Literature DB >> 32487081

Development and validation of the isothermal recombinase polymerase amplification assays for rapid detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in sheep.

Jinfeng Wang1,2, Ruiwen Li3, Xiaoxia Sun1,2, Libing Liu1,2, Xuepiao Hao3, Jianchang Wang4,5, Wanzhe Yuan6.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mycoplasmal pneumonia is an important infectious disease that threatens sheep and goat production worldwide, and Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae is one of major etiological agent causing mycoplasmal pneumonia. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) is an isothermal nucleic acid amplification technique, and RPA-based diagnostic assays have been described for the detection of different types of pathogens.
RESULTS: The RPA assays using real-time fluorescence detection (real-time RPA) and lateral flow strip detection (LFS RPA) were developed to detect M. ovipneumoniae targeting a conserved region of the 16S rRNA gene. Real-time RPA was performed in a portable florescence scanner at 39 °C for 20 min. LFS RPA was performed in a portable metal bath incubator at 39 °C for 15 min, and the amplicons were visualized with the naked eyes within 5 min on the lateral flow strip. Both assays were highly specific for M. ovipneumoniae, as there were no cross-reactions with other microorganisms tested, especially the pathogens involved in respiratory complex and other mycoplasmas frequently identified in ruminants. The limit of detection of LFS RPA assay was 1.0 × 101 copies per reaction using a recombinant plasmid containing target gene as template, which is 10 times lower than the limit of detection of the real-time RPA and real-time PCR assays. The RPA assays were further validated on 111 clinical sheep nasal swab and fresh lung samples, and M. ovipneumoniae DNA was detected in 29 samples in the real-time RPA, 31 samples in the LFS RPA and 32 samples in the real-time PCR assay. Compared to real-time PCR, the real-time RPA and LFS RPA showed diagnostic specificity of 100 and 98.73%, diagnostic sensitivity of 90.63 and 93.75%, and a kappa coefficient of 0.932 and 0.934, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The developed real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays provide the attractive and promising tools for rapid, convenient and reliable detection of M. ovipneumoniae in sheep, especially in resource-limited settings. However, the effectiveness of the developed RPA assays in the detection of M. ovipneumoniae in goats needs to be further validated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  16S rRNA gene; Isothermal amplification; Lateral flow strip; Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae; Real-time RPA

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32487081      PMCID: PMC7268655          DOI: 10.1186/s12917-020-02387-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMC Vet Res        ISSN: 1746-6148            Impact factor:   2.741


Background

Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae is one of the major pathogens that cause mycoplasma pneumonia in sheep, goats, and wild ruminants [1-5]. M. ovipneumoniae-associated respiratory disease is characterized by cough, gasp, runny noses, progressive weight loss, pulmonary interstitial hyperplasia inflammation, and variable morbidity and mortality rates between flocks [6, 7]. Moreover, upon M. ovipneumoniae infection, sheep and goats become susceptible to other common pathogens causing respiratory disease, such as Mannheimia haemolytica, Pasteurella multocida and Parainfluenza-3 virus [8, 9]. Since first confirmed in Australia in 1972, infections by M. ovipneumoniae have been an endemic problem worldwide and have caused severe economic losses to the sheep and goat industry [10-12]. Bacteriological culture of M. ovipneumoniae is currently the gold standard for diagnosis, however, the culture is cumbersome and time-consuming due to the fastidious nature of the bacterium as well as that the follows required species identification by biochemical or serological tests, which make the assay burdensome for the routine applications [13-15]. In addition, the bacterial isolation may be hampered by sample contamination and prior antibiotic treatments received by the diseased animals. Serological tests, such as ELISA, indirect hemagglutination assay, are the common and economic methods for M. ovipneumoniae herd surveillance [12, 16]. However, seroconversion to M. ovipneumoniae is often delayed after natural infection, which makes the serology less effective in detecting early-stages of infection in herds, and unsuitable for detecting acute mycoplasmal pneumonia in the field [9, 14]. It is an urgent need to develop a rapid and accurate method to detect M. ovipneumoniae. Different nucleic acid amplification-based methods have been described to be sensitive and specific for M. ovipneumoniae, i.e. PCR, real-time PCR, and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) [9, 14, 15]. PCR assays require a well-equipped laboratory, expensive equipment and trained personnel, which limits their application in the under-equipped laboratories and the point-of-need (PON) diagnosis [9, 15]. Compared to the PCR assays, the isothermal amplification methods have advantages regarding convenience to perform and minimal equipment requirement. A LAMP assay for the detection of M. ovipneumoniae has been described for low requirement of experimental conditions, however, the assay requires 60 min to complete the reaction [14]. Recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA), an isothermal DNA amplification technique, is rapid, reliable and considered to be a promising approach for PON diagnosis [17, 18]. RPA-based diagnostic assays have been described for the detection of different pathogens from different clinical samples [19, 20]. In this study, a real-time RPA assay using the exo probe and a LFS RPA assay using the nfo probe combined with lateral flow strip were developed for rapid, specific and sensitive detection of M. ovipneumoniae. The performance of the assays was further assessed by collecting and detecting the clinical sheep nasal swab and lung samples.

