Literature DB >> 32480370

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of null-cell versus silent gonadotroph adenomas in a series of 1166 pituitary adenomas from a single institution.

Alexander F Haddad1, Jacob S Young2, Taemin Oh2, Matheus P Pereira1, Rushikesh S Joshi3, Kaitlyn M Pereira4, Robert C Osorio1, Kevin C Donohue1, Zain Peeran2, Sweta Sudhir2, Saket Jain2, Angad Beniwal2, Ashley S Chopra2, Narpal S Sandhu2, Philip V Theodosopoulos2, Sandeep Kunwar2, Ivan H El-Sayed5, José Gurrola5, Lewis S Blevins2, Manish K Aghi2.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas present without biochemical or clinical signs of hormone excess and are the second most common type of pituitary adenomas. The 2017 WHO classification scheme of pituitary adenomas differentiates null-cell adenomas (NCAs) and silent gonadotroph adenomas (SGAs). The present study sought to highlight the differences in patient characteristics and clinical outcomes between NCAs and SGAs.
METHODS: The records of 1166 patients who underwent transsphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenoma between 2012 and 2019 at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed. Patient demographics and clinical outcomes were collected.
RESULTS: Of the overall pituitary adenoma cohort, 12.8% (n = 149) were SGAs and 9.2% (n = 107) NCAs. NCAs were significantly more common in female patients than SGAs (61.7% vs 26.8%, p < 0.001). There were no differences in patient demographics, initial tumor size, or perioperative and short-term clinical outcomes. There was no significant difference in the amount of follow-up between patients with NCAs and those with SGAs (33.8 months vs 29.1 months, p = 0.237). Patients with NCAs had significantly higher recurrence (p = 0.021), adjuvant radiation therapy usage (p = 0.002), and postoperative diabetes insipidus (p = 0.028). NCA pathology was independently associated with tumor recurrence (HR 3.64, 95% CI 1.07-12.30; p = 0.038), as were cavernous sinus invasion (HR 3.97, 95% CI 1.04-15.14; p = 0.043) and anteroposterior dimension of the tumor (HR 2.23, 95% CI 1.09-4.59; p = 0.030).
CONCLUSIONS: This study supports the definition of NCAs and SGAs as separate subgroups of nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas, and it highlights significant differences in long-term clinical outcomes, including tumor recurrence and the associated need for adjuvant radiation therapy, as well as postoperative diabetes insipidus. The authors also provide insight into independent risk factors for these outcomes in the adenoma population studied, providing clinicians with additional predictors of patient outcomes. Follow-up studies will hopefully uncover mechanisms of biological aggressiveness in NCAs and associated molecular targets.

Entities:  

Keywords:  AP = anteroposterior; GTR = gross-total resection; ML = medial-lateral; NCA = null-cell adenoma; NFPA = nonfunctioning pituitary adenoma; SGA = silent gonadotroph adenoma; SI = superior-inferior; SPA = silent pituitary adenoma; STR = subtotal resection; TVDT = tumor volume doubling time; UCSF = University of California, San Francisco; null-cell adenoma; pituitary adenoma; silent gonadotroph adenoma

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32480370     DOI: 10.3171/2020.3.FOCUS20114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurosurg Focus        ISSN: 1092-0684            Impact factor:   4.047


  4 in total

1.  Non-functioning pituitary macroadenomas: factors affecting postoperative recurrence, and pre- and post-surgical endocrine and visual function.

Authors:  Venkatram Subramanian; Rachel Su Min Lee; Simon Howell; Samuel Gregson; Ian M Lahart; Kalpana Kaushal; Joseph M Pappachan
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2021-04-06       Impact factor: 3.633

2.  Impact of histopathological classification of non-functioning adenomas on long term outcomes: comparison of the 2004 and 2017 WHO classifications.

Authors:  Ajay Chatrath; Jacob Kosyakovsky; Parantap Patel; Jungeun Ahn; Mazin Elsarrag; Lena C Young; Angela Wu; Jennifer D Sokolowski; Davis Taylor; John A Jane; M Beatriz S Lopes
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2022-10-19       Impact factor: 3.599

Review 3.  Pituitary neuroendocrine tumors: a model for neuroendocrine tumor classification.

Authors:  Ashley B Grossman; Shereen Ezzat; Sylvia L Asa; Ozgur Mete; Michael D Cusimano; Ian E McCutcheon; Arie Perry; Shozo Yamada; Hiroshi Nishioka; Olivera Casar-Borota; Silvia Uccella; Stefano La Rosa
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2021-05-21       Impact factor: 7.842

Review 4.  An Overview of Pituitary Incidentalomas: Diagnosis, Clinical Features, and Management.

Authors:  Shigeyuki Tahara; Yujiro Hattori; Koji Suzuki; Eitaro Ishisaka; Shinichiro Teramoto; Akio Morita
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 6.575

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.