| Literature DB >> 22536199 |
Ignasi Roca1, Paula Espinal, Xavier Vila-Farrés, Jordi Vila.
Abstract
During the past few decades Acinetobacter baumannii has evolved from being a commensal dweller of health-care facilities to constitute one of the most annoying pathogens responsible for hospitalary outbreaks and it is currently considered one of the most important nosocomial pathogens. In a prevalence study of infections in intensive care units conducted among 75 countries of the five continents, this microorganism was found to be the fifth most common pathogen. Two main features contribute to the success of A. baumannii: (i) A. baumannii exhibits an outstanding ability to accumulate a great variety of resistance mechanisms acquired by different mechanisms, either mutations or acquisition of genetic elements such as plasmids, integrons, transposons, or resistant islands, making this microorganism multi- or pan-drug-resistant and (ii) The ability to survive in the environment during prolonged periods of time which, combined with its innate resistance to desiccation and disinfectants, makes A. baumannii almost impossible to eradicate from the clinical setting. In addition, its ability to produce biofilm greatly contributes to both persistence and resistance. In this review, the pathogenesis of the infections caused by this microorganism as well as the molecular bases of antibacterial resistance and clinical aspects such as treatment and potential future therapeutic strategies are discussed in depth.Entities:
Keywords: Acinetobacter baumannii; antimicrobial peptides; antimicrobial resistance; biofilm; pathogenesis
Year: 2012 PMID: 22536199 PMCID: PMC3333477 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (A–C). Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) (D–F) of an A. baumannii biofilm-forming strain in liquid medium. Black arrow specifies appendage structures (pili or fimbriae), and white arrow the thick exopolysaccharide layer. All electron microscopy images are derived from the work by Espinal et al. (unpublished data)
Antimicrobial resistance mechanisms in .
| Antimicrobial | Resistance mechanism | Class/family | Protein | Described in association with | Selected reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| β-Lactams | Chromosomal cephalosporinase | Class C | AmpC | IS | Hujer et al. ( |
| Carbapenem-hydrolyzing class D β-lactamases | Class D | OXA-51-like | IS | Turton et al. ( | |
| OXA-23-like | IS, Tn, AbaR | Corvec et al. ( | |||
| OXA-24/40-like | XerC/XerD | Merino et al. ( | |||
| OXA-58-like | IS, Tn | Poirel and Nordmann ( | |||
| OXA-143-like | Higgins et al. ( | ||||
| Metallo-β-lactamases | Class B | IMP | Integron | Cornaglia et al. ( | |
| VIM | Integron | Cornaglia et al. ( | |||
| SIM-1 | Integron | Cornaglia et al. ( | |||
| NDM | IS, Tn | Espinal et al. ( | |||
| Minor relevance β-lactamases | Class A | TEM | AbaR | Adams et al. ( | |
| SHV | Naas et al. ( | ||||
| SCO-1 | Poirel et al. ( | ||||
| CARB | IS, Tn, integron | Potron et al. ( | |||
| PER | IS, Tn, integron | Poirel et al. ( | |||
| VEB | IS, integron, AbaR | Fournier et al. ( | |||
| CTX-M | Tn | Potron et al. ( | |||
| GES | Integron | Moubareck et al. ( | |||
| KPC | Robledo et al. ( | ||||
| Class D | OXA-2, 10, 20, 37 | Integron, AbaR | Navia et al. ( | ||
| Decreased permeability | CarO | IS | Ravasi et al. ( | ||
| 47 kDa OMP | Quale et al. ( | ||||
