INTRODUCTION: A high prevalence of stress and burnout has been reported among healthcare professionals; however, the current tools utilized to quantify such metrics are not in keeping with doctors' busy lifestyles, and moreover do not comply with infection prevention policies. Given that increased stress can subsequently impact both the healthcare profession and the patient in care, this study aimed to assess the validity of a wearable biosensor to monitor and manage stress experienced by healthcare professionals. METHODS: In all, 12 healthy, male volunteers completed an incremental exercise protocol to volitional exhaustion, which aimed to induce physiological stress in a graded manner. A wearable consumer-grade biosensor (Vital Scout, VivaLNK, Inc.) was used to measure stress, energy expenditure, respiration rate, and activity throughout the exercise protocol. These variables were validated against online breath-by-breath analysis (MedGraphics Ultima Series). RESULTS: When compared against online "gold standard" measurements, the Vital Scout biosensor demonstrated a high level of accuracy to measure energy expenditure (r = .776, p < .001) and respiration rate (r = .744, p < .001). The V ˙ O 2 increase observed during the incremental exercise test was associated with the Vital Scout biosensor's measurement of activity (r = .777, p < .001). In contrast, there was a poor relationship between the changes in V ˙ O 2 and the Vital Scout biosensor's ability to detect stress (r = -.195, p = .013). CONCLUSION: The Vital Scout biosensor provided an accurate assessment of energy expenditure and respiration when compared to the "gold standard" assessment of these parameters. Biosensors have the potential to measure stress and deserve further research in the peri-hospital environment.
INTRODUCTION: A high prevalence of stress and burnout has been reported among healthcare professionals; however, the current tools utilized to quantify such metrics are not in keeping with doctors' busy lifestyles, and moreover do not comply with infection prevention policies. Given that increased stress can subsequently impact both the healthcare profession and the patient in care, this study aimed to assess the validity of a wearable biosensor to monitor and manage stress experienced by healthcare professionals. METHODS: In all, 12 healthy, male volunteers completed an incremental exercise protocol to volitional exhaustion, which aimed to induce physiological stress in a graded manner. A wearable consumer-grade biosensor (Vital Scout, VivaLNK, Inc.) was used to measure stress, energy expenditure, respiration rate, and activity throughout the exercise protocol. These variables were validated against online breath-by-breath analysis (MedGraphics Ultima Series). RESULTS: When compared against online "gold standard" measurements, the Vital Scout biosensor demonstrated a high level of accuracy to measure energy expenditure (r = .776, p < .001) and respiration rate (r = .744, p < .001). The V ˙ O 2 increase observed during the incremental exercise test was associated with the Vital Scout biosensor's measurement of activity (r = .777, p < .001). In contrast, there was a poor relationship between the changes in V ˙ O 2 and the Vital Scout biosensor's ability to detect stress (r = -.195, p = .013). CONCLUSION: The Vital Scout biosensor provided an accurate assessment of energy expenditure and respiration when compared to the "gold standard" assessment of these parameters. Biosensors have the potential to measure stress and deserve further research in the peri-hospital environment.
Authors: Sonal Arora; Nick Sevdalis; Debra Nestel; Maria Woloshynowych; Ara Darzi; Roger Kneebone Journal: Surgery Date: 2009-12-14 Impact factor: 3.982
Authors: Mariska Weenk; Alexander P B Alken; Lucien J L P G Engelen; Sebastian J H Bredie; Tom H van de Belt; Harry van Goor Journal: Am J Surg Date: 2017-06-06 Impact factor: 2.565
Authors: Jamie J Coleman; Caitlin K Robinson; Ben L Zarzaur; Lava Timsina; Grace S Rozycki; David V Feliciano Journal: J Am Coll Surg Date: 2019-04-06 Impact factor: 6.113
Authors: David B T Robinson; Osian P James; Luke Hopkins; Chris Brown; Chris Bowman; Tarig Abdelrahman; Michael J Pollitt; Richard J Egan; Damian M Bailey; Wyn G Lewis Journal: J Surg Educ Date: 2019-07-31 Impact factor: 2.891
Authors: Luke Hopkins; Benjamin Stacey; David B T Robinson; Osian P James; Christopher Brown; Richard J Egan; Wyn G Lewis; Damian M Bailey Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2020-06
Authors: Céline Vetter; Elizabeth E Devore; Lani R Wegrzyn; Jennifer Massa; Frank E Speizer; Ichiro Kawachi; Bernard Rosner; Meir J Stampfer; Eva S Schernhammer Journal: JAMA Date: 2016-04-26 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Osian P James; David B T Robinson; Luke Hopkins; Chris Bowman; Arfon G M T Powell; Chris Brown; Damian M Bailey; Richard J Egan; Wyn G Lewis Journal: BMJ Simul Technol Enhanc Learn Date: 2020-08-13
Authors: Luke Hopkins; Benjamin Stacey; David B T Robinson; Osian P James; Christopher Brown; Richard J Egan; Wyn G Lewis; Damian M Bailey Journal: Physiol Rep Date: 2020-06