| Literature DB >> 32475459 |
Marcelle C A de Melo1, Herbenson M Gomes2, Nadja N P Faria2, Ednardo R Freitas2, Pedro H Watanabe2, Germana C A Watanabe2, Davyd H Souza2, Danilo R Fernandes2.
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the incidence of black bone syndrome (BBS) in broiler chickens fed with ethanolic extract of mango seed (EEMS). A total of 504 one-day-old male broilers were used in a completely randomised design assigned with 7 experimental diets and 6 replicates of 12 broilers per experimental plot. The experimental diets consisted of: diet without addition of synthetic antioxidant; diet with addition of synthetic antioxidant (200 ppm); and 5 levels of EEMS: 200 ppm, 400 ppm, 600 ppm, 800 ppm, and 1,000 ppm. Two methods of cooking (roasted and boiled) were used to prepare thigh samples. According to the results, the diets did not significantly influence the performance of the broilers. BBS incidence was higher in broilers fed a diet without antioxidants and was reduced with EEMS dietary inclusion, with the lowest incidence occurring with the inclusion of 1,000 ppm. The synthetic antioxidant butylated hydroxytoluene in the diet promoted a significantly higher BBS incidence than that obtained with 800 and 1,000 ppm EEMS and did not differ from the other diets. Of the cooking methods, a higher BBS incidence was observed for the boiled method. For the meat coloration and bone parameters, there were no significant interactions between the factors, diets and cooking methods. There was a linear reduction in the darkening score and linear increase in the luminosity (L∗) of the meat with increasing EEMS in the diet. With regard to the cooking method, the boiled thighs had lower luminosity (L∗), higher parameter a∗, and lower parameter b∗ values because of more pronounced meat darkening. The roasted bones were less heavy, dense, and flexible. A negative correlation was observed between the degree of darkening of the meat that characterizes the BBS with the luminosity (L∗) and intensity of yellow. We concluded that the addition of EEMS contributes to a reduced darkening of meat that characterises the BBS and recommend the dietary inclusion of 1,000-ppm EEMS.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; black bone; bone quality; darkening meat; ethanolic extract
Year: 2020 PMID: 32475459 PMCID: PMC7597690 DOI: 10.1016/j.psj.2020.02.003
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Poult Sci ISSN: 0032-5791 Impact factor: 3.352
Antioxidant potential, total antioxidant activity, and phenolic compounds of the ethanolic extract of mango seed.
| Antioxidant | DDPH | ABTS | Total phenolics |
|---|---|---|---|
| BHT | 289.17 | 350.83 | - |
| EEMS | 175.66 | 518.68 | 9.50 |
Abbreviations: BHT, butylated hydroxytoluene; EEMS, ethanolic extract from mango seed; GAE, gallic acid equivalent; TEAC, Trolox equivalent antioxidative capacity.
Radical compound 2.2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl.
Radical 2.2′-azinobis (3-ethylbenzthiazoline-6-sulfonic acid).
Phenolic compound.
Composition of control diet1 for broilers in the initial (1–21 D), growth (22–35 D), and final (36–42 D).
| Ingredients (kg) | Period | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Initial | Growth | Final | |
| Corn | 56.61 | 61.51 | 63.66 |
| Soybean meal (45%) | 36.50 | 31.44 | 28.47 |
| Soy oil | 2.70 | 3.31 | 4.34 |
| Bicalcium phosphate | 1.87 | 1.65 | 1.56 |
| Calcitic limestone | 0.92 | 0.83 | 0.79 |
| Common salt | 0.43 | 0.41 | 0.38 |
| DL, methionine | 0.30 | 0.25 | 0.26 |
| L- lysine | 0.27 | 0.21 | 0.28 |
| Mineral and vitamin supplement | 0.20 | 0.20 | 0.10 |
| Inert | 0.10 | 0.10 | 0.10 |
| Choline chloride | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.05 |
| Anticoccidian | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.00 |
| Calculated nutritional level | |||
| Metabolizable energy (kcal/kg) | 3.000 | 3.100 | 3.200 |
| Crude protein (%) | 21.40 | 19.41 | 18.31 |
| Dry matter (%) | 88.67 | 88.64 | 88.70 |
| ADF (%) | 4.85 | 4.62 | 4.45 |
| Neutral detergent fiber (%) | 11.78 | 11.67 | 11.52 |
| Calcium (%) | 0.92 | 0.82 | 0.78 |
| Available phosphorus (%) | 0.46 | 0.41 | 0.39 |
| Sodium (%) | 0.19 | 0.18 | 0.17 |
| Chlorine (%) | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.28 |
| Total lysine (%) | 1.36 | 1.18 | 1.16 |
| (%) Methionine + total cistine (%) | 0.95 | 0.85 | 0.83 |
| Total methionine (%) | 0.60 | 0.53 | 0.53 |
| Total threonine (%) | 0.83 | 0.76 | 0.71 |
| Total tryptophan (%) | 0.26 | 0.24 | 0.22 |
Control-ration without antioxidant.
