Literature DB >> 32479590

Birth weight affects body protein retention but not nitrogen efficiency in the later life of pigs.

Carola M C van der Peet-Schwering1, Lisanne M G Verschuren1,2,3, Mette S Hedemann4, Gisabeth P Binnendijk1, Alfons J M Jansman1.   

Abstract

Exploring factors that might affect nitrogen (N) efficiency in pigs could support the development of precision feeding concepts. Therefore, an experiment was conducted to determine the effects of birth weight (BiW) on N retention, N efficiency, and concentrations of metabolites in plasma and urine related to N efficiency in male pigs of 14 wk of age. BiW of the low BiW (LBW) and high BiW (HBW) pigs was 1.11 ± 0.14 and 1.79 ± 0.12 kg, respectively. Twenty LBW and 20 HBW pigs were individually housed in metabolism cages and were subjected to an N balance study in two sequential periods of 5 d, after an 11-d adaptation period. Pigs were assigned to a protein adequate (A) or protein restricted (R, 70% of A) regime in a change-over design and fed restrictedly 2.8 times the energy requirements for maintenance. Nontargeted metabolomics analyses were performed in urine and blood plasma samples. The N retention in g/d was higher in the HBW than in the LBW pigs (P < 0.001). The N retention in g/(kg BW0.75·d) and N efficiency (= 100% × N retention / N intake), however, were not affected by BiW of the pigs. Moreover, fecal digestibility of N and urinary concentration of N and urea were not affected by BiW of the pigs. The concentration of insulin (P = 0.08) and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1;P = 0.05) in blood plasma was higher in HBW pigs, whereas the concentration of α-amino N tended to be lower in HBW pigs (P = 0.06). The LBW and HBW pigs could not be discriminated based on the plasma and urinary metabolites retrieved by nontargeted metabolomics. Restricting dietary protein supply decreased N retention (P < 0.001), N efficiency (P = 0.07), fecal N digestibility (P < 0.001), urinary concentration of N and urea (P < 0.001), and concentration of urea (P < 0.001), IGF-1 (P < 0.001), and α-amino N (P < 0.001) in blood plasma. The plasma and urinary metabolites differing between dietary protein regime were mostly amino acids (AA) or their derivatives, metabolites of the tricarboxylic acid cycle, and glucuronidated compounds, almost all being higher in the pigs fed the A regime. This study shows that BiW affects absolute N retention but does not affect N efficiency in growing pigs. Therefore, in precision feeding concepts, BiW of pigs should be considered as a factor determining protein deposition capacity but less as a trait determining N efficiency.
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  birth weight; growing pigs; nitrogen efficiency; nitrogen retention; nontargeted metabolomics

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479590      PMCID: PMC7299550          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skaa180

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  33 in total

1.  In large litters birth weight and gender is decisive for growth performance but less for carcass and pork quality traits.

Authors:  J Bérard; M Kreuzer; G Bee
Journal:  Meat Sci       Date:  2010-07-17       Impact factor: 5.209

2.  Analytical error reduction using single point calibration for accurate and precise metabolomic phenotyping.

Authors:  Frans M van der Kloet; Ivana Bobeldijk; Elwin R Verheij; Renger H Jellema
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Identifying the limitations for growth in low performing piglets from birth until 10 weeks of age.

Authors:  S P Paredes; A J M Jansman; M W A Verstegen; L A den Hartog; H M J van Hees; J E Bolhuis; T A T G van Kempen; W J J Gerrits
Journal:  Animal       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Creatinine assay in the presence of protein.

Authors:  J G Cook
Journal:  Clin Chim Acta       Date:  1971-05       Impact factor: 3.786

5.  Determination of apparent ileal amino acid digestibility in pigs: effect of dietary amino acid level.

Authors:  M Z Fan; W C Sauer; R T Hardin; K A Lien
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Effects of partial replacement of ryegrass by low protein feeds on rumen fermentation and nitrogen loss by dairy cows.

Authors:  A M van Vuuren; C J van der Koelen; H Valk; H de Visser
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1993-10       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Intra-uterine growth retardation affects birthweight and postnatal development in pigs, impairing muscle accretion, duodenal mucosa morphology and carcass traits.

Authors:  A L N Alvarenga; H Chiarini-Garcia; P C Cardeal; L P Moreira; G R Foxcroft; D O Fontes; F R C L Almeida
Journal:  Reprod Fertil Dev       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.311

Review 8.  Consequences of birth weight for postnatal growth performance and carcass quality in pigs as related to myogenesis.

Authors:  C Rehfeldt; G Kuhn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Insulin sensitivity in juvenile and adult Large White pigs of low and high birthweight.

Authors:  K R Poore; A L Fowden
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2004-01-14       Impact factor: 10.122

10.  Proteomic analysis indicates that mitochondrial energy metabolism in skeletal muscle tissue is negatively correlated with feed efficiency in pigs.

Authors:  Liangliang Fu; Yueyuan Xu; Ye Hou; Xiaolong Qi; Lian Zhou; Huiying Liu; Yu Luan; Lu Jing; Yuanxin Miao; Shuhong Zhao; Huazhen Liu; Xinyun Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

1.  The effects of birth weight and estimated breeding value for protein deposition on nitrogen efficiency in growing pigs.

Authors:  Carola M C Van der Peet-Schwering; Lisanne M G Verschuren; Rob Bergsma; Mette S Hedemann; Gisabeth P Binnendijk; Alfons J M Jansman
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 3.159

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.