| Literature DB >> 32486519 |
Laura Micheli1, Lorenzo Di Cesare Mannelli1, Luisa Mattoli2, Sara Tamimi2, Enrico Flamini2, Stefano Garetto2,3, Jacopo Lucci2,3, Emiliano Giovagnoni2, Lorenzo Cinci1, Mario D'Ambrosio1, Cristina Luceri1, Carla Ghelardini1.
Abstract
Current pharmacological therapies for the management of chronic articular diseases are far from being satisfactory, so new strategies need to be investigated. We tested the intra-articular pain relieving properties of a system of molecules from a characterized Centella asiatica extract (14G1862) in a rat model of osteoarthritis induced by monoiodoacetate (MIA). 14G1862 (0.2-2 mg mL-1) was intra-articularly (i.a.) injected 7 days after MIA, behavioural and histological evaluations were performed 14, 30 and 60 days after treatments. Moreover, the effect of 14G1862 on nitrate production and iNOS expression in RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulated with LPS was assessed. In vitro, 14G1862 treatment attenuated LPS-induced NO production and iNOS expression in a comparable manner to celecoxib. In vivo, 14G1862 significantly reduced mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, spontaneous pain and motor alterations starting on day 14 up to day 60. The efficacy was higher or comparable to that evoked by triamcinolone acetonide (100 μg i.a.) used as reference drug. Histological evaluation highlighted the improvement of several morphological parameters in MIA + 14G1862-treated animals with particularly benefic effects on joint space and fibrin deposition. In conclusion, i.a. treatment with Centella asiatica is a candidate to be a novel effective approach for osteoarthritis therapy.Entities:
Keywords: 14G1862; Centella asiatica; MIA; RAW 264.7 cell line; intra-articular treatment; osteoarthritis; pain
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32486519 PMCID: PMC7352185 DOI: 10.3390/nu12061618
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nutrients ISSN: 2072-6643 Impact factor: 5.717
Composition study of the system of molecules 14G1862 from Centella asiatica.
| Methods | Compounds | % |
|---|---|---|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Kaempferol-7-O-glucoside | 0.019 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Quercetin-3-O-glucuronide | 0.18 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Quercetin-3-O-glucopyranoside | 0.033 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Rutin | 0.02 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Isorhamnetin | 0.0390 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Flavanomarein | 0.01 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Phloridzin | 0.014 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Luteolin-4’-O-glucoside | 0.091 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Luteolin-7-O-β-D-glucoside | 0.012 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Schaftoside | 0.012 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Protocatechuic acid | 0.023 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| GC-MS (HS) | Cinnamic acid ethyl ester | 0.00006212 |
| GC-MS (HS) | Cinnamic acid methyl ester | 0.00004905 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Verbascoside | 0.0130 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Rosmarinic acid | 0.0097 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF (pos) | Syringin (Eleutheroside B) | 0.0068 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Aesculetin | 0.064 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Aesculin | 0.034 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Fraxin | 0.013 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Acetyleugenol | 0.00011256 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | β-Asarone | 0.00011564 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | α-Asarone | 0.00006897 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Apiole | 0.00006139 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Dillapiole | 0.00006708 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Eugenol | 0.00017197 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Isoeugenyl acetate | 0.00013133 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Myristicin | 0.00004111 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | 3,4-Dicaffeoylquinic acid | 0.022 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | 4,5-Dicaffeoylquinic acid | 0.13 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Chlorogenic Acid | 0.190 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Salicylic acid | 0.027 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | 0.00001636 | |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Guaiacol Methyl ether | 0.00002774 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Mangiferin | 0.0075 |
| SFM |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | β-Curcumene | 0.00068904 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | 0.00017318 | |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | α-Curcumene | 0.00007149 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Limonene | 0.00004334 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | β-Myrcene (myrcene) | 0.00007774 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | β-Pinene | 0.00003455 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | ɣ-Terpinene | 0.00003338 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | trans-Anethole | 0.00004189 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Borneol | 0.00076609 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | 1,8-Cineol (Eucalyptol) | 0.00002888 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Geranyl Acetate | 0.00037654 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Linalool | 0.00143459 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Terpinen-4-ol | 0.00020283 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Menthol | 0.00003828 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Camphor | 0.00027296 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Carvone | 0.00029010 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Carvacrol | 0.00012183 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Thymol | 0.00010886 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Guaiazulene | 0.00000929 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Valencene | 0.00000851 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | β-Eudesmol | 0.00002983 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Cedrol | 0.00002645 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Guaiol | 0.00003122 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Alloaromadendrene | 0.00021006 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | α-Humulene | 0.00011879 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | α-Bisabolol | 0.00003985 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Azulene | 0.00001726 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Chamazulene | 0.00001117 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Asiatic Acid | 0.087 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Madecassic Acid | 0.660 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Asiaticoside | 1.96 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Madecassoside | 2.30 |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Hederagenin | 0.00024 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | β-Ionone | 0.00008004 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | α-Ionone | 0.00003722 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | 1-Phenylethanol | 0.00003749 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | 4-Isopropyl Benzyl Alcohol | 0.00014199 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Anisaldehyde | 0.00026692 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Cuminaldehyde | 0.00003838 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Phenylacetic Acid Ethyl ester | 0.00003081 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Benzoic acid Ethyl ester | 0.00002015 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Benzyl Acetate | 0.00002002 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Benzyl Benzoate | 0.00001766 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Benzoic acid Eugenyl Ester | 0.00001478 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Benzoic Acid Methyl ester | 0.00000798 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Cinnamyl Acetate | 0.00012305 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | 4-Chromanone | 0.0000718 |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Acetophenone | 0.0000223 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (HS) | Ethyl Decanoate | 0.00003215 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Quinic acid | 0.13 |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF | Azelaic acid | 0.032 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (Der) | Lignoceric Acid | 0.00220 |
| GC-QqQ (Der) | Myristic Acid | 0.00160 |
| GC-QqQ (Der) | Behenic Acid | 0.00300 |
| GC-QqQ (Der) | Arachidic Acid | 0.00240 |
| GC-QqQ (Der) | Octanoic Acid | 0.00009 |
|
|
| |
| GC-QqQ (Der) | Oleic Acid | 0.00089 |
| GC-QqQ (Der) | Linoleic Acid | 0.01810 |
| HPLC-RID |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| UHPLC q-ToF (pos) | Choline (Vit J) | 0.35 |
|
|
| |
|
|
| |
| ICP-MS | Calcium | 0.0614 |
| ICP-MS | Magnesium | 0.2183 |
| ICP-MS | Potassium | 7.0843 |
| ICP-MS | Sodium | 1.5854 |
|
|
| |
| ICP-MS | Cobalt | 0.000172 |
| ICP-MS | Copper | 0.000757 |
| ICP-MS | Iron | 0.0028 |
| ICP-MS | Manganese | 0.0053 |
| ICP-MS | Selenium | 0.000001 |
| ICP-MS | Zinc | 0.001016 |
| ICP-MS | Arsenic | 0.000006 |
| ICP-MS | Boron | 0.000439 |
| ICP-MS | Chromium | 0.000027 |
| ICP-MS | Nichel | 0.000608 |
| ICP-MS | Silicon | 0.0107 |
| ICP-MS | Vanadium | 0.0000140 |
|
|
| |
| ICP-MS | Rubidium | 0.02217 |
| ICP-MS | Lithium | 0.000063 |
| ICP-MS | Barium | 0.000103 |
| ICP-MS | Aluminium | 0.0069 |
| ICP-MS | Cadmium | 0.0000190 |
| ICP-MS | Thallium | 0.0000260 |
| ICP-MS | Gallium | 0.0000090 |
| ICP-MS | Selenium | 0.0000010 |
|
|
| |
| IC-CD | Chloride | 6.8162 |
| IC-CD | Nitrate | 0.3251 |
| IC-CD | Phosphate | 0.2086 |
| IC-CD | Sulphate | 0.1685 |
Figure 1In-vitro antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties of the system of molecules 14G1862 from Centella asiatica. (a) Effect of 14G1862 (0.5–2 mg mL−1), on nitrites production in RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulated with LPS 1 μg mL−1 for 18 h in comparison to celecoxib 3 μM. (b) Effect of 14G1862 (0.5–2 mg mL−1), on iNOS mRNA expression in RAW 264.7 macrophages stimulated with LPS 1 μg m−1 for 18 h in comparison to celecoxib 3 μM. Data are expressed as mean ± S.E.M. of three independent experiments. *** p < 0.001 vs. unstimulated control cells; ^ p < 0.001 and ^^^ p < 0.0001 vs. LPS-treated cells.
Figure 2Articular pain, behavioural measurements related to hyperalgesia and allodynia. Monoarthritis was induced by MIA (2 mg/25 μL) injection into the tibio-tarsal joint on day 7. Twenty μL of 14G1862 (0.2–2 mg mL−1) or triamcinolone acetonide 100 μg were i.a. administered 7 days after MIA (day 1). Behavioural measurements were performed on days 14, 30 and 60 after osteoarthritis induction. The results obtained with the lower doses of 14G1862 were reported only in the Paw pressure test. (a) Effect of i.a. injection of 14G1862 in the rat, response to a noxious mechanical stimulus (Paw pressure test); (b) Effect of i.a. injection of 14G1862 in the rat, response to a non-noxious mechanical stimulus (Von Frey test); (c) Effect of i.a. injection of 14G1862 in the rat, measure of postural equilibrium related to pain (Incapacitance test). Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of 6 rats per group, performed in 2 different experimental sets. ** p < 0.01 vs. vehicle + vehicle; ^ p < 0.05 and ^^ p < 0.01 vs. MIA + vehicle.
Figure 3Articular pain, behavioural measurements related to motor alterations. Monoarthritis was induced by MIA (2 mg/25 μL) injection into the tibio-tarsal joint on day 7. Twenty μL of 14G1862 (2 mg mL−1) or triamcinolone acetonide 100 μg were i.a. administered 7 days after MIA (day 1). Behavioural measurements were performed on days 14, 30 and 60 after osteoarthritis induction. (a) Effect of i.a. injection of 14G1862 in the rat, measure of motor abilities related to pain (Beam balance test); (b) Effect of i.a. injection of 14G1862 in the rat, measure of number of falls in 10 min (Rota rod test); (c) Effect of i.a. injection of 14G1862 in the rat, measure of number of movements (Animex test). Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of 6 rats per group, performed in 2 different experimental sets. ** p < 0.01 vs. vehicle + vehicle; ^ p < 0.05 and ^^ p < 0.01 vs. MIA + vehicle.
Figure 4Morphological evaluations on tibio-tarsal joints. The upper panel (from a to g) represents the quantification of morphological parameters by specific score (0: absent; 1: light; 2: moderate; 3: severe). Control animals had all morphological score equal to 0 and were indicated in graphs by the red line. The lower panel shows comparative images of histological samples of tibio-tarsal joints from each experimental group. In the images are highlighted some morphological damages: cartilage and bone erosion by black arrows and fibrin deposition in joint space by asterisks. Magnification 100×; Scale bar 100 µM. Each value represents the mean ± S.E.M. of 6 rats per group, performed in 2 different experimental sets. ** p < 0.01 vs. vehicle + vehicle; ^^ p < 0.01 vs. MIA + vehicle.