Literature DB >> 32477313

Mobile Genetic Elements Harboring Antibiotic Resistance Determinants in Acinetobacter baumannii Isolates From Bolivia.

Mónica Cerezales1, Kyriaki Xanthopoulou2,3, Julia Wille2,3, Oleg Krut4, Harald Seifert2,3, Lucía Gallego1, Paul G Higgins2,3.   

Abstract

Using a combination of short- and long-read DNA sequencing, we have investigated the location of antibiotic resistance genes and characterized mobile genetic elements (MGEs) in three clinical multi-drug resistant Acinetobacter baumannii. The isolates, collected in Bolivia, clustered separately with three different international clonal lineages. We found a diverse array of transposons, plasmids and resistance islands related to different insertion sequence (IS) elements, which were located in both the chromosome and in plasmids, which conferred resistance to multiple antimicrobials, including carbapenems. Carbapenem resistance might be caused by a Tn2008 carrying the bla OXA-23 gene. Some plasmids were shared between the isolates. Larger plasmids were less conserved than smaller ones and they shared some homologous regions, while others were more diverse, suggesting that these big plasmids are more plastic than the smaller ones. The genetic basis of antimicrobial resistance in Bolivia has not been deeply studied until now, and the mobilome of these A. baumannii isolates, combined with their multi-drug resistant phenotype, mirror the transfer and prevalence of MGEs contributing to the spread of antibiotic resistance worldwide and require special attention. These findings could be useful to understand the antimicrobial resistance genetics of A. baumannii in Bolivia and the difficulty in tackling these infections.
Copyright © 2020 Cerezales, Xanthopoulou, Wille, Krut, Seifert, Gallego and Higgins.

Entities:  

Keywords:  A. baumannii; antimicrobial resistance; carbapenemase; mobile genetic elements; plasmids

Year:  2020        PMID: 32477313      PMCID: PMC7237729          DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.00919

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Front Microbiol        ISSN: 1664-302X            Impact factor:   5.640


Introduction

Acinetobacter baumannii is a non-fermenting Gram-negative bacilli and it is the second most common species after Pseudomonas aeruginosa in this group causing bacterial infections (Gonzalez-Villoria and Valverde-Garduno, 2016). While A. baumannii has been isolated from the wider environment such as water, soil, and animals, most studied isolates come from clinical samples, where A. baumannii has become a serious health problem, particularly in the intensive care unit, where it can cause serious and prolonged outbreaks (Gonzalez-Villoria and Valverde-Garduno, 2016). A. baumannii is often multidrug resistant (Peleg et al., 2008; Gonzalez-Villoria and Valverde-Garduno, 2016) making antimicrobial therapy of A. baumannii infections difficult. In some cases, with the advent of resistance to last line antibiotics such as colistin, there are few therapeutic options left (Higgins et al., 2010; Manchanda et al., 2010; Göttig et al., 2014; Cayô et al., 2016). Acinetobacter baumannii is known to have a great genome plasticity, which is the capacity to acquire and disseminate genes, especially those related to antimicrobial resistance which are commonly associated with insertion sequence (IS) elements in transposons and plasmids; this dynamism in the genome of A. baumannii contributed to the rapid evolution of drug resistance (Adams et al., 2010) as has been demonstrated for ISAba1 mobilizing antimicrobial resistance genes (Mugnier et al., 2009). These processes are achieved thanks to mobile genetic elements (MGEs) harboring resistance genes. The simplest MGEs are ISs, that can also form transposons (Tn), and there are more complex structures such as integrons, resistance islands (RI), and plasmids. Antimicrobial resistance genes are often integrated into resistance cassettes related to translocation elements, causing cumulative resistance to multiple drugs (Roca et al., 2012). A diverse range of MGEs have been described in A. baumannii, for example transposons such as Tn2008, Tn2008B, Tn2006, Tn2009, or Tn2007, which represent different transposon configurations carrying the blaOXA–23 gene together with ISAba1 or ISAba4, and additional genes (Nigro and Hall, 2016). Great variability in antimicrobial resistance platforms, including MGEs, have been recorded even within the same international clone (IC), illustrating their contribution to the evolution of drug resistance (Adams et al., 2010). Plasmids in Acinetobacter spp. are unique and unrelated to those from other genera, although they often share the same resistance determinants, such as strA, strB, tet(B) or sul2. In A. baumannii, a diverse array of plasmids have been found, ranging in size from 2 Kb to more than 150 Kb. The larger plasmids normally encode for more than one resistance gene, but up to now little is known about these plasmids (Carattoli, 2013; Hamidian et al., 2016). The aim of this study was to characterize the MGEs such as plasmids and RI of three different A. baumannii clinical isolates, representing different clonal lineages.