Results

Analytical specificity and sensitivity of the RPA assays

Only M. ovipneumoniae was amplified in both real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays (Fig. 1). The specificity analysis was repeated five times with similar results, which demonstrated the good repeatability of the RPA assays.
Fig. 1

Analytical Specificity of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA (a, b) and LFS RPA (c, d) assays. Only the M. ovipneumoniae was amplified, but not other pathogens tested (n = 5). lane 1, M. ovipneumoniae; lane 2, M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae; lane 3, M. mycoides subsp. capri; lane 4, M. arginini; lane 5, M. agalactiae; lane 6, P. multocida; lane 7, K. pneumoniae; lane 8, PPRV; lane 9, M. bovis; lane 10, M. flocculare; lane 11, M.bovoculi; lane 12, M.leachii; lane 13, M. capricolum subsp. capricolum; lane 14, M.dispar; lane 15, M. haemolytica

Analytical Specificity of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA (a, b) and LFS RPA (c, d) assays. Only the M. ovipneumoniae was amplified, but not other pathogens tested (n = 5). lane 1, M. ovipneumoniae; lane 2, M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae; lane 3, M. mycoides subsp. capri; lane 4, M. arginini; lane 5, M. agalactiae; lane 6, P. multocida; lane 7, K. pneumoniae; lane 8, PPRV; lane 9, M. bovis; lane 10, M. flocculare; lane 11, M.bovoculi; lane 12, M.leachii; lane 13, M. capricolum subsp. capricolum; lane 14, M.dispar; lane 15, M. haemolytica The limit of detection of LFS RPA assay was 1.0 × 101 copies M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA per reaction (Fig. 2a), while the LOD of real-time RPA was 1.0 × 102 copies per reaction (Fig. 2b), which was same as that of the real-time PCR (data not shown). The real-time RPA assay was further performed eight times on the standard DNA, and 1.0 × 107–1.0 × 102 copies DNA molecules were detected in 8/8 runs, 1.0 × 101 -1.0 × 100, 0/8, which demonstrated the good reproducibility (Fig. 3).
Fig. 2

Analytical Sensitivity of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA (a) and LFS RPA (b) assays. The LOD of the real-time RPA was 1.0 × 102 copies per reaction of M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA, while the LOD of the LFS RPA was 1.0 × 101 copies per reaction. Lane 1, 1.0 × 107 copies; lane 2, 1.0 × 106 copies; lane 3, 1.0 × 105 copies; lane 4, 1.0 × 104 copies; lane 5, 1.0 × 103 copies; lane 6, 1.0 × 102 copies; lane 7, 1.0 × 101 copies; lane 8, 1.0 × 100 copies

Fig. 3

Reproducibility of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA assay. The analytical sensitivity was determined on DNA molecular standard (8 runs) for real-time RPA. Semi-logarithmic regression of the data collected from real-time RPA test runs on the DNA molecular standards using Prism Software. The run time of the real-time RPA was between 4 min–13 min for 1.0 × 107–1.0 × 102 copies M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA

Analytical Sensitivity of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA (a) and LFS RPA (b) assays. The LOD of the real-time RPA was 1.0 × 102 copies per reaction of M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA, while the LOD of the LFS RPA was 1.0 × 101 copies per reaction. Lane 1, 1.0 × 107 copies; lane 2, 1.0 × 106 copies; lane 3, 1.0 × 105 copies; lane 4, 1.0 × 104 copies; lane 5, 1.0 × 103 copies; lane 6, 1.0 × 102 copies; lane 7, 1.0 × 101 copies; lane 8, 1.0 × 100 copies Reproducibility of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA assay. The analytical sensitivity was determined on DNA molecular standard (8 runs) for real-time RPA. Semi-logarithmic regression of the data collected from real-time RPA test runs on the DNA molecular standards using Prism Software. The run time of the real-time RPA was between 4 min–13 min for 1.0 × 107–1.0 × 102 copies M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA

Validation of the RPA assays on clinical samples

Of the 111 sheep clinical samples, M. ovipneumoniae DNA was detected in 29 (26.12%), 31 (27.93%) and 32 (28.83%) samples by the real-time RPA, LFS RPA and real-time PCR, respectively (Table 1). Compared to the real-time PCR assay, the real-time RPA assay and LFS RPA assay showed diagnostic specificity (DSp) of 100 and 98.73%, diagnostic sensitivity (DSe) of 90.63 and 93.75%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 100 and 96.77%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 96.34 and 97.5%, and kappa value of 0.932 and 0.934, respectively (Table 2). The real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays demonstrated the comparable performance in detecting the 111 sheep clinical samples. In the RPA assays, it took no more than 20 min to obtain the positive results, while it need approximately 32 min - 46 min in the real-time PCR with the Ct values ranging from 20.77 to 36.52.
Table 1

Comparison of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA, LFS RPA and real-time PCR assays for detection of clinical samples

OriginLocationSampleNumberReal-time RPALFS RPAReal-time PCR
PNPNPN
Farm 1Dingzhou County, Baodingnasal swabs30111911191317
Farm 2Tang County, Baodingnasal swabs35431530530
Farm 3Pingquan County, Chengdenasal swabs30822921822
Slaughter houseTang County, Baodingfresh lungs16610610610
T111298231803279
Table 2

Diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, predictive value, and kappa value of real-time RPA, LFS RPA and real-time PCR assays for diagnosing M. ovipneumoniae infection

real-time PCR
PNT
real-time RPA
 P29029
 N37982
 T3279111
DSe:90.63%DSp:100%K:0.932
PPV:100%NPV:96.34%
LFS RPA
 P30131
 N27880
 T3279111
DSe:93.75%DSp:98.73%K:0.934
PPV:96.77%NPV:97.5%

P positive, N negative, DSe diagnostic sensitivity, DSp diagnostic specificity, K kappa value, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value

Discussion

The developed real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays are highly specific and sensitive for detection of M. ovipneumoniae in the sheep clinical samples. Both RPA assays performed well at 39 °C within 20 min, which is faster than other common nucleic acid amplification methods. The real-time RPA assay and LFS RPA assay were performed on the tube scanner Genie III and a metal bath incubator, respectively. These two pieces of equipment are portable, lightweight, easily carried and can be charged by battery for working a whole day. For the RPA reagents, they are provided in the form of lyophilized powder and are independent of cold chains. Several studies also demonstrated that RPA was tolerant to most of the PCR inhibitors [19, 21]. The above characteristics make the developed RPA assays ideal for the detection of M. ovipneumoniae in field which is especially important for farms located in rural areas. The PCR and LAMP assays targeted on the 16S rRNA gene, elongation factor TU gene or adhesin P113 gene had demonstrated their efficacy in the detection of M. ovipneumoniae in different clinical specimens, including the nasal swabs and lung samples [4, 9, 14, 15]. The RPA primers and probes were designed basing on the 16S rRNA gene of M. ovipneumoniae in this study. To ensure that the target sequences were unique to M. ovipneumoniae, we screened the selected primers and probes in silico using the pattern searching tool function from the EMBOSS package against the genomes of the common mycoplasmas causing infections in ruminants [22]. The complementary regions could not be found when allowing 1 or 5 sequence mismatches for the primer sequences. Furthermore, there was no mismatch in the reverse primers and probes in the M. ovipneumoniae strains available in Genbank, and only one mismatch in the forward primer in two strains: 2013–12,928-46 (Accession number: MN028079) and NCTC10151 (Accession number: LR215028.1). According to the above in silico analysis, the designed primers and probes fulfilled the specificity requirements of RPA [23]. In the specificity analysis, both the real-time RPA and LFS RPA only amplified the genomic DNA of M. ovipneumoniae, and no other mycoplasmas, bacteria and PPRV. Most importantly, M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae, the etiological agent of contagious caprine pleuropneumonia, was not amplified by the new developed RPA assays. Although the in silico sequence analysis support that all the M. ovipneumoniae strains are detectable, more genomic DNA of different strains of M. ovipneumoniae should be tested for further confirmation. With the real-time PCR as the reference assay, the diagnostic performances of the developed real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays were evaluated. The performances of the RPA assays were comparable to the real-time PCR, while the RPA assays were faster to obtain the detection results. Furthermore, the developed real-time RPA was slightly weak in the detection of the clinical samples containing low amounts of M. ovipneumoniae DNA, as three nasal samples were negative in real-time RPA assay while positive in real-time PCR with Ct values of 36.49, 35.50 and 36.52. The above results are inspiring, but the RPA assays should be further validated on more clinical samples, especially those containing low amounts of M. ovipneumoniae DNA.