| 44 kDa OMP | Quale et al. ( | ||||
| 37 kDa OMP | Quale et al. ( | ||||
| 33–36 kDa OMP | del Mar Tomas et al. ( | ||||
| 22–33 kDa OMP | Bou et al. ( | ||||
| HMP-AB | Gribun et al. ( | ||||
| 43 kDa OMP | Fernández-Cuenca et al. ( | ||||
| Efflux pump | RND | AdeABC | IS | Magnet et al. ( | |
| AdeIJK | Damier-Piolle et al. ( | ||||
| Modified penicillin-binding proteins | PBP | Cayo et al. ( | |||
| Aminoglycosides | Aminoglycoside-modifying enzymes | Acetyltransferases | IS, Tn, Integron, AbaR | Cho et al. ( | |
| Nucleotidyltransferases | Cho et al. ( | ||||
| Phosphotransferases | Cho et al. ( | ||||
| Target binding site modification | 16S rRNA methylases | IS, Tn | Doi et al. ( | ||
| Efflux | RND | AdeABC | IS | Magnet et al. ( | |
| MATE | AbeM | Su et al. ( | |||
| Quinolones | Target site mutations | GyrA/ParC | Hamouda and Amyes ( | ||
| Efflux pump | RND | AdeABC | IS | Magnet et al. ( | |
| AdeIJK | Damier-Piolle et al. ( | ||||
| AdeFGH | Coyne et al. ( | ||||
| MATE | AbeM | Su et al. ( | |||
| SMR | AbeS | Srinivasan et al. ( | |||
| Chloramphenicol | Efflux pump | RND | AdeABC | IS | Magnet et al. ( |
| AdeIJK | Damier-Piolle et al. ( | ||||
| AdeFGH | Coyne et al. ( | ||||
| MFS | CmlA | AbaR | Fournier et al. ( | ||
| CraA | Roca et al. ( | ||||
| MATE | AbeM | Su et al., | |||
| SMR | AbeS | Srinivasan et al. ( | |||
| Tetracyclines | Efflux pump | MFS | TetA | IS, Tn, AbaR | Ribera et al. ( |
| TetB | Vila et al. ( | ||||
| Ribosomal protection | TetM | Ribera et al. ( | |||
| Tigecycline | Efflux pump | RND | AdeABC | IS | Magnet et al. ( |
| AdeIJK | Damier-Piolle et al. ( | ||||
| Polymyxins | Lipid A modification | PmrCAB | Arroyo et al. ( | ||
| Loss of lipopolysaccharide | LpxABC | IS | Moffatt et al. ( | ||
| Porin loss | Fernández-Reyes et al. ( |
IS, Insertion sequence; Tn, transposon; AbaR, resistance island; RND, resistance–nodulation–cell division family; MFS, major facilitator superfamily; MATE, multidrug and toxic compound extrusion family; SMR, small multidrug resistance family.
Resistance Islands in .
| AbaR-type | Size (kb) | Strain | EC | Reference | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AbaR1 | 86 | AYE | I | + | Fournier et al. ( |
| AbaR2 | 17 | ACICU | II | + | Iacono et al. ( |
| AbaR3 | 63 | AB0057 | I | + | Adams et al. ( |
| AbaR4 | 18 | AB0057 | I | − | Adams et al. ( |
| AbaR5 | 56 | 3208 | I | + | Post and Hall ( |
| AbaR6 | 27 | D2 | I | + | Post et al. ( |
| AbaR7 | 20 | A92 | I | + | Post et al. ( |
| AbaR8 | 29 | D13 | I | + | |
| AbaR9 | 39 | AB056 | I | + | Adams et al. ( |
| AbaR10 | 30 | AB058 | I | + | Adams et al. ( |
| AbaR11 | 20 | NIPH470 | I | + | Krizova et al. ( |
| AbaR12 | 38 | LUH 6013 | I | + | Krizova et al. ( |
| AbaR13 | 45 | LUH6015 | I | + | Krizova et al. ( |
| AbaR14 | 21 | LUH5881 | I | + | Krizova et al. ( |
| AbaR15 | 55 | LUH6125 | I | + | Krizova et al. ( |
| AbaR16 | 39 | LUH7140 | I | + | Krizova et al. ( |
| AbaR17 | 58 | LUH8592 | I | + | Krizova et al. ( |
| AbaR18 | 52 | NIPH2713 | I | + | Krizova et al. ( |
| AbaR19 | 30 | NIPH2554 | I | + | Krizova et al. ( |
| AbaR21 | 64 | RUH875 | I | + | Nigro et al. ( |
| AbaR22 | 39 | MDR-ZJ06 | II | + | Zhou et al. ( |
| n.a. | n.f. | A473 | I | − | Rose ( |
| n.a. | n.f. | A473 | I | − | Rose ( |
EC, European clone lineage; n.a., not assigned; n.f., not found.
Figure 2Schematic overview of the conserved AbaR structure found in .