Materials and Methods

Bacterial Isolates

Three A. baumannii isolates recovered from two hospitals in Cochabamba, Bolivia, in September 2015, January 2016, and October 2016 (Table 1) representing three different ICs (IC4, IC5. and IC7) were selected for this study. We previously reported their carbapenem resistance mechanisms and molecular epidemiology (Cerezales et al., 2019).
TABLE 1

Acinetobacterbaumannii isolates data.

IsolateMolecularepidemiology
MIC (mg/L) for various antimicrobials
STs Ox/PasICblaOXA–51–likeSample originGenBank accession numberAMKAZI*CHLCIPSXT*CSTERY*GENIPMKAN*LVXMEMMIN*TET*TGC*
MC11518/991IC7blaOXA–64CatheterNZ_QXPV00 000000.1>128 R64>128 R>128 R1281 S6432 R32 R>25632 R64 R64>12816
MC231520/79IC5blaOXA–65UrineNZ_QXPJ00 000000.1>128 R64>128 R128 R1281 S64>128 R1 S>25632 R2 S1164
MC75236/15IC4blaOXA–51UlcerNZ_QXOL000 00000.1>128 R32128 R>128 R1281 S32>128 R32 R>2568 R64 R0,5162
Acinetobacterbaumannii isolates data.

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

In addition to previously reported carbapenem susceptibility testing results, in the present study we investigated the following antimicrobials by agar dilution: amikacin, azithromycin, chloramphenicol, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, erythro- mycin, levofloxacin, minocycline, kanamycin, and tetracycline. MICs were interpreted using the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints[1].

MinION Long-Read Sequencing and Assembly

The Oxford Nanopore Technologies (Oxford, United Kingdom) MinION sequencer was used to obtain long reads to span repetitive elements and close genomes and plasmids. DNA extraction was performed using the Genomic-tip 100/G kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Library preparation was carried out according to manufacturer’s indications using a combination of Native Barcoding Kit 1D and Ligation Sequencing Kit 1D; EXP-NBD103 and SQK-LSK108 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom), respectively. The tool Albacore (Oxford Nanopore Technologies, Oxford, United Kingdom) was used for demultiplexing the reads which were later used to perform the Canu assembly (Koren et al., 2017). A hybrid assembly combining previous MiSeq short reads with MinION-generated long reads was performed using a hybridSpades (Antipov et al., 2016).

Plasmid Annotation and Visualization

ORFfinder (NCBI)[2] was used to predict the open reading frames (ORF) of the plasmids. A second functional annotation of the genomes was performed using the online tool Rapid Annotation Subsystem Technology (RAST)[3] (Genomics et al., 2008). Subsequently, the tool SnapGene Viewer (GSL Biotech)[4] was used to obtain a circular diagram of the plasmids. Graphic comparisons between similar plasmids, pMC1.1 and pA297-3, as well as pMC23.1 and pAC30c, were carried out with the tool Kablammo (Wintersinger and Wasmuth, 2015).

Conjugation Experiments

Broth mate conjugation experiments were performed to determine the location of antimicrobial resistance genes using the sodium azide-resistant Escherichia coli J53 and the rifampicin-resistant A. baumannii BM4547 as recipient strains. Selection of E. coli J53 transconjugants was performed using sodium azide (200 mg/L) combined either with amikacin (30 mg/L), streptomycin (30 mg/L), kanamycin (30 mg/L), gentamicin (30 mg/L), or ticarcillin (100 mg/L), and selection for A. baumannii BM4547 was performed using rifampicin (60 mg/L) combined with gentamicin (30 mg/L) or ticarcillin (100 mg/L. Transconjugants were selected with the antimicrobials to select for the plasmids encoding their respective resistance genes. Strain MC1 was resistant to rifampicin, therefore conjugation with A. baumannii BM4547 could not be performed. The transconjugants were tested by PCR for the blaTEM gene.

