| Literature DB >> 32487996 |
Susan Creary1,2, Chandra L Shrestha3, Kavitha Kotha4, Abena Minta3, James Fitch5, Lisa Jaramillo6, Shuzhong Zhang3, Swaroop Pinto4, Rohan Thompson4, Octavio Ramilo6,7, Peter White5, Asuncion Mejias6,7, Benjamin T Kopp8,9.
Abstract
Acute chest syndrome (ACS) is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality in sickle cell disease (SCD), but preventive, diagnostic, and therapeutic options are limited. Further, ACS and acute vasoccclusive pain crises (VOC) have overlapping features, which causes diagnostic dilemmas. We explored changes in gene expression profiles among patients with SCD hospitalized for VOC and ACS episodes to better understand ACS disease pathogenesis. Whole blood RNA-Seq was performed for 20 samples from children with SCD at baseline and during a hospitalization for either an ACS (n = 10) or a VOC episode (n = 10). Respiratory viruses were identified from nasopharyngeal swabs. Functional gene analyses were performed using modular repertoires, IPA, Gene Ontology, and NetworkAnalyst 3.0. The VOC group had a numerically higher percentage of female, older, and hemoglobin SS participants compared to the ACS group. Viruses were detected in 50% of ACS cases and 20% of VOC cases. We identified 3004 transcripts that were differentially expressed during ACS episodes, and 1802 transcripts during VOC episodes. Top canonical pathways during ACS episodes were related to interferon signaling, neuro-inflammation, pattern recognition receptors, and macrophages. Top canonical pathways in patients with VOC included IL-10 signaling, iNOS signaling, IL-6 signaling, and B cell signaling. Several genes related to antimicrobial function were down-regulated during ACS compared to VOC. Gene enrichment nodal interactions demonstrated significantly altered pathways during ACS and VOC. A complex network of changes in innate and adaptive immune gene expression were identified during both ACS and VOC episodes. These results provide unique insights into changes during acute events in children with SCD.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32487996 PMCID: PMC7265336 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-65822-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Cohort Demographics.
| ACS, n = 10 | VOC, n = 10 | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Female | 50.00% | 90.00% | 0.05 |
| Age (mean years) | 8.1 ± 6.2 | 11.6 ± 2.7 | 0.27 |
| SCD Genotype | |||
| Hemoglobin SS | 40.00% | 60.00% | 0.4 |
| Hemoglobin SC | 50.00% | 20.00% | 0.18 |
| Hemoglobin SB + | 10.00% | 20.00% | 0.56 |
| Prescribed hydroxyurea | 30.00% | 70.00% | 0.08 |
| Viral + | 50.00% | 20.00% | 0.18 |
| Rhino/enterovirus | 20.00% | 10.00% | |
| Respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) | 10.00% | 0.00% | |
| Human metapneumovirus | 10.00% | 0.00% | |
| AH3 (Influenza A) | 10.00% | 0.00% | |
| Length of stay (days) | 3.2 ± 1.5 | 5.0 ± 1.9 | 0.03 |
Cohort Hematologic Studies.
| Hematologic Parameters (mean ± SD) | ACS n = 10 | VOC n = 10 | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | During ACS | p value | Baseline | During VOC | p value | |
| White Blood Cell Count (×103/µL) | 9.3 ± 3.1 | 12.8 ± 5.3 | 0.06 | 10.6 ± 3.8 | 14.4 ± 8.1 | 0.08 |
| Absolute Neutrophil Count (×103/mm3) | 4.5 ± 1.6 | 8.3 ± 4.7 | 0.03 | 5.4 ± 2.3 | 9.7 ± 6.7 | 0.06 |
| Absolute Lymphocyte Count (×103/mm3) | 3.7 ± 1.5 | 3.0 ± 2.1 | 0.4 | 3.9 ± 1.6 | 3.0 ± 2.3 | 0.2 |
| Absolute Monocyte Count (×103/mm3) | 0.7 ± 0.4 | 1.4 ± 1.0 | 0.03 | 1.0 ± 0.5 | 1.3 ± 1.0 | 0.05 |
| Hemoglobin (g/dL) | 10.3 ± 1.7 | 9.6 ± 2.1 | 0.04 | 9.5 ± 1.5 | 8.6 ± 2.0 | 0.03 |
| Absolute Reticulocyte Count (×109/L) | 235.4 ± 137.1 | 163.4 ± 114.9 | 0.001 | 297.7 ± 130.7 | 243.9 ± 128.7 | 0.2 |
| Platelet Count (×103/µL) | 313.1 ± 130.4 | 288.0 ± 141.4 | 0.6 | 360.9 ± 143.7 | 270.8 ± 129.3 | 0.08 |
Figure 1Alterations in global gene expression profiles during ACS and VOC in children with SCD. Volcano plot of changes in whole-blood RNA-Seq gene expression profiles for SCD patients (A) during ACS compared to baseline health (3130 transcripts) and (B) during VOC compared to baseline health (1802 transcripts). Colored genes represent significant changes in expression, with yellow colors representing greater changes in comparison to red. Log fold changes are presented on the x axis and –log10 p values shown on the y axis. Principal component analysis (PCA) of whole blood RNA-Seq profiles for SCD patients (C) during ACS compared to baseline health and (D) during VOC compared to baseline health. Grouping are indicated by colors and shading with baseline samples in green in both comparisons. For the ACS to baseline comparison (C), further separation by gender is shown by the blue line. The % variance accounted for by the top 2 components are shown on the X and Y axes for both PCA plots.