Guarantee levels per kg of product: vitamin A (min) 5500000 IU vitamin B1 (min) 500 mg, vitamin B12 (min) 7500 mcg, vitamin B2 (min) 2502 mg, vitamin B6 (min) 750 mg, vitamin D3 (min) 1000000 IU, vitamin E (min) 6500 IU, vitamin K3 (min) 1250 mg, biotin (min) 25 mg, niacin (min) 175 g, folic acid (min) 251 mg, pantothenic acid (min) 6,030 mg, cobalt (min) 50 mg, copper (min) 3,000 mg, iron (min) 25 g, iodine (min) 500 mg, manganese (min) 325g, selenium (min) 1,0005 mg, zinc (min) 22.49 g.
Inert-Washed sand.
Average weight and standard deviation of broiler chickens selected for evaluation of black bone syndrome.
| Diets | Average weight ± standard deviation (kg/bird) |
|---|---|
| Without SA | 3.20 ± 0.22 |
| With SA - 200 ppm | 3.18 ± 0.17 |
| 200 ppm EEMS | 3.20 ± 0.36 |
| 400 ppm EEMS | 3.09 ± 0.34 |
| 600 ppm EEMS | 3.27 ± 0.16 |
| 800 ppm EEMS | 3.19 ± 0.24 |
| 1,000 ppm EEMS | 3.17 ± 0.20 |
| Average | 3.19 |
| SEM | 0.0225 |
| ANOVA | |
| Diet | 0.5584 |
| Regression | |
| Linear | 0.7167 |
| Quadratic | 0.7302 |
Abbreviations: EEMS, ethanolic extract from mango seed; SA, synthetic antioxidant.
ANOVA (P > 0.05), statistical effect not significant.
Number and incidence of samples per coloring scores of the meat of the thighs of the broilers fed with the different diets.
| Diets | Cooking methods | Total | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roasted | Boiled | ||||||||
| Score | Score | Score | |||||||
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 1 | 2 | |
| Number of samples per score | |||||||||
| Without SA | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 18 | 0 | 0 | 36 | 0 |
| With SA - 200 ppm | 2 | 16 | 0 | 1 | 16 | 1 | 3 | 32 | 1 |
| 200 ppm EEMS | 1 | 17 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 0 | 2 | 34 | 0 |
| 400 ppm EEMS | 4 | 14 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 6 | 30 | 0 |
| 600 ppm EEMS | 5 | 13 | 0 | 2 | 16 | 0 | 7 | 29 | 0 |
| 800 ppm EEMS | 6 | 12 | 0 | 3 | 15 | 0 | 9 | 27 | 0 |
| 1,000 ppm EEMS | 8 | 10 | 0 | 6 | 12 | 0 | 12 | 22 | 0 |
| Total | 26 | 100 | 0 | 15 | 110 | 1 | 41 | 210 | 1 |
| Percentage of sample per score | |||||||||
| Without SA | 0 | 100.00 | 0 | 0 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00d | 100.00a | 0 |
| With SA - 200 ppm | 11.11 | 88.89 | 0 | 5.56 | 88.89 | 5.56 | 8.33b,d | 88.89a,b | 2.78 |
| 200 ppm EEMS | 5.56 | 94.44 | 0 | 5.56 | 94.44 | 0 | 5.56d,c | 94.44a,b | 0 |
| 400 ppm EEMS | 22.22 | 77.78 | 0 | 11.11 | 88.89 | 0 | 16.67b,c | 83.33b,c | 0 |
| 600 ppm EEMS | 27.78 | 72.22 | 0 | 11.11 | 88.89 | 0 | 19.44a,b | 80.56b,c | 0 |
| 800 ppm EEMS | 33.33 | 66.67 | 0 | 16.67 | 83.33 | 0 | 25.00a,b | 75.00c,d | 0 |
| 1,000 ppm EEMS | 44.44 | 55.56 | 0 | 33.33 | 66.67 | 0 | 33.33a | 61.11d | 0 |
| Total | 20.63A | 79.37B | 0B | 11.90B | 87.30A | 0.79A | 16.27 | 83.33 | 0.40 |
a-d, A,BIn the row, values for the same score, followed by a different capital letter, indicate significant difference between the cooking methods, by the chi-squared test (P < 0.05). In the column, values for the same score, followed by a different lowercase letter, indicate a significant difference between the rations, by the chi-squared test (P < 0.05).
Abbreviations: EEMS, ethanolic extract from mango seed; SA, synthetic antioxidant.