Results and Discussion

MC1 and MC75 were previously tested as carbapenem-resistant and carried the carbapenemase encoding blaOXA–23–like gene (Cerezales et al., 2019). Further testing revealed that MC1 and MC75 were also resistant to amikacin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and levofloxacin. MC23 was resistant to amikacin, chloramphenicol, ciprofloxacin, gentamicin, and levofloxacin but was susceptible to carbapenems. All three isolates were susceptible to colistin (Table 1). The blaOXA–23 encoding gene was located on the chromosome in a Tn2008 vehicle in the isolates MC1 and MC75 (Table 2). In A. baumannii, the blaOXA–23–like gene is associated with ISAba1, which contributes to its overexpression as well as its mobilization (Nigro and Hall, 2016). Tn2008 has previously been described in Bolivian A. baumannii isolates and this mirrors the spread of this structure among different ICs leading to a carbapenem-resistant phenotype (Nigro and Hall, 2016; Sennati et al., 2016; Chen et al., 2017; Ewers et al., 2017; Cerezales et al., 2018).
TABLE 2

Plasmid content, size, location resistance genes as determined by WGS, and accession numbers.

Location of resistance genes
IsolatePlasmidsAccession numberSizePlasmidChromosome
MC1pMC1.1MK531536184 KbstrAstrBaac(3)-IIaaac(6′)-Iantet(B)sul2blaOXA–23
pMC1.2MK5315378.7 Kb
MC23pMC23.1pMC23.2pMC23.3 MK531538MK531537MK53153967 Kb8.7 Kb6 KbaadBstrAstrBsul2floRaadA1sat2dfrA1
MC75pMC75.1MK531540149 KbstrAstrBsul2blaOXA–23aphA6
pMC75.2MK53154113.9 KbblaTEM–1
aac(3)-IIa
Plasmid content, size, location resistance genes as determined by WGS, and accession numbers.

Resistance Islands

In the isolate MC23, the gene strA was located on a resistance island in the chromosome (RI1.MC23) (accession number MK531542), together with other antimicrobial resistance genes such as sul2, floR, and strB. Diverse IS elements were found, with the resistance island bracketed by two copies of a transposase from the IS4 family in reverse orientation (Figure 1). Two genes involved in conjugation were also present in this structure, suggesting a plasmid origin.
FIGURE 1

Resistance island RI1.MC23 in isolate MC23. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and transposon-related genes, recombinases, and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Genes involved in plasmid mobility are shown in pink. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown.

Resistance island RI1.MC23 in isolate MC23. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and transposon-related genes, recombinases, and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Genes involved in plasmid mobility are shown in pink. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown. In addition, a second chromosomal resistance island was also found in this isolate (RI2.MC23) (accession number MK531543), that carried a typical structure from class 2 integrons, dfrA-sat2-aadA1-ybeA-ybfAybfB-ybgA, located between the Tn7 transposition module tnsABCDE and a non-functional Intl2 integrase. Additionally, a Tn3 transposon was found inserted in the Tn7 transposon, carrying three genes, tnpA, encoding for a Tn3 transposase; tnpR encoding a Tn3 resolvase; and the antimicrobial resistance gene blaTEM–1A (Figure 2).
FIGURE 2

Resistance island RI2.MC23 in isolate MC23. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and transposon-related genes, recombinases, and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown.

Resistance island RI2.MC23 in isolate MC23. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and transposon-related genes, recombinases, and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown. The gene encoding Apha6 was found on the chromosome of MC75 bracketed by two ISAba125 that is a composite transposon known as TnaphA6 (Matos et al., 2019).

