| Literature DB >> 32488249 |
Keum Hwa Lee1, Hyo Jin Seong2, Gaeun Kim3, Gwang Hun Jeong4, Jong Yeob Kim2, Hyunbong Park5, Eunyoung Jung5, Andreas Kronbichler6, Michael Eisenhut7, Brendon Stubbs8,9,10, Marco Solmi11, Ai Koyanagi12,13, Sung Hwi Hong2,14, Elena Dragioti15, Leandro Fórnias Machado de Rezende16, Louis Jacob12,17, NaNa Keum18,19, Hans J van der Vliet20, Eunyoung Cho21,22, Nicola Veronese23, Giuseppe Grosso24, Shuji Ogino25,26,27,28, Mingyang Song18,26,29,30, Joaquim Radua31,32,33,34, Sun Jae Jung26,35, Trevor Thompson36, Sarah E Jackson37, Lee Smith38, Lin Yang39,40, Hans Oh41, Eun Kyoung Choi42, Jae Il Shin1, Edward L Giovannucci18,22, Gabriele Gamerith43.
Abstract
Multiple studies have suggested that ω-3 fatty acid intake may have a protective effect on cancer risk; however, its true association with cancer risk remains controversial. We performed an umbrella review of meta-analyses to summarize and evaluate the evidence for the association between ω-3 fatty acid intake and cancer outcomes. We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews from inception to December 1, 2018. We included meta-analyses of observational studies that examined associations between intake of fish or ω-3 fatty acid and cancer risk (gastrointestinal, liver, breast, gynecologic, prostate, brain, lung, and skin) and determined the level of evidence of associations. In addition, we appraised the quality of the evidence of significant meta-analyses by using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system. We initially screened 598 articles, and 15 articles, including 57 meta-analyses, were eligible. Among 57 meta-analyses, 15 reported statistically significant results. We found that 12 meta-analyses showed weak evidence of an association between ω-3 fatty acid intake and risk of the following types of cancer: liver cancer (n = 4 of 6), breast cancer (n = 3 of 14), prostate cancer (n = 3 of 11), and brain tumor (n = 2 of 2). In the other 3 meta-analyses, studies of endometrial cancer and skin cancer, there were no assessable data for determining the evidence levels. No meta-analysis showed convincing, highly suggestive, or suggestive evidence of an association. In the sensitivity analysis of meta-analyses by study design, we found weak associations between ω-3 fatty acid intake and breast cancer risk in cohort studies, but no statistically significant association in case-control studies. However, the opposite results were found in case of brain tumor risk. Although ω-3 fatty acids have been studied in several meta-analyses with regard to a wide range of cancer outcomes, only weak associations were identified in some cancer types, with several limitations. Considering the nonsignificant or weak evidence level, clinicians and researchers should cautiously interpret reported associations between ω-3 fatty acid consumption and cancer risks.Entities:
Keywords: cancer; fish; meta-analysis; umbrella review; ω-3 fatty acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32488249 PMCID: PMC7490175 DOI: 10.1093/advances/nmaa055
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Adv Nutr ISSN: 2161-8313 Impact factor: 8.701