Average results for the coloring scores of broiler's thighs fed with ethanolic extract of the mango seed in the diets.
| Diets | Scores values | |
|---|---|---|
| Real | Transformed | |
| Without SA | 1.00a | 1.40a |
| With SA - 200 ppm | 0.91a,b | 1.37a,b |
| 200 ppm EEMS | 0.94a,b | 1.38a |
| 400 ppm EEMS | 0.83a,b | 1.33a,b |
| 600 ppm EEMS | 0.86a,b | 1.34a,b |
| 800 ppm EEMS | 0.75b,c | 1.30a,b |
| 1000 ppm EEMS | 0.6c | 1.24b |
| Cooking methods | ||
| Roasted | 0.79b | 1.32b |
| Boiled | 0.90a | 1.36a |
| Average | 0.86 | 1.34 |
| SEM | 0.0362 | 0.0145 |
| ANOVA | ||
| Diet | <0.001 | |
| Cooking methods | 0.0208 | |
| Diets × cooking methods | 0.6190 | |
| Regression | ||
| Linear | 0.0003 | |
| Quadratic | 0.4493 | |
a-cIn the column, values followed by different lowercase letter indicate significant statistical difference (P < 0.05).
Abbreviations: EEMS, ethanolic extract from mango seed; SA, synthetic antioxidant.
Average results for the color parameters of thighs of birds fed with EEMS in the diets.
| Diets | Color parameters | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| L∗ | a∗ | b∗ | |
| Without SA | 53.07b | 7.21a | 15.13a |
| With SA - 200 ppm | 53.42b | 7.42a | 14.97a |
| 200 ppm EEMS | 54.72a,b | 7.41a | 15.14a |
| 400 ppm EEMS | 54.80a,b | 7.72a | 14.96a |
| 600 ppm EEMS | 54.81a,b | 7.69a | 14.65a |
| 800 ppm EEMS | 55.26a | 7.52a | 15.11a |
| 1000 ppm EEMS | 56.23a | 7.34a | 15.42a |
| Cooking Methods | |||
| Roasted | 54.99a | 7.29b | 15.28a |
| Boiled | 54.24b | 7.66a | 14.83b |
| SEM | 0.1867 | 0.0607 | 0.0846 |
| ANOVA | |||
| Diet | <0.0001 | 0.2159 | 0.3691 |
| Cooking methods | 0.0339 | 0.0019 | 0.0088 |
| Diets × cooking methods | 0.4240 | 0.0870 | 0.9661 |
| Regression | |||
| Linear | 0.0158 | 0.6091 | 0.3670 |
| Quadratic | 0.3079 | 0.1272 | 0.1224 |
a,bIn the column, values followed by different lowercase letter indicate significant statistical difference (P < 0.05).
Abbreviations: EEMS, ethanolic extract from mango seed; SA, synthetic antioxidant.
Pearson's correlation between the darkening score and the meat coloring parameters.
| Coloring parameter | Correlation coefficient | |
|---|---|---|
| L∗ - luminosity | −0.37 | <0.0001 |
| a∗ - red to green | 0.11 | 0.0791 |
| b∗ - yellow to blue | −0.18 | 0.0041 |
Bone parameters of the femur of broilers fed ethanolic extract of mango seed.
| Diets | Weight (g) | Length (mm) | Seedor index (mg/mm) | Resistance (kgf/cm2) | Deformity (mm) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Without SA | 11.81 | 79.63 | 148.08 | 21.14 | 5.32 |
| With SA - 200 ppm | 11.65 | 79.63 | 146.21 | 20.64 | 5.18 |
| 200 ppm EEMS | 11.77 | 79.43 | 149.57 | 22.36 | 5.59 |
| 400 ppm EEMS | 12.02 | 79.57 | 150.85 | 22.85 | 5.23 |
| 600 ppm EEMS | 12.42 | 80.40 | 154.45 | 22.46 | 5.55 |
| 800 ppm EEMS | 12.00 | 80.35 | 149.32 | 20.85 | 5.36 |
| 1,000 ppm EEMS | 12.05 | 80.31 | 150.34 | 21.81 | 5.53 |
| Cooking methods | |||||
| Roasted | 12.27a | 79.78a | 153.86a | 21.78a | 5.58a |
| Boiled | 11.66b | 80.02a | 145.82b | 21.68a | 5.21b |
| SEM | 0.0791 | 0.1555 | 0.8728 | 0.2597 | 0.06862 |
| ANOVA | |||||
| Diet | 0.1555 | 0.3942 | 0.2353 | 0.1638 | 0.5313 |
| Cooking methods | <0.0001 | 0.5350 | <0.0001 | 0.8394 | 0.0077 |
| Diets × cooking methods | 0.6646 | 0.9733 | 0.6643 | 0.9650 | 0.3681 |
| Regression | |||||
| Linear | 0.3566 | 0.0538 | 0.9840 | 0.1548 | 0.9702 |
| Quadratic | 0.1084 | 0.4194 | 0.2580 | 0.8888 | 0.3875 |
a,bIn the column, values followed by different lowercase letter indicate significant statistical difference (P < 0.05).
Abbrwviations: EEMS, ethanolic extract from mango seed; SA, synthetic antioxidant.