 5% CO2, 37 °C incubator for 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 days. The
culture medium was then discarded, 10% Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8; Dojindo,
Kumamoto, Japan) was added in serum-free medium. Results were observed in a
microplate reader after culture for 1 hour. Determination of absorbance was at
450 nm. The results represent the mean values from 3 independent
experiments.
Cell Invasion Assay
Transwell chamber (Corning) and Matrigel-coated transwell chamber 8-µm and
24-well format were inserted into 24-well cell culture plates to measure
migration and invasion. Cells with density 1 × 105 in 0.3 mL of
serum-free medium were added in the upper chamber, while 800 µL of RPMI 1640
containing 10% FBS was added to the lower chamber. Cells were cultured for 48
hours. Then, the cells with transwell chambers were fixed in methanol for 5
minutes and stained with crystal violet and counted in 3 random fields under
microscope. The results represent the mean values from 3 independent
experiments.
Flow Cytometry Apoptosis Experiment
MKN-28NC and BGC-823NC gastric cancer cells and MKN-28SH and BGC-823SH cells of
the experimental group were detected for culture with trypsin solution to
prepare a single-cell suspension. The cells were counted and seeded in a 24-well
cell culture plate at 1.0 × 105 cells/well. The cells were cultured
in a cell culture incubator at 37 °C (5% CO2, saturated humidity).
After incubating for 48 hours in an incubator, the suspension cells were
collected into a centrifuge tube, and the adherent cells were detected with
trypsin without EDTA, collected together with the suspension cells, and
centrifuged at 1200 r/min for 5 minutes. The supernatant was discarded and the
cells were washed twice with phosphate-buffered serum (PBS). The cells were
resuspended in 1× binding buffer and transferred to a 5-mL flow tube,
centrifuged at 1200 r/min for 5 minute, discarded the supernatant. A 5-µL
Annexin V-FITC reagent was added to the flow tube and mixed. Then 5-µL propidium
iodide (PI) reagent was added into the tube, mix by shaking, and incubated for
10 to 15 minutes in the dark at room temperature. One blank control tube (ie,
only cells, without any dye staining) and 2 single-dye adjustment compensation
tubes (1 tube is only dyed with Annexin V-FITC dye, and the other tube is
stained with PI dye only) were used as controls. Binding buffer (400 μL, 1×) was
added to each tube. After resuspension, apoptotic cells in each group were
detected by flow cytometry (to avoid fluorescence quenching, it should be
detected at 1 hour after staining). Analysis of cells by flow cytometry revealed
that cells were divided into 4 subgroups: live cells (low fluorescence
intensity), early apoptotic cells (higher green fluorescence), advanced cells in
apoptosis, and necrotic cells (green and red double fluorescence will appear).
The results were analyzed using BD FACSDIVA Software/Cell Quest version 3.0
software. The cell survival rate, early apoptosis rate, middle and late
apoptosis rate, and cell mortality were calculated. The experiment was repeated
3 times.
Animal Experiments
All mice used in the experiment were 4-week-old male nude mice purchased from the
Institute of Zoology, Shanghai Academy of Sciences, China. All experiments were
carried out according to the official recommendations of the Chinese Animal
Community. Ten large culture dishes of MKN-28nc and MKN-28sh cells were
cultured. Confluence cells were detached with trypsin for 5 minutes and
centrifuged for 5 to 10 minutes, and the supernatant was discarded. The cells
were washed repeatedly with PBS, centrifuged again, and the pellet was
harvested. The PBS 100 µL (pH = 7.4) was added, uniformly mixed, and injected
into the subcutaneous and intraperitoneal tissues of the nude mice (5 each
group; 20 in total). After 30 days, the mice were killed by cervical
displacement, and the subcutaneous growth and peritoneal metastasis and spread
were observed and photographed.
Statistical Analysis
Mean ± standard deviation ( s) indicates measurement data and statistical value
calculation was done using GraphPad.Prism version 5.0-1 statistical software.
Student t test was used to compare the mean of multiple
samples, and tissue immunohistochemistry results were tested by χ2
test before and after cell treatment. All results were found statistically
significant at P < .05.
