| Literature DB >> 32486212 |
Nik Ida Mardiana Nik-Pa1,2, Mohamad Farhan Mohamad Sobri1,3, Suraini Abd-Aziz1, Mohamad Faizal Ibrahim1, Ezyana Kamal Bahrin1, Noorjahan Banu Mohammed Alitheen4, Norhayati Ramli1.
Abstract
Two optimization strategies, codon usage modification and glycine supplementation, were adopted to improve the extracellular production of Bacillus sp. NR5 UPM β-cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase (CGT-BS) in recombinant Escherichia coli. Several rare codons were eliminated and replaced with the ones favored by E. coli cells, resulting in an increased codon adaptation index (CAI) from 0.67 to 0.78. The cultivation of the codon modified recombinant E. coli following optimization of glycine supplementation enhanced the secretion of β-CGTase activity up to 2.2-fold at 12 h of cultivation as compared to the control. β-CGTase secreted into the culture medium by the transformant reached 65.524 U/mL at post-induction temperature of 37 °C with addition of 1.2 mM glycine and induced at 2 h of cultivation. A 20.1-fold purity of the recombinant β-CGTase was obtained when purified through a combination of diafiltration and nickel-nitrilotriacetic acid (Ni-NTA) affinity chromatography. This combined strategy doubled the extracellular β-CGTase production when compared to the single approach, hence offering the potential of enhancing the expression of extracellular enzymes, particularly β-CGTase by the recombinant E. coli.Entities:
Keywords: codon usage; cyclodextrin; cyclodextrin glycosyltransferase; extracellular enzyme; glycine; inducer
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 32486212 PMCID: PMC7313058 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21113919
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Codon preference in E. coli, codon usage in the native gene (cgt-BS) and the optimized synthetic gene (cocgt-BS).
| Amino Acid | Codon | Relative Frequency | Frequency | Amino Acid | Codon | Relative Frequency | Frequency | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| Ala (A) | GCA | 0.22 | 11 | 7 | Leu (L) | CUA | 0.03 | 5 | 0 |
| GCC | 0.25 | 8 | 9 | CUC | 0.10 | 4 | 6 | ||
| GCG | 0.34 | 5 | 16 | CUG | 0.55 | 2 | 27 | ||
| GCU | 0.19 | 9 | 1 | CUU | 0.10 | 9 | 5 | ||
| Arg (R) | AGA | 0.04 | 3 | 0 | UUA | 0.11 | 31 | 13 | |
| AGG | 0.03 | 1 | 0 | UUG | 0.11 | 9 | 9 | ||
| CGA | 0.05 | 5 | 0 | Lys (K) | AAA | 0.76 | 22 | 27 | |
| CGC | 0.37 | 4 | 12 | AAG | 0.24 | 10 | 5 | ||
| CGG | 0.08 | 1 | 2 | Met (M) | AUG | 1.00 | 15 | 15 | |
| CGU | 0.42 | 8 | 8 | Phe (F) | UUC | 0.49 | 11 | 14 | |
| Asn (N) | AAC | 0.61 | 34 | 41 | UUU | 0.51 | 24 | 21 | |
| AAU | 0.39 | 36 | 29 | Pro (P) | CCA | 0.20 | 7 | 4 | |
| Asp (D) | GAC | 0.41 | 11 | 20 | CCC | 0.10 | 3 | 2 | |
| GAU | 0.59 | 37 | 28 | CCG | 0.55 | 2 | 18 | ||
| Cys (C) | UGC | 0.57 | 1 | 4 | CCU | 0.16 | 7 | 5 | |
| UGU | 0.43 | 3 | 0 | Ser (S) | AGC | 0.27 | 16 | 19 | |
| Gln (Q) | CAA | 0.31 | 22 | 10 | AGU | 0.13 | 11 | 8 | |
| CAG | 0.69 | 10 | 22 | UCA | 0.12 | 16 | 14 | ||
| Glu (E) | GAA | 0.70 | 22 | 21 | UCC | 0.17 | 6 | 9 | |
| GAG | 0.30 | 9 | 10 | UCG | 0.13 | 4 | 14 | ||
| Gly (G) | GGA | 0.09 | 13 | 3 | UCU | 0.19 | 14 | 3 | |
| GGC | 0.40 | 17 | 22 | Thr (T) | ACA | 0.30 | 17 | 11 | |
| GGG | 0.13 | 13 | 7 | ACC | 0.43 | 14 | 26 | ||
| GGU | 0.38 | 16 | 27 | ACG | 0.23 | 14 | 13 | ||
| His (H) | CAC | 0.48 | 7 | 7 | ACU | 0.21 | 11 | 6 | |
| CAU | 0.52 | 10 | 10 | Trp (V) | UGG | 1.00 | 15 | 15 | |
| Ile (I) | AUA | 0.07 | 12 | 0 | Tyr (Y) | UAC | 0.47 | 20 | 19 |
| AUC | 0.46 | 13 | 30 | UAU | 0.53 | 28 | 29 | ||
| AUU | 0.47 | 24 | 19 | Val (V) | GUA | 0.17 | 18 | 10 | |
| GUC | 0.20 | 11 | 18 | ||||||
| GUG | 0.34 | 5 | 11 | ||||||
| GUU | 0.29 | 19 | 14 | ||||||
Physicochemical parameters of CGT-BS (this study) in comparison to the other CGTases from selected Bacillus spp., computed using ExPASY’s ProtParam tool.
