| Literature DB >> 32488850 |
Łukasz Zadka1, Damian J Grybowski2, Piotr Dzięgiel3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Tumor initiation and subsequent progression are usually long-term processes, spread over time and conditioned by diverse aspects. Many cancers develop on the basis of chronic inflammation; however, despite dozens of years of research, little is known about the factors triggering neoplastic transformation under these conditions. Molecular characterization of both pathogenetic states, i.e., similarities and differences between chronic inflammation and cancer, is also poorly defined. The secretory activity of tumor cells may change the immunophenotype of immune cells and modify the extracellular microenvironment, which allows the bypass of host defense mechanisms and seems to have diagnostic and prognostic value. The phenomenon of immunosuppression is also present during chronic inflammation, and the development of cancer, due to its duration, predisposes patients to the promotion of chronic inflammation. The aim of our work was to discuss the above issues based on the latest scientific insights. A theoretical mechanism of cancer immunosuppression is also proposed.Entities:
Keywords: Cancer; immune response; immune system; immunosuppression; inflammation; solid tumor
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32488850 PMCID: PMC7363737 DOI: 10.1007/s13402-020-00519-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Cell Oncol (Dordr) ISSN: 2211-3428 Impact factor: 6.730
Fig. 1.A proposed simplified model of the association between inflammation and oncogenesis. A. Common risk factors for cancers described in the text and their proinflammatory potential. Inflammation can be triggered by risk factors for cancer and long-term exposure to these factors can lead to permanent changes in cell structure and signaling associated with neoplastic transformation. B Hypoxia and proangiogenic activity are responsible for modifying the tumor microenvironment. The secretory activity of cancer cells leads to a change in the polarization of immune cells, which increases immunosuppression and causes cancer progression
Cytokines and their influence on tumor immunity
| Type of cancer | Cytokine | Recognized role in the immune response | Cancer-associated immune response |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ovarian cancer (SKOV-3) | IL-6 | One of the most potent proinflammatory cytokines; activation of the Src kinase family; activation of STAT transcription factors [ | Inducing polarization of M2 macrophages [ |
Breast cancer (MCF-7) | Cellular senescence phenotype [ | ||
| Tumor-derived murine squamous cell carcinoma cell line (PDSC5)/ fibroblasts accelerate stromal supported tumorigenesis (FASST) mouse/ MK16-Ras | Increases in suppressive myeloid cells, accelerates the ability of MDSCs to inhibit anti-tumor T cell responses [ | ||
| Hepatocellular carcinoma | TAM recruitment [ | ||
| Tumor-bearing mice (B16 melanoma, MC38 colon carcinoma, or EL4 lymphoma) | Regulates IL-4R expression on MDSCs thereby indirectly inhibiting the release of arginase (Arg1) [ | ||
| Colorectal cancer | IL-17 | Proinflammatory effect; promotion of congenital activity; activation of neutrophils and T-cells [ | MDSC recruitment; more pronounced immunosuppressive activity of MDSCs; decrease in the number of CD8+ T cells; positive effect on Treg [ |
| Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) | Correlation with CXCL2/CXCL3 ligands, enhanced tendency of inflammatory cells to migrate [ | ||
| Breast cancer | Inhibits MDSC proliferation, promotes MDSC differentiation, reduces levels of TGF-β and IL-10 released by MDSCs and enhances the synthesis of pro-inflammatory factors [ | ||
Breast cancer (MCF-7) | IL-8 | Proinflammatory effect; involved in lymphocytic infiltration in various cancers [ | Cellular senescence phenotype [ |
| Gastric cancer | TNF-α | Biological functions dependent on the type of activated receptors; possible proinflammatory and oncostatic effects [ | Induction of PD-L1 expression on mast cells, indirect negative impact on T cell immunity [ |
Ehrlich’s ascites carcinoma (EAC) cells 4T1 mouse breast cancer cells | M1 TAM marker, prevents polarization towards the M2 subtype [ | ||
| Lung cancer (NSCLC) | IL-33 | Early inducer of inflammation [ | Blockade of M2 TAM polarization, decreased recruitment of Tregs in TME; shaping functional immune surveillance [ |
N/A (TME imitating milieu) | Suppresses or enhances effector functions of cytotoxic/regulatory T cells, differentiation of CD8+ T cells, supports TCR-dependent activation of CD8+ lymphocytes/T lymphocytes [ | ||
Human lung cancer cell line/NSCLC (NCI-H1299 (ATCC® CRL-5803) | TGF-β | The predominant immunosuppressive activity; regulation of T lymphocyte activity; abolition of anti-tumor immune response [ | Enhances the antiproliferative effect of MDSCs on T cells, Treg promotion through MDSCs, attenuated antitumor immunity [ |
| N/A | TAN polarization to N2 subtype [ | ||
| Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) | TGF-β-dependent Smad3 enhanced PD-1 expression on TILs in the TME [ | ||
Mouse model of pancreatic cancer (LSL-KRasG12D) | IL-1/IL-1R signaling | Strong proinflammatory effect; alternative action as a transcription factor [ | Senescence-associated secretory phenotype (SASP) [ |
| Human mammary cancer-derived cells (MDA-MB-231, MCF-7) | Oncostatin M | Proinflammatory cytokine, induces endothelial activation [ | Promotes M2 polarization via HIF-1α/ARG1/COX-2 [ |
Fig. 2Chronic inflammation may predispose patients to the development of neoplasms. Long term activation of inflammatory cells leads to changes in their immunophenotype, secretory activity, function and subpopulation numbers. Discrete molecular changes in the phenotype of lymphocytes and their ongoing activation in inflammatory sites are the cause of functional exhaustion of these cells, which may lead to immune suppression and, consequently, increase the chance of neoplastic transformation
Fig. 3Cancer-associated immune suppression delays wound healing after tissue injury sustained during oncologic resection. Surgery does not always allow complete removal of the neoplasm and remnant cancer cells may aggravate immune suppression. Inherent characteristics of cancer patients may indirectly suppress the immune system – some psychological factors such as chronic stress may enhance this process. Surgery modulating immune activity has impact in a specific way. Immune responses to surgery in oncologic and nononcologic patients are compared chronologically
Fig. 4Extracellular vesicles (EVs) actively secreted by cells transport various molecules, including proteins and genetic material, that are biologically active. Communication between neoplastic and host cells using EVs may modify the metabolism of targeted cells and promote neoplastic development. Neoplastic vesicles may have immunosuppressive effects on the activity of immune cells. Specific cargo of these vesicles may promote cellular anergy and decrease the ability to present antigens by switching the immunophenotype of immune cells. Exosomes released into body fluids may facilitate biomarker discovery, with special emphasis on new markers for cancer progression and classification. As yet, little is known about molecular differences between chronic inflammation-associated cancers and sporadic cancers
Fig. 5The prognostic value of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and other immune cells depends on various parameters at both cellular and tissue levels. The tumor microenvironment (TME), the extracellular matrix (ECM) and the cancer cells affect the host’s adaptive immune response. On the other hand, the subtype, immunophenotype, microanatomical location and activity of inflammatory cells in the TME shape tumor immunity, which may have a pronounced effect on the patient’s clinical condition. The figure shows known molecular and tissue features (red stars) that have prognostic value due to their effect on inflammatory cells acting in the vicinity of the tumor.