Giacomo Montagna1, Anita Mamtani1, Andrea Knezevic2, Edi Brogi3, Andrea V Barrio1, Monica Morrow4. 1. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 2. Biostatistics Service, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Breast Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. morrowm@mskcc.org.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided in node-positive patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) if three or more negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are retrieved. We evaluate how often node-positive patients avoid ALND with NAC, and identify predictors of identification of three or more SLNs and of nodal pathological complete response (pCR). METHODS: From November 2013 to July 2019, all patients with cT1-3, biopsy-proven N1 tumors who converted to cN0 after NAC received SLN biopsy (SLNB) with dual mapping and were identified from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: 630 consecutive N1 patients were eligible for axillary downstaging with NAC; 573 (91%) converted to cN0 and had SLNB, and 531 patients (93%) had three or more SLNs identified. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI; odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.87; p = 0.02) and increasing body mass index (BMI; OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.96 per 5-unit increase; p = 0.02) were significantly associated with failure to identify three or more SLNs. 255/573 (46%) patients achieved nodal pCR; 237 (41%) had adequate mapping. Factors associated with ALND avoidance included high grade (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.6-3.94, p = 0.001) and receptor status (HR+/HER2- [referent]: OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.15-3.46 [p = 0.01] for HR-/HER2-, OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.40-6.44 [p < 0.001] for HR+/HER2+, and OR 8.24, 95% CI 4.16-16.3 [p < 0.001] for HR-/HER2+). LVI was associated with a lower likelihood of avoiding ALND (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18-0.43; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: ALND was avoided in 41% of cN1 patients after NAC. Increased BMI and LVI were associated with lower retrieval rates of three or more SLNs. ALND avoidance rates varied with receptor status, grade, and LVI. These factors help select patients most likely to avoid ALND.
BACKGROUND: Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) can be avoided in node-positive patients who receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) if three or more negative sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are retrieved. We evaluate how often node-positive patients avoid ALND with NAC, and identify predictors of identification of three or more SLNs and of nodal pathological complete response (pCR). METHODS: From November 2013 to July 2019, all patients with cT1-3, biopsy-proven N1 tumors who converted to cN0 after NAC received SLN biopsy (SLNB) with dual mapping and were identified from a prospectively maintained database. RESULTS: 630 consecutive N1 patients were eligible for axillary downstaging with NAC; 573 (91%) converted to cN0 and had SLNB, and 531 patients (93%) had three or more SLNs identified. Lymphovascular invasion (LVI; odds ratio [OR] 0.46, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.24-0.87; p = 0.02) and increasing body mass index (BMI; OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.62-0.96 per 5-unit increase; p = 0.02) were significantly associated with failure to identify three or more SLNs. 255/573 (46%) patients achieved nodal pCR; 237 (41%) had adequate mapping. Factors associated with ALND avoidance included high grade (OR 2.51, 95% CI 1.6-3.94, p = 0.001) and receptor status (HR+/HER2- [referent]: OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.15-3.46 [p = 0.01] for HR-/HER2-, OR 3.93, 95% CI 2.40-6.44 [p < 0.001] for HR+/HER2+, and OR 8.24, 95% CI 4.16-16.3 [p < 0.001] for HR-/HER2+). LVI was associated with a lower likelihood of avoiding ALND (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.18-0.43; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS:ALND was avoided in 41% of cN1patients after NAC. Increased BMI and LVI were associated with lower retrieval rates of three or more SLNs. ALND avoidance rates varied with receptor status, grade, and LVI. These factors help select patients most likely to avoid ALND.
Authors: Bryan T Hennessy; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Roman Rouzier; Henry Kuerer; Nour Sneige; Aman U Buzdar; Shu Wan Kau; Bruno Fornage; Aysegul Sahin; Kristine Broglio; S Eva Singletary; Vicente Valero Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-12-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anita Mamtani; Andrea V Barrio; Tari A King; Kimberly J Van Zee; George Plitas; Melissa Pilewskie; Mahmoud El-Tamer; Mary L Gemignani; Alexandra S Heerdt; Lisa M Sclafani; Virgilio Sacchini; Hiram S Cody; Sujata Patil; Monica Morrow Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-05-09 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Jean-Francois Boileau; Brigitte Poirier; Mark Basik; Claire M B Holloway; Louis Gaboury; Lucas Sideris; Sarkis Meterissian; Angel Arnaout; Muriel Brackstone; David R McCready; Stephen E Karp; Isabelle Trop; Andre Lisbona; Frances C Wright; Rami J Younan; Louise Provencher; Erica Patocskai; Atilla Omeroglu; Andre Robidoux Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2014-12-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Laura S Dominici; Viviana M Negron Gonzalez; Aman U Buzdar; Anthony Lucci; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Huong T Le-Petross; Gildy V Babiera; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Kelly K Hunt; Henry M Kuerer Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-06-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Brittany L Murphy; Courtney N Day; Tanya L Hoskin; Elizabeth B Habermann; Judy C Boughey Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Judy C Boughey; Vera J Suman; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gretchen M Ahrendt; Lee G Wilke; Bret Taback; A Marilyn Leitch; Henry M Kuerer; Monet Bowling; Teresa S Flippo-Morton; David R Byrd; David W Ollila; Thomas B Julian; Sarah A McLaughlin; Linda McCall; W Fraser Symmans; Huong T Le-Petross; Bruce G Haffty; Thomas A Buchholz; Heidi Nelson; Kelly K Hunt Journal: JAMA Date: 2013-10-09 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: Jose Vila; Elizabeth A Mittendorf; Gabriel Farante; Roland L Bassett; Paolo Veronesi; Viviana Galimberti; Nicolas Peradze; Michael C Stauder; Mariana Chavez-MacGregor; Jennifer F Litton; Lei Huo; Henry M Kuerer; Kelly K Hunt; Abigail S Caudle Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2016-05-23 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Orli Friedman-Eldar; Tolga Ozmen; Salah James El Haddi; Neha Goel; Youley Tjendra; Susan B Kesmodel; Mecker G Moller; Dido Franceschi; Christina Layton; Eli Avisar Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Austin D Williams; Chau T Dang; Varadan Sevilimedu; Monica Morrow; Andrea V Barrio Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-07-24 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Giacomo Montagna; Minna K Lee; Varadan Sevilimedu; Andrea V Barrio; Monica Morrow Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-07-28 Impact factor: 4.339
Authors: Janine M Simons; Thiemo J A van Nijnatten; Carmen C van der Pol; Paul J van Diest; Agnes Jager; David van Klaveren; Boen L R Kam; Marc B I Lobbes; Maaike de Boer; Cees Verhoef; Paul R A Sars; Harald J Heijmans; Els R M van Haaren; Wouter J Vles; Caroline M E Contant; Marian B E Menke-Pluijmers; Léonie H M Smit; Wendy Kelder; Marike Boskamp; Linetta B Koppert; Ernest J T Luiten; Marjolein L Smidt Journal: JAMA Surg Date: 2022-09-07 Impact factor: 16.681
Authors: Willard Wong; Edi Brogi; Jorge S Reis-Filho; George Plitas; Mark Robson; Larry Norton; Monica Morrow; Hannah Y Wen Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2021-07-22