| Literature DB >> 32482872 |
Nadezhda N Logunova1, Valeriia V Kriukova2,3, Pavel V Shelyakin2, Evgeny S Egorov2,4, Alina Pereverzeva2, Nina G Bozhanova5,6, Mikhail Shugay2,3,4, Dmitrii S Shcherbinin4, Mikhail V Pogorelyy2,4, Ekaterina M Merzlyak2,4, Vasiliy N Zubov2, Jens Meiler5,6,7, Dmitriy M Chudakov2,3,4, Alexander S Apt8, Olga V Britanova9.
Abstract
T cell maturation and activation depend upon T cell receptor (TCR) interactions with a wide variety of antigenic peptides displayed in a given major histocompatibility complex (MHC) context. Complementarity-determining region 3 (CDR3) is the most variable part of the TCRα and -β chains, which govern interactions with peptide-MHC complexes. However, it remains unclear how the CDR3 landscape is shaped by individual MHC context during thymic selection of naïve T cells. We established two mouse strains carrying distinct allelic variants of H2-A and analyzed thymic and peripheral production and TCR repertoires of naïve conventional CD4+ T (Tconv) and naïve regulatory CD4+ T (Treg) cells. Compared with tuberculosis-resistant C57BL/6 (H2-Ab) mice, the tuberculosis-susceptible H2-Aj mice had fewer CD4+ T cells of both subsets in the thymus. In the periphery, this deficiency was only apparent for Tconv and was compensated for by peripheral reconstitution for Treg We show that H2-Aj favors selection of a narrower and more convergent repertoire with more hydrophobic and strongly interacting amino acid residues in the middle of CDR3α and CDR3β, suggesting more stringent selection against a narrower peptide-MHC-II context. H2-Aj and H2-Ab mice have prominent reciprocal differences in CDR3α and CDR3β features, probably reflecting distinct modes of TCR fitting to MHC-II variants. These data reveal the mechanics and extent of how MHC-II shapes the naïve CD4+ T cell CDR3 landscape, which essentially defines adaptive response to infections and self-antigens.Entities:
Keywords: MHC-II; TCR repertoire landscape; naïve CD4+ T cells; regulatory T cells
Year: 2020 PMID: 32482872 PMCID: PMC7306996 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2003170117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ISSN: 0027-8424 Impact factor: 11.205