Plasmids

pMC1.1

Annotation of pMC1.1 (accession number MK531536), 39% GC content, revealed many different IS elements such as IS1006, IS1007, IS1008, ISAcsp1, IS91 family, ISAha2, ISAba11, ISAba12, and IS17. This plasmid carried a mercuric resistance operon, similar to an already described mercuric Tn in a 200 Kb plasmid (pA297-3) from an IC1 A. baumannii isolate, but it lacks the merP open reading frame (Hamidian et al., 2016). Different antimicrobial resistance determinants such as strA, strB, aac(3)-IIa, and aac(6′)-Ian, conferring resistance to aminoglycosides, sul2 conferring resistance to sulphonamides, and tet(B) conferring resistance to tetracycline were also present. The region of the plasmid carrying strA, strB, and sul2 shared high homology with Tn6172, located in pA297-3 as well (Figure 3), however, in pMC1.1 arsR, tetR, and tet(B) genes were also located within Tn6172 with an ISCR2 transposable element (IS91 family). This ISCR element has been described associated with different antimicrobial resistance genes in A. baumannii, especially with sul2, contributing to their mobilization thanks to a rolling circle transposition mechanism (Toleman et al., 2006), and was similar to other plasmids from Argentina (Vilacoba et al., 2013) and to plasmids found in an ST25 isolate from Australia (Hamidian and Hall, 2016). However, the location of tetR-tetB genes was different; they were located between glmM and arsR, suggesting a possible later insertion of these genes in different positions within the transposon (Vilacoba et al., 2013). In addition, the same inverted repeats (IR) generated by the insertion of the transposon were also found in pMC1.1 which together with the similar backbone with pA297-3 (Figure 4) suggest they share a common origin. The genes aac(3)-IIa and aac(6′)-Ian were associated with IS6 family IS and bracketed by two ISCR1 in inverted orientation. ISCR1 belongs to the IS91 family and has been described related to class 1 integrons and antimicrobial resistance genes in diverse Gram-negative species such as Klebsiella pneumoniae, P. aeruginosa, and Citrobacter freundii (Toleman et al., 2006). Different transfer genes (tra) were also found in this plasmid, as well as genes involved in plasmid partition and replication (parB/repB and xerC) that are related to segregational stability of plasmids. This plasmid also encoded a system called BREX type 1 (bacteriophage exclusion) which has been described to be involved in phage resistance (Goldfarb et al., 2015).
FIGURE 3

Plasmid pMC1.1 in isolate MC1. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and transposon-related genes, recombinases and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Transfer protein encoding genes, conjugal transfer protein encoding genes, and genes involved in plasmid partition and replication are shown in pink. The mercury resistance operon genes are indicated by yellow arrows and the BREX type 1 system is shown in purple. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown.

FIGURE 4

Comparison of plasmids pMC1.1 and pA297-3. The top axis represents the pMC1.1, the bottom axis represents pA297-3. Gray shaded regions show the homologous regions between the two plasmids.

Plasmid pMC1.1 in isolate MC1. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and transposon-related genes, recombinases and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Transfer protein encoding genes, conjugal transfer protein encoding genes, and genes involved in plasmid partition and replication are shown in pink. The mercury resistance operon genes are indicated by yellow arrows and the BREX type 1 system is shown in purple. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown. Comparison of plasmids pMC1.1 and pA297-3. The top axis represents the pMC1.1, the bottom axis represents pA297-3. Gray shaded regions show the homologous regions between the two plasmids.

pMC1.2/pMC23.2

The 8.7 Kb plasmids found in MC1 and MC23 (pMC1.2 and pMC23.2) were identical (accession number MK531537), with a GC content of 34.3% (Figure 5). This small plasmid has often been found in IC1 A. baumannii isolates (Lean and Yeo, 2017). Annotation of this plasmid revealed ORFs encoding for a RepB replicon (Rep-3 superfamily, GR2) (Bertini et al., 2010; Lean and Yeo, 2017) a toxin-antitoxin system (BrnT-BrnA), that is involved in vertical stability; TonB-dependent receptor, related to the transmission of signals from the outside of the cell leading to transcriptional activation of target genes; a septicolysin gene encoding a cytolytic enzyme toward eukaryotic cells and is involved in pathogenesis; as well as sel1 gene that encodes for a protein that has been described in diverse prokaryotic genera and has an important role in virulence.
FIGURE 5

Plasmids pMC1.2 and pMC23.2 in isolates MC1 and MC23, respectively. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Red arrow is used for the replicon. The toxin-antitoxin system is indicated by violet arrows and blue arrows represent virulence genes. Other genes are shown in gray.

