Literature DB >> 32479184

A Sociotechnical Framework for Safety-Related Electronic Health Record Research Reporting: The SAFER Reporting Framework.

Hardeep Singh1, Dean F Sittig2.   

Abstract

Electronic health record (EHR)-based interventions to improve patient safety are complex and sensitive to who, what, where, why, when, and how they are delivered. Success or failure depends not only on the characteristics and behaviors of individuals who are targeted by an intervention, but also on the technical characteristics of the intervention and the culture and environment of the health system that implements it. Current reporting guidelines do not capture the complexity of sociotechnical factors (technical and nontechnical factors, such as workflow and organizational issues) that confound or influence these interventions. This article proposes a methodological reporting framework for EHR interventions targeting patient safety and builds on an 8-dimension sociotechnical model previously developed by the authors for design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technology. The Safety-related EHR Research (SAFER) Reporting Framework enables reporting of patient safety-focused EHR-based interventions while accounting for the multifaceted, dynamic sociotechnical context affecting intervention implementation, effectiveness, and generalizability. As an example, an EHR-based intervention to improve communication and timely follow-up of subcritical abnormal test results to operationalize the framework is presented. For each dimension, reporting should include what sociotechnical changes were made to implement an EHR-related intervention to improve patient safety, why the intervention did or did not lead to safety improvements, and how this intervention can be applied or exported to other health care organizations. A foundational list of research and reporting recommendations to address implementation, effectiveness, and generalizability of EHR-based interventions needed to effectively reduce preventable patient harm is provided. The SAFER Reporting Framework is not meant to replace previous research reporting guidelines, but rather provides a sociotechnical adjunct that complements their use.

Entities:  

Year:  2020        PMID: 32479184     DOI: 10.7326/M19-0879

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  11 in total

1.  Identifying the mechanisms that contribute to safe and effective electronic test result management systems- a multisite qualitative study.

Authors:  Andrew Georgiou; Julie Li; Judith Thomas; Maria R Dahm
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  Preliminary Exploration of Main Elements for Systematic Classification Development: Case Study of Patient Safety Incidents.

Authors:  Riikka Vuokko; Anne Vakkuri; Sari Palojoki
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-03-29

3.  Computerised clinical decision support systems and absolute improvements in care: meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials.

Authors:  Janice L Kwan; Lisha Lo; Jacob Ferguson; Hanna Goldberg; Juan Pablo Diaz-Martinez; George Tomlinson; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Kaveh G Shojania
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2020-09-17

4.  Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study.

Authors:  Greg Rubin; Fiona M Walter; Jon Emery; Willie Hamilton; Zoe Hoare; Jenny Howse; Catherine Nixon; Tushar Srivastava; Chloe Thomas; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Juliet A Usher-Smith; Sophie Whyte; Richard D Neal
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.692

5.  Exploring healthcare professionals' perceptions of artificial intelligence: Validating a questionnaire using the e-Delphi method.

Authors:  Lucy Shinners; Christina Aggar; Sandra Grace; Stuart Smith
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2021-03-23

6.  Implementation strategies for the patient safety reporting system using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a retrospective mixed-method analysis.

Authors:  Daisuke Koike; Masahiro Ito; Akihiko Horiguchi; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Atsuhiko Ota
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Teamwork and Patient Safety in Intensive Care Units: Challenges and Opportunities.

Authors:  You Chen; Yang Gong
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2022-06-06

8.  Evaluation of a Clinical Decision Support Strategy to Increase Seasonal Influenza Vaccination Among Hospitalized Children Before Inpatient Discharge.

Authors:  Evan W Orenstein; Omar ElSayed-Ali; Swaminathan Kandaswamy; Erin Masterson; Reena Blanco; Pareen Shah; Patricia Lantis; Amy Kolwaite; Thomas E Dawson; Edwin Ray; Christy Bryant; Srikant Iyer; Andi L Shane; Stephanie Jernigan
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2021-07-01

9.  Implementing an electronic health record dashboard for safe anticoagulant management: learning from qualitative interviews with existing and potential users to develop an implementation process.

Authors:  Geoffrey D Barnes; Emily Sippola; Allison Ranusch; Linda Takamine; Michael Lanham; Michael Dorsch; Anne Sales; Jeremy Sussman
Journal:  Implement Sci Commun       Date:  2022-02-02

Review 10.  Do providers use computerized clinical decision support systems? A systematic review and meta-regression of clinical decision support uptake.

Authors:  Andrew Kouri; Janet Yamada; Jeffrey Lam Shin Cheung; Stijn Van de Velde; Samir Gupta
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.