Literature DB >> 32486952

Coupling protocol of interlocked feedback oscillators in circadian clocks.

Md Mamunur Rashid1, Hiroyuki Kurata2.   

Abstract

Circadian rhythms (approx. 24 h) show the robustness of key oscillatory features such as phase, period and amplitude against external and internal variations. The robustness of Drosophila circadian clocks can be generated by interlocked transcriptional-translational feedback loops, where two negative feedback loops are coupled through mutual activations. The mechanisms by which such coupling protocols have survived out of many possible protocols remain to be revealed. To address this question, we investigated two distinct coupling protocols: activator-coupled oscillators (ACO) and repressor-coupled oscillators (RCO). We focused on the two coupling parameters: coupling dissociation constant and coupling time-delay. Interestingly, the ACO was able to produce anti-phase or morning-evening cycles, whereas the RCO produced in-phase ones. Deterministic and stochastic analyses demonstrated that the anti-phase ACO provided greater fluctuations in amplitude not only with respect to changes in coupling parameters but also to random parameter perturbations than the in-phase RCO. Moreover, the ACO deteriorated the entrainability to the day-night master clock, whereas the RCO produced high entrainability. Considering that the real, interlocked feedback loops have evolved as the ACO, instead of the RCO, we first proposed a hypothesis that the morning-evening or anti-phase cycle is more essential for Drosophila than achieving robustness and entrainability.

Entities:  

Keywords:  circadian rhythms; entrainability; interlocked feedback; phase shift; robustness; stochastic simulation

Year:  2020        PMID: 32486952      PMCID: PMC7328379          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2020.0287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  58 in total

1.  Delay model of the circadian pacemaker.

Authors:  M A Lema; D A Golombek; J Echave
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  2000-06-21       Impact factor: 2.691

2.  Robustness of circadian rhythms with respect to molecular noise.

Authors:  Didier Gonze; José Halloy; Albert Goldbeter
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Evolution of circadian rhythms: from bacteria to human.

Authors:  Utpal Bhadra; Nirav Thakkar; Paromita Das; Manika Pal Bhadra
Journal:  Sleep Med       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 3.492

4.  A mathematical model for the intracellular circadian rhythm generator.

Authors:  T Scheper; D Klinkenberg; C Pennartz; J van Pelt
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-01-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Deciphering the Dynamics of Interlocked Feedback Loops in a Model of the Mammalian Circadian Clock.

Authors:  Dorjsuren Battogtokh; John J Tyson
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2018-10-11       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Light-induced degradation of TIMELESS and entrainment of the Drosophila circadian clock.

Authors:  M P Myers; K Wager-Smith; A Rothenfluh-Hilfiker; M W Young
Journal:  Science       Date:  1996-03-22       Impact factor: 47.728

7.  Coupling governs entrainment range of circadian clocks.

Authors:  Ute Abraham; Adrián E Granada; Pål O Westermark; Markus Heine; Achim Kramer; Hanspeter Herzel
Journal:  Mol Syst Biol       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 11.429

8.  An intensity ratio of interlocking loops determines circadian period length.

Authors:  Jie Yan; Guangsen Shi; Zhihui Zhang; Xi Wu; Zhiwei Liu; Lijuan Xing; Zhipeng Qu; Zhen Dong; Ling Yang; Ying Xu
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2014-08-13       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  Mathematical identification of critical reactions in the interlocked feedback model.

Authors:  Hiroyuki Kurata; Takayuki Tanaka; Fumitaka Ohnishi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Modulation of Phase Shift between Wnt and Notch Signaling Oscillations Controls Mesoderm Segmentation.

Authors:  Katharina F Sonnen; Volker M Lauschke; Julia Uraji; Henning J Falk; Yvonne Petersen; Maja C Funk; Mathias Beaupeux; Paul François; Christoph A Merten; Alexander Aulehla
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 41.582

View more
  1 in total

1.  Combined multiple transcriptional repression mechanisms generate ultrasensitivity and oscillations.

Authors:  Eui Min Jeong; Yun Min Song; Jae Kyoung Kim
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 4.661

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.