Literature DB >> 32480399

Validation of the UNESP-Botucatu pig composite acute pain scale (UPAPS).

Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna1, Ana Lucélia de Araújo2, Pedro Isidro da Nóbrega Neto3, Juliana Tabarelli Brondani1, Flávia Augusta de Oliveira2, Liliane Marinho Dos Santos Azerêdo3, Felipe Garcia Telles1, Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade1.   

Abstract

The creation of species-specific valid tools for pain assessment is essential to recognize pain and determine the requirement and efficacy of analgesic treatments. This study aimed to assess behaviour and investigate the validity and reliability of an acute pain scale in pigs undergoing orchiectomy. Forty-five pigs aged 38±3 days were castrated under local anaesthesia. Behaviour was video-recorded 30 minutes before and intermittently up to 24 hours after castration. Edited footage (before surgery, after surgery before and after rescue analgesia, and 24 hours postoperatively) was analysed twice (one month apart) by one observer who was present during video-recording (in-person researcher) and three blinded observers. Statistical analysis was performed using R software and differences were considered significant when p<0.05. Intra and inter-observer agreement, based on intra-class correlation coefficient, was good or very good between most observers (>0.60), except between observers 1 and 3 (moderate agreement 0.57). The scale was unidimensional according to principal component analysis. The scale showed acceptable item-total Spearman correlation, excellent predictive and concurrent criterion validity (Spearman correlation ≥ 0.85 between the proposed scale versus visual analogue, numerical rating, and simple descriptive scales), internal consistency (Cronbach's α coefficient >0.80 for all items), responsiveness (the pain scores of all items of the scale increased after castration and decreased after intervention analgesia according to Friedman test), and specificity (> 95%). Sensitivity was good or excellent for most of the items. The optimal cut-off point for rescue analgesia was ≥ 6 of 18. Discriminatory ability was excellent for all observers according to the area under the curve (>0.95). The proposed scale is a reliable and valid instrument and may be used clinically and experimentally to assess postoperative acute pain in pigs. The well-defined cut-off point supports the evaluator´s decision to provide or not analgesia.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32480399      PMCID: PMC7263847          DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0233552

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  PLoS One        ISSN: 1932-6203            Impact factor:   3.240


  58 in total

1.  Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency.

Authors:  David L Streiner
Journal:  J Pers Assess       Date:  2003-02

2.  Animal welfare implications of surgical castration and its alternatives in pigs.

Authors:  E von Borell; J Baumgartner; M Giersing; N Jäggin; A Prunier; F A M Tuyttens; S A Edwards
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Validation of two behaviour-based pain scales for horses with acute colic.

Authors:  Gila Abells Sutton; Ora Paltiel; Menashe Soffer; Dan Turner
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 2.688

4.  Assessing the diagnostic accuracy of pulse pressure variations for the prediction of fluid responsiveness: a "gray zone" approach.

Authors:  Maxime Cannesson; Yannick Le Manach; Christoph K Hofer; Jean Pierre Goarin; Jean-Jacques Lehot; Benoît Vallet; Benoît Tavernier
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 7.892

5.  Reproducibility and responsiveness of health status measures. Statistics and strategies for evaluation.

Authors:  R A Deyo; P Diehr; D L Patrick
Journal:  Control Clin Trials       Date:  1991-08

6.  Evaluation of a short duration behaviour-based post-operative pain scoring system in rats.

Authors:  John V Roughan; Paul A Flecknell
Journal:  Eur J Pain       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.931

7.  Acute and chronic morphine administration in swine.

Authors:  J M Risdahl; C Chao; M P Murtaugh; P K Peterson; T W Molitor
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.533

Review 8.  Quality of life assessment in domestic dogs: An evidence-based rapid review.

Authors:  Z Belshaw; L Asher; N D Harvey; R S Dean
Journal:  Vet J       Date:  2015-07-21       Impact factor: 2.688

9.  Development of a Piglet Grimace Scale to Evaluate Piglet Pain Using Facial Expressions Following Castration and Tail Docking: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Abbie V Viscardi; Michelle Hunniford; Penny Lawlis; Matthew Leach; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2017-04-18

10.  Pharmacokinetics of flunixin meglumine in mature swine after intravenous, intramuscular and oral administration.

Authors:  Monique D Pairis-Garcia; Locke A Karriker; Anna K Johnson; Butch Kukanich; Larry Wulf; Suzanne Sander; Suzanne T Millman; Kenneth J Stalder; Johann F Coetzee
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 2.741

View more
  7 in total

1.  Validation of the Unesp-Botucatu composite scale to assess acute postoperative abdominal pain in sheep (USAPS).

Authors:  Nuno Emanuel Oliveira Figueiredo Silva; Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade; Alice Rodrigues Oliveira; Marilda Onghero Taffarel; Maria Alice Pires Moreira; Renan Denadai; Paula Barreto Rocha; Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Validation of the rabbit pain behaviour scale (RPBS) to assess acute postoperative pain in rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus).

Authors:  Renata Haddad Pinho; Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna; Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade; André Augusto Justo; Daniela Santilli Cima; Mariana Werneck Fonseca; Bruno Watanabe Minto; Fabiana Del Lama Rocha; Amy Miller; Paul Flecknell; Matthew C Leach
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-05-26       Impact factor: 3.752

3.  Development, Validation, and Reliability of a Sedation Scale in Horses (EquiSed).

Authors:  Alice Rodrigues de Oliveira; Miguel Gozalo-Marcilla; Simone Katja Ringer; Stijn Schauvliege; Mariana Werneck Fonseca; Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade; José Nicolau Prospero Puoli Filho; Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-02-16

4.  Multilingual validation of the short form of the Unesp-Botucatu Feline Pain Scale (UFEPS-SF).

Authors:  Stelio P L Luna; Pedro H E Trindade; Beatriz P Monteiro; Nadia Crosignani; Giorgia Della Rocca; Helene L M Ruel; Kazuto Yamashita; Peter Kronen; Chia Te Tseng; Lívia Teixeira; Paulo V Steagall
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 5.  Pain Management in Farm Animals: Focus on Cattle, Sheep and Pigs.

Authors:  Paulo V Steagall; Hedie Bustamante; Craig B Johnson; Patricia V Turner
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 2.752

6.  Spontaneous Behaviors of Post-Orchiectomy Pain in Horses Regardless of the Effects of Time of Day, Anesthesia, and Analgesia.

Authors:  Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade; Marilda Onghero Taffarel; Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 2.752

7.  Validation of the Donkey Pain Scale (DOPS) for Assessing Postoperative Pain in Donkeys.

Authors:  Maria Gláucia Carlos de Oliveira; Valéria Veras de Paula; Andressa Nunes Mouta; Isabelle de Oliveira Lima; Luã Barbalho de Macêdo; Talyta Lins Nunes; Pedro Henrique Esteves Trindade; Stelio Pacca Loureiro Luna
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-06-11
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.