Conclusions

In this study, we describe the development of the real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays for the simple, rapid and reliable detection of M. ovipneumoniae from the sheep nasal and lung samples. The developed RPA assays could be performed in field conditions without the need of any expensive equipment, and could also become a routine test for rapid and direct detection of M. ovipneumoniae in the farm.

Methods

Bacteria, virus strains, clinical samples and DNA extraction

Genomic DNA of M. ovipneumoniae (Y98) and genomic DNA or cDNA of a panel of pathogens involved in respiratory complex and other mycoplasmas frequently identified in ruminant were maintained in our laboratory and used in the study, which were the following 6 mycoplasmas, 3 non-mycoplasma bacteria and 1 virus: M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae (F38), M. mycoides subsp. capri (PG3), M. arginini (G230), M. agalactiae (PG2), M. bovis (PG45), M. flocculare (HB-XS3), Mannheimia haemolytica (F120G3), Klebsiella pneumoniae (F21W3), Pasteurella multocida (F91G3) and Peste des petits ruminants virus (Nigeria 75/1 vaccine strain). Four artificial constructs, pUC57-Mbovoculi, pUC57-Mleachii, pUC57-Mcc and pUC57-Mdispar, were also used in the study. The constructs contain the full 16S rRNA gene of M.bovoculi (1531 bp), M.leachii (1524 bp), M. capricolum subsp. capricolum (1466 bp) and M.dispar (1475 bp), which were synthesized artificially by Sangon Biotech (Shanghai, China) based on the reference sequences available in GenBank (Accession numbers: CP007154, NR_044773, NR_118796, NR_025182). A total of 46 sheep clinical samples (30 nasal swabs and 16 fresh lungs) were collected in Baoding City, Hebei Province from October to November 2019. The nasal swabs were collected from the sheep with coughing symptom in Fangzhuang farm in Dingzhou County, Baoding City, and the sheep fresh lungs were obtained from Zhuanluzhen slaughter house in Tang County, Baoding City. The sheep nasal swabs and lung samples were treated and the total DNA was extracted as described previously [24]. Furthermore, 65 nucleic acid samples extracted from the clinically healthy sheep nasal swabs were kindly provided by Dr. Qingan Han from Hebei Animal Disease Prevention and Control Center. The 65 sheep nasal swabs were collected in October–December 2019, in which 35 samples were collected from one sheep farm in Tang Country, Baoding City and the other 30 samples were collected from one sheep farm in Pingquan County, Chengde City. All the samples were used for the daily sheep disease surveillance. The 65 nucleic acid samples were also quantified using a ND-2000c spectrophotometer (NanoDrop, Wilmington, USA) and used in the study.

Generation of standard DNA

To generate a M. ovipneumoniae standard DNA for the RPA assays, a PCR product containing 361 bp covering the region of interest of 16S rRNA gene was amplified from the M. ovipneumoniae DNA using LMF1 and LMR1 as primers (Table 3) and cloned into the pMD19-T (Takara, Dalian, China) for standards. The resulting plasmid, pMO-16SrRNA, was transformed into Escherichia coli DH5α cells, purified with the SanPrep Plasmid MiniPrep Kit (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China) and quantified. The copy number of DNA molecules was calculated by the following formula: amount (copies/μL) = [DNA concentration (g/μL)/ (plasmid length in base pairs× 660)] × 6.02 × 1023. Ten-fold dilutions of the pMO-16SrRNA, ranging from 1.0 × 107 to 1.0 × 100copies/μL, were prepared in nuclease-free water and aliquots of each dilution were stored at − 80 °C.
Table 3

Sequences of the primers and probes for M .ovipneumoniae real-time RPA, LFS RPA and PCR assays