Plasmids pMC1.2 and pMC23.2 in isolates MC1 and MC23, respectively. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Red arrow is used for the replicon. The toxin-antitoxin system is indicated by violet arrows and blue arrows represent virulence genes. Other genes are shown in gray.

pMC23.1

The largest plasmid in MC23 was the 67.5 Kb pMC23.1 (accession number MK531538) (Figure 6). It belonged to GR6 according to its replicase, repAci6. Its GC content was 33.7% and almost all of its putative protein encoding genes were related to conjugative plasmid transfer in a tra locus, some of them are part of a type IV (T4SS) secretion system. This T4SS is able to secrete or take up both proteins and DNA, and possibly is involved in natural competence, a feature of A. baumannii (Salto et al., 2018). Two toxin encoding genes were present in the plasmid, relE and zeta toxin, but no antitoxins were found, although they were present in a very similar plasmid (pAC30c) in an A. baumannii isolate belonging to ST195 (IC2) (Figure 7; Lean et al., 2016). In addition, the partition genes parA/parB were also encoded on pMC23.1. The backbone of pMC23.1 and pAC30c were very similar, with only a few differences. pMC23.1 lacked some hypothetical proteins present in pAC30c, and the region encoding for tellurite resistance (telA gene and IS66); while traD, a cupin-like protein (that is a superfamily of enzymes including dioxygenases, decarboxylases, hydrolases, or isomerases); HlyD protein, that exports proteins from the cytosol to the outside of the cell, and an ABC transporter were not present in pAC30.
FIGURE 6

Plasmid pMC23.1 in isolate MC23. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Red arrow is used for the replicon. The toxins are indicated by violet arrows represent virulence genes. Transfer protein encoding genes, conjugal transfer protein encoding genes, and genes involved in plasmid partition and replication are shown in pink. Other genes are shown in gray. Hypothetical proteins are not shown.

FIGURE 7

Comparison of plasmids pMC23.1 and pAC30c. The top axis represents the pMC23.1, the bottom axis represents pAC30c. Gray shaded regions show the homologous regions between the two plasmids.

Plasmid pMC23.1 in isolate MC23. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Red arrow is used for the replicon. The toxins are indicated by violet arrows represent virulence genes. Transfer protein encoding genes, conjugal transfer protein encoding genes, and genes involved in plasmid partition and replication are shown in pink. Other genes are shown in gray. Hypothetical proteins are not shown. Comparison of plasmids pMC23.1 and pAC30c. The top axis represents the pMC23.1, the bottom axis represents pAC30c. Gray shaded regions show the homologous regions between the two plasmids.

pMC23.3

A 6 Kb small plasmid was present in the isolate MC23, pMC23.3 (accession number MK531539), 39.2% GC content, and was found to have 100% similarity with an already described plasmid, pRAY from an isolate in South Africa, encoding resistance to gentamicin, kanamycin and tobramycin (aadB gene) together with mobA and mobC genes, which are thought to encode mobilization proteins (Lean and Yeo, 2017). Many similar plasmids have been found in diverse A. baumannii isolates from different ICs and countries, suggesting a common origin and subsequent diversification in their evolution. Concurrent with other studies, no rep gene was found in the plasmid sequence, supporting the idea of the presence of a mechanism of replication relying in the host RNA polymerase (Lean and Yeo, 2017).

pMC75.1

Analysis of pMC75.1 (accession number MK531540) a large plasmid of 150 Kb revealed that it was very similar to pMC1.1 (sharing 80% of their sequences), it also carried a Tn6172, in which antimicrobial resistance genes such as sul2, strB, and strA are encoded, but lacking tet(B) and arsR that were present in pMC1.1 (Figure 8). The mer operon was also found in this plasmid, and many genes encoding conjugative transfer proteins. The BREX type 1 system was also present. A stbA gene was found, the protein encoded by this gene plays a role in plasmid stability as well as parA/parB. Several IS elements were also present, i.e., ISAba1, ISAba125, ISAba14, ISAba42, IS1007, and ISAha2. However, this plasmid lacked the transposon carrying aac(3)-IIa and aac(6′)-Ian.
FIGURE 8

Plasmid pMC75.1 in isolate MC75. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and transposon-related genes, recombinases and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Transfer protein encoding genes, conjugal transfer protein encoding genes, and genes involved in plasmid partition and replication are shown in pink. The mercury resistance operon genes are indicated by yellow arrows and the BREX type 1 system is shown in purple. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown.