| Description | Accession Number | Theoretical MW (Da) | pI | R+ | R− | EC a (M−1·cm−1) | EC b (M−1·cm−1) | II | Stability | AI | GRAVY | TNA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HQ876173.1 | 80,622.34 | 4.81 | 48 | 76 | 142,810 | 142,560 | 24.57 | stable | 75.36 | −0.405 | 11,108 | |
| X78145.1 | 77,309.28 | 6.08 | 52 | 58 | 120,795 | 120,670 | 22.72 | stable | 74.05 | −0.250 | 10,710 | |
| X15752.1 | 78,002.68 | 5.57 | 48 | 59 | 124,805 | 124,680 | 18.17 | stable | 71.75 | −0.243 | 10,785 | |
| M19880.1 | 78,249.29 | 5.41 | 49 | 63 | 133,285 | 133,160 | 25.23 | stable | 75.76 | −0.286 | 10,826 | |
| KX579963.2 | 80,168.90 | 4.23 | 46 | 111 | 129,735 | 129,610 | 30.92 | stable | 73.39 | −0.483 | 10,983 | |
| EF363797.1 | 80,096.84 | 4.24 | 46 | 110 | 129,735 | 129,610 | 30.65 | stable | 73.39 | −0.478 | 10,974 |
* This study. Theoretical isoelectric point (pI), number of positively charged amino acids − Arg + Lys (R+); number of negatively charged amino acids − Asp + Glu (R−); extinction coefficient (EC) (a: assuming all pairs of Cys residues form cystines, b: assuming all Cys residues are reduced); instability index (II); aliphatic index (AI); grand average of hydropathicity (GRAVY); total number of atoms (TNA).
Central composite design (CCD) matrix, the predicted and experimental values obtained for the expression of codon optimized CGTase (cocgtBS) from recombinant E. coli.
| Run | Concentration (mM) | Induction Time (h) | Post-Induction Temperature (°C) | β-CGTase Activity (U/mL) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Predicted | ||||
| 1 | 1.60 | 1.00 | 42.0 | 23.47 | 23.47 |
| 2 | 1.60 | 3.00 | 32.0 | 34.23 | 32.38 |
| 3 | 1.20 | 2.00 | 37.0 | 64.76 | 64.17 |
| 4 | 1.20 | 2.00 | 37.0 | 63.88 | 64.17 |
| 5 | 1.60 | 3.00 | 42.0 | 24.37 | 25.77 |
| 6 | 1.20 | 2.00 | 37.0 | 62.72 | 64.17 |
| 7 | 1.20 | 2.00 | 37.0 | 65.73 | 64.17 |
| 8 | 1.20 | 3.68 | 37.0 | 29.96 | 30.70 |
| 9 | 1.20 | 2.00 | 37.0 | 63.97 | 64.17 |
| 10 | 1.60 | 1.00 | 32.0 | 30.18 | 31.67 |
| 11 | 1.20 | 2.00 | 37.0 | 63.83 | 64.17 |
| 12 | 0.80 | 3.00 | 32.0 | 16.61 | 17.19 |
| 13 | 1.20 | 0.32 | 37.0 | 42.88 | 41.31 |
| 14 | 0.80 | 3.00 | 42.0 | 17.57 | 16.66 |
| 15 | 1.20 | 2.00 | 28.6 | 8.47 | 9.11 |
| 16 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 32.0 | 32.92 | 32.10 |
| 17 | 1.20 | 2.00 | 45.4 | 3.11 | 1.65 |
| 18 | 1.87 | 2.00 | 37.0 | 47.64 | 47.31 |
| 19 | 0.80 | 1.00 | 42.0 | 27.55 | 29.98 |
| 20 | 0.53 | 2.00 | 37.0 | 40.50 | 40.01 |
Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) for response surface quadratic model for the expression of extracellular recombinant CGTase (cocgtBS) from recombinant E. coli.
| Source | Sum of Squares | Degree of Freedom (df) | Mean Square | F Value | Significant Term Based on | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 7839.26 | 9 | 871.03 | 329.64 | <0.0001 |
|
| A | 64.26 | 1 | 64.26 | 24.32 | 0.0006 | |
| B | 135.82 | 1 | 135.82 | 51.40 | <0.0001 | |
| C | 64.98 | 1 | 64.98 | 24.59 | 0.0006 | |
| AB | 121.96 | 1 | 121.96 | 46.16 | <0.0001 | |
| AC | 18.47 | 1 | 18.47 | 6.99 | 0.0246 | |
| BC | 1.27 | 1 | 1.27 | 0.48 | 0.5044 | |
| A2 | 758.03 | 1 | 758.03 | 286.88 | <0.0001 | |
| B2 | 1428.85 | 1 | 1428.85 | 540.75 | <0.0001 | |
| C2 | 6229.12 | 1 | 6229.12 | 2357.42 | <0.0001 | |
| Residual | 26.42 | 10 | 2.64 | |||
| Lack of fit | 21.29 | 5 | 4.26 | 4.14 | 0.0724 |
|
| Pure error | 5.14 | 5 | 1.03 | |||
| Cor total | 7865.69 | 19 | ||||
| R2 | 0.9966 | |||||
| Adjusted R2 | 0.9936 |
Figure 1Effects of (a) glycine concentration vs. induction time, (b) glycine concentration vs. post-induction temperature, (c) post-induction temperature vs. induction time on the recombinant β-CGTase activities.
Figure 2E. coli harboring pQEcoCGT-BS were grown in Terrific Broth (TB) media without glycine (□) and with glycine supplementation at the optimized conditions (▲) which were at post-induction temperature of 37 °C, glycine concentration of 1.2 mM and induction at 2 h of cultivation as indicates by arrow.
Purification yield of recombinant codon optimized β-CGTase (cocgtBS) from E. coli following induction with 1.2 mM glycine at 2 h of fermentation at 37 °C.
| Purification Step | Volume (mL) | Total Activity (U/mL) | Total Protein (mg/mL) | Specific Activity (U/mg) | Purification Fold | Purification Yield (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Crude | 1000 | 77.1 | 16.2 | 4.8 | 1.0 | 100.0 |
| Diafiltration | 250 | 65.6 | 10.6 | 6.2 | 1.3 | 85.2 |
| Affinity Chromatography | 9 | 19.1 | 0.2 | 95.6 | 20.0 | 24.8 |
| Ultrafiltration | 3 | 11.0 | 0.1 | 113.4 | 23.8 | 14.3 |
Figure 3Production of β-cyclodextrin by purified β-CGTase using different concentrations of soluble starch. Standard deviations are shown as bars and the deviation from the mean is below 5%.
Figure 4Hanes–Woolf plot to identify Km and Vmax which were used in the Michaelis–Menten equation. S: substrate, v: velocity.
Figure 5Properties of the recombinant β-CGTase produced by E. coli harboring pQEcoCGT-BS; (a) Optimal pH and (b) pH stability of the crude (○) and purified (■) β-CGTase.
Figure 6Properties of the recombinant β-CGTase produced by E. coli harboring pQEcoCGT-BS; (a) Temperature profile and (b) temperature stability of the crude (○) and purified (■) β-CGTase.