Literature DB >> 32483380

Site-specific ubiquitination affects protein energetics and proteasomal degradation.

Emma C Carroll1, Eric R Greene1, Andreas Martin2,3,4, Susan Marqusee5,6,7,8.   

Abstract

Changes in the cellular environment modulate protein energy landscapes to drive important biology, with consequences for signaling, allostery and other vital processes. The effects of ubiquitination are particularly important because of their potential influence on degradation by the 26S proteasome. Moreover, proteasomal engagement requires unstructured initiation regions that many known proteasome substrates lack. To assess the energetic effects of ubiquitination and how these manifest at the proteasome, we developed a generalizable strategy to produce isopeptide-linked ubiquitin within structured regions of a protein. The effects on the energy landscape vary from negligible to dramatic, depending on the protein and site of ubiquitination. Ubiquitination at sensitive sites destabilizes the native structure and increases the rate of proteasomal degradation. In well-folded proteins, ubiquitination can even induce the requisite unstructured regions needed for proteasomal engagement. Our results indicate a biophysical role of site-specific ubiquitination as a potential regulatory mechanism for energy-dependent substrate degradation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32483380      PMCID: PMC8513624          DOI: 10.1038/s41589-020-0556-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Chem Biol        ISSN: 1552-4450            Impact factor:   15.040


  44 in total

1.  Confirmation of the hierarchical folding of RNase H: a protein engineering study.

Authors:  T M Raschke; J Kho; S Marqusee
Journal:  Nat Struct Biol       Date:  1999-09

2.  An unstructured initiation site is required for efficient proteasome-mediated degradation.

Authors:  Sumit Prakash; Lin Tian; Kevin S Ratliff; Rebecca E Lehotzky; Andreas Matouschek
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2004-08-15       Impact factor: 15.369

3.  Effects of local protein stability and the geometric position of the substrate degradation tag on the efficiency of ClpXP denaturation and degradation.

Authors:  Jon A Kenniston; Randall E Burton; Samia M Siddiqui; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  J Struct Biol       Date:  2004 Apr-May       Impact factor: 2.867

4.  Ensemble-based signatures of energy propagation in proteins: a new view of an old phenomenon.

Authors:  Tong Liu; Steven T Whitten; Vincent J Hilser
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2006-03-15

5.  Protein unfolding by a AAA+ protease is dependent on ATP-hydrolysis rates and substrate energy landscapes.

Authors:  Andreas Martin; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2008-01-27       Impact factor: 15.369

6.  Intrinsic disorder in ubiquitination substrates.

Authors:  Tzachi Hagai; Ariel Azia; Ágnes Tóth-Petróczy; Yaakov Levy
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2011-07-23       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Recognition of Client Proteins by the Proteasome.

Authors:  Houqing Yu; Andreas Matouschek
Journal:  Annu Rev Biophys       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 12.981

8.  Post-translational modifications induce significant yet not extreme changes to protein structure.

Authors:  Fuxiao Xin; Predrag Radivojac
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  In Vivo Ubiquitin Linkage-type Analysis Reveals that the Cdc48-Rad23/Dsk2 Axis Contributes to K48-Linked Chain Specificity of the Proteasome.

Authors:  Hikaru Tsuchiya; Fumiaki Ohtake; Naoko Arai; Ai Kaiho; Sayaka Yasuda; Keiji Tanaka; Yasushi Saeki
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 10.  Ubiquitin modifications.

Authors:  Kirby N Swatek; David Komander
Journal:  Cell Res       Date:  2016-03-25       Impact factor: 25.617

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Site-specific ubiquitination: Deconstructing the degradation tag.

Authors:  Emma C Carroll; Susan Marqusee
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2022-03-02       Impact factor: 7.786

2.  The structural context of posttranslational modifications at a proteome-wide scale.

Authors:  Isabell Bludau; Sander Willems; Wen-Feng Zeng; Maximilian T Strauss; Fynn M Hansen; Maria C Tanzer; Ozge Karayel; Brenda A Schulman; Matthias Mann
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 9.593

Review 3.  Mechanisms of substrate recognition by the 26S proteasome.

Authors:  Caroline Davis; Brian Logan Spaller; Andreas Matouschek
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2020-12-06       Impact factor: 6.809

4.  Mechanistic basis for ubiquitin modulation of a protein energy landscape.

Authors:  Emma C Carroll; Naomi R Latorraca; Johanna M Lindner; Brendan C Maguire; Jeffrey G Pelton; Susan Marqusee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 12.779

Review 5.  Proteasome interaction with ubiquitinated substrates: from mechanisms to therapies.

Authors:  Xiang Chen; Zaw Min Htet; Erika López-Alfonzo; Andreas Martin; Kylie J Walters
Journal:  FEBS J       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 5.622

6.  USP3 promotes gastric cancer progression and metastasis by deubiquitination-dependent COL9A3/COL6A5 stabilisation.

Authors:  Xiaosheng Wu; Hao Wang; Danping Zhu; Yixia Chai; Jing Wang; Weiyu Dai; Yizhi Xiao; Weimei Tang; Jiaying Li; Linjie Hong; Miaomiao Pei; Jieming Zhang; Zhizhao Lin; Jide Wang; Aimin Li; Side Liu
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 8.469

7.  Site-Specific Protein Ubiquitylation Using an Engineered, Chimeric E1 Activating Enzyme and E2 SUMO Conjugating Enzyme Ubc9.

Authors:  Gaku Akimoto; Arianna P Fernandes; Jeffrey W Bode
Journal:  ACS Cent Sci       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 14.553

Review 8.  Ubiquitin specific peptidase 11 as a novel therapeutic target for cancer management.

Authors:  Yihao Liao; Diansheng Zhou; Pu Wang; Mengyue Yang; Ning Jiang
Journal:  Cell Death Discov       Date:  2022-06-17

Review 9.  Proteasome in action: substrate degradation by the 26S proteasome.

Authors:  Indrajit Sahu; Michael H Glickman
Journal:  Biochem Soc Trans       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 5.407

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.