AssayPrimers and probesSequence 5′-3′Amplicon size (bp)References
real-time RPAMO-exo-FTGAGTAACACGTACCTAACCTACCTTTTGGAC254This study
MO-exo-RTGCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGTCTGGGCCGTATCTC
MO-exo-PTTGGTAGGGTAAAGGCCTACCAAGACGATGA (FAM-dT)(THF)(BHQ1-dT)TTAGCGGGGCCAAGAG-C3-spacer
LFS RPAMO-nfo-FTGAGTAACACGTACCTAACCTACCTTTTGGAC254This study
MO-nfo-RBiotin-TGCTGCCTCCCGTAGGAGTCTGGGCCGTATCTC
MO-nfo-PFAM-TTGGTAGGGTAAAGGCCTACCAAGACGATGAT(THF)TTTAGCGGGGCCAAGAG-C3-spacer
real-time PCRMo16S_35FTGGGTGAGTAACACGTACCTAACC62[4]
Mo16S_96RAGCCGCTGTTTCCAATGG
Mo16S_60TFAM-ACCTTTTGGACCGGGATA-MGB
PCRLMF1TGAACGGAATATGTTAGCTT361[9]
LMR1GACTTCATCCTGCACTCTGT
Comparison of M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA, LFS RPA and real-time PCR assays for detection of clinical samples Diagnostic sensitivity, diagnostic specificity, predictive value, and kappa value of real-time RPA, LFS RPA and real-time PCR assays for diagnosing M. ovipneumoniae infection P positive, N negative, DSe diagnostic sensitivity, DSp diagnostic specificity, K kappa value, PPV positive predictive value, NPV negative predictive value Sequences of the primers and probes for M .ovipneumoniae real-time RPA, LFS RPA and PCR assays

RPA primers and probe

The 16S rRNA gene of M. ovipneumoniae was determined as the amplification target for RPA. According to the reference sequences of M. ovipneumoniae (Accession numbers: NR_025989.1, LR215028.1, MN028361, MN028184, MN028079, MH133233), the highly conserved region in the 16S rRNA gene was identified, and the RPA primers, exo and nfo probes were designed following the RPA manufacturer guidelines (TwistDx. Cambridge, UK). Primers and probe are listed in Table 3 and synthesized by a commercial company (Sangon Biotech, Shanghai, China).

Real-time RPA and LFS RPA assays

The M. ovipneumoniae real-time RPA assay was performed as described previously [24]. The total reaction volume was 50 μL including 40.9 μL of Buffer A (rehydration buffer), 2.0 μL of each RPA primers (MO-exo-F and MO-exo-R, 10 μmol/L), 0.6 μL of exo probe (MO-exo-P, 10 μmol/L) and 2.5 μL of Buffer B (magnesium acetate, 280 mmol/L). Furthermore, 1 μL of genomic DNA or recombinant plasmid was used for the specificity and sensitivity analysis, or 2 μL of sample DNA was used for the clinical sample diagnosis. The M. ovipneumoniae LFS RPA assay was also performed as described previously [24]. The total reaction volume was 50 μL including 29.5 μL of rehydration buffer, 2.1 μL of each RPA primers (MO-nfo-F and MO-nfo-R, 10 μmol/L), 0.6 μL of exo probe (MO-nfo-P, 10 μmol/L) and 2.5 μL of magnesium acetate (280 mmol/L). In addition, 1 μL of bacterial genomic DNA or recombinant plasmid was used for the specific and sensitive analysis, or 2 μL of sample DNA was used for the clinical sample diagnosis. The assay was performed in a metal bath incubator at 39 °C for 15 min. Furthermore, the lateral flow strips (Milenia Biotec GmbH, Germany) were used to detect the RPA amplicons dual-labeled with FAM and biotin.

Analytical specificity and sensitivity analysis

Both RPA assays were performed to amplify the nucleic acids of a panel of microorganisms including M. ovipneumoniae, M. capricolum subsp. capripneumoniae, M. mycoides subsp. capricolum, M. arginini, M. agalactiae, M.bovoculi, M.leachii, M. capricolum subsp. capricolum, M.dispar, M. bovis, M. flocculare, M. haemolytica, P. multocida, K. pneumoniae, PPRV, which are considered to be dangerous to the sheep and goat respiratory system or frequently identified in the ruminants. The analytical specificity analysis was repeated five times. The standard DNA of M. ovipneumoniae, ranging from 1.0 × 107 to 1.0 × 100 copies/μL, was used for the RPA analytical sensitivity analysis. One microliter of each dilution was amplified by both RPA assays to determine the limit of detection (LOD). The analytical sensitivity analysis was repeated five times. Furthermore, the real-time RPA was tested using the standard DNA in 8 replicates, the threshold time was plotted against the molecules detected and a semi-log regression was calculated using Prism software 5.0 (Graphpad Software Inc., SanDiego, California).