Plasmid pMC75.1 in isolate MC75. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and transposon-related genes, recombinases and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Transfer protein encoding genes, conjugal transfer protein encoding genes, and genes involved in plasmid partition and replication are shown in pink. The mercury resistance operon genes are indicated by yellow arrows and the BREX type 1 system is shown in purple. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown.

pMC75.2

The 13.9 Kb plasmid, pMC75.2 (accession number MK531541) (Figure 9) with a GC content of 40.3%, carried the broad-spectrum β-lactamase blaTEM–1B and the aminoglycoside resistance gene aac(3)-IIa flanked on both sides by IS15DIV; a toxin-antitoxin system, brnT/brnA; a TonB-dependant receptor, a septicolysin gene and mobA/mobS, which are involved in plasmid mobility. Conjugation experiments revealed that pMC75.2 was transferable into A. baumannii BM4547 but it was unstable and was lost after several passages. The replicon of this plasmid belonged to the RepB (Rep_3) superfamily with 100% homology. This plasmid shares a great homology with pMC1.2/pMC23.2, same RepB, toxin-antitoxin system, TonB-dependant receptor and septicolysin; it seems that one of them has lost or alternatively acquired the integron carrying the antimicrobial resistance genes and the mobility genes.
FIGURE 9

Plasmid pMC75.2 in isolate MC75. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Genes involved in plasmid mobility are shown in pink. The toxin-antitoxin system is shown in violet. Blue represents virulence genes. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown. Red arrow is used for the replicon.

Plasmid pMC75.2 in isolate MC75. Arrows represent predicted ORFs and the direction of the arrow represents the direction of transcription. Resistance genes are shown by orange arrows and insertion sequences are indicated by green arrows. Genes involved in plasmid mobility are shown in pink. The toxin-antitoxin system is shown in violet. Blue represents virulence genes. Other genes are indicated by gray arrows. Hypothetical proteins are not shown. Red arrow is used for the replicon. Recently, two similar plasmids to pMC75.1 and pMC75.2 were described in a Brazilian A. baumannii isolate representing the same ST (ST15). This illustrates that these plasmids can be very plastic by acquiring or losing genes, but can also be conserved within a ST (Matos et al., 2019). The two carbapenem-resistant isolates carried the blaOXA–23 gene in Tn2008, which has been previously described in diverse ICs (Nigro and Hall, 2016; Ewers et al., 2017) including IC7 isolates recovered from a hospital in the same city, Cochabamba (Sennati et al., 2016). The Tn2008 contributes to the overexpression of the carbapenemase encoding gene and to its mobilization. In addition, all three isolates harbored three aminoglycoside resistance genes such as aac(3)-IIa, strA, and strB; and sul2 conferring resistance to sulphonamides; MC1 carried tetB conferring resistance to tetracycline as well. All the genes were found to be associated with IS elements, constituting transposons that lead to their mobilization and make genetic rearrangements more likely to happen. These genes were found both in the chromosome and in plasmids, demonstrating the plasticity of the A. baumannii genome and the mobility of these antimicrobial resistance determinants within MGEs such as transposons or plasmids.

Conclusion

In summary, these data further confirm that A. baumannii has a great ability to acquire antimicrobial resistance determinants and become a threat in hospitals. These are associated with different plasmids and many different IS elements, of which some are found in multiple genera. For these reasons it is important to study the dynamics and resistomes of the bacterial populations in order to understand the situation in each hospital or unit. The fact that some of these plasmids have been found in diverse A. baumannii clonal lineages mirrors the transfer and prevalence of these MGEs contributing to the spread of antimicrobial resistance worldwide.

Data Availability Statement

The datasets generated for this study can be found in the GenBank, MK531536, MK531538, MK531537, MK531539, MK531540, and MK531541.

Author Contributions

MC, KX, JW, and PH contributed to the design of the experiments. MC, KX, and JW performed the experiments. MC, KX, JW, OK, HS, LG, and PH analyzed and interpreted the data. MC, KX, and PH wrote the manuscript. All authors contributed to critical manuscript revision, read, and approved the submitted version.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
  30 in total

1.  hybridSPAdes: an algorithm for hybrid assembly of short and long reads.

Authors:  Dmitry Antipov; Anton Korobeynikov; Jeffrey S McLean; Pavel A Pevzner
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-11-20       Impact factor: 6.937

Review 2.  Structure and context of Acinetobacter transposons carrying the oxa23 carbapenemase gene.

