Literature DB >> 36261697

Impact of histopathological classification of non-functioning adenomas on long term outcomes: comparison of the 2004 and 2017 WHO classifications.

Ajay Chatrath1, Jacob Kosyakovsky2, Parantap Patel3, Jungeun Ahn2, Mazin Elsarrag4, Lena C Young5, Angela Wu5, Jennifer D Sokolowski2, Davis Taylor6, John A Jane7, M Beatriz S Lopes8,9.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Outcomes of patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas categorized using the 2004 and 2017 WHO classification systems are understudied. We report outcomes from the University of Virginia of patients with non-functioning pituitary adenomas categorized using both systems.
METHODS: We constructed a database from all 239 patients who underwent resection of a non-functioning pituitary adenoma between 2003 and 2015 and had at least 5 years of follow-up. Pathologic diagnosis was determined under both the 2004 and 2017 WHO classification systems. We compared the rates of recurrence and progression between subtypes using univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses.
RESULTS: Nearly 30% of the tumors in our database were classified as null cell adenomas under the 2004 classification system, whereas only 10% of the tumors were classified as null cell adenomas using the 2017 classification system. Most of these tumors were reclassified as either corticotroph or gonadotroph adenomas. Despite our relatively large cohort and average follow-up of nearly 9 years, we did not detect a significant difference in recurrence and progression between subtypes.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of null cell adenomas diagnosed under the 2004 WHO classification system are reclassified as gonadotroph or corticotroph adenomas under the 2017 WHO classification system. Rates of progression and recurrence between subtypes are not as different as previously believed at our institution and require a larger cohort to further investigate.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Corticotroph adenoma; Gonadotroph adenoma; Non-functioning pituitary adenoma; Null cell adenoma

Year:  2022        PMID: 36261697     DOI: 10.1007/s11102-022-01281-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pituitary        ISSN: 1386-341X            Impact factor:   3.599


  14 in total

1.  Prognostic significance of corticotroph staining in radiosurgery for non-functioning pituitary adenomas: a multicenter study.

Authors:  Or Cohen-Inbar; Zhiyuan Xu; Cheng-Chia Lee; Chin-Chun Wu; Tomáš Chytka; Danilo Silva; Mayur Sharma; Hesham Radwan; Inga S Grills; Brandon Nguyen; Zaid Siddiqui; David Mathieu; Christian Iorio-Morin; Amparo Wolf; Christopher P Cifarelli; Daniel T Cifarelli; L Dade Lunsford; Douglas Kondziolka; Jason P Sheehan
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.130

Review 2.  Epidemiology, clinical presentation and diagnosis of non-functioning pituitary adenomas.

Authors:  Georgia Ntali; John A Wass
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 4.107

3.  Clinical, pathologic, and imaging characteristics of pituitary null cell adenomas as defined according to the 2017 World Health Organization criteria: a case series from two pituitary centers.

Authors:  Joao Paulo Almeida; Corbin C Stephens; Jennifer M Eschbacher; Michelle M Felicella; Kevin C J Yuen; William L White; Michael A Mooney; Anne Laure Bernat; Ozgur Mete; Gelareh Zadeh; Fred Gentili; Andrew S Little
Journal:  Pituitary       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 4.107

Review 4.  World Health Ozganization 2017 Classification of Pituitary Tumors.

Authors:  M Beatriz S Lopes
Journal:  Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am       Date:  2020-07-15       Impact factor: 4.741

5.  A comprehensive long-term retrospective analysis of silent corticotrophic adenomas vs hormone-negative adenomas.

Authors:  Arman Jahangiri; Jeffrey R Wagner; Melike Pekmezci; Anne Hiniker; Edward F Chang; Sandeep Kunwar; Lewis Blevins; Manish K Aghi
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 4.654

Review 6.  Overview of the 2017 WHO Classification of Pituitary Tumors.

Authors:  Ozgur Mete; M Beatriz Lopes
Journal:  Endocr Pathol       Date:  2017-09       Impact factor: 3.943

7.  Transcription factor immunohistochemistry in the diagnosis of pituitary tumours.

Authors:  Nèle F Lenders; Adam C Wilkinson; Stephen J Wong; Tint T Shein; Richard J Harvey; Warrick J Inder; Peter E Earls; Ann I McCormack
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 6.664

Review 8.  How to Classify the Pituitary Neuroendocrine Tumors (PitNET)s in 2020.

Authors:  Jacqueline Trouillas; Marie-Lise Jaffrain-Rea; Alexandre Vasiljevic; Gérald Raverot; Federico Roncaroli; Chiara Villa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 6.639

9.  Recurrence in silent corticotroph adenomas after primary treatment: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Athanasios Fountas; Aikaterini Lavrentaki; Anuradhaa Subramanian; Konstantinos A Toulis; Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar; Niki Karavitaki
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-12-21       Impact factor: 5.958

10.  Clinicopathological analysis of 250 cases of pituitary adenoma under the new WHO classification.

Authors:  Jiayu Liu; Yuhao He; Xuebin Zhang; Xiaoling Yan; Ying Huang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2020-01-08       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.