BACKGROUND: Many patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Recent trials suggest the potential for limiting axillary surgery in patients who convert to pathologically node-negative disease. The authors developed a nomogram to predict axillary response to NAC in patients with cN1 disease that can assist clinicians in treatment planning. METHODS: Patients with cT1-4N1M0 breast cancer who received NAC and underwent axillary lymph node dissection from 2001 through 2013 were identified (n = 584). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors predictive of nodal conversion. A nomogram to predict the likelihood of nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) was constructed based on clinicopathologic variables and validated using an external dataset. RESULTS: Axillary pCR was achieved for 217 patients (37 %). Patients presenting with high nuclear grade [grade 3 vs. 1, odds ratio (OR) 13.4], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (OR 4.7), estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (OR 3.5), or progesterone receptor-negative (OR 4.3) tumors were more likely to achieve nodal pCR. These factors, together with clinically relevant factors including presence of multifocal/centric disease, clinical T stage, and extent of nodal disease seen on regional nodal ultrasound at diagnosis were used to create nomograms predicting nodal conversion. The discrimination of the nomogram using ER+ status (>1 % staining) versus ER- status [area under the curve (AUC) 78 %] was improved slightly using the percentage of ER staining (AUC 78.7 %). Both nomograms were validated using an external cohort. CONCLUSION: Nomograms incorporating routine clinicopathologic parameters can predict axillary pCR in node-positive patients receiving NAC and may help to inform treatment decisions.
BACKGROUND: Many patients with clinically node-positive breast cancer receive neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). Recent trials suggest the potential for limiting axillary surgery in patients who convert to pathologically node-negative disease. The authors developed a nomogram to predict axillary response to NAC in patients with cN1 disease that can assist clinicians in treatment planning. METHODS:Patients with cT1-4N1M0 breast cancer who received NAC and underwent axillary lymph node dissection from 2001 through 2013 were identified (n = 584). Uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine factors predictive of nodal conversion. A nomogram to predict the likelihood of nodal pathologic complete response (pCR) was constructed based on clinicopathologic variables and validated using an external dataset. RESULTS: Axillary pCR was achieved for 217 patients (37 %). Patients presenting with high nuclear grade [grade 3 vs. 1, odds ratio (OR) 13.4], human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (OR 4.7), estrogen receptor (ER)-negative (OR 3.5), or progesterone receptor-negative (OR 4.3) tumors were more likely to achieve nodal pCR. These factors, together with clinically relevant factors including presence of multifocal/centric disease, clinical T stage, and extent of nodal disease seen on regional nodal ultrasound at diagnosis were used to create nomograms predicting nodal conversion. The discrimination of the nomogram using ER+ status (>1 % staining) versus ER- status [area under the curve (AUC) 78 %] was improved slightly using the percentage of ER staining (AUC 78.7 %). Both nomograms were validated using an external cohort. CONCLUSION: Nomograms incorporating routine clinicopathologic parameters can predict axillary pCR in node-positive patients receiving NAC and may help to inform treatment decisions.
Authors: Marco Galvez; Carlos A Castaneda; Joselyn Sanchez; Miluska Castillo; Lia Pamela Rebaza; Gabriela Calderon; Miguel De La Cruz; Jose Manuel Cotrina; Julio Abugattas; Jorge Dunstan; Henry Guerra; Omar Mejia; Henry L Gomez Journal: World J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-04-10
Authors: Orli Friedman-Eldar; Tolga Ozmen; Salah James El Haddi; Neha Goel; Youley Tjendra; Susan B Kesmodel; Mecker G Moller; Dido Franceschi; Christina Layton; Eli Avisar Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2022-03-18 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Giacomo Montagna; Anita Mamtani; Andrea Knezevic; Edi Brogi; Andrea V Barrio; Monica Morrow Journal: Ann Surg Oncol Date: 2020-06-02 Impact factor: 5.344
Authors: Hyung Suk Kim; Man Sik Shin; Chang Jong Kim; Sun Hyung Yoo; Tae Kyung Yoo; Yong Hwa Eom; Byung Joo Chae; Byung Joo Song Journal: J Breast Cancer Date: 2017-12-19 Impact factor: 3.588
Authors: Hee Jun Choi; Jai Min Ryu; Isaac Kim; Seok Jin Nam; Seok Won Kim; Jonghan Yu; Jeong Eon Lee; Se Kyung Lee Journal: Ann Surg Treat Res Date: 2019-03-28 Impact factor: 1.859
Authors: Sarah Nietz; Daniel S O'Neil; Oluwatosin Ayeni; Wenlong Carl Chen; Maureen Joffe; Judith S Jacobson; Alfred I Neugut; Paul Ruff; Witness Mapanga; Ines Buccimazza; Urishka Singh; Sharon Čačala; Laura Stopforth; Boitumelo Phakathi; Tobias Chirwa; Herbert Cubasch Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2020-09-01 Impact factor: 4.872