Authors:  Steven J Nigro; Ruth M Hall
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2016-01-10       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  Functional analysis of insertion sequence ISAba1, responsible for genomic plasticity of Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Pauline D Mugnier; Laurent Poirel; Patrice Nordmann
Journal:  J Bacteriol       Date:  2009-01-09       Impact factor: 3.490

4.  Kablammo: an interactive, web-based BLAST results visualizer.

Authors:  Jeff A Wintersinger; James D Wasmuth
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  Acinetobacter baumannii analysis by core genome multi-locus sequence typing in two hospitals in Bolivia: endemicity of international clone 7 isolates (CC25).

Authors:  Mónica Cerezales; Kyriaki Xanthopoulou; Julia Wille; Zulema Bustamante; Harald Seifert; Lucía Gallego; Paul G Higgins
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2019-03-27       Impact factor: 5.283

Review 6.  Plasmids and the spread of resistance.

Authors:  Alessandra Carattoli
Journal:  Int J Med Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-14       Impact factor: 3.473

7.  A large conjugative Acinetobacter baumannii plasmid carrying the sul2 sulphonamide and strAB streptomycin resistance genes.

Authors:  Mohammad Hamidian; Stephanie J Ambrose; Ruth M Hall
Journal:  Plasmid       Date:  2016-09-04       Impact factor: 3.466

8.  OXA-23 and ISAba1-OXA-66 class D β-lactamases in Acinetobacter baumannii isolates from companion animals.

Authors:  Christa Ewers; Peter Klotz; Ursula Leidner; Ivonne Stamm; Ellen Prenger-Berninghoff; Stephan Göttig; Torsten Semmler; Sandra Scheufen
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 5.283

9.  High Prevalence of Extensively Drug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii at a Children Hospital in Bolivia.

Authors:  Mónica Cerezales; Alain A Ocampo-Sosa; Laura Álvarez Montes; Catalina Díaz Ríos; Zulema Bustamante; Jazmín Santos; Luis Martínez-Martínez; Paul G Higgins; Lucía Gallego
Journal:  Pediatr Infect Dis J       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 2.129

10.  The Acinetobacter baumannii Oxymoron: Commensal Hospital Dweller Turned Pan-Drug-Resistant Menace.

Authors:  Ignasi Roca; Paula Espinal; Xavier Vila-Farrés; Jordi Vila
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-23       Impact factor: 5.640

View more
  6 in total

1.  Targeted Conservative Cointegrate Formation Mediated by IS26 Family Members Requires Sequence Identity at the Reacting End.

Authors:  Christopher J Harmer; Ruth M Hall
Journal:  mSphere       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 4.389

2.  A Novel Family of Acinetobacter Mega-Plasmids Are Disseminating Multi-Drug Resistance Across the Globe While Acquiring Location-Specific Accessory Genes.

Authors:  Timothy M Ghaly; Ian T Paulsen; Ammara Sajjad; Sasha G Tetu; Michael R Gillings
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 3.  Recent Advances in Genetic Tools for Acinetobacter baumannii.

Authors:  Ellen M E Sykes; Soumya Deo; Ayush Kumar
Journal:  Front Genet       Date:  2020-12-22       Impact factor: 4.599

4.  Impact of target site mutations and plasmid associated resistance genes acquisition on resistance of Acinetobacter baumannii to fluoroquinolones.

Authors:  Mostafa Ahmed Mohammed; Mohammed T A Salim; Bahaa E Anwer; Khaled M Aboshanab; Mohammad M Aboulwafa
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 5.  Incorporation of Antibiotics into Solid Lipid Nanoparticles: A Promising Approach to Reduce Antibiotic Resistance Emergence.

Authors:  Lide Arana; Lucia Gallego; Itziar Alkorta
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-10       Impact factor: 5.076

Review 6.  Mechanisms Protecting Acinetobacter baumannii against Multiple Stresses Triggered by the Host Immune Response, Antibiotics and Outside-Host Environment.

Authors:  Soroosh Monem; Beata Furmanek-Blaszk; Adrianna Łupkowska; Dorota Kuczyńska-Wiśnik; Karolina Stojowska-Swędrzyńska; Ewa Laskowska
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 5.923

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.