Results and Discussion
The expression of NCOA2 in gastric cancer tissues is higher than that in normal
tissues. Immunohistochemical staining of gastric cancer and adjacent tissues (Figure 1A-D) demonstrated that
the expression of NCOA2 in tumor tissues is significantly higher than that of
nontumor tissues, with patients with gastric cancer having of NOCA2 high expression
(Figure 1E;
P = .005). The patients with gastric cancer have high
expression status of NCOA2. We further studied the relationship between the
expression of NCOA2 and the pathological features of gastric cancer and found that
the expression of NCOA2 is related to lymph node metastasis (P =
.007), TNM stage (P = .027), as well as gender (P
= .035). The expression of NCOA2 was not related to age, tumor size, and distant
metastases (Table 1).
The difference in gender is far beyond our expectation because although androgen
deprivation is still the most commonly used treatment of prostate cancer, most
patients die of castration resistance.[31] Then, whether androgen deprivation therapy can be used for the treatment of
gastric cancer and whether there will be a prostate cancer-like outcome in the later
stage of the disease are our next questions.
Figure 1.
Degree of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (NCOA2) protein expression in human
gastric cancer tissues and paired normal gastric tissue determined by
immunohistochemical staining. A, Strong positive expression of NCOA2 in
gastric cancer. B, Weak NCOA2 expression is in gastric cancer. C, Negative
expression of NCOA2 in gastric cancer tissues. D, Negative expression of
NCOA2 in nontumor gastric mucosa. E, NCOA2 protein expression is
significantly higher in the gastric cancer tissues than in the normal
gastric tissues.
Table 1.
Relationship Between Expression of NCOA2 and Clinicopathological Factors of
Gastric Cancer.a
a Positive expression of NCOA2 includes all positive cases,
such as weak and strong.
b P < .05.
Degree of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (NCOA2) protein expression in humangastric cancer tissues and paired normal gastric tissue determined by
immunohistochemical staining. A, Strong positive expression of NCOA2 in
gastric cancer. B, Weak NCOA2 expression is in gastric cancer. C, Negative
expression of NCOA2 in gastric cancer tissues. D, Negative expression of
NCOA2 in nontumor gastric mucosa. E, NCOA2 protein expression is
significantly higher in the gastric cancer tissues than in the normal
gastric tissues.Relationship Between Expression of NCOA2 and Clinicopathological Factors of
Gastric Cancer.aAbbreviation: NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2.a Positive expression of NCOA2 includes all positive cases,
such as weak and strong.b P < .05.
Knockdown of the Expression of NCOA2 Can Inhibit the Wnt/β-Catenin Signaling
Pathway in the Gastric Cancer Cells
The expression of NCOA2 in humangastric cancer cells MKN-28 and BGC-823 was higher
that of than other cell lines (Figure 2A). Therefore, MKN-28 and BGC-823 cell lines were used in next
experiments. The NCOA2 small interfering RNA inhibited the expression of NCOA2 in
MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cells compared to MKN-28nc and BGC-823nc cells. The knockdown
effect was confirmed by Western blotting (Figure 2B). To explore whether NCOA2 is
essential for the EMT in gastric cancer cells, we also detected EMT-related proteins
in gastric cancer cells by Western blotting. The levels of β-catenin, N-cad, Vim,
and Slug proteins in MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cells after inhibition of NCOA2
expression were significantly lower than those in the control group. In contrast,
E-cad expression in the experimental group was higher than the control group (Figure 2C). These results
indicate the functional role of NCOA2 in regulating EMT in gastric cancer cells.
Figure 2.
Western blotting analyzed NCOA2 and Wnt/EMT signal pathway proteins
expression. A, NCOA2 expression in 9 gastric cancer cell lines. B, After the
knockdown of NCOA2 expression by lentivirus, the difference in protein
content between the experimental group and the control group of the 2
gastric cancer cells was tested. C, After knockdown of NCOA2, difference in
EMT marker proteins in experimental and control groups of gastric cancer
cells. EMT indicates epithelial–mesenchymal transformation; NCOA2, nuclear
receptor coactivator 2.
Western blotting analyzed NCOA2 and Wnt/EMT signal pathway proteins
expression. A, NCOA2 expression in 9 gastric cancer cell lines. B, After the
knockdown of NCOA2 expression by lentivirus, the difference in protein
content between the experimental group and the control group of the 2
gastric cancer cells was tested. C, After knockdown of NCOA2, difference in
EMT marker proteins in experimental and control groups of gastric cancer
cells. EMT indicates epithelial–mesenchymal transformation; NCOA2, nuclear
receptor coactivator 2.