Validation with clinical samples

The RPA assays were validated with 95 sheep nasal swabs and 16 sheep fresh lungs. All samples tested with the two RPA assays were also tested by a real-time PCR in parallel. The real-time PCR for M. oviopneumoniae was performed on a ABI 7500 instrument (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California), which was described previously [4].
  24 in total

1.  EMBOSS: the European Molecular Biology Open Software Suite.

Authors:  P Rice; I Longden; A Bleasby
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  An aetiopathological study of chronic bronchopneumonia in lambs in Ireland.

Authors:  Maresa Sheehan; Joseph P Cassidy; Joseph Brady; Hywel Ball; Michael L Doherty; Patrick J Quinn; Robin A J Nicholas; Bryan K Markey
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 2.688

Review 3.  Mycoplasmas of goats and sheep.

Authors:  A J DaMassa; P S Wakenell; D L Brooks
Journal:  J Vet Diagn Invest       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 1.279

4.  Isolation, propagation, and characterization studies of an ovine Mycoplasma responsible for proliferative interstitial pneumonia.

Authors:  L E Carmichael; T D St George; N D Sullivan; N Horsfall
Journal:  Cornell Vet       Date:  1972-10

5.  Influence of sequence mismatches on the specificity of recombinase polymerase amplification technology.

Authors:  Rana K Daher; Gale Stewart; Maurice Boissinot; Dominique K Boudreau; Michel G Bergeron
Journal:  Mol Cell Probes       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Seroprevalence and molecular detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae in goats in tropical China.

Authors:  Guang Rong; Jun-Ming Zhao; Guan-Yu Hou; Han-Lin Zhou
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2014-08-07       Impact factor: 1.559

7.  Association of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infection with population-limiting respiratory disease in free-ranging Rocky Mountain bighorn sheep (Ovis canadensis canadensis).

Authors:  Thomas E Besser; E Frances Cassirer; Kathleen A Potter; John VanderSchalie; Allison Fischer; Donald P Knowles; David R Herndon; Fred R Rurangirwa; Glen C Weiser; Subramaniam Srikumaran
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  A real-time PCR for detection and quantification of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae.

Authors:  Falong Yang; Xiaofang Dao; Alex Rodriguez-Palacios; Xufei Feng; Cheng Tang; Xiaonong Yang; Hua Yue
Journal:  J Vet Med Sci       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 1.267

Review 9.  Recombinase Polymerase Amplification for Diagnostic Applications.

Authors:  Rana K Daher; Gale Stewart; Maurice Boissinot; Michel G Bergeron
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 8.327

10.  Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae--a primary cause of severe pneumonia epizootics in the Norwegian Muskox (Ovibos moschatus) population.

Authors:  Kjell Handeland; Torstein Tengs; Branko Kokotovic; Turid Vikøren; Roger D Ayling; Bjarne Bergsjø; Olöf G Sigurðardóttir; Tord Bretten
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  3 in total

1.  Recombinase polymerase amplification assay combined with a dipstick-readout for rapid detection of Mycoplasma ovipneumoniae infections.

Authors:  Sandeep K Gupta; Qing Deng; Tanushree B Gupta; Paul Maclean; Joerg Jores; Axel Heiser; D Neil Wedlock
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-04       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Development and Evaluation of the Rapid and Sensitive RPA Assays for Specific Detection of Salmonella spp. in Food Samples.

Authors:  Liwei Zhao; Jianchang Wang; Xiao Xia Sun; Jinfeng Wang; Zhimin Chen; Xiangdong Xu; Mengyuan Dong; Ya-Nan Guo; Yuanyuan Wang; Pingping Chen; Weijuan Gao; Yunyun Geng
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 5.293

3.  Development of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification assay for the rapid detection of Russula subnigricans and Russula japonica.

Authors:  Pan Long; Zijuan Jiang; Zhengmi He; Zuohong Chen
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2022-08-23       Impact factor: 6.064

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.