Figure 2ACS and VOC are associated with distinct regulation of genes in children with SCD. Heat maps of top differentially expressed genes for (A) SCD patients during ACS compared to baseline health and (B) during VOC compared to baseline health. The top 50 differentially expressed genes are annotated. Each vertical row represents an individual patient with groupings of patients indicated by color at the top of the figures (Group). At the bottom of each figure a legend represents the color continuum scheme used in the heat maps (low to high gene expression). Group clustering determined by Ward’s methods.
Figure 3Altered immune-related gene responses during ACS and VOC. (A) qRT-PCR of CD177, s100A9, and THEM5 gene expression in 10 SCD patients during ACS or VOC. Results are presented as gene expression ratios of SCD patients during ACS or VOC relative to baseline samples and normalized to the housekeeping genes GAPDH and HPRT1. Statistical significance determined by REST mathematical modeling for each comparison (“**”=p value ≤0.01, “***”=p value <0.001). (B) Grouping of significantly altered genes by modular expression in SCD patients during ACS or VOC. Each M# designation represents a cluster of coordinately expressed genes (modules) that share the same biological function[16]. Each group was compared to matched, baseline samples. Both ACS and VOC groups demonstrated significant overexpression of inflammation-related genes and apoptosis genes, and significant under-expression of T and B cell-related genes during these episodes compared to baseline. Patients during ACS demonstrated overexpression of interferon and monocyte-related genes, and under-expression of erythrocyte-related genes. Patients during VOC had over-expression of neutrophil-related genes. The intensity of the modules (dots) indicates the proportion of over-expressed (in red) or under-expressed (in blue) transcripts within each module. Numeric values indicate the exact percentage of transcripts expressed in each specific module. A blank dot indicates that <10% of the genes in the module were differentially expressed.
Figure 4Unique pathways are regulated during ACS. (A) IPA analysis of canonical pathways altered during ACS compared to baseline. The top 14 differentially regulated canonical pathways are presented in descending order of statistical significance of −log p values. The % of genes within each pathway significantly altered is shown, with the exact # of genes altered presented at the end of each horizontal row. Upregulated genes are shown in red and downregulated in green. “*” indicates shared pathway with VOC events in Fig. 5. (B) Representative network analysis of the top predicted regulator of alterations in interferon signaling genes during ACS. A colored prediction legend is listed to describe predicted interactions. (C) Top biological processes determined by gene ontology (GO) analysis for genes regulated during ACS. Biological processes are arranged in descending order of fold enrichment of each pathway. “*” indicates shared pathway with VOC events in Fig. 5.
Figure 5Unique pathways are regulated during VOC. (A) IPA analysis of canonical pathways altered during VOC compared to baseline. The top 14 differentially regulated canonical pathways are presented in descending order of statistical significance of –log p values. The % of genes within each pathway significantly altered is shown, with the exact # of genes altered presented at the end of each horizontal row. Upregulated genes are shown in red and downregulated in green. “*” indicates shared pathway with ACS events in Fig. 4. (B) Representative network analysis of the top predicted regulator of alterations in inflammatory signaling genes during VOC. A colored prediction legend is listed to describe predicted interactions. (C) Top biological processes determined by GO analysis for genes regulated during VOC. Biological processes are arranged in descending order of fold enrichment of each pathway. “*” indicates shared pathway with ACS events in Fig. 4.
Figure 6Nodal networks of gene interactions during ACS and VOC. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) of SCD gene expression profiles during (A) ACS and (B) VOC. Nodes are colored according to their enrichment score (Red > orange> yellow> grey). The size of the node corresponds to the number of genes from that gene set that are on the analyzed gene list (larger nodes with more genes). The small filled nodes correspond to individual genes, and they are colored according to their fold change (red = overexpressed, green = under-expressed). Pathway names are listed next to the large nodes. White lines indicate connections between genes and pathways.