Knockdown of NCOA2 Can Suppress the Proliferation of Gastric Cancer Cells
The cancer MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cell clusters with knockdown NCOA2
genes were significantly smaller than those of MKN-28nc and BGC-823nc cells. The
proliferation ability was significantly lower than that of the control (Figure 3A). The CCK-8 assay
analyzes cell proliferation ability. The results of plate cloning were identical to
CCK-8 assay (Figure 3C).
After knocking down NCOA2, the absorbance at 450 nm of MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells was
significantly decreased, showing that cell proliferation was inhibited
(P < .05; Figure 3D). These results also indicate the role of NCOA2 in the
proliferation of gastric cancer cells.
Figure 3.
Gastric cancer cell proliferation. A, Differences in MKN-28 and BGC-823
colony formation in NC and SH groups. B, The colony formation in SH group is
lower than in the NC group in MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells. C, CCK-8 experiments
on days 2 to 5 with MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells in both NC and SH groups. D,
CCK-8 detected the ability of proliferation of MKN-28 and BGC-823 in both NC
and SH groups for 1 to 5 days. CCK-8 indicates Cell Counting Kit-8; NC,
negative control; NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2; SH, short hairpin
RNA.
Gastric cancer cell proliferation. A, Differences in MKN-28 and BGC-823
colony formation in NC and SH groups. B, The colony formation in SH group is
lower than in the NC group in MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells. C, CCK-8 experiments
on days 2 to 5 with MKN-28 and BGC-823 cells in both NC and SH groups. D,
CCK-8 detected the ability of proliferation of MKN-28 and BGC-823 in both NC
and SH groups for 1 to 5 days. CCK-8 indicates Cell Counting Kit-8; NC,
negative control; NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2; SH, short hairpin
RNA.
Knockdown of NCOA2 Expression Inhibits the Invasion Ability of Gastric Cancer
Cells
MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cells with knockdown NCOA2 expression had a lower number of
cells penetrating the transwell cell membrane compared to MKN-28nc and BGC-823nc
(Figure 4A and B;
P < .05). Thus, the invasion ability of gastric cancer cells
with stably knockdown of NCOA2 was significantly reduced.
Figure 4.
Gastric cancer cells metastasis invasion assay. A, Knockdown of the
expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (NCAO2) inhibited the invasion
ability of MKN-28 cells. B, Knockdown of the expression of NCAO2 inhibited
the invasion ability of BGC-823 cells. C, Quantification of the results from
(A) and (B), respectively.
Gastric cancer cells metastasis invasion assay. A, Knockdown of the
expression of nuclear receptor coactivator 2 (NCAO2) inhibited the invasion
ability of MKN-28 cells. B, Knockdown of the expression of NCAO2 inhibited
the invasion ability of BGC-823 cells. C, Quantification of the results from
(A) and (B), respectively.
Knockdown of NCOA2 Expression Promotes Apoptosis of Gastric Cancer Cells
The apoptosis rate of MKN-28nc and BGC-823nc with NCOA2 expression was significantly
lower than that of MKN-28sh and BGC-823sh cells after NCOA2 knockdown.
Microscopically, knockdown of NCOA2 gene expression in gastric
cancer cells simultaneously increased the number of early apoptosis (LR) and
late-stage apoptosis (UR) cells in gastric cancer cells, thus more NCOA2 knockdown
had a pronounced effect on early-stage apoptosis than late-stage apoptosis (Figure 5A and B).
Figure 5.
FCM assay tested the apoptosis in knockdown of NCOA2 of gastric cancer cells.
A, Knockdown of the expression of NCAO2 promotes the cells apoptosis of
BGC-823 cells. B, Knockdown of the expression of NCAO2 promotes the cells
apoptosis of MKN-28 cells. 188 × 97 mm (300 × 300 DPI). C, The quantity of
apoptosis cells in SH group is larger than in NC group in BGC823 and MKN28
cells. FCM indicates flow cytometry; NC, negative control; NCOA2, nuclear
receptor coactivator 2; SH, short hairpin RNA.
FCM assay tested the apoptosis in knockdown of NCOA2 of gastric cancer cells.
A, Knockdown of the expression of NCAO2 promotes the cells apoptosis of
BGC-823 cells. B, Knockdown of the expression of NCAO2 promotes the cells
apoptosis of MKN-28 cells. 188 × 97 mm (300 × 300 DPI). C, The quantity of
apoptosis cells in SH group is larger than in NC group in BGC823 and MKN28
cells. FCM indicates flow cytometry; NC, negative control; NCOA2, nuclear
receptor coactivator 2; SH, short hairpin RNA.
NCOA2 Knockdown Inhibited Subcutaneous Growth and Peritoneal Spread of Gastric
Cancer Cells In Vivo
In order to confirm whether NCOA2 knockdown can suppress the proliferation of gastric
cancer cells in vivo, we injected MKN-28nc and MKN-28sh cells
subcutaneously and in the abdomen of nude mice. The cancer nodules in the peritoneal
cavity of the mice inoculated with the control group MKN-28nc cells were
significantly larger than those in the mice inoculated with the NCOA2 MKN-28sh cells
(Figure 6A and B;
P = .046 and <.05). The subcutaneous cancer nodules of the
mice inoculated with the control group MKN-28nc cells were significantly larger than
those of the mice inoculated with the NCOA2 MKN-28sh cells (Figure 6C and D).
Figure 6.
Effect of NCOA2 on the growth and peritoneal metastasis of MKN-28 cells. A,
Comparison of the number of cancer nodules of MKN-28 cells in peritoneal
metastasis of mice in NC and SH groups of MKN-28 cells. B, Quantification of
the results from (A). C, Comparison of MKN-28 groups subcutaneously in NC
and SH groups of MKN-28 cells. D, Stated subcutaneous tumor of the MKN-28nc
group. The MKN28-SH group had not tumor growth. NC indicates negative
control; NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2; SH, short hairpin RNA.
Effect of NCOA2 on the growth and peritoneal metastasis of MKN-28 cells. A,
Comparison of the number of cancer nodules of MKN-28 cells in peritoneal
metastasis of mice in NC and SH groups of MKN-28 cells. B, Quantification of
the results from (A). C, Comparison of MKN-28 groups subcutaneously in NC
and SH groups of MKN-28 cells. D, Stated subcutaneous tumor of the MKN-28nc
group. The MKN28-SH group had not tumor growth. NC indicates negative
control; NCOA2, nuclear receptor coactivator 2; SH, short hairpin RNA.In summary, NCOA2 plays an important role in the occurrence and development of
gastric cancer. Knockdown of NCOA2 expression can not only inhibit the proliferation
of gastric cancer cells but also weaken the survival of gastric cancer cells by
promoting apoptosis, inhibiting metastasis and invasion via Wnt signaling pathway,
affecting the progression of gastric cancer.
Authors: S Satoh; Y Daigo; Y Furukawa; T Kato; N Miwa; T Nishiwaki; T Kawasoe; H Ishiguro; M Fujita; T Tokino; Y Sasaki; S Imaoka; M Murata; T Shimano; Y Yamaoka; Y Nakamura Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: S Y Lin; W Xia; J C Wang; K Y Kwong; B Spohn; Y Wen; R G Pestell; M C Hung Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2000-04-11 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Jeff S Pawlikowski; Tony McBryan; John van Tuyn; Mark E Drotar; Rachael N Hewitt; Andrea B Maier; Ayala King; Karen Blyth; Hong Wu; Peter D Adams Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2013-09-16 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Irina U Agoulnik; Ajula Vaid; Manjula Nakka; Misty Alvarado; William E Bingman; Halime Erdem; Anna Frolov; Carolyn L Smith; Gustavo E Ayala; Michael M Ittmann; Nancy L Weigel Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2006-11-01 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Véronique Delmas; Friedrich Beermann; Silvia Martinozzi; Suzanne Carreira; Julien Ackermann; Mayuko Kumasaka; Laurence Denat; Jane Goodall; Flavie Luciani; Amaya Viros; Nese Demirkan; Boris C Bastian; Colin R Goding; Lionel Larue Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Olivera Bozickovic; Linn Skartveit; Agnete S T Engelsen; Thomas Helland; Kristin Jonsdottir; Marianne Hauglid Flågeng; Ingvild S Fenne; Emiel Janssen; James B Lorens; Lise Bjørkhaug; Jørn V Sagen; Gunnar Mellgren Journal: J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol Date: 2018-07-23 Impact factor: 4.292
Authors: Erin L Reineke; Brian York; Erin Stashi; Xian Chen; Anna Tsimelzon; Jianming Xu; Christopher B Newgard; George E Taffet; Heinrich Taegtmeyer; Mark L Entman; Bert W O'Malley Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-12-31 Impact factor: 3.240