Literature DB >> 15037244

Effects of local protein stability and the geometric position of the substrate degradation tag on the efficiency of ClpXP denaturation and degradation.

Jon A Kenniston1, Randall E Burton, Samia M Siddiqui, Tania A Baker, Robert T Sauer.   

Abstract

ClpX and related AAA+ ATPases of the Clp/Hsp100 family are able to denature native proteins. Here, we explore the role of protein stability in ClpX denaturation and subsequent ClpP degradation of model substrates bearing ssrA degradation tags at different positions. ClpXP degraded T. thermophilus RNase-H* with a C-terminal ssrA tag very efficiently, despite the very high global stability of this thermophilic protein. In fact, global thermodynamic stability appears to play little role in susceptibility to degradation, as a far less stable RNase-H*-ssrA mutant was degraded more slowly than wild type by ClpXP and a completely unfolded mutant variant was degraded less than twice as fast as the wild-type parent. When ssrA peptide tags were covalently linked to surface cysteines at positions 114 or 140 of RNase-H*, the conjugates were proteolyzed very slowly. This resistance to degradation was not caused by inaccessibility of the ssrA tag or an inability of ClpXP to degrade proteins with side-chain linked ssrA tags. Our results support a model in which ClpX denatures proteins by initially unfolding structural elements attached to the degradation tag, suggest an important role for the position of the degradation tag and direction of force application, and correlate well with the mapping of local protein stability within RNase-H* by native-state hydrogen exchange.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15037244     DOI: 10.1016/j.jsb.2003.10.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Struct Biol        ISSN: 1047-8477            Impact factor:   2.867


  35 in total

1.  Protein unfolding and degradation by the AAA+ Lon protease.

Authors:  Eyal Gur; Marina Vishkautzan; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.725

Review 2.  Ratcheting up protein translocation with anthrax toxin.

Authors:  Geoffrey K Feld; Michael J Brown; Bryan A Krantz
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Role and regulation of sigma S in general resistance conferred by low-shear simulated microgravity in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  S V Lynch; E L Brodie; A Matin
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Partitioning between unfolding and release of native domains during ClpXP degradation determines substrate selectivity and partial processing.

Authors:  Jon A Kenniston; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-01-25       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Prediction of the translocation kinetics of a protein from its mechanical properties.

Authors:  Daniel K West; David J Brockwell; Emanuele Paci
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-06-30       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Proteasome substrate degradation requires association plus extended peptide.

Authors:  Junko Takeuchi; Hui Chen; Philip Coffino
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2006-12-07       Impact factor: 11.598

7.  Altered specificity of a AAA+ protease.

Authors:  Christopher M Farrell; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 17.970

8.  Single-molecule protein unfolding and translocation by an ATP-fueled proteolytic machine.

Authors:  Marie-Eve Aubin-Tam; Adrian O Olivares; Robert T Sauer; Tania A Baker; Matthew J Lang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Inhibition of regulated proteolysis by RseB.

Authors:  Brent O Cezairliyan; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  A Structurally Dynamic Region of the HslU Intermediate Domain Controls Protein Degradation and ATP Hydrolysis.

Authors:  Vladimir Baytshtok; Xue Fei; Robert A Grant; Tania A Baker; Robert T Sauer
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 5.006

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.