Literature DB >> 33737422

Electronic clinical decision support tool for assessing stomach symptoms in primary care (ECASS): a feasibility study.

Greg Rubin1, Fiona M Walter2, Jon Emery3, Willie Hamilton4, Zoe Hoare5, Jenny Howse6, Catherine Nixon6, Tushar Srivastava7, Chloe Thomas7, Obioha C Ukoumunne8, Juliet A Usher-Smith2, Sophie Whyte7, Richard D Neal9.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of a definitive trial in primary care of electronic clinical decision support (eCDS) for possible oesophago-gastric (O-G) cancer. DESIGN AND
SETTING: Feasibility study in 42 general practices in two regions of England, cluster randomised controlled trial design without blinding, nested qualitative and health economic evaluation. PARTICIPANTS: Patients aged 55 years or older, presenting to their general practitioner (GP) with symptoms associated with O-G cancer. 530 patients (mean age 68 years, 58% female) participated. INTERVENTION: Practices randomised 1:1 to usual care (control) or to receive a previously piloted eCDS tool for suspected cancer (intervention), for use at the discretion of the GPs, supported by a theory-based implementation package and ongoing support. We conducted semistructured interviews with GPs in intervention practices. Recruitment lasted 22 months. OUTCOMES: Patient participation rate, use of eCDS, referrals and route to diagnosis, O-G cancer diagnoses; acceptability to GPs; cost-effectiveness. Participants followed up 6 months after index encounter.
RESULTS: From control and intervention practices, we screened 3841 and 1303 patients, respectively; 1189 and 434 were eligible, 392 and 138 consented to participate. Ten patients (1.9%) had O-G cancer. eCDS was used eight times in total by five unique users. GPs experienced interoperability problems between the eCDS tool and their clinical system and also found it did not fit with their workflow. Unexpected restrictions on software installation caused major problems with implementation.
CONCLUSIONS: The conduct of this study was hampered by technical limitations not evident during an earlier pilot of the eCDS tool, and by regulatory controls on software installation introduced by primary care trusts early in the study. This eCDS tool needed to integrate better with clinical workflow; even then, its use for suspected cancer may be infrequent. Any definitive trial of eCDS for cancer diagnosis should only proceed after addressing these constraints. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN125595588. © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY. Published by BMJ.

Entities:  

Keywords:  gastrointestinal tumours; primary care; risk management

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33737422      PMCID: PMC7978254          DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ Open        ISSN: 2044-6055            Impact factor:   2.692


  23 in total

Review 1.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amit X Garg; Neill K J Adhikari; Heather McDonald; M Patricia Rosas-Arellano; P J Devereaux; Joseph Beyene; Justina Sam; R Brian Haynes
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2005-03-09       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Decision support tools to improve cancer diagnostic decision making in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sophie Chima; Jeanette C Reece; Kristi Milley; Shakira Milton; Jennifer G McIntosh; Jon D Emery
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-11-28       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 3.  Improving clinical practice using clinical decision support systems: a systematic review of trials to identify features critical to success.

Authors:  Kensaku Kawamoto; Caitlin A Houlihan; E Andrew Balas; David F Lobach
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-03-14

4.  Investigation and management of iron deficiency anaemia in general practice: a cluster randomised controlled trial of a simple management prompt.

Authors:  E C M Logan; J M Yates; R M Stewart; K Fielding; D Kendrick
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.401

5.  Effect of adding a diagnostic aid to best practice to manage suspicious pigmented lesions in primary care: randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Fiona M Walter; Helen C Morris; Elka Humphrys; Per N Hall; A Toby Prevost; Nigel Burrows; Lucy Bradshaw; Edward C F Wilson; Paul Norris; Joe Walls; Margaret Johnson; Ann Louise Kinmonth; Jon D Emery
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-07-04

6.  Development and validation of risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of common cancers in men and women: prospective cohort study.

Authors:  Julia Hippisley-Cox; Carol Coupland
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  The risk of oesophago-gastric cancer in symptomatic patients in primary care: a large case-control study using electronic records.

Authors:  S Stapley; T J Peters; R D Neal; P W Rose; F M Walter; W Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-12-20       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Implementing referral guidelines: lessons from a negative outcome cluster randomised factorial trial in general practice.

Authors:  Moyez Jiwa; Paul Skinner; Akinoso Olujimi Coker; Lindsey Shaw; Michael J Campbell; Joanne Thompson
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2006-11-02       Impact factor: 2.497

9.  Evaluating a computer aid for assessing stomach symptoms (ECASS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Helen J Moore; Catherine Nixon; Anisah Tariq; Jon Emery; Willie Hamilton; Zoë Hoare; Anne Kershenbaum; Richard D Neal; Obioha C Ukoumunne; Juliet Usher-Smith; Fiona M Walter; Sophie Whyte; Greg Rubin
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 2.279

10.  The spectrum effect in tests for risk prediction, screening, and diagnosis.

Authors:  Juliet A Usher-Smith; Stephen J Sharp; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2016-06-22
View more
  1 in total

1.  Optimization of a Quality Improvement Tool for Cancer Diagnosis in Primary Care: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Sophie Chima; Javiera Martinez-Gutierrez; Barbara Hunter; Jo-Anne Manski-Nankervis; Jon Emery
Journal:  JMIR Form Res       Date